Should I Build A Niche City Site or Link to Existing Directory?
-
I have a main site for real estate that works fairly well. There's city pages within the site. I have been able to get the specific citynamehomesforsale.com domain and now I'm back to the old question of whether to build out a high traffic niche site to capitalize on the exact keyword match or should I just link it to the directory (domain.com/city)
Thanks!
-
Hey Josh,
Understood, and I think the basic feedback on this would be buy it if you have a plan for what to do with it, and you're sure that your plan won't be detrimental to what you've accomplished with the main site (like sharing NAP, which would be detrimental). I think that's pretty much what both Tom and I are saying.
-
The original reason for the question was I have a fairly good thing going with my current domain but a keyword specific domain became available. So I really was wondering if it made sense to build that out (which I decided to do).
Imagine you have Miriamstuff.com and it's doing well raking 15th for "Blue Whirly Widgets" However you can't seem to break to the top. A few of your pages do well "Blue Whirly Widgets with handles" etc. Then one day you have an opportunity to buy BlueWhirlyWidgets.com... do you take it?
In my example it's real estate specific. So the domain was a larger city option outside our metro area.
-
Hey Josh,
It's kind of a Rule #1 thing - don't put your NAP on more than 1 website (unless we're talking about building citations and earning links, of course!). So, yes, if you want to run multiple sites for what is actually the same business, you'll need to brand them separately and not use any part of the NAP on them. You'd need to think of them as having some other purpose, like educational content or something. In which case, I'd personally prefer to build that out on my own main domain to strengthen my core brand, but I have heard of other taking this multi-site approach, so long as it's treated as a totally different animal.
-
Nice, so you feel that the local "NAP" effect is strong enough to erode any SEO gains by having a niche. Thanks for sharing.
-
Hi Josh,
I would only suggest building out the nice sites if they are run completely independently of the main company website and do not share any of the NAP (name, address, phone). What you do not want is Google getting confused between the various businesses if they are sharing a name, address or phone number. So, if you simply want these to be independent entities, with no duplicated NAP or content, there might be some value.
-
I do have a physical office. My current set up has a main hub site of domain.com and pages with cities on them and then "neighborhoods" further in.
I would normally never opt for a niche site but I've never had the luxury of an exact keyword match before. The city itself is large enough (enough content) to stand on it's own - so it's just the effort it would take to get it up on it's own.
I think I answered my own question. In instances like this if I have the resources then it's worth it only if the city is large enough. If I was in Texas for example and had Texashomes.com - wouldn't it make sense to have Austinhomes and dallashomes as well and build those out?
Thanks for your response!
-
Hi Joshua,
Ah, yes, back to the old question of this
I know how you feel about that and it is definitely an important decision. I'd like to understand:
-
Are you running a virtual business, or does your current website represent a physical realty office?
-
What would you be putting on the new site? Would this also be branded in some way with the realty office (if this is a realty office and not a virtual business)?
-
-
First thing's first:
Is the current city page getting any traffic?
If yes - don't change a winning formula.
If not - let's weigh up the options.
By going with a separate domain, you're making the assumption that you'll be able to target the site specifically for the region + product/service and that users might be more likely to convert on a domain that contains the city (which may or may not be true).
By adding to the existing site, you're helping to reinforce the site's brand and you're collecting link equity in one place. If you have a solid on-site SEO structure, that link equity can be efficiently passed around to rank other pages on your site. Potentially, you'll get a stronger link equity with this method than you would with a dedicated city site, as you have several cities and products all with the potential to win links.
The citynamehomesforsale.com (unless it has historical links) is unlikely to have any SEO equity itself, meaning you'll be starting from scratch? Is that really worthwhile, or would you be better off building up your existing web property and brand, utilising the strength it may already have, and attempt to rank your city keywords that way?
I'd be more inclined to look at that method, unless the site is under a form of algorithmic penalty.
Hope this helps
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How do you check keyword rankings for your sites?
The other day I used Rank Tracker form SEO PowerSuite and SEO small tools ranking checker http://smallseotools.com/keyword-position/ to check a keyword ranking. Both said that my clients keyword is not in top 50, but when I used Rank Tracker from Moz.com it showed that my client's keyword ranks #30 ! What's the tool that works for you all the time and is 100% reliable?
