Is any tool which is similar to LDA? Topic modeling
-
Hi friends,
earlier I used to use LDA tool of Moz but now I am unable to fetch that tool. is there any similar tool in the market to analyze the content. I have already used onpage.org.
-
Hey there!
I had a little dig into LDA (this tool was before my time) and it looks like a content relevancy analyzer. From what I understand, there are so many factors to consider in modern ranking algorithms and signals that there may not be one tool or metric that does this. Of course I could be wrong, so I hope other people jump in with their tool tips as well!
In terms of Moz tools, I can suggest the Page Optimization tool in Moz Pro and MozBar. Resources below
https://moz.com/help/guides/moz-pro-overview/on-page-optimization
https://moz.com/help/guides/research-tools/mozbar
I hope this is helpful!
Cheers!
Jo
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Related topics / content suggestion
Hello, In the related topic feature now called content suggestions https://moz.com/blog/related-topics-in-moz-pro. Are the words indicated words to include in my content or are they "topics" to talk about using words that would describe those words turning these words into concepts ? Thank you,
Moz Bar | | seoanalytics0 -
How do you use Moz to research related topics?
Like most of the folks here I'm a pretty big fan of the content that comes out through Whiteboard Fridays, and I try to apply the things I learn, but one of the WBF videos that I'm following along with does not do a stellar job of detailing execution using Moz KW Explorer. https://moz.com/blog/related-topics-in-seo-whiteboard-friday Now granted, this came out in 2016, but I still feel the core principle and strategy results in a higher quality piece of content and is still relevant to discovering and understanding searcher task completion requirements, and drafting content that fulfills those requirements. Towards the end Rand sort of mentions that you'll be able to do this with KW explorer, but I'm not really seeing the functionality. The steps I followed were to enter in the keyword in kw explorer, went to keyword suggestions, and selected "based on closely related topics" and ran it, but received no suggestions - came up blank. I then selected "based on broadly related topics" and the same thing happened. I tried this out with the keyword r22, keeping it very broad to start but that didn't seem to work. So what do you all do to perform this sort of research within Moz? Or do you even feel it's relevant in today's Rank Brain driven world?
Moz Bar | | brettmandoes0 -
I got a 404 in the Crawl Test Tool Report
I, yesterday i ran an crawl on http://www.everlastinggarden.nl and i get an 404. Does anybody know why this happens? <colgroup><col width="1535"></colgroup>
Moz Bar | | IMforYou
| # ---------------------------------------- |
| Crawl Test Tool Report | Moz,http://pro.seomoz.org/tools/crawl-test |
| www.everlastinggarden.nl |
| Report created: 15 Jul 18:34 |
| # ---------------------------------------- |
| URL,Time Crawled,Title Tag,Meta Description,HTTP Status Code,Referrer,Link Count,Content-Type Header,4XX (Client Error),5XX (Server Error),Title Missing or Empty,Duplicate Page Content,URLs with Duplicate Page Content (up to 5),Duplicate Page Title,URLs with Duplicate Title Tags (up to 5),Long URL,Overly-Dynamic URL,301 (Permanent Redirect),302 (Temporary Redirect),301/302 Target,Meta Refresh,Meta Refresh Target,Title Element Too Short,Title Element Too Long,Too Many On-Page Links,Missing Meta Description Tag,Search Engine blocked by robots.txt,Meta-robots Nofollow,Blocked by X-robots,X-Robots-Tag Header,Blocked by meta-robots,Meta Robots Tag,Rel Canonical,Rel-Canonical Target,Blocking All User Agents,Blocking Google,Blocking Yahoo,Blocking Bing,Internal Links,Linking Root Domains,External Links,Page Authority |
| http://www.everlastinggarden.nl,2014,404 : Received 404 (Not Found) error response for page.,Error attempting to request page | Best regards, Jos0 -
Have there been recent changes to the On-Page Grader tool?
