2 Duplicate E-commerce sites Risk vs Reward
-
Hi guys
I have a duplicate content question I was hoping someone might be able to give me some advice on?
I work for a small company in the UK and in our niche we have a huge product range and an excellent website providing the customer with a very good experience. We’re also backed up by a bespoke warehouse/logistic management system further enhancing the quality of our product. We get most traffic through PPC and are not one of the biggest brands in the industry and have to fight for marketshare.
Recently we were approached by another company in our industry that have built up a huge and engaged audience over decades but can’t logistically tap into their following to sell the products so they have suggested a partnership. They are huge fans of what we do and basically want a copy of our site to be rebranded and hosted on a subdomain of their website and we would then pay them a commission of all the sales the new site received. So 2 identical sites with different branding would exist.
Based on tests they have carried out we could potentially double our sales in weeks and the potential is huge so we are excited about the possibility.
But…..how would we handle the duplicate content, would we be penalised? Would just one of the sites be penalised? Or if sales increase as much as we think they might, would it be worth a penalty as our current rankings aren’t great?
Any advice would be great.
Cheers
Richard
-
Thats great advice, i'll be sure to put it to good use!
And thanks for the Yahoo analogy, i'll keep it in mind!
-
Thanks Rich for the insight, it helps in understanding where you are coming from. My only other point would be that if you do go through with this partnership, there should be some other way to build your brand with all the customers coming through the site you are going to build/maintain. Your contract should make clear that you are allowed to have access to all customer data and can use it for marketing etc from your main product site (not the one you are managing). Your partner should not only promote this new site, but your branded products and main site as well. Leverage this situation to gain awareness of your product so that you can build organic traffic to your site. Set your business plan so that at the end of the contract you have used this relationship to make your reach "huge". Therefore, if at the end of the contract your revenue goes to zero from this project it does not matter. Don't assume that your partner would never start their own e-commerce operation. Once they watch you guys take the lion's share of the revenue, they can do the math really quick to realize that they can afford to build something, pay for it and make even more money.
There was once this massive web portal that ruled the internet called "Yahoo" way back in the last century. Yahoo decided to let this little startup that was founded by a couple of goofy college kids to show branded web search results on the Yahoo website. As Yahoo was the biggest site on the internet at the time, lots of people learned about this really great little search engine called "Google" (you may have heard of it). So many people liked the search results from Google that even after Yahoo stopped using Google for search results, it did not matter as the users were already going to Google directly.
-
Thanks very much for your responses I really appreciate them.
CleverPhd - we wouldn’t be giving total control of the domain away as we would design it, maintain it and add and remove products when we see fit. But I totally agree with you about them gaining a higher volume of organic and direct traffic and potentially doing what they want with it.
If they did decide not to sell our products it would mean ending the contract we have after an allotted time frame and either finding a new partner to design a new website and entering in a similar deal with them or start their own e-commerce operation which logistically is a huge undertaking, its taken us 15 years to build up relationships and offer the amount of products we sell so it’s not a viable option (at the minute anyway).
From the initial meeting they did stress that they didn’t want to run their online shop themselves and were happy to take a commission. They also gave a firm commitment to push the site through various media channels and their reach is huge. You said we would be at a disadvantage if the set up works out good or bad but either way we would be gaining more sales, just not increasing our brand reach through that channel. So in essence wouldn’t you just see it as separate revenue stream we could live without even if it fell apart?
Dimitri – Thanks, it looks like if we go ahead I’ll be insisting on canonical tags!
Don – Cheers for the alternatives and the offer to PM you.
I really appreciate the insight guys!
Rich
-
Hello Rich,
I think giving them a copy of you domain would be a very bad choice. They will likely have the duplicate content problems as I am sure Google would "most likely" recognize you as the source of the content. Since you were around first. Basically, to Google, the site would be relegated to a low quality clone of yours and they would never see respectable SERP results. Ultimately not really helping either of you.
I am of the opinion there is an alternative solution out there, some off the top of my head....
- First, a referral program makes complete sense here, this is exactly the kind of situations in which referral programs were designed for.
