Optimizing blog domain for maximum rank/traffic potential
-
Hello wonderful Moz community! I need some advice. Here is the situation: I work in a small division within a much larger company. We each have our own domain, i.e. www.parent.com and www.child.com. We (the child) have a domain authority of 57, while our parent has a domain authority of 86. Our blog lives on blogs.parent.com/child. My understanding is that www.brand.com/blogs is better for SEO than blogs.brand.com (we had no control of directory structure decisions at the parent level).
Given all that, in terms of maximizing traffic to our domain, would we be better off moving our blog to www.child.com/blogs? Here are a couple of potential pros/cons bouncing around in my newbie brain:
a) By moving the blog to our domain, our whole site could benefit from having any external links our blog posts earn point back to our domain vs. our parent's domain.
b) On the other hand, leaving the blog on our parent's domain and then linking to our content from posts over there might give our content a boost. (Of course, that theory is shot down if Google recognizes our parent/child relationship and doesn't reward our site with the benefit of linkbacks coming from our parent domain.)
What say you? Are there other angles to this I’m not even considering? If you think the right decision is to move the blog over to our site, any suggestions on how not to screw that up? (301’s, etc.) Thanks in advance for your thoughts!
-John
-
Thanks Robert and Erick for your quick and thoughtful answers! Robert, to clarify based on your foursquare dilemma, we are currently in situation 1) and it sounds like we ought to move to situation 4).
Erick, regarding the point you make in reason #4 ("the way you have it set up right now you may not be getting the DA of your parent site anyway") -- It appears that in terms of DA, www.parent.com and blogs.parent.com are the same. However, the TF and CF for blogs.parent.com are significantly lower than www.parent.com (and lower than www.child.com), so I think your point is valid.
I hear what you're saying regarding the Parent/Child relationship and the need to be careful. I think our situation is very much analogous to the P&G example, so I think we'd be fine.
Thanks again to you both for the great insights!
-
Hi John,
I would go with www.child.com/blog
Here is why:
1. As you stated this structure ranks better due to your blog getting your domains authority.
2. As you gain page authority for your posts your domain will also benefit.
3. Your child content is most likely relevant to your child domain.
4. the way you have it set up right now you may not be getting the DA of your parent site anyway because it is set up as a subdomain. Double check but I believe Google sees sub domains as there own deal so the metrics for your main domain do not match up. Do some testing in MOZ OSE to check both your root domain, www subdomain, and blog sub domain you will see different values for DA and PA. You can also check this way on Majestic and your TF and CF will be different as well.Strategy you may want to use is:
1. Move your blog to the child domain
2. New content should be posted here
3. You can syndicate the same post to the parent domain if you want, but make sure you use a rel canonical pointing to the original content at www.child.com/blog/post-name, that way you pass the credit back to the original post on the child domain and avoid duplicate content issues.
4. If you just want to get rid of the old blog, you can 301 the posts to the new post URLs, or rel canonical them pointing back to the NEW Original Content location at www.child.com/blog/post-nameParent Child Relationship:
This is just my opinion based on what I have encountered. If you are a manufacturer, and you have multiple brands, it is totally ok for you to have a Manufacturers website, and websites for each of your brands. Think of Proctor and Gamble, they have a P&G website with pages that spotlight their brands, and then they have individual sites for each of their brands. The P&G parent site links to all of its children. I am sure it passes authority that way, but each of the brand sites have also built their own authority.I believe the thing to look out for is, if you are building other sites to focus on brands or products, like P&G does, you should be fine. But if you are building child sites just so you can build links, like a PBN (private/public blog network) then you run a chance of getting a penalty. Just be careful and make sure you only try to get credit in one place and I think you will be all good. I am sure others have other thoughts on that, so you just have to make your own decision and track your progress to make sure you are getting the results you need.
Let me know if you have any questions, we have built the parent child relationships above before and it has worked great. No penalties and we are able to control most of page one for the traffic bringing brand related queries.
-
Hi John,
Your "newbie brain" is not deceiving you - the placement of a blog on your website for direct value to your brand is best practice.
The big questions I have are whether or not the information/content you would be placing on your blog would be directly relevant to services and/or products your parent company provides, and whether or not your parent company features their own blog.
This creates a foursquare dilemma:
- Parent company has a blog, and Child company features blog on same domain (subdomain)
If this is the case, you are creating blog overkill on 1 domain and leaving your child company in the lurch. I don't suggest this.
- Parent company doesn't have a blog, but child company does on its domain/subdomain
This is not a great strategy, as it dilutes your child company's website potential and creating links from your parent company to your child company will result in problems down the road. Google will find this connection sooner or later, and penalties may (will) result.
- Parent company doesn't feature a blog, but child company does on its website
This is a slightly better outcome - the child company maximizes its ranking and traffic potential but the parent company is left in the lurch. This can create problems as the parent company should be represented alongside the child company.
- Both websites feature unique blogs on their respective domains
This is really the ideal scenario. It keeps both companies separated (so no risk of penalties) but also allows them to maximize their ranking and traffic potential. This is what I strongly suggest if you want to be successful without risking long-term damage to your websites.
