International Href Lang Tag Parameter Issue
-
Hey, let's say I'm on the following page..
site.com/product-name/product-code/?d=womens
I view the page source and it looks like this..
My question is, should I remove the parameter for the hreflang tag????
I just need some clarification that NO parameter page should have a canonical tag and / or href lang with parameters..
-
Hreflang tags should point to the canonical version of the page. So yes, please remove the ?d=Womens from all your Hreflang URLs.
Here are the results of a test run on this URL to check for Hreflang errors:
https://app.hreflang.org/results.php?runid=f622e3d03dbf4a03958c6a6d2d180bd020160719202039
You will see that all errors are because of the ?d=Womens in the URLs.
-
No, they should not stay.
Canonicals and hreflang should point to the same page.Like this:
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="en-us" href="<a href="http://www.revolve.com/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.revolve.com/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/" />
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-fr"href="<a href="http://www.revolveclothing.fr/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.revolveclothing.fr/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/" />
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="ru-ru" href="<a href="http://www.revolveclothing.ru/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.revolveclothing.ru/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/" />
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="es-es"href="<a href="http://www.revolveclothing.es/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.revolveclothing.es/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/" />
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="ko-kr" href="<a href="http://www.revolve.co.kr/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.revolve.co.kr/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/" />
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="pt-br"href="<a href="http://www.revolveclothing.com.br/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.revolveclothing.com.br/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/" />
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="en-au" href="<a href="http://www.revolveclothing.com.au/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.revolveclothing.com.au/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/" />
<link rel="alternate" hreflang="ja-jp" href="<a href="http://www.revolveclothing.co.jp/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.revolveclothing.co.jp/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?" /></link rel="alternate" hreflang="ja-jp" href="<a></link rel="alternate" hreflang="en-au" href="<a></link rel="alternate" hreflang="pt-br"href="<a></link rel="alternate" hreflang="ko-kr" href="<a></link rel="alternate" hreflang="es-es"href="<a></link rel="alternate" hreflang="ru-ru" href="<a></link rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-fr"href="<a></link rel="alternate" hreflang="en-us" href="<a> -
Here, Ill just show the site
So here
view-source:http://www.revolve.com/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/
If you control find "href lang" you'll see the following (see below). Are you sure that the parameters (?d=Womens) should stay on there when the canonical page is http://www.revolve.com/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/ ?????
| rel="alternate" hreflang="en-us" href="http://www.revolve.com/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" /> |
| | rel="alternate" hreflang="fr-fr" href="http://www.revolveclothing.fr/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" /> |
| | rel="alternate" hreflang="ru-ru" href="http://www.revolveclothing.ru/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" /> |
| | rel="alternate" hreflang="es-es" href="http://www.revolveclothing.es/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" /> |
| | rel="alternate" hreflang="ko-kr" href="http://www.revolve.co.kr/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" /> |
| | rel="alternate" hreflang="pt-br" href="http://www.revolveclothing.com.br/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" /> |
| | rel="alternate" hreflang="en-au" href="http://www.revolveclothing.com.au/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" /> |
| |rel="alternate" hreflang="ja-jp" href="http://www.revolveclothing.co.jp/nightcap-dixie-cutout-mini-dress-in-sangria/dp/NIGH-WD262/?d=Womens" />
|
-
ok,
no, you should not remove the parameter unless there is a canonical tag, then set the hreflang as the canonical -
No it's not about removing the hreflang tag. It's that the hreflang has a parameter. Should I remove the parameter?
-
So, the clarification that you needed: No, you have not to remove the hreflang.
And there must be one tag for every language, in this case 8 hreflang. -
Hey GR,
There are 7 other ccTLD's which is why we have the href lang tag.
-
Hi paul,
Does that page have other languages? Or just frech?
In that case, it is no needed to set hreflang. Just declarin it in search console is enough.Besides its a page with a parameter, it still needs to be declared its language. (with hreflan if there are other languages and with SC, or if there is only one language just with SC)
Hope it helps
GR.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
301 Question - issue
A while back we had a 'bleed' on one of our sites, which basically meant one of our sites started to leak across pages to another and that site started to rank for the same pages and now we have hundreds of pages ranking for urls that do not exists. It's hard to explain, bare with me. If you were to click on the cached view in Google for the ranked page it would show you the main site, but if you were to click it as usual, then you would be taken to the site but a 404 would show as the intended page was not for that site. We believe we fixed the 'bleed' and have setup 301s for all the affected pages to go to the home page for the site it affected. But these pages have not been removed from Google, which we thought a 301 would do. So we still have hundreds of pages being ranked but are redirected to the home page. Why hasn't these pages been removed?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JH_OffLimits0 -
Pagination new pages vs parameters
I'm working on a site that currently handles pagination like this cars-page?p=1 cars-page?p=2 In webmaster tools I can then tell ?p= designates pagination However I have a plugin I want to add to fix other seo issues, among those it adds rel="prev" rel="next" and it modifies the pagination to this cars-page-1.html cars-page2.html Notice I lost the parameter here and now each page is a different page url, pagination is no longer a parameter. I will not longer be able to specify the pagination parameter in webmaster tools. Would this confuse google as the pagination is no longer a parameter and there will now be multiple urls instead of one page with parameters? My gut says this would be bad, as I haven't seen this approach often on ecommerce site, but I wanted to see what the community thought?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | K-WINTER0 -
Original Source Tag or Canonical Tag for News Publishers?
