Javascript content not being indexed by Google
-
I thought Google has gotten better at picking up unique content from javascript. I'm not seeing it with our site. We rate beauty and skincare products using our algorithms. Here is an example of a product -- https://www.skinsafeproducts.com/tide-free-gentle-he-liquid-laundry-detergent-100-fl-oz
When you look at the cache page (text) from google none of the core ratings (badges like fragrance free, top free and so forth) are being picked up for ranking. Any idea what we could do to have the rating incorporated in the indexation.
-
Hello!
Pretty sure the issue is that this content requires a user action before being seen. Google will not crawl/index content which is not loaded until the user interacts. This post is a great resource %20Summary:%20How%20to%20Make%20Your%20Company%20Diverse%20Without%20Focusing%20on%20Diversity%20%20%20Name:%20Heather%20Huhman%20Spark%20Hire%20%20Category:%20Business%20and%20Finance%20%20%20Email:%20query-7wru@helpareporter.net%20%20%20Media%20Outlet:%20Spark%20Hire%20%20Deadline:%205:00%20PM%20EST%20-%2023%20April%20%20%20Query:%20%20%20LinkedIn's%20most%20recent%20Global%20Recruiting%20Trends%20report,%20recruiters%20say%20their%20top%20focus%20is%20on%20diversity%20and%20inclusion.%20But%20when%20it%20comes%20to%20hiring%20for%20diversity,%20there's%20a%20misunderstanding%20that%20the%20focus%20must%20be%20on%20the%20ethnicity,%20race,%20and%20sex%20of%20candidates.%20We're%20looking%20for%20insight%20into%20how%20hiring%20pros%20can%20break%20out%20of%20that%20rigid%20diversity%20box%20and%20find%20creative%20ways%20to%20hire%20diverse%20candidates%20who%20will%20positively%20impact%20various%20aspects%20of%20their%20company.%20Responses%20that%20are%20selected%20will%20be%20featured%20on%20the%20Spark%20Hire%20blog%20and%20promoted%20to%20over%2010K%20blog%20subscribers.%20%20Please%20respond%20to%20the%20following%20questions:%20%20How%20can%20focusing%20only%20on%20the%20ethnicity,%20race,%20and%20sex%20of%20candidates%20hurt%20hiring%20pros'%20efforts%20of%20hiring%20the%20best%20diverse%20candidates?%20What%20other%20candidate%20factors%20can%20hiring%20pros%20look%20into%20to%20find%20diverse%20candidates?%20Please%20share%20a%20story%20of%20a%20time%20when%20you%20or%20a%20fellow%20hiring%20pro%20narrowed%20your%20diversity%20focus%20too%20much,%20resulting%20in%20hires%20that%20weren%27t%20the%20best%20fit%20for%20the%20company.%20How%20can%20hiring%20professionals%20create%20a%20unique%20hiring%20strategy%20to%20attract%20diverse%20candidates%20who%20are%20the%20best%20fit%20for%20their%20open%20roles%20and%20company?%20%20Requirements:%20%20%20Please%20send%20your%20input%20in%20your%20initial%20response%20(don%27t%20send%20requests%20for%20interviews%20or%20article%20links).%20Include%20%22How%20to%20Make%20Your%20Company%20Diverse%20Without%20Focusing%20on%20Diversity%22%20in%20the%20subject%20line.%20Answer%20each%20question%20separately.%20Keep%20answers%20brief%20but%20informative.%20%20Include:%20%20Your%20title%20and%20qualifications%20Contact%20information,%20including%20an%20email%20Headshot%20(must%20be%20a%20link%20and%20at%20least%20200x200)%20Twitter%20handle%20%20Thank%20You.)on JS auditing/crawling%20Summary:%20How%20to%20Make%20Your%20Company%20Diverse%20Without%20Focusing%20on%20Diversity%20%20%20Name:%20Heather%20Huhman%20Spark%20Hire%20%20Category:%20Business%20and%20Finance%20%20%20Email:%20query-7wru@helpareporter.net%20%20%20Media%20Outlet:%20Spark%20Hire%20%20Deadline:%205:00%20PM%20EST%20-%2023%20April%20%20%20Query:%20%20%20LinkedIn's%20most%20recent%20Global%20Recruiting%20Trends%20report,%20recruiters%20say%20their%20top%20focus%20is%20on%20diversity%20and%20inclusion.%20But%20when%20it%20comes%20to%20hiring%20for%20diversity,%20there's%20a%20misunderstanding%20that%20the%20focus%20must%20be%20on%20the%20ethnicity,%20race,%20and%20sex%20of%20candidates.