Is there a way to make Google realize/detect scraper content?
-
Good morning,Theory states that duplicated content reduces certain keywords’ position in Google. It also says that a web who copy content will be penalized. Furthermore, we have spam report tools and the scraper report to inform against these bad practices.In my case: the website, both, sells content to other sites and write and prepare its own content which is not in sale. However, other sites copy these last ones, publish them and Google do not penalize their position in results (not in organic results neither in Google news), even though they are reported using Google tools for that purpose.Could someone explain this to me? Is there a way to make Google realize/detect these bad practices?Thanks
-
I've found backlinks in scraper websites linking to the scraped website I am taking care of.
They are in css, images, forms.
What's the point in doing it on their side?
-
Stolen content is a big issue today and recent reports have shown that people who steal the content from you will usually knock you out of your search engine position, no matter what your authority, backlink, or social share profiles look like.
This great presentation given by Jon Earnshaw at Brighton SEO last week gives a better idea of how it has affected other websites : http://www.slideshare.net/jonathanearnshaw/is-your-content-working-better-for-someone-else
Google use to have a Scraper report that you could file the offending site and get it removed from the SERPS but they have removed this.
I found a similar way to report the stolen content on this blog post :
http://www.techng.info/removing-your-stolen-content-from-google-search-using-dmca/
Hope this answers your question, even if it is a bit delayed from the original post
-
Hello,
The reporting tools are not particularly useful in this scenario as duplicate content is not a penalty-worthy situation. While Panda is used to destroy spam-oriented content, duplicate content is treated as more of a null/void situation than as a penalty.
For example, when you place your newly-created original content and it is crawled and indexed, Google attributes your domain with being the origin of said content. If another website showcases this content, it is recognized as duplicate by Google (which has compared it to your indexed version) and given no benefit or penalty. In effect, using duplicate content is merely a neutral practice - it's the spam that Google is really after.
Here's a beginner's report on duplicate content that spells it out quite nicely:
https://moz.com/learn/seo/duplicate-content
As Charles mentioned, copied content is not an automatic ban sentence. If it is within "acceptable limits" there is not a detrimental impact to the website. However, if the website is made up of purely copied content from multiple sources, and spams links or keyword stuffs, it will be dealt with accordingly.
In short, this website will not be penalized in the fashion you desire unless they are spamming or keyword stuffing (among other penalty-worthy offences). Your best bet is to beat them out by building up your link profile and continuing to post valuable, original content.
Let me know if there is anything else I can help with.
Rob
-
Theory states that duplicated content reduces certain keywords’ position in Google.
Wrong. Google might omit duplicate results or ban sites practising it, but it doesn't lower rankings based on number of duplicates or something. Otherwise wikipedia or any aggregating websites like car dealers etc would be nowhere to be found.
It also says that a web who copy content will be penalized.
Semi-wrong. It will be penalized if it's spammy and overdoing it.
Watch this video of Matt Cutts on duplicate content - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQZY7EmjbMA
So, my understanding is that there is no 100% working way of getting down scrapers, because some of them are actually "good" scrapers. Like Facebook! - the biggest scraper in the world.
So, to beat them in rankings, just make sure that you are an authority in your industry, have awesome backlink profile and all aspects of SEO are properly implemented. And yes, sometimes those penalization tools can help.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Javascript content not being indexed by Google
I thought Google has gotten better at picking up unique content from javascript. I'm not seeing it with our site. We rate beauty and skincare products using our algorithms. Here is an example of a product -- https://www.skinsafeproducts.com/tide-free-gentle-he-liquid-laundry-detergent-100-fl-oz When you look at the cache page (text) from google none of the core ratings (badges like fragrance free, top free and so forth) are being picked up for ranking. Any idea what we could do to have the rating incorporated in the indexation.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | akih0 -
Is this the correct way of using rel canonical, next and prev for paginated content?
Hello Moz fellows, a while ago (3-4 years ago) we setup our e-commerce website category pages to apply what Google suggested to correctly handle pagination. We added rel "canonicals", rel "next" and "prev" as follows: On page 1: On page 2: On page 3: And so on, until the last page is reached: Do you think everything we have been doing is correct? I have doubts on the way we have handled the canonical tag, so, any help to confirm that is very appreciated! Thank you in advance to everyone.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau0 -
I'm updating content that is out of date. What is the best way to handle if I want to keep old content as well?
So here is the situation. I'm working on a site that offers "Best Of" Top 10 list type content. They have a list that ranks very well but is out of date. They'd like to create a new list for 2014, but have the old list exist. Ideally the new list would replace the old list in search results. Here's what I'm thinking, but let me know if you think theres a better way to handle this: Put a "View New List" banner on the old page Make sure all internal links point to the new page Rel=canonical tag on the old list pointing to the new list Does this seem like a reasonable way to handle this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jim_shook0 -
Thousands of /img/img/img urls generated by website - where are they coming from?
Hello -just fed website into Screaming Frog and ended up crashing computer as these img/img/img urls went into the 10s of thousands (and the numbers of img/img/img/ in each URL ended up going into the dozens and probably hundreds and more per URL). Never seen anything like it! Any idea what might be going on with this website and why it's generating so many of these URLs - it is anything to worry about? Here's example of shorter URL... www.company.com/discover/img/img/img/img/img/img/img/img/img/img/img/img/img/img/img/img/photo-competition-winners
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | McTaggart0 -
Google Authorship. Is there a way to check all the articles by one author?
Hey guys, Is there any search query or website where I can get a list with all the articles by one author? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Felip30 -
Buying a Google News website, against Google Terms?
We are looking at buying a business that has a number of websites Is it against buying a business that has a Google News website and continue to use the site? Once the business is sold, would google remove the site from its News?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JohnPeters0 -
Can I, in Google's good graces, check for Googlebot to turn on/off tracking parameters in URLs?
Basically, we use a number of parameters in our URLs for event tracking. Google could be crawling an infinite number of these URLs. I'm already using the canonical tag to point at the non-tracking versions of those URLs....that doesn't stop the crawling tho. I want to know if I can do conditional 301s or just detect the user agent as a way to know when to NOT append those parameters. Just trying to follow their guidelines about allowing bots to crawl w/out things like sessionID...but they don't tell you HOW to do this. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | KenShafer0 -
Could a HTML <select>with large numbers of <option value="<url>">'s affect my organic rankings</option></select>
Hi there, I'm currently redesigning my website, and one particular pages lists hotels in New York. Some functionality I'm thinking of adding in is to let the user find hotels close to specific concert venues in New York. My current thinking is to provide the following select element on the page - selecting any one of the options will automatically redirect to my page for that concert venue. The purpose of this isn't to affect the organic traffic - I'm simply introducing this as a tool to help customers find the right hotel, but I certainly don't want it to have an adverse effect on my organic traffic. I'd love to know your thoughts on this. I must add that in certain cities, such as New York, there could be up to 450 different options in this select element. | <select onchange="location=options[selectedIndex].value;"> <option value="">Show convenient hotels for:</option> <option value="http://url1..">1492 New York</option> <option value="http://url2..">Abrons Arts Center</option> <option value="http://url3..">Ace of Clubs New York</option> <option value="http://url4..">Affairs Afloat</option> <option value="http://url5..">Affirmation Arts New York</option> <option value="http://url6..">Al Hirschfeld Theatre</option> <option value="http://url7..">Alice Tully Hall</option> .. .. ..</select> Many thanks Mike |
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mjk260