- Second, let them build their own website with your products, provide support in the process but be careful to ensure they are in fact building their own site with their own branding and content. If they want your product descriptions make it clear that they must be accompanied by their own description ie (Manufacture Description | Our Description). Let the site evolve on its own, user reviews, testimonials, user images.. ect.
- Third, give them an incentive program. If they want to partner with you and it is beneficial then make it work for both of you. The exact details would need your input. My thinking is to offer their community an exclusive offer (5%-10%) off their first purchase of $X or more. Then pay your partner $X amount for each discount claimed, + X% of the next non-discounted sale. Obviously you would need to cross check that they are in fact a user of your partner's community which would involve some data exchange. You don't want people just posting the discount on the internet for anybody to use.
The actual solution I would recommend would require more information from both sides of the situation, The good thing here is you are in the power seat and nothing really can get done with out your say-so. I would recommend caution with giving anybody direct access to your content, if somebody wants it that means you are doing something right.
I hope this input helps you. I have had personal experience with duplicating a retail website for business to business sales. If you would like more thoughts feel free to PM me.
Don
-
Hi there.
Duplicate content = problems. That's for sure. If website does get penalized, it would be the website, which will be considered scraper by Google. In your case (if your current website is indexed, ranking and don't have any penalties) it would be your partners. So, in theory you can bring a penalization to your partner
Or if sales increase as much as we think they might, would it be worth a penalty as our current rankings aren’t great?
Penalty is never good. It might seem ok in the beginning, but when you get hit, you gonna get screwed.
Now, my suggestion would be to go with partnership and give them a "copy" of your website, but put canonical links to every single page, linking back to your original one. Then it'll be win-win combination. Just make sure it's one of required and clear conditions to your partner.
Cheers.
-
The duplicate content issue could be as simple as having them setup canonical links from their site to the same pages on your site so that Google would see where they originated from on your site.
I would not be concerned as much about the SEO implications, what about your business implications? If the other site can sell all your products and controls the domain they are on, what happens when this other site now has all this great organic and direct traffic and decides to NOT to sell your products? They can just take that subdomain traffic and direct folks to wherever and whatever product they want.
I am sure there are other reasons that you cannot mention here on why you all are considering this, but at face value, this agreement makes no sense to me. If your product is so great and the other site has a great audience, they should just buy the product from you and sell it like any other wholesale type vendor relationship.
It sounds like they do not want to take the risk and would rather have your company take the risk. Then, if this all works out ok, they have all the leverage to control the traffic. You are at a disadvantage if this setup works out good or bad.
Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Mobile First Index: What Could Happen To Sites w Large Desktop but Small Mobile Sites?
I have a question about how Mobile First could affect websites with separate (and smaller) mobile vs desktop sites. Referencing this SE Roundtable article (seorountable dot com /google-mobile-first-index-22953.html), "If you have less content on your mobile version than on your desktop version - Google will probably see the less content mobile version. Google said they are indexing the mobile version first." But Google/ Gary Illyes are also on the record stating the switch to mobile-first should be minimally disruptive. Does "Mobile First" mean that they'll consider desktop URLs "second", or will they actually just completely discount the desktop site in lieu of the mobile one? In other words: will content on your desktop site that does not appear in mobile count in desktop searches? I can't find clear answer anywhere (see also: /jlh-marketing dot com/mobile-first-unanswered-questions/). Obviously the writing is on the wall (and has been for years) that responsive is the way to go moving forward - but just looking for any other viewpoints/feedback here since it can be really expensive for some people to upgrade. I'm basically torn between "okay we gotta upgrade to responsive now" and "well, this may not be as critical as it seems". Sigh... Thanks in advance for any feedback and thoughts. LOL - I selected "there may not be a right answer to this question" when submitting this to the Moz community. 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mirabile0 -
Http and https protocols being indexed for e-commerce website