%20We're%20looking%20for%20insight%20into%20how%20hiring%20pros%20can%20break%20out%20of%20that%20rigid%20diversity%20box%20and%20find%20creative%20ways%20to%20hire%20diverse%20candidates%20who%20will%20positively%20impact%20various%20aspects%20of%20their%20company.%20Responses%20that%20are%20selected%20will%20be%20featured%20on%20the%20Spark%20Hire%20blog%20and%20promoted%20to%20over%2010K%20blog%20subscribers.%20%20Please%20respond%20to%20the%20following%20questions:%20%20How%20can%20focusing%20only%20on%20the%20ethnicity,%20race,%20and%20sex%20of%20candidates%20hurt%20hiring%20pros'%20efforts%20of%20hiring%20the%20best%20diverse%20candidates?%20What%20other%20candidate%20factors%20can%20hiring%20pros%20look%20into%20to%20find%20diverse%20candidates?%20Please%20share%20a%20story%20of%20a%20time%20when%20you%20or%20a%20fellow%20hiring%20pro%20narrowed%20your%20diversity%20focus%20too%20much,%20resulting%20in%20hires%20that%20weren%27t%20the%20best%20fit%20for%20the%20company.%20How%20can%20hiring%20professionals%20create%20a%20unique%20hiring%20strategy%20to%20attract%20diverse%20candidates%20who%20are%20the%20best%20fit%20for%20their%20open%20roles%20and%20company?%20%20Requirements:%20%20%20Please%20send%20your%20input%20in%20your%20initial%20response%20(don%27t%20send%20requests%20for%20interviews%20or%20article%20links).%20Include%20%22How%20to%20Make%20Your%20Company%20Diverse%20Without%20Focusing%20on%20Diversity%22%20in%20the%20subject%20line.%20Answer%20each%20question%20separately.%20Keep%20answers%20brief%20but%20informative.%20%20Include:%20%20Your%20title%20and%20qualifications%20Contact%20information,%20including%20an%20email%20Headshot%20(must%20be%20a%20link%20and%20at%20least%20200x200)%20Twitter%20handle%20%20Thank%20You.) and will show you how to use Chrome's 'inspect element' as a better way to see what's going on.
But in general, the content needs to load before a user action takes place (even if in JS) and yes Google is getting better, but won't look at anything behind a click. Google just confirmed this at their recent I/O conference, stating that they do render JavaScript but it could be a week after they first render the normal HTML.
-Dan
PS - Huge apologies for the delay in answering, Moz was having technical issues with the backend of the forum, affecting the ability to reply to some questions.
-
Hi akih,
I don't believe the "text-only" cache is representative of Google's index. They process JavaScript via their rendering service before they index content - so the full cached version is a more accurate representation of the content Google has seen/indexed.
Also, I ran a search for your site using a snippet of copy from the "Common Preservative Free" badge, and Google is returning pages with this text in the displayed page description. Here's a link to the SERP for the query I used.
I'd say Google's able to see and index this content just fine - it's just the "text-only" cached content does not include any JavaScript-rendered content.
Best,
Mike
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How can I make a list of all URLs indexed by Google?
I started working for this eCommerce site 2 months ago, and my SEO site audit revealed a massive spider trap. The site should have been 3500-ish pages, but Google has over 30K pages in its index. I'm trying to find a effective way of making a list of all URLs indexed by Google. Anyone? (I basically want to build a sitemap with all the indexed spider trap URLs, then set up 301 on those, then ping Google with the "defective" sitemap so they can see what the site really looks like and remove those URLs, shrinking the site back to around 3500 pages)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bryggselv.no0 -
Pages are Indexed but not Cached by Google. Why?
