News Errors In Google Search Console
-
Years ago a site I'm working on was publishing news as one form of content on the site.
Since then, has stopped publishing news, but still has a q&a forum, blogs, articles... all kinds of stuff.
Now, it triggers "News Errors" in GWT under crawl errors. These errors are
"Article disproportionately short"
"Article fragmented" on some q&a forum pages
"Article too long" on some longer q&a forum pages
"No sentences found"
Since there are thousands of these forum pages and it's problem seems to be a news critique, I'm wondering what I should do about it. It seems to be holding these non-news pages to a news standard:
https://support.google.com/news/publisher/answer/40787?hl=en
For instance, is there a way and would it be a good idea to get the hell out of Google News, since we don't publish news anymore? Would there be possible negatives worth considering?
What's baffling is, these are not designated news urls. The ones we used to have were /news/title-of-the-story per...
https://support.google.com/news/publisher/answer/2481373?hl=en&ref_topic=2481296
Or, does this really not matter and I should just blow it off as a problem.
The weird thing is that we recently went from http to https and The Google News interface still has us as http and gives the option to add https, which I am reluctant to do sine we aren't really in the news business anymore.
What do you think I should do?
Thanks!
-
Update: 5 months later, the problem has long since gone away.
-
Thanks for the answers Matthew & Martijn. So, I'm going to go with what I have in place... 301s to the main forums page to pick up/recycle the incoming links to that section and removing the /news category from where Google News looks for news, but not leave the Google News program altogether right now.
Thanks, again!
-
I'd opt for 301s if there is any link equity on those pages worth pushing to the forum pages. If not, I'd robots.txt them out to save on wasted crawl.
-
HI Matthew,
Thanks for the insight. On your, "I think the important part is that Google doesn't suddenly crawl a bunch of 404s that they think are news pages of some importance" would you robots.txt out the old category they looked at (/news) or leave it and figure out via the mass of 301s and the removal from the url structure we told them to crawl, so that Google figures it out on it's own?
-
Hi there,
It wouldn't be a problem to get out of Google News, but by the same logic, it wouldn't hurt just to leave it alone and let them figure out you're not publishing news anymore. It won't affect your web search rankings, since you're not targeting traffic from the news onebox or news.google.com.
These old pages redirect to forum pages? I think the important part is that Google doesn't suddenly crawl a bunch of 404s that they think are news pages of some importance.
-
Possible, hard to guess what your current set-up looks like. What you could do alternatively is set up a robots.txt with Disallow statement that are only targeting the Google News bot instead of just the general Google Bot.
-
Hi Martijn,
We still have the old /news url still in Google News. I don't think we've ever submitted a news site map.
Is there any downside to deleting the url structure they're currently looking at, which does forward to our forum? Or, would it be better to just get out of Google News altogether, since we don't really have or publish news anymore? Is there a downside to that?
To summarize... delete the url they look to as news or get out of Google News altogether... what do you think?
Thanks!
-
Are you still submitting a Google News Sitemap to Google Search Console? Because usually that's the biggest reason where these errors are coming from because Google is picking up these kind of 'new' pages/articles as news content and then seeing it doesn't match with their guidelines.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Pagination Changes
What with Google recently coming out and saying they're basically ignoring paginated pages, I'm considering the link structure of our new, sooner to launch ecommerce site (moving from an old site to a new one with identical URL structure less a few 404s). Currently our new site shows 20 products per page but with this change by Google it means that any products on pages 2, 3 and so on will suffer because google treats it like an entirely separate page as opposed to an extension of the first. The way I see it I have one option: Show every product in each category on page 1. I have Lazy Load installed on our new website so it will only load the screen a user can see and as they scroll down it loads more products, but how will google interpret this? Will Google simply see all 50-300 products per category and give the site a bad page load score because it doesn't know the Lazy Load is in place? Or will it know and account for it? Is there anything I'm missing?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | moon-boots0 -
I have implemented rel = "next" and rel = "prev" but google console is picking up pages as being duplicate. Can anyone tell me what is going on?