Keyword Research | | vitaliykolos1 -
Keyword research tool - for off site results
New to Moz, and after playing with keyword research, it seems very comprehensive for analysing keywords based on my site content, and showing me how many people are visiting based on those keywords. However what I'm really looking for is 'alternative' keywords that are 'not' on my site, but still relevant to my sector, and how many searchers are using those. basic example My site is optimised for 'soccer for kids' which Moz shows me getting 50 hits for. Google KW tool reports that every month there are over 2000 searches for 'football for kids' Because my site has no mention of 'Football', Moz doesn't show this as an alternative KW Admittedly my site is new in Moz, so do I just wait a bit longer? or do I continue to use Google KW tool? I'm sure I'm missing the obvious. Thanks!
Keyword Research | | petenorris0 -
Should I 'nofollow' the pages on my site I want to rank the highest??
I have a lot of pages on my site & I was wondering if I would be better off tagging the pages that are most important to me nofollow. Any suggestions would be wonderful. Thanks
Keyword Research | | Caseman0 -
Can I target the same keywords on multiple sites?
I am launching a series of geographically specific sites to support my main website. Is there any problem with targeting the same keywords on both sites?
Keyword Research | | theLotter0 -
Niche Research: Broad Match V.S. Exact Match
Hey SeoMozzers, Do you guys use broad match or exact match to gauge whether or not there's enough volume to be worth your time? Take the freelancing niche for example. These are the results for broad match: <a class="aw-ti-resultsPanel-details">how to be a freelance writer [2,740,000]</a> how to freelance [165,000] In exact match however: <a class="aw-ti-resultsPanel-details">how to become a freelance writer [1,000]</a> how to freelance [480] In this niche in particular, there's not really any keyword that gets more than 20,000 exact match searches a month. However, the broad level keywords have more than 2 million searches. Here's my thinking: Instead of targeting highly specific terms to optimize for, I'm just going to optimize for broad terms and aim to capture the long tail. It seems there's a lot of people searching for things, but they're all spread out across different keywords. So my instinct is to go with the broad match results, assume there's enough traffic to support a profitable website and ignore the low exact match results. Your thoughts ... ?
Keyword Research | | DerekP0 -
Is the order placement of a city name in title tag very important?
Is "Austin Plumbers" much different than "Plumbers Austin" in the eyes of the search engine and best practices? I would think that Plumbers Austin would have more search volume. But Austin Plumbers is easier to work in to sentences in the body. Does Google sees them as the same? Is it ok to use Plumbers Austin in the title tag and use Austin Plumbers in the body or should I choose one target phrase and stick with just that? If so should the city name come first or last?
Keyword Research | | judd_trifectainteractive.com1 -
Should we change our site domain name to include our keyword?
Our niche has one keyword phrase that is much, much more active than any other comparable phrase. Let's call that phrase "math problems". Within this phrase, the "math" is absolutely the most important keyword, as it is also used in every spin-off search phrase, like "math answers", "math practice", etc. We've had our domain since 1996, and is currently the company name - "Rocketproblems.com". Over the last year (2010-2011) our SERPs have steadily dropped to the point where we're not getting a sustainable level of business from organic search, whereas in 2009 we were doing fantastic. However, we've also had "Rocketmathproblems.com" since about 2000, just gathering dust. What I've noticed from the top search results is that nearly every domain has either "math" or "math problems" in its URL. Do you think it's worth it to switch to the keyword-rich URL? It is a bit more verbose, and the "Rocketmathproblems.com" v.s. "Rocketproblems.com" example perfectly captures the different feeling. My inclination is that SEO is only becoming more competitive, and if we aren't getting worthwhile business from organic search at the moment then we should bite the bullet and make the switch for the future, along with ramping up our content generation. However, I also noticed that in late 2009 a previous webmaster switched to "Rogermath.com" but switched back within a month when our SERP for the key phrase was a page lower - I gleaned this from a Moz Juicy Keywords Report :). Thoughts?
Keyword Research | | ACann0 -
Do building sites on expired domains help?
Many times I have wondered whether building sites on expired domains, which are sold at popular domain auction websites like TDNAM(Godaddy),SEDO etc. Is it of any worth ? Buying domains with existing parameters such as PR,Alexa ranks etc. and already indexed pages where these expired sites rank on keywords which one is looking forth and then building sites on these domains to promote your other sites. How successful would this trick be?
Keyword Research | | 99fusion0