Here's an example: I get a 404 error for this: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://www.qjamba.com/restaurants-coupons/ferguson/mo/all But a search for qjamba restaurant coupons gives a clear result as does this: site:http://www.qjamba.com/restaurants-coupons/ferguson/mo/all What is going on? How can this page be indexed but not in the Google cache? I should make clear that the page is not showing up with any kind of error in webmaster tools, and Google has been crawling pages just fine. This particular page was fetched by Google yesterday with no problems, and even crawled again twice today by Google Yet, no cache.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | friendoffood2 -
Google is indexing the wrong pages
I have been having problems with Google indexing my website since mid May. I haven't made any changes to my website which is wordpress. I have a page with the title 'Peterborough Cathedral wedding', I search Google for 'wedding Peteborough Cathedral', this is not a competitive search phrase and I'd expect to find my blog post on page one. Instead, half way down page 4 I find Google has indexed www.weddingphotojournalist.co.uk/blog with the title 'wedding photojournalist | Portfolio', what google has indexed is a link to the blog post and not the blog post itself. I repeated this for several other blog posts and keywords and found similar results, most of which don't make any sense at all - A search for 'Menorca wedding photography' used to bring up one of my posts at the top of page one. Now it brings up a post titled 'La Mare wedding photography Jersey" which happens to have a link to the Menorca post at the bottom of the page. A search for 'Broadoaks country house weddng photography' brings up 'weddingphotojournalist | portfolio' which has a link to the Broadoaks post. a search for 'Blake Hall wedding photography' does exactly the same. In this case Google is linking to www.weddingphotojournalist.blog again, this is a page of recent blog posts. Could this be a problem with my sitemap? Or the Yoast SEO plugin? or a problem with my wordpress theme? Or is Google just a bit confused?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | weddingphotojournalist0 -
Site not indexed in Google UK
This site was moved to a new host by the client a month back and is still not indexed in Google UK if you search for the site directly. www.loftconversionswestsussex.com Webmaster tools shows that 55 pages have been crawled and no errors have been detected. The client also tried the "Fetch as Google Bot" tactic in GWT as well as running a PPC campaign and the site is still not appearing in Google. Any thoughts please? Cheers, SEO5..
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SEO5Team0 -
How to Avoid Duplicate Content Issues with Google?
We have 1000s of audio book titles at our Web store. Google's Panda de-valued our site some time ago because, I believe, of duplicate content. We get our descriptions from the publishers which means a good
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | lbohen
deal of our description pages are the same as the publishers = duplicate content according to Google. Although re-writing each description of the products we offer is a daunting, almost impossible task, I am thinking of re-writing publishers' descriptions using The Best Spinner software which allows me to replace some of the publishers' words with synonyms. I have re-written one audio book title's description resulting in 8% unique content from the original in 520 words. I did a CopyScape Check and it reported "65 duplicates." CopyScape appears to be reporting duplicates of words and phrases within sentences and paragraphs. I see very little duplicate content of full sentences
or paragraphs. Does anyone know whether Google's duplicate content algorithm is the same or similar to CopyScape's? How much of an audio book's description would I have to change to stay away from CopyScape's duplicate content algorithm? How much of an audio book's description would I have to change to stay away from Google's duplicate content algorithm?0 -
XML Sitemap index within a XML sitemaps index
We have a similar problem to http://www.seomoz.org/q/can-a-xml-sitemap-index-point-to-other-sitemaps-indexes Can a XML sitemap index point to other sitemaps indexes? According to the "Unique Doll Clothing" example on this link, it seems possible http://www.seomoz.org/blog/multiple-xml-sitemaps-increased-indexation-and-traffic Can someone share an XML Sitemap index within a XML sitemaps index example? We are looking for the format to implement the same on our website.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Lakshdeep0 -
Google Sitemap only indexing 50% Is that a problem?
We have about 18,000 pages submitted on our Google Sitemap and only about 9000 of them are indexed. Is this a problem? We have a script that creates a sitemap on a daily basis and it is submitted on a daily basis. Am I better off only doing it once a week? Is this why I never get to the full 18,000 indexed?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EcommerceSite0 -
Google consolidating link juice on duplicate content pages
I've observed some strange findings on a website I am diagnosing and it has led me to a possible theory that seems to fly in the face of a lot of thinking: My theory is:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | James77
When google see's several duplicate content pages on a website, and decides to just show one version of the page, it at the same time agrigates the link juice pointing to all the duplicate pages, and ranks the 1 duplicate content page it decides to show as if all the link juice pointing to the duplicate versions were pointing to the 1 version. EG
Link X -> Duplicate Page A
Link Y -> Duplicate Page B Google decides Duplicate Page A is the one that is most important and applies the following formula to decide its rank. Link X + Link Y (Minus some dampening factor) -> Page A I came up with the idea after I seem to have reverse engineered this - IE the website I was trying to sort out for a client had this duplicate content, issue, so we decided to put unique content on Page A and Page B (not just one page like this but many). Bizarrely after about a week, all the Page A's dropped in rankings - indicating a possibility that the old link consolidation, may have been re-correctly associated with the two pages, so now Page A would only be getting Link Value X. Has anyone got any test/analysis to support or refute this??0