I have been sourcing content from a news publisher who is my partner for publishing content online. My website deals with sourcing content from a couple of websites. I did use a canonical tag pointing towards the respective syndicated source but I have not seen traffic for those articles. I did some research and found out that Google does have a tag for news publishers which is the "original-source" tag which helps news publishers to give proper credit for their work. Here's a link to the official word by Google" https://news.googleblog.com/2010/11/credit-where-credit-is-due.html Although Google has officially stated that the "syndication-source" tag has been replaced by the "canonical" tag. However, there is no mention about the "original-source" tag.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Starcom_Search
Can I still use the "original-source" tag to syndicate content from my partner site instead of the "canonical" tag? P.S.: The reason why I am not convinced with the use of the canonical tag is because:
1. As per what Google says, duplicate content won't harm my website unless it is spam. (And since we are rightfully content from our partner'website and showcasing it to a larger audience by hosting it on our website as well, we are thereby not indulging in any unethical practices) 2. The canonical tag could possibly hamper my crawl bandwidth issues as it would essentially need the crawler to crawl the whole page to figure out that the canonical is present, post which any possible valuation that my site could have garnered gets lost.3. Moreover, since I am from the news, media and publication industry, content republication is a widely accepted practice and in such cases simply including a link to the original source of the article or using the original source tag should suffice, That being mentioned, I do not want to go ahead without taking a second opinion about this. Kindly help me to resolve this issue.0 -
A new website issue
Hello everybody,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mtmaster
I have started a new website 22 days ago at the beginning of this month and i have long articles. I think this should make the site appear in search results for long tail keywords even if they are not very relevant but as you can see in the attached image from my webmaster tools the impression count has suddenly increased to 100 then significantly decreased again. Even when i cancel "filter" option. Is this normal for a 3 weeks old website? or there is something i have to check? thanks. cLMa04l.jpg0 -
Canonical URL Tag
I have 3 websites with same content, I want to add Canonical tag to my main website. Is this also important to mentioned other duplicate URL in canonical tag in main website? or just need to just add
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | marknorman0 -
Internal Linking for better seo
On our site http://villasdiani.com we have a blog called Kenya news, which is a category where we regular post articles. I am always creating external links to the category Kenya news so as it would pass juice to the posts in it and the posts have back links to category. There are no internal links among posts in the category. As our main target is to rent beach villas and boutique hotels, each of that posts in the category Kenya news has only a link either to category with beach villas or to category with boutique hotels. My question is, if this is good practice?, is it just not too much links going to categories to beach villas and boutique hotels form the Kenya news?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Rebeca1
Thank you very much for any thoughts Iris0 -
Meta NoIndex tag and Robots Disallow
Hi all, I hope you can spend some time to answer my first of a few questions 🙂 We are running a Magento site - layered/faceted navigation nightmare has created thousands of duplicate URLS! Anyway, during my process to tackle the issue, I disallowed in Robots.txt anything in the querystring that was not a p (allowed this for pagination). After checking some pages in Google, I did a site:www.mydomain.com/specificpage.html and a few duplicates came up along with the original with
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bjs2010
"There is no information about this page because it is blocked by robots.txt" So I had added in Meta Noindex, follow on all these duplicates also but I guess it wasnt being read because of Robots.txt. So coming to my question. Did robots.txt block access to these pages? If so, were these already in the index and after disallowing it with robots, Googlebot could not read Meta No index? Does Meta Noindex Follow on pages actually help Googlebot decide to remove these pages from index? I thought Robots would stop and prevent indexation? But I've read this:
"Noindex is a funny thing, it actually doesn’t mean “You can’t index this”, it means “You can’t show this in search results”. Robots.txt disallow means “You can’t index this” but it doesn’t mean “You can’t show it in the search results”. I'm a bit confused about how to use these in both preventing duplicate content in the first place and then helping to address dupe content once it's already in the index. Thanks! B0 -
Is white text on a white background an issue when...?
Hi guys, This question was loosely answered here (http://www.seomoz.org/q/will-google-index-a-site-with-white-text-will-it-give-it-bad-ratings), but I wanted to elaborate on the concern. The issue I have is this, http://www.searchenginexperts.com.au/preview/white-text-white-background-issue Of the four div elements on the page, which; is best practice for SEO? and which of them would not be penalized by google on the grounds of hidden text? The reason I ask is that I have a site that is currently implementing the first div styling, but if you either remove the image OR uncheck the repeat-x (in inspect element) the text is left as white on white. I have added the transparent image on green to prove that having a background colour to back up the tiled image is not always going to work. What can be done in this scenario? Thanks in advance, Dan (From my managers account)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RuchirP0