To answer your question directly:
#3 or #4 above are the options I would consider to maximize traffic to your domain. #4 has the added benefit of helping out the parent company, although if you don't have any say in what they do, it may not be possible.
Hope this helps and let me know if you have any further questions.
All the best,
Rob
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Decline in traffic and duplicate content in different domains
Hi, 6 months ago my customer purchased their US supplier and moved the supplier's website to their e-commerce platform. When moving to the new platform they copied the descriptions of the products from their site to the supplier's site so now both sites have the same content in the product pages. Since then they have experienced decrease in traffic in about 80%. They didn't implement canonical tag or hreflang. My customer's domain format is https://www.xxx.biz and the supplier's domain is https://www.zzz.com The last one is targeting the US and when someone from outside of the US wants to purchase a product they get a message that they need to move to the first website, the www.xxx.biz. Both sites are in English. The old site version of www.zzz.com, before the shit to the new platform, contained different product descriptions, and BTW, the old website version is still live and indexed under a subdomain of www.zzz.com. My question is what's the best thing to do in this case so that the rankings will be back to higher positions and they'll get back their traffic. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | digital19740 -
Sudden ranking Hike For domain
Hello there, I have domain Which got penalized By google Before 2 nd half years & all First Page Ranking Gone Down by 7-8 pages, But Now It got Sudden up after 3 years, So my Question is Will I need Worry or that Can Be Positive Sign For My efforts Given to Website? Will It stay Up?? As i have Updated My website As Told by Moz experts. Thanx, in advance
Technical SEO | | innovative10030 -
One server, two domains - robots.txt allow for one domain but not other?
Hello, I would like to create a single server with two domains pointing to it. Ex: domain1.com -> myserver.com/ domain2.com -> myserver.com/subfolder. The goal is to create two separate sites on one server. I would like the second domain ( /subfolder) to be fully indexed / SEO friendly and have the robots txt file allow search bots to crawl. However, the first domain (server root) I would like to keep non-indexed, and the robots.txt file disallowing any bots / indexing. Does anyone have any suggestions for the best way to tackle this one? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | Dave1000 -
Domain forwarding
Hi Is it ok or bad practice to domain forward shorter more memorable snappier domains used for promoting a website to a longer domain where the website actually lives, such as: Promoting in social media profiles, emails and offline literature a domain with forwarding set up like: www.brand.com To the main website: www.brandincludingprimaryproductrelatedkeyword.com And if ok (not bad practice), since its the forwarded domains that are being promoted they are hence the links most likely to be shared on social media and other websites so will they be treated like 301's and 'link building' for those will pretty much equate to link building for the main domain (or not) ? Many Thanks Dan
Technical SEO | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
Will syndicated content hurt a website's ranking potential?
I work with a number of independent insurance agencies across the United States. All of these agencies have setup their websites through one preferred insurance provider. The websites are customizable to a point, but the content for the entire website is mostly the same. Therefore, literally hundreds of agency sites have essentially the same content. The only thing that changes is a few "wildcards" in the copy where the agency fills in their city, state, services areas, company history, etc. My questions is: will this syndicated content hurt their ranking potential? I've been toying with the idea of further editing the content to make it more unique to an agency, but I would hate to waste a lot of hours doing this if it won't help anything. Would you expect this approach to be beneficial or a waste of time? Thank you for your help!
Technical SEO | | copyjack0 -
Will rankings for my micro site rank better if I 301 redirect it to my main site?
This is my first time asking so I will try to be as clear as possible. Ok, I have a micro site that is an (exact match domain) and the domain is a couple 3-4 years old and ranks very well for several search terms. The main two terms it ranks for are like this. houses for rent in XXXXX XXXXX homes for rent (XXXXX equals a city name) The issue is this site has no backlinks, zero advanced SEO, I only did basic optimization to it when i set the site up. Even site structure, url structure all are not good.
Technical SEO | | Robbie8299
The only page I have ever even seen rank is the main root url. But with all that the site does really good in the top 1-2 results for key search terms. Now, I have a main site that is a very big site that has steadily been climbing in search terms every month with great backlinks, optimized for the city and all.
It currently ranks on second page for the listed search terms listed above. What I want to do is 301 redirect this microsite to my city page on my main site that is much better optimized for the key city terms.
The 301 redirect would point this "root domain" (mymicrosite.com) to my city page that looks like this. www.mymaindomain.com/city/XXXXXXX If I do this will Google rank my main URL city page as well as it ranks this microsite with zero links, seo, etc, etc. What happens if it does not? Will I be able to turn off the 301 redirect and keep the microsite rankings? My main reason for wanting this is I want this city page to rank well and I only want to optimize one site instead of both. Any help would be great!0 -
Optimizing the canibalization
My client has a website that ranks 1st on ex: widget for website.com The domain also has a section website.com/widgets that ranks lower in the SERP The question is... are there any on-page elements or tactics to improve that specific page without affecting the overall home page performance?
Technical SEO | | mosaicpro0 -
How will a domain change affect my rankings?
My company will undergo a domain change in the next few months. Other than implementing 301 redirects, what else can I do to help the search engines realize the site has moved? What kind of impact on rankings can I expect to see? Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | raylau0