Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Redirecting all URLs appended with index.htm or index.html
-
It has come to my attention with one of my clients (WordPress website) that for some time they have within their Landing Page report (of GA - Google Analytics) URLs that should all be pointing to the one page, example:
domain.com/about-us, also has a listing in GA as domain.com/about-us/index.htm
Is this some kind of indication of a subdirectory issue? Has anyone had experience with this in such wordpress plugins as Yoast SEO, or other SEO plugin?
My thoughts here are to simply redirect any of these non-existent files with a redirect in .htaccess - but what I'm using isn't working. I will insert the redirect here - - and any help would be greatly appreciated.
RewriteEngine onRewriteCond %{THE_REQUEST} ^./index.html?
RewriteRule ^(.)index.html?$ http://www.dupontservicecenter.com/$1 [R=301,L]and this rewrite doesn't work:
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^(.+).htm$ http://dupontservicecenter.com/$1.php [R,NC]_Cindy
-
ThompsonPaul,
Thank you! I've looked at that feature so many times, and read and reread the info Google provided, and clearly reading this information literally, as someone at my level would, it really doesn't specify whether adding the default page "adds" index.htm(l) to the url and therefore combines all "same-pages" or if it removes it to combine "same-pages"
-- and I assumed the later since that is what happens with permalinks in WP... go figure. Now I realize it adds. Also it didn't occur to me that this feature wouldn't act as a filter would and you would see the results right away.
OK so I have removed "index.htm" from the default page field, it is all clear now. Additionally I am also showing appended to my url's an "index.html" -- and this is in addition the actual url. So I am seeing, for example:
/about-us/ /about-us/index.htm and in some cases urls like /about-us/index.html.
I can only guess that at one time both of these default urls were in the default page setting... "index.html" and "index.htm" And anyway these pages with index.htm(l) do not exist, ...which would explain that right, likely this issue concerns settings in GA
-
So one more perplexing issue - in the search console landing page report I am showing 0 hits for any url appended with either index.htm or index.html.
-
But in the regular reporting of landing pages, and also custom reporting, these pages are showing hits (pages appended w index.htm(l)). What could cause this discrepancy?
-
As you suggestion it would take a bit of filtering to clean up these url's in Google Analytics? And so if it is in Google Analytics then any redirect in the htaccess file is for naught?
-
So a several weeks, likely for this small business site, to begin showing clean urls and to see if this is actually this issue?
Thank you so very much!
_Cindy
-
-
Thomas, thank you for your help. I did occur to me that perhaps the order of items in the htaccess file may be the issue.
I am going to look into this issue - thanks to your suggestion, and then see if my redirects are working as they should.
When I do, I'll get back to you on this topic.
Now, I'm trying to wrap my mind around the issue of why "index.htm and index html" when my site is WP based and therefore a PHP framework. ThompsonPaul has responded with what was my next look (and actually a 4th to 8th look) concerning the default page setting in GA.
Thanks again.
_Cindy -
Cindy, this is almost certainly an issue with the way your Google Analytics is configured, not your WP site. (the fact the "index.htm" comes after a "/" is the clue.
If you check the View Settings link under the View in the Admin section of your dashboard, you'll find a field called Default Page. For most correctly configured modern sites (WP sites included), this field must be empty for GA to be configured correctly. I'm betting your config has index.htm entered in that field. [See screenshot below.]
Once you remove that entry, your data will avoid the problem going forward, but it will take some work with custom filters if you want to try to clean up the historical data.
Let me know if that solves the issue?
Paul
-
Are you able to copy out your whole htaccess?
I've got to admit, i'm not the best with it but I'll try and help you figure this out
-
Hi Thomas,
Very much appreciate your reponse.
So far none of the redirects are working, including your suggestion. So I tested the htaccess file with this redirect, changing one of the redirects already listed in the htaccess file for some time now, which use to work...
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^dupontservicecenter.com/buying-and-selling$
RewriteRule ^$ http://dupontservicecenter.com/rewards/auto-service-credit [L,R=301]...not working, is redirecting to the old url, the one I changed.
I have purged cache (using litespeed cache for wp since I'm on a litespeed server these days). Could it be a purge issue? What would cause the htaccess file not to work properly?
The only redirect that is working is through a plugin for wp - quick redirects which uses the wp_redirect() function.
Totally lost in a haystack.
Any further suggestions would be helpful, otherwise, a complete, timely, breakdown of all website components will have to be proposed to the client.
_Cindy
-
https://moz.com/community/q/redirecting-index-html-to-the-root
StreamlineMetrics:
If you want to redirect all index.html(s) to their roots, then try this code -
RewriteEngine On
RewriteRule ^index.html$ / [R=301,L]
RewriteRule ^(.*)/index.html$ /$1/ [R=301,L]And yes, Google will treat them as 301 redirects so your juice will be transferred and consolidated.
Obviously, change index.html to index.htm
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Website excluded from indexing, google-selected canonical: N/A
The google search console revealed to me that none of my pages was indexed, all pages are listed in the 'excluded' section "duplicate, google chose different canonical than user".