I use this page all the time to grade my primary and secondary keywords and for four years now have consistently managed to achieve A-C grades for all. Today however, I noticed I am flagging F grades for 50% of the keywords. I do make a note of the initial grades for all pages (as the majority of the keywords I grade using the tool are NOT added/tracked in MOZ 'campaigns'). To make sure I wasn't going mad I went back and graded some keywords I had achieved A-C grades for just 6 days ago. The changes are as follows: keyword 1 initially graded an A - 6 days later is still an A keyword 2 initially graded C and is now graded as an F keyword 3 initially graded C and now an F keyword 4 initially a C grade and now an F keyword 5 initially a B grade and has remained a B. Out of interest I then went and added one of the keywords that is now graded an F (but last week was a C) into the 'Add and manage Page Grades' section and graded once again - it's now grading this as a C. I then removed this keyword from my tracked keywords and graded again using the 'On-Page Grader' tool and ... it's back down to an 'F'. Please could you shed some light on what's going on? I don't want to track each keyword I grade over time but I do want the parameters for grading to remain the same if I use the 'On-Page Grader' tool - what's changed? I haven't received any alerts about any changes to the tool so if anyone could shed some light on any changes I would appreciate it.
Moz Bar | | em_h_uk0 -
On the Keyword Difficulty tool what do the green boxes and ticks mean?
Hi, I'm trying to figure out what the significance of the colors are in the Keyword Difficulty tool. When I do a search some of the boxes are light green, some dark green and some of them have ticks - any ideas? Thanks, Matt
Moz Bar | | MattNW0 -
Bing data in the keyword difficulty and SERP analysis tool
Hi Guys, I'm wondering about the exact match bing data in the Moz KWD & SERP analysis tool. We're looking at the ranking difficulty for given terms in Google but getting exact match bing numbers. Is the tool estimating Google searches from the bing data (perhaps a simple formula assuming maybe 10% search totals for Bing, 60% for Google or whatever is closest these days) or is it just raw bing numbers that we then have to upsize in order to estimate search numbers in Google? Hope that makes some kind of sense! In other words - how are you guys using that Bing data when considering terms to target using this tool? Look forward to hearing your thoughts.
Moz Bar | | lovealbatross
Cheers
James0 -
Can the Moz tool identify variations of a Chinese language branded keyword?
We've recently started a trial of the Moz Pro service and are tracking a selection of keywords. Our primary band / product name is 功夫英语(Kungfu English), so we've set a rule that any keywords containing those four Chinese characters (功夫英语) should be marked as a branded keyword. However, in the "Non-Paid Keywords Sending Search Visits" section of our traffic report, we see a few variations on our brand name that are not being marked as branded keywords. (See attached Images). Based on our rules, shouldn't these variations also be marked as branded keywords without our needing to manually add them as such? Or have I misunderstood the intent of this rule? For the English text, the brand rule about words containing "kungfuenglish" seems to have resulted in all of "www.kungfuenglish.com", "http://www.kungfuenglish.com", and kungfuenglish being labelled as branded keywords. However, I'm not seeing the same sort of result with variations on the Chinese keyword, 功夫英语. KedTi1D.png z5bcUIt.png
Moz Bar | | PaulCoffey0 -
Why do my top linking domains according to Webmaster tools, not even appear in my OSE report?
I know the Google index is obviously a lot larger than the MOZ index...but.... I have 8,000 links from blogspot.com according to Webmaster tools, and just one link according to OSE I have 600 links from an online dictionary according to Webmaster tools, not one is mentioned in my OSE report. I'd go so far as to say most of my top 10 linking domains according to Webmaster Tools, don't even have a single mention in my OSE report. We've been hit hard by Penguin 2.0 and I want to look at our link profile.....it seems OSE may be great for looking at my competitors link profiles, but for my own site it seems to be, well, not very accurate at all! So from a trying to do undo the damage caused by Penguin 2.0 point of view, should I just use webmaster tools and forget about OSE? Thanks!
Moz Bar | | MarbellaSurferDude0