Question on Indexing, Hreflang tag, Canonical
-
Dear All,
Have a question.
We've a client (pharma), who has a prescription medicine approved only in the US, and has only one global site at .com which is accessed by all their target audience all over the world.
For the rest of the US, we can create a replica of the home page (which actually features that drug), minus the existence of the medicine, and set IP filter so that non-US traffic see the duplicate of the home page.Question is, how best to tackle this semi-duplicate page. Possibly no-index won't do because that will block the site from the non-US geography. Hreflang won't work here possibly, because we are not dealing different languages, we are dealing same language (En) but different Geographies.
Canonical might be the best way to go?
Wanted to have an insight from the experts.
Thanks,
Suparno (for Jeff) -
Any time always happy to help me let me know if I can be of any service in the future.
-
Thanks Tom for all the insights and details.
suparno
-
-
Hi Suparno,
Yes you can by using the /x/ page to list Languages that you offer you can utilize it to tell users what language's you offer. But keep your site the way it is (for the USA) so it would look like this. One lang page & then making "/" the US site/folder.
Does that make sense?
Let me know if you have any other questions.
all the best,
Tom
-
Hi Tom,
Sorry, one more question, trying to narrow down.
So, we can use:for the rest of the world page
and
for the US site.
Am I correct?
suparno
-
Hi Suparno,
Happy to be of help.
PS.
I know one thing that has made a very big difference for me. If you are going to use one domain to rank all over the world using subfolders. By matching a server near users with a web-based load balancer like (GSLB) global server load balancer you can keep users very happy.
I have seen the best from Fastly & Incapsula
- https://www.fastly.com/products/load-balancing
- or
- https://www.incapsula.com/global-server-load-balancing.html
All the best,
Tom
-
Thanks Tom, this should be good enough, many thanks.
suparno
-
"So, the question is how do we tackle that .../ex-us home page, which will be an almost duplicate of example.com"
Make the x page /x & tell people that what types of English you have with it.
Then on /en-us/ use the USA based content you have now you can even skip the
hreflang="x-default" href="https://example.com/
&
Use
I would use
The bottom four to start going after the rest of the world if you add hreflang the page is not thought of a duplicate page.
Try making tags using https://www.sistrix.com/hreflang-guide/hreflang-generator/
Wach this video by Google https://youtu.be/8ce9jv91beQ
This tell's you everything https://www.sistrix.com/hreflang-guide/ about duplicate content & hreflang
Hope this helps,
Tom
-
Hi David and Tom,
Many thanks for all the details and references and combining my reply. And BTW, I'm Suparno, our agency account is in Jeff's name, anyways.I thought of hreflang tags, but here is the point. We can force EN-US for US site, but how can we tackle the rest of the world. They won't be willing to go for all (major) country specific pages and tags, because So in practical scenario, it will be example.com for the US and and example.com/ex-us for the rest of the world. So, the question is how do we tackle that .../ex-us home page, which will be an almost duplicate of example.com
LMK your thoughts.
suparno
-
Hi David and Tom,
Many thanks for all the details and references and combining my reply. And BTW, I'm Suparno, our agency account is in Jeff's name, anyways.I thought of hreflang tags, but here is the point. We can force EN-US for US site, but how can we tackle the rest of the world. They won't be willing to go for all (major) country specific pages and tags, because So in practical scenario, it will be example.com for the US and and example.com/ex-us for the rest of the world. So, the question is how do we tackle that .../ex-us home page, which will be an almost duplicate of example.com
LMK your thoughts.
suparno
-
Hi Jeff,
I agree with what David said. I think the only way to do it you're talking about is with Hreflang ideally you would use that technology to accomplish dealing the same language (En) but different geographies you will need to put pricing everything in the native countries correct format. Great Britain and Canada spell color differently than the United States take that into account as well as it's extremely important.
Take a look at this tool and if you can create the country you wish to specify and keep English as the language which you can and you can create hreflang tags ( I left a good amount of references below to get you started)
- A tool to make the URLs: https://www.aleydasolis.com/english/international-seo-tools/hreflang-tags-generator/
now keep in mind this is nowhere near perfect but this would be something you could easily do remember English is written differently all over the world and you want to take advantage of that when you write the content for Great Britain or for Canada.
or
Usage: The markup for the part of the HTML document:
-
example.com/en-gb: For English-speaking users in the UK
-
example.com/en-us: For English-speaking users in the USA
-
example.com/en-au: For English-speaking users in Australia
-
example.com/: The homepage may, for example, display a list of countries to chose from and is defined as the default page for users worldwide
-
https://moz.com/community/q/can-you-target-the-same-site-with-multiple-regional-hreflang-entries
-
https://www.semrush.com/blog/7-common-hreflang-mistakes-and-how-to-fix-them/
Hope that helps,
Tom
-
Hi Jeff,
You can use hreflang to target the same language in different regions.
Google provide a good example of this about halfway down this page: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/189077?hl=en
Like in the example here, you may want to use the US version of the site as the English default and specify regions for the rest.