I have implemented rel="next" and rel = "prev" across our site but google console is picking it up as duplications. Also individual pages show up in search result too. Here is an example linkhttp://www.empowher.com/mental-health/content/sizeismweightism-how-cope-it-and-how-it-affects-mental-healthhttp://www.empowher.com/mental-health/content/sizeismweightism-how-cope-it-and-how-it-affects-mental-health?page=0,3The second link shows up as duplicate. What can i do to fix this issue?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | akih0 -
I have 6 URL errors in GSC showing a 500 error code. How do I fix?
I am not sure how to fix some errors that are popping up in Google Search Console. The response codes showing are all: 500 error code I need some advice as to how to fix these. What are my options?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | pmull0 -
Website using search term as URL brand name to cheat Google
Google has come a long way over the past 5 years, the quality updates have really helped bring top quality content to the top that is relevant for users search terms, although there is one really ANNOYING thing that still has not been fixed. Websites using brand name as service search term to manipulate Google I have got a real example but I wouldn't like to use it in case the brand mentions flags up in their tools and they spot this post, but take this search for example "Service+Location" You will get 'service+location.com' rank #1 Why? Heaven knows. They have less than 100 backlinks which are of a very low, spammy quality from directories. The content is poor compared to the competition and the competitors have amazing link profiles, great social engagement, much better website user experience and the data does not prove anything. All the competitors are targeting the same search term but yet the worst site is ranking the highest. Why on earth is Google not fixing this issue. This page we are seeing rank #1 do not even deserve to be ranking on the first 5 pages.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Jseddon920 -
Google snippet chosen why?
We have a page about buying property in the Megeve area of the Alps in France. We are No.2 on Google.co.uk for the term "megeve property for sale" and No.1 for "megeve property". http://www.prestigeproperty.co.uk/MegeveProperty/Properties.asp If you search for "megeve property for sale", Google serves our META description as the snippet: Ski chalets, homes and apartments for sale in this exclusive, prestigious Rhone Alpes village - 520000-16500000 EUR. However, we noticed that searching for just "megeve property" serves up a much better snippet taken from the text on the page: A crucial factor for potential property buyers is that there is a strong rental market in Megève and this remains high all year around with properties close to the ... Does anyone know why Google would serve this particular snippet instead of the META description. Is it the number of strong and descriptive words used, or some other reason?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PPGUKLTD0 -
Google and private networks?
I have one or two competitors (in the UK) in my field who buy expired 1 - 8 year old domains on random subjects (SEO, travel, health you name it) and they are in the printing business and they stick 1 - 2 articles (unrelated to what was on there before) on these and that's it. I think they stick with PA and DA above 30 and most have 10 – 100 links so well used expired domains, hosted in the USA and most have different Ip’s although they now have that many (over 70% of their backlink profile) that some have the same ip. On further investigation none of the blogs have any contact details but it does look like they have been a little smart here and added content to the about us (similar to I use to run xxx but now do xxx) also they have one or two tabs with content on (article length) that is on the same subject they use to do and the titles are all the same content. So basically they are finding expired 1 – 10 year old domains that have only been expired (from what I can see) 6 months max and putting 1 – 2 articles on the home page in relation with print (maybe adding a third on the subject the blog use to cover), add 1 – 3 articles via tabs at the top on subjects the sites use to cover, registering the details via xbybssgcf@whoisprivacyprotect.com and that’s it. They have been ranking via this method for the last couple of years (through all the Google updates) and still do extremely well. Does Google not have any way to combat link networks other than the stupid stuff such as public link networks, it just seems that if you know what you are doing you get away, if your big enough you get away with it but the middle of the ground (mum and pop sites) get F*** over with spam pointing to there site that no spammer would dream of doing anyway?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobAnderson0 -
Is Google applying some customized search results, even when Private Browsing?
I am including a screenshot of a very interesting search result I received while InPrivate Browsing in Google using IE9. I was spot-checking some keywords while private browsing and the first one I searched was "presonus studiolive." Then, I searched a completely unrelated term "communion supplies." I am attaching a screenshot of the search results page I then received from Google. Interesting, no? I can't even begin to wrap my head around the implications of a search results page that mixes results from two completel unrelated terms. Thoughts? 7QNxPHM.jpg
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | danatanseo0 -
Tips for Getting into Bing News?
For anyone that has gone through the process of getting accepted into Bing news---do you have any suggestions for what we can do? Any resources you'd recommend reading?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline0