What to do when your home page an index for a series of pages.
-
I have created an index stack. My home page is http://www.southernwhitewater.com
The home page is the index itself and the 1st page http://www.southernwhitewater.com/nz-adventure-tours-whitewater-river-rafting-hunting-fishing
My home page (if your look at it through moz bat for chrome bar} incorporates all the pages in the index. Is this Bad? I would prefer to index each page separately. As per my site index in the footer
What is the best way to optimize all these pages individually and still have the customers arrive at the top to a picture. rel= canonical?
Any help would be great!!
-
HI Rod,
That should have fixed your duplicate content problem.
-
Hi Don, I have made those changes now.
I still have an index for my home page, but it is; a banner, 2 text pages and a gallery page. If you look at the index though the Moz bar you can see that the H1 & H2 titles have information from the whole index as if it is one long single page.
Rod B
-
Thanks Moosa
Yes I have just put this up and went a little OTT on the urls. I will pull strip them back shortly.
No, the index (index stack) is about the individual pages stacked down a page with no submenu, as opposed to the site index in the footer. The footer shows how to get to the individual pages by themselves the same way you would in a drop down menu.
-
Thanks Don
Good answer and I appreciate the detail. I have been assured that the individual content will not be seen by google as duplicate by the creators, but I am not entirely convinced, and have come to a similar conclusion to you and will be pulling away the home page and making a link across to an index of the services pages. I have a client who is very particular about the look. Most will understand the trade-off between plenty of above the fold content, and keeping the opening image clean picturesque and minimalistic.
I will let you know when its finished. I would like to hear from other people who stack pages in an index as opposed to a drop-down menu or sub-navigation. This design seems to be quite good for tablets where scrolling is easy and loading pages is slower. (another trade of between desktops and tablets)
I will be testing a change from one configuration to other to see if the performance improves or not on some of my other sites. Nothing like an a/b split to put the mind at rest.
-
Hi Rod,
I will try address the 2 questions I see here.
1. Is an "index stack" bad for your site.
2. How do I optimize my site.1. Index Stack, okay to be completely honest I have never heard the term before. However, with the link you provided I was able to understand what you mean. In such case you have taken the content of your sub-pages and placed them directly on your home page. Is this bad.. YES!
The reason why this is bad is because it is creating duplicate content. This is bad because the page that should be ranking for X content is now competing with your home page for these rankings. Your home page should be about your business and services, what you do, and how you do it. The sub-pages are your re-enforcement they support the content stated on your homepage.
Imagine a beautiful hotel. The outside is adorned in the finest materials of the time, well maintained and awe inspiring. A equally impressive doorway beacons you to come in. As you do, you find yourself in the lobby. Well placed pristine signs detail some of the hotel's offerings, private gym's, hot tubs, saunas, massage, 5 star dinning, dance halls, and judging by the impressive lobby you have no doubt these offerings will be spectacular.
In this example the lobby is your homepage an impressive list of the offerings guest will find inside. What you don't see is a middle-aged fat man sprawled out in the lobby getting a massage. Which is what your index stack is doing.
2. How to optimize (fix it). To fix this you'll want to structure you home page to be about your business, and services. High level overviews of what you offer, with strong brand placement.
The purpose of the homepage is to make it clear what you do, how you do it, why people love it, and in general more about your brand. The purpose of your inner pages is to completely detail the particular service or products, with call to action to convert interest into money.
I would remove the internal page content from the homepage, and focus again more on an overview. Essentially cut out everything between the Hunting & Gathering Club, and the Call to Action "There's a Southern Whitewater Experience for everyone". Beef up the links to the internal pages by making them look more attractive and obvious.
There are other things that may need addressed as well, but I hope this answers your primary question,
Don
-
Your question is kind of confusing to me but if you are asking about having all internal links on the home page. This is fine. I take a quick look of your website and from the indexing point of view it looks just fine to me!
Although your URLs are very much over optimized it will not take more than a second for one to realize that you are pushing SEO here. I think this is not really a very good idea so my advice is to optimize your URLs and make it SEO friendly instead of inserting your keywords in to it.
If you are asking something different, I would love if you can elaborate your question a bit more.
Hope this helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What is the proper way to execute 'page to page redirection'
I need to redirection every page of my website to a new url of another site I've made. I intend to add:"Redirect 301 /oldpage.html http://www.example.com/newpage.html"I will use the 301 per page to redirect every page of my site, but I'm confused that if I add:"Redirect 301 / http://mt-example.com/" it will redirect all of my pages to the homepage and ignore the URLs i have separately mentioned for redirection.Please guide me.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | NABSID0 -
301'd an important, ranking page to the wrong new page, any recourse?
Our 1,300 page site conversion from static html to Wordpress platform went flawlessly with the exception of 1 significant issue....an old, important, highly ranking page was 301 redirected to the wrong corresponding new page. The page it was redirected to is about a similar product, but not the same. This was an oversight that slipped through. It was brought to my attention when I noticed this new page was still holding the old page's rankings but the bounce rate skyrocketed (clearly because the content on the wrong new page was not relevant). Once identified, we cleaned up the redirect. My fear is that all the juice built up on the old .html page that ranked well has now permanently been passed to an irrelevant, insignificant page. -Is there any way to clean up this mistake? -Is there anything I can do to assist Google in associating the correct 'new' page with correct 'old' page after the wrong redirect was initially set-up? -Am I going to have to start from scratch with the new page in terms of trust, backlinks, etc. since google already noted the redirect? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seagreen0 -
Big discrepancies between pages in Google's index and pages in sitemap
Hi, I'm noticing a huge difference in the number of pages in Googles index (using 'site:' search) versus the number of pages indexed by Google in Webmaster tools. (ie 20,600 in 'site:' search vs 5,100 submitted via the dynamic sitemap.) Anyone know possible causes for this and how i can fix? It's an ecommerce site but i can't see any issues with duplicate content - they employ a very good canonical tag strategy. Could it be that Google has decided to ignore the canonical tag? Any help appreciated, Karen
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Digirank0 -
Links from non-indexed pages
Whilst looking for link opportunities, I have noticed that the website has a few profiles from suppliers or accredited organisations. However, a search form is required to access these pages and when I type cache:"webpage.com" the page is showing up as non-indexed. These are good websites, not spammy directory sites, but is it worth trying to get Google to index the pages? If so, what is the best method to use?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | maxweb0 -
301 redirect for page 2, page 3 etc of an article or feed
Hey guys, We're looking to move a blog feed we have to a new static URL page. We are using 301 redirects but I'm unsure of what to regarding page 2, page 3 etc. of the feed. How do I make sure those urls are being redirected as well? For example: Moving FloridaDentist.com/blog/dental-tips/ to a new page url FloridaDentist.com/dental-tips. So, we are using a 301 on that old url to the new one. My questions is what to do with the other pages like FloridaDentist.com/blog/dental-tips/page/3. How do we make sure that page is also 301'd to the new main url?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RickyShockley0 -
First Link on Page Still Only Link on Page?
Bruce Clay and others did some research and found that the first link on the page is the most important and what is accredited as the link. Any other links on the page mean nothing. Is this still true? And in that case, on an ecommerce site with category links in the top navigation (which is high on the code), is it not useful to link to categories in the content of the page? Because the category is already linked to on that page. Thank you, Tyler
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | tylerfraser0 -
Using Canonical on home page
Our home page has the canonical tag pointing to itself (something from wordpress i understand). Is there any positive or negative affect that anyone is aware of from having pages canonical'ed to themselves?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | halloranc0 -
PR Dilution and Number of Pages Indexed
Hi Mozzers, My client is really pushing for me to get thousands, if not millions of pages indexed through the use of long-tail keywords. I know that I can probably get quite a few of them into Google, but will this dilute the PR on my site? These pages would be worthwhile in that if anyone actually visits them, there is a solid chance they will convert to a lead do to the nature of the long-tail keywords. My suggestion is to run all the keywords for these thousands of pages through adwords to check the number of queries and only create pages for the ones which actually receive searches. What do you guys think? I know that the content needs to have value and can't be scraped/low-quality and pulling these pages out of my butt won't end well, but I need solid evidence to make a case either for or against it to my clients.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Travis-W0