Why isn't our new site being indexed?
-
We built a new website for a client recently.
Site: https://www.woofadvisor.com/
It's been live for three weeks. Robots.txt isn't blocking Googlebot or anything.
Submitted a sitemap.xml through Webmasters but we still aren't being indexed.
Anyone have any ideas?
-
Hey Dirk,
No worries - I visited the question first time today and considered it unanswered as the site is perfectly accessible in California. I like to confirm what Search Console says as that is 'straight from the horses mouth'.
Thanks for confirming that the IP redirect has changed, that is interesting. It is impossible for us to know when that happened - I would have expected thing to get indexed quite fast when it changed.
With the extra info I'm happy to mark this as answered, but would be good to hear from the OP.
Best,
-Tom
-
Hi Tom,
I am not questioning your knowledge - I re-ran the test on webpagetest.org and I see that the site is now accessible for Californian ip (http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150911_6V_14J6/) which wasn't the case a few days ago (check the result on http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150907_G1_TE9/) - so there has been a change on the ip redirection. I also checked from Belgium - the site is now also accessible from here.
I also notice that if I now do a site:woofadvisor.com in Google I get 19 pages indexed rather than 2 I got a few days ago.
Apparently removing the ip redirection solved (or is solving) the indexation issue - but still this question remains marked as "unanswered"
rgds,
Dirk
-
I am in California right now, and can access the website just fine, which is why I didn't mark the question as answered - I don't think we have enough info yet. I think the 'fetch as googlebot' will help us resolve that.
You are correct that if there is no robots.txt then Google assumes the site is open, but my concern is that the developers on the team say that there IS a robots.txt file there and it has some contents. I have, on at least two occasions, come across a team that was serving a robots.txt that was only accessible to search bots (once they were doing that 'for security', another time because they mis-understood how it worked). That is why I suggested that Search Console is checked to see what shows up for robots.txt.
-
To be very honest - I am quite surprised that this question is still marked as "Unanswered".
The owners of the site decided to block access for all non UK / Ireland adresses. The main Googlebot is using a Californian ip address to visit the site. Hence - the only page Googlebot can see is https://www.woofadvisor.com/holding-page.php which has no links to the other parts of the site (this is confirmed by the webpagetest.org test with Californian ip address)
As Google indicates - Googlebot can also use other IP adresses to crawl the site ("With geo-distributed crawling, Googlebot can now use IP addresses that appear to come from other countries, such as Australia.") - however it's is very likely that these bots do not crawl with the same frequency/depth as the main bot (the article clearly indicates " Google might not crawl, index, or rank all of your locale-adaptive content. This is because the default IP addresses of the Googlebot crawler appear to be based in the USA).
This can easily be solved by adding a link on /holding-page.php to the Irish/UK version which contains the full content (accessible for all ip adresses) which can be followed to index the full site (so - only put the ip detection on the homepage - not on the other pages)
The fact that the robots.txt gives a 404 is not relevant: if no robots.txt is found Google assumes that the site can be indexed (check this link) - quote: "You only need a
robots.txtfile if your site includes content that you don't want Google or other search engines to index." -
I'd be concerned about the 404ing robots.txt file.
You should check in Search Console:
-
What does Search Console show in the robots.txt section?
-
What happens if you fetch a page that is no indexed (e.g. https://www.woofadvisor.com/travel-tips.php) with the 'Fetch as Googlebot' tool?
I checked and do not see any obvious indicators of why the pages are not being indexed - we need more info.
-
-
I just did a quick check on your site with Webpagetest.org with California IP address http://www.webpagetest.org/result/150907_G1_TE9/ - as you can see here these IP's also go to the holding page - which is logically the only page which can be indexed as it's the only one Googlebot can access.
rgds,
Dirk
-
Hi,
I can't access your site in Belgium - I guess you are redirecting your users based on ip address. If , like me, they are not located in your target country they are 302 redirected to https://www.woofadvisor.com/holding-page.php and there is only 1 page that is indexed.
Not sure which country you are actually targeting - but could it be that you're accidentally redirecting Google bot as well?
Check also this article from Google on ip based targeting.
rgds
Dirk
-
Strangely, there are two pages indexed on Google Search.
The homepage and one other
-
I noticed the robots.txt file returned a 404 and asked the developers to take a look and they said the content of it is fine.
Sometimes developers say this stuff. If you are getting a 404, demonstrate it to them.
-
I noticed the robots.txt file returned a 404 and asked the developers to take a look and they said the content of it is fine.
But yes, I'll doublecheck the WordPress settings now.
-
Your sitemap all looked good, but when I tried to view the robots.txt file in your root, it returned a 404 and so was unable to determine if there was an issue. Could any of your settings in your WordPress installation also be causing it to trip over.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Blog page won't get indexed
Hi Guys, I'm currently asked to work on a website. I noticed that the blog posts won't get indexed in Google. www.domain.com/blog does get indexed but the blogposts itself won't. They have been online for over 2 months now. I found this in the robots.txt file: Allow: / Disallow: /kitchenhandle/ Disallow: /blog/comments/ Disallow: /blog/author/ Disallow: /blog/homepage/feed/ I'm guessing that the last line causes this issue. Does anyone have an idea if this is the case and why they would include this in the robots.txt? Cheers!