Reporting & Analytics | | Fibigrus
But in the URL-inspection tab it shows me google-selected canonical: N/A Indexing and crawling is both allowed. Don't know how to get my pages to be indexed correctly. (by the way, they do NOT exist in other languages, so that can't be a reason why google might think they are a duplicate. There's definitively no other version of those pages available)0 -
Change Phone Number Based on Traffic Source + Ping URL for Call Tracking Number
Hi Everyone, Is there a tool that can change the phone number on a web page based on the visitor source (i.e., direct, organic, paid, etc.)? I'd like to implement a solution like this with different call tracking numbers based on the visitor source. We use the Google suite for our analytics (GA, GTM, Google Data Studio, Google Optimize is also an option as well). - Also, is there a good call tracking service that will ping a URL each time the phone number is called so that we can track these calls as events in GA? The majority of our visitors use a desktop PC and dial in the number on the screen rather than clicking (tapping) on it from a mobile device. Thanks, Andy
Reporting & Analytics | | AndyRCWRCM0 -
How to Diagnose "Crawled - Currently Not Indexed" in Google Search Console
The new Google Search Console gives a ton of information about which pages were excluded and why, but one that I'm struggling with is "crawled - currently not indexed". I have some clients that have fallen into this pit and I've identified one reason why it's occurring on some of them - they have multiple websites covering the same information (local businesses) - but others I'm completely flummoxed. Does anyone have any experience figuring this one out?
Reporting & Analytics | | brettmandoes2 -
Redirecting one domain to another using utm tags
I have two live websites, which have both been live for over 10 years, so we have plenty of backlinks to both...domain1.com & domain2.com. Domain 1 and all urls is being merged into domain2.com. So 301 redirects will be setup for every page of the site....domain1.com/abc-1234/ to > domain2.com/abc-1234/ In Google analytics for domain2.com we want to be able to see which visits we have received as a result of a redirect from domain1.com. It is possible to see these visits that come in via organic, referrals and social etc, as those will come to us with the referral as domain1.com. However, with direct traffic, i.e. if someone types domain1.com into their search bar, these visits will be assigned as direct and we are not able to tell in GA if those users have typed in domain2.com, or domain1.com to get to our webpage. There are some suggestions in forums of adding utm_source tracking to all redirects (and add canonicals to those urls pointing to the non utm_source version), but my concern is that Google is going to have to go through one extra step to reach the page on the redirected domain. So without the utm source code Google will follow this route
Reporting & Analytics | | Sayers
domain1.com/123/ to domain2.com/123/ With the utm source code Google will follow this route
domain.com/123/ to domain2.com/123/?utm_source... then see's canonical, so moves to domain2.com/123/ So essentially I am giving Google one extra step to follow before it gets to the equivalent page on the new site. Is this an issue, and/or are there any other ways to track this redirection without adding extra parameters to the url?0 -
We have a client that wants to apply UTM URL tagging to track local organic traffic in Google Analytics. Is there any benefit in doing this?
One of our clients requested that we apply UTM URL tagging to better track organic traffic in Google Analytics. We found this to be an odd request because we are most familiar with UTM tracking for special campaigns (referral tracking, PPC, email tracking, etc). Is there any benefit of applying UTM tags to urls to analyze local organic traffic in Google Analytics? Are there any resources out there about this? Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | RosemaryB0 -
How to safely exclude search result pages from Google's index?
Hello everyone,
Reporting & Analytics | | llamb
I'm wondering what's the best way to prevent/block search result pages from being indexed by Google. The way search works on my site is that search form generates URLs like:
/index.php?blah-blah-search-results-blah I wanted to block everything of that sort, but how do I do it without blocking /index.php ? Thanks in advance and have a great day everyone!0 -
Why is Google Analytics showing index.php after every page URL?
Hi, My client's site has GA tracking code gathering correct data on the site, but the pages are listed in GA as having /index.php at the end of every URL, although this does not appear when you visit the site pages. Even if there is a redirect happening for site visitors, shouldn't GA be showing the pages as their redirect destination, i.e. the URL that visitors actually see? Could this discrepancy be adversely affecting my search performance? Example page: http://freshstarttax.com/innocent-spouse/ shows up in GA as http://freshstarttax.com/innocent-spouse/index.php thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | JMagary0 -
Why are Seemingly Randomly Generated URLs Appearing as Errors in Google Webmaster Tools?
I've been confused by some URLs that are showing up as errors in our GWT account. They seem to just be randomly generated alphanumeric strings that Google is reporting as 404 errors. The pages do 404 because nothing ever existed there or was linked to. Here are some examples that are just off of our root domain: /JEzjLs2wBR0D6wILPy0RCkM/WFRnUK9JrDyRoVCnR8= /MevaBpcKoXnbHJpoTI5P42QPmQpjEPBlYffwY8Mc5I= /YAKM15iU846X/ymikGEPsdq 26PUoIYSwfb8 FBh34= I haven't been able to track down these character strings in any internet index or anywhere in our source code so I have no idea why Google is reporting them. We've been pretty vigilant lately about duplicate content and thin content issues and my concern is that there are an unspecified number of urls like this that Google thinks exist but don't really. Has anyone else seen GWT reporting errors like this for their site? Does anyone have any clue why Google would report them as errors?
Reporting & Analytics | | kimwetter0