Hi team, Our new e-commerce website has launched and I've noticed both http and https protocols are being indexed. www.mountainjade.co.nz Our old website was http with only the necessary pages running https (cart, checkout etc). No https pages were indexed and you couldn't access a https page if you manually typed it into the browser. We outrank our competition by a mile, so I'm treading carefully here and don't want to undo the progress we made on the old site, so I have a few questions: 1. How exactly do we remove one protocol from the index? We are running on Drupal. We tried a hard redirect from https to http and excluded the relevant pages (cart, login etc from the redirect), but found that you could still access https pages if you we're in the cart (https) and then pressed back on the browser button for example. At that point you could browse the entire site on https. 2. Is the safer option to emulate what we had in place on the old website e.g http with only the necessary pages being https, rather than making the switch to sitewide https? I've been struggling with this one, so any help would be much appreciated. Jake S
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jacobsheehan0 -
Use Nonindex or Canonical on product tags of a e-commerce site
I run a e-commerce site and we have many product tags. These product tags come up as "Duplicate Page Content" when Moz does it's crawl. I was wondering if I should use Nonindex or Canonical? The tags all go to the same product when used so I figure I would just nonindex them but was wondering what's the best for SEO?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EmmettButler1 -
Domain Authority... http://www.domain.com/ vs. http://domain.com vs. http://domain.com/
Hey Guys, Looking at Page Authority for my Site and ranking them in Decending Order, I see these 3 http://www.domain.com/ | Authority 62 http://domain.com | Authority 52 http://domain.com/ | Authority 52 Since the first one listed has the highest Authority, should I be using a 301 redirects on the lower ranking variations (which I understand how works) or should I be using rel="canonical" (which I don't really understand how it works) Also, if this is a problem that I should address, should we see a significant boost if fixed? Thanks ahead of time for anyone who can help a lost sailor who doesn't know how to sail and probably shouldn't have left shore in the first place. Cheers ZP!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mr_Snack0 -
SEO effect of content duplication across hub of sites
Hello, I have a question about a website I have been asked to work on. It is for a real estate company which is part of a larger company. Along with several other (rival) companies it has a website of property listings which receives a feed of properties from a central hub site - so lots of potential for page, title and meta content duplication (if if isn't already occuring) across the whole network of sites. In early investigation I don't see any of these sites ranking very well at all in Google for expected search phrases. Before I start working on things that might improve their rankings, I wanted to ask some questions from you guys: 1. How would such duplication (if it is occuring) effect the SEO rankings of such sites individually, or the whole network/hub collectively? 2. Is it possible to tell if such a site has been "burnt" for SEO purposes, especially if or from any duplication? 3. If such a site or the network has been totally burnt, are there any approaches or remedies that can be made to improve the site's SEO rankings significantly, or is the only/best option to start again from scratch with a brand new site, ensuring the use of new meta descriptions and unique content? Thanks in advance, Graham
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | gmwhite9991 -
Best E-commerce CMS from a SEO perspective
Hello fellow mozzers, I have a lot of experience with Magento and a little bit of experience with Prestashop and i am quite aware of their strengths and weaknesses regarding SEO. I was wondering which E-commerce CMS is the best for SEO. I am talking about the CMS as you download it. There are hundreds of plugins for the popular systems which improve their SEO power tremendously, but i'm interested in which CMS is the best right out-of-the-box. Let me know what you think and why you think so. Thanks in advance 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | WesleySmits1 -
Stuck on Page 2 - What Would You Do?!?
My site is : http://goo.gl/JgK1e My main keyword is : Plastic Bins i have been going back and forth between page 1 and 2 for this keyword and i was wondering if any of you could provide any guidance as to why i can't get on the top of page 1, and stay there... My site has been around for a while, we believe we have a great user experience, all unique, fresh content, and the lowest prices... I must be missing out on something major if I cannot get a steady page 1 ranking... Any thoughts? Thanks in advance...
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Prime850 -
Our site has been up almost 2 months and no rankings yet?
Our site is www.AkinsSeptic.com. We spent a lot of time on the site and have not received any rankings yet. Can you advise as to what we can do to get this site ranked at all. I know it needs a lot of SEO work and some links, however, it should rank mildly due to the low competition of keywords we are using. Thanks in advance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Tormz0