Technical SEO | | Happy-SEO2 -
Sitemap url's not being indexed
There is an issue on one of our sites regarding many of the sitemap url's not being indexed. (at least 70% is not being indexed) The url's in the sitemap are normal url's without any strange characters attached to them, but after looking into it, it seems a lot of the url's get a #. + a number sequence attached to them once you actually go to that url. We are not sure if the "addthis" bookmark could cause this, or if it's another script doing it. For example Url in the sitemap: http://example.com/example-category/0246 Url once you actually go to that link: http://example.com/example-category/0246#.VR5a Just for further information, the XML file does not have any style information associated with it and is in it's most basic form. Has anyone had similar issues with their sitemap not being indexed properly ?...Could this be the cause of many of these url's not being indexed ? Thanks all for your help.
Technical SEO | | GreenStone0 -
Migrating to new subdomain with new site and new content.
Our marketing department has decided that a new site with new content is needed to launch new products and support our existing ones. We cannot use the same subdomain(www = old subdomain and ww1 = new subdomain)as there is a technically clash between the windows server currently used, and the lamp stack required to run the new wordpress based CMS and site. We also have an aging piece of SAAS software on the www domain which is makes moving it to it's own subdomain far too risky. 301's have been floated as a way of managing the transition. I'm not too keen on that idea due to the double effect of new subdomain and content, and the SEO impact it might have. I've suggested uploading the new site to the new subdomain while leaving the old site in place. Then gradually migrating sections over before turning parts of the old site off and using a 301 at that point to finalise the move. The old site would inform user's there is a new version and it would then convert them to the new site(along with a cookie to auto redirect them in future.) while still leaving the old content in place for existing search traffic, bookmarks and visitors via static URLs. Before turning off sections on the old site we would create rel canonicals to redirect to the new pages based on a a mapped set of URLs(this in itself concerns me as the rel canonical is essentially linking to different content). Would be grateful for any advice on whether this strategy is flawed or whether another strategy might be more suitable?
Technical SEO | | Rezza0 -
Submitting a new sitemap index file. Only one file is getting read. What is the error?
Hi community, I am working to submit a new a new sitemap index files, where about 5 50,000 sku files will be uploaded. Webmasters is reporting that only 50k skus have been submitted. Google Webmasters is accepting the index, however only the first file is getting read. I have 2 errors and need to know if this is the reason that the multiple files are not getting uploaded. Errors: | 1 | | Warnings | Invalid XML: too many tags | Too many tags describing this tag. Please fix it and resubmi | | 2 | | Warnings | Incorrect namespace | Your Sitemap or Sitemap index file doesn't properly declare the namespace. | 1 | Here is the url I am submitting: http://www.westmarine.com/sitemap/wm-sitemap-index.xml | 1 | | | | |
Technical SEO | | mm9161570 -
Merging two sites into a new one: best way?
Hi, I have one small blog on a specific niche and let's call it firstsite.com (.com extension) and it's hosted on my server. I am going to takeover a second blog on same niche but with lots more links, posts, authority and traffic. But it his on a .info domain and let's call it secondsite.info and for now it's on a different server. I have a third domain .com where I would like join both blogs. Domain is better and reflects niche better and let's call it thirdsite.com How should I proceed to have the best result? I was thinking of creating a new account at my server with domain thirdsite.com After that upload all content from secondsite.info and go to google webmaster to let they know that site now sits on a new domain. Also do a full 301 redirect. Should it be page by page or just one 301 redirect? And finally insert posts (they are not many) from firstsite.com on thirdsite.com and do specific redirects. Is this a good option? Or should I first move secondsite.info to my server and keep updating it and only a few weeks later make transition to thirdsite.com? I am worried that it could be too much changes at once.
Technical SEO | | delta440 -
Redirect old URL's from referring sites?
Hi I have just came across some URL's from the previous web designer and the site structure has now changed. There are some links on the web however that are still pointing at the old deep weblinks. Without having to contact each site it there a way to automatically sort the links from the old structure www.mydomain.com/show/english/index.aspx to just www.mydomain.com Many Thanks
Technical SEO | | ocelot0 -
Sitemap for pages that aren't on menus
I have a site that has pages that has a large number, about 3,000, pages that have static URLs, but no internal links and are not connected to the menu. The pages are pulled up through a user-initiated selection process that builds the URL as they make their selections, but,as I said, the pages already exist with static URLs. The question: should the sitemap for this site include these 3,000 static URLs? There is very little opportunity to optimize the pages in any serious kind of way, if you feel that makes a difference. There is also no chance that a crawler is going to find its way to these pages through the natural flow of the site. There isn't a single link to any of these pages anywhere on the site. Help?
Technical SEO | | RockitSEO0 -
Delete old site but redirect domain to a new domain and site
I just have a quick query and I have a feeling about what the answer is so just wanted to see what you guys thought... Basically I am working on a client site. This client has a few other websites that are divisions of their company. However these divisions/websites are no longer used. They are wanting to delete the websites but redirect the domains to their name main website. They believe this will pass on SEO benefits as these old division sites are old and have a good PR and history. I'm unsure for DEFINITE, which way is correct?
Technical SEO | | Weerdboil0