Cheers,
David
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
301 Question - issue
A while back we had a 'bleed' on one of our sites, which basically meant one of our sites started to leak across pages to another and that site started to rank for the same pages and now we have hundreds of pages ranking for urls that do not exists. It's hard to explain, bare with me. If you were to click on the cached view in Google for the ranked page it would show you the main site, but if you were to click it as usual, then you would be taken to the site but a 404 would show as the intended page was not for that site. We believe we fixed the 'bleed' and have setup 301s for all the affected pages to go to the home page for the site it affected. But these pages have not been removed from Google, which we thought a 301 would do. So we still have hundreds of pages being ranked but are redirected to the home page. Why hasn't these pages been removed?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JH_OffLimits0 -
VisitSweden indexing error
Hi all Just got a new site up about weekend travel for VisitSweden, the official tourism office of Sweden. Everything went just fine except som issues with indexing. The site can be found here at weekend.visitsweden.com/no/ For some weird reason the "frontpage" of the site does not get indexed. What I have done myself to find the issue: Added sitemaps.xml Configured and added site to webmaster tools Checked 301s so they are not faulty By doing a simple site:weekend.visitsweden.com/no/ you can see that the frontpage is simple not in the index. Also by doing a cache:weekend.visitsweden.com/no/ I see that Google tries to index the page without the trailing /no/ for some reason. http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://weekend.visitsweden.com/no/ Any smart ideas to get this fixed or where to start looking? All help greatly appreciated Kind regards Fredrik
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Resultify0 -
Will Canonical tag on parameter URLs remove those URL's from Index, and preserve link juice?
My website has 43,000 pages indexed by Google. Almost all of these pages are URLs that have parameters in them, creating duplicate content. I have external links pointing to those URLs that have parameters in them. If I add the canonical tag to these parameter URLs, will that remove those pages from the Google index, or do I need to do something more to remove those pages from the index? Ex: www.website.com/boats/show/tuna-fishing/?TID=shkfsvdi_dc%ficol (has link pointing here)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | partnerf
www.website.com/boats/show/tuna-fishing/ (canonical URL) Thanks for your help. Rob0 -
Canonical OR redirect
Hi, i've a site about sport which cover matches. for each match i've a page. last week there was a match between: T1 v T2 so a page was created: www.domain.com/match/T1vT2 - Page1 this week T2 host T1, so there's a new page www.domain.com/match/T2vT1 - Page2 each page has a unique content with Authorship, but the URL, Title, Description, H1 look very similar cause the only difference is T2 word before T1. though Page2 is available for a few days, on site links & sitemap, for the search query "T2 T1 match" Page1 appears on the SERP (high location). of course i want Page2 to be on SERP for the above query cause it's the relevant match. i even don't see Page2 anywhere on the SERP and i think it wasn't indexed. Questions: 1. do you think google see both pages as duplicated though the content is different? 2. is there a difference when you search for T1 vs T2 OR T2 vs T1 ? 3. should i redirect 301 Page1 to Page2? consider that all content for Page1 and the Authorship G+ will be lost. 4. should i make rel=canonical on Page1 to Page2? 5. should i let google sort it out? i know it's a long one, thanks for your patience. Thanks, Assaf
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | stassaf0 -
Is link juice passed through a 301 and a canonical tag?
Hi all, I am led to believe that link juice does not pass through more than one 301 redirect, however what about a 301 and then a canonical meta tag? Here is an example: subdomain.site.com/uk/page/ -> 301 -> **www.**site.com/uk/page/ www.site.com**/uk/**page/ -> canonical -> www.site.com/page/ Thanks,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Further
Chris0 -
SEOMOZ Diagram question
Hi, On this SEOMOZ help page (http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/internal-link) the diagram explaining the optimal link structure (image also attached) has me a little confused. From the homepage, if the bot crawls down the right-hand link first, will it not just hit a dead end where it cant crawl any further and disappear? OR... will it hit the end of the structure and then crawl backwards to the homepage again and follow down another link and then just repeat the process until all pages are indexed? Cheers pyramid.jpg
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | activitysuper0 -
To "Rel canon" or not to "Rel canon" that is the question
Looking for some input on a SEO situation that I'm struggling with. I guess you could say it's a usability vs Google situation. The situation is as follows: On a specific shop (lets say it's selling t-shirts). The products are sorted as follows each t-shit have a master and x number of variants (a color). we have a product listing in this listing all the different colors (variants) are shown. When you click one of the t-shirts (eg: blue) you get redirected to the product master, where some code on the page tells the master that it should change the color selectors to the blue color. This information the page gets from a query string in the URL. Now I could let Google index each URL for each color, and sort it out that way. except for the fact that the text doesn't change at all. Only thing that changes is the product image and that is changed with ajax in such a way that Google, most likely, won't notice that fact. ergo producing "duplicate content" problems. Ok! So I could sort this problem with a "rel canon" but then we are in a situation where the only thing that tells Google that we are talking about a blue t-shirt is the link to the master from the product listing. We end up in a situation where the master is the only one getting indexed, not a problem except for when people come from google directly to the product, I have no way of telling what color the costumer is looking for and hence won't know what image to serve her. Now I could tell my client that they have to write a unique text for each varient but with 100 of thousands of variant combinations this is not realistic ir a real good solution. I kinda need a new idea, any input idea or brain wave would be very welcome. 🙂
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ReneReinholdt0 -
Original Source and Canonical tags
We've been using canonical links to protect site SEO for contributor content and requiring canonical of our partners (as well as tagging internal duplicate content with canonical). Most other media sites have been doing the same but this is a moving target. I'm now hearing that the original source tag is now a better option. Special focus for us is placement on google news. Any guidance?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jbertfield0