Can Sitemap Be Used to Manage Canonical URLs?
-
We have a duplicate content challenge that likely has contributed to us loosing SERPs especially for generic keywords such as "audiobook," "audiobooks," "audio book," and "audio books."
Our duplicate content is on two levels.
1. The first level is at our web store, www.audiobooksonline.com.
Audiobooks are sometimes published in abridged, unabridged, on compact discs, on MP3 CD by the same publisher. In this case we use the publisher description of the story for each "flavor" = duplicate content.
Can we use our sitemap to identify only one "flavor" so that a spider doesn't index the others?
2. The second level is that most online merchants of the same publisher's audio book use the same description of the story = lots of duplicate content on the Web.
In that we have 11,000+ audio book titles offered at our Web store, I expect Google sees us as having lots of duplicated (on the Web) content and devalues our site.
Some of our competitors who rank very high for our generic keywords use the same publisher's description.
Any suggestions on how we could make our individual audio book title pages unique will be greatly appreciated.
-
Your sitemap.xml can't be used to solve this issue, Larry. The sitemap is only used to tell the search engines which pages exist on the site, not what to do if many of those pages share similar content.
In your case, likely the best approach is to use the rel=canonical tag to inform the search engines that you aware that the different formats of the audiobooks share similar descriptions, and to pick one format to be the primary page. Once you've determined the primary page, the other formats' pages would use the canonical tag in their headers to point to the primary page.
This essentially tells the search engines "these other pages are useful to the user, so I don't want to hide them, but they are really variations of the primary page, so assign all their value to the primary page, please".
This process is only a suggestion to the search engines, but it is usually heeded. The only real alternative would be to combine all the different format pages into one page with a description of the book, then listing the other formats and their prices. Kinda doubt your eCommerce system would allow this "out of the box". (You would then 301-redirect all the other format pages to the new main page.)
As for the fact that the book descriptions are the same as the publisher's and all the other sites - the only way around this is to write your own custom descriptions. There are many reasons the other sites could be ranking well even with those duplicate descriptions, ranging from better overall site authority, to having been online longer, to having better, more powerful incoming links.
It's a tough spot to be in, but you could start by rewriting the descriptions for, say, the top 25 books (according to your Analytics and your own instincts for which ones are the most valuable sales) and see if that results in an improvement to rankings and conversions.
One other way to beat the duplicate content in this case would be to get customers to leave reviews which are included on each page. These reviews would be different from other sites, making the overall content look different to the search engines. But this is also a lot of work to get to scale up as your customers must be encouraged to come back to your site at a later date to leave the review.
Hope that helps;
Paul
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can we use internal no-follow links without negatively affecting rankings
we are creating a site structure for a travel website. the site homepage has a top navigation bar with 8 top level links and a total link count of 33 links in this (within menus). There are also 10 footer and ad-hoc links As this top navigation bar is a site-wide navigation, when entering s specific "travel destination" page, the "travel destination" page has its own contextual links and reference links, making the total inks on the destination page approx 107. do you think its ok to make all links in the top navigation bar no follow on all pages except the homepage? how would you approach this to create less links to maintain effective link-juice flow to required pages
On-Page Optimization | | Direct_Ram0 -
Google is indexing urls with parameters despite canonical
Hello Moz, Google is indexing lots of urls despite the canonical in my site. Those urls are linked all over the site with parameters like ?, and looks like Google is indexing them despite de canonical. Is Google deciding to index those urls because they are linked all over the site? The canonical tag is well implemented.
On-Page Optimization | | Red_educativa0 -
Should I be using the town or city in url with my keyword or keyphrase?
should I be using the town or city in url with my keyword or keyphrase? So lets say I'm trying to rank for butchers in home town should i put the town in the url as well so www.website.com/butchers-in-mytown is that bad? Or would it be best to just put www.website.com/butchers?
On-Page Optimization | | genkee0 -
Url structure with dash or slash
Hi There We have a content website. We don't rank well category image related searches but we get quite good traffic for those keywords. Those keywords are mostly like "category images". We want to change our url structure and we have 2 options now. 1- domain.com/category/category-images 2-domain.com/category/images option 1 repeats the category name so it looks spammy option 2 doesn't really have the keyword. any ideas which one tho choose? Thanks! ps: we don't want to use domain.com/category-images (too many root link)
On-Page Optimization | | muminaydin0 -
Ref = Canonical
Does it make sense to use the Canonical statement on pages on your web site that already have the correct URL. Or, should I ask, "Does it do any harm?"
On-Page Optimization | | JustInsulation0 -
Long URLs
Many URLs of my site are long due to long navigation paths. Here is an example: http://tinyurl.com/6qc4syb. My question is, if I shorten the urls (which I probably should do), does it matter that they no longer follow the navigation path?
On-Page Optimization | | rdreich490 -
Meta refresh - nojavascript url
seomox is telling me that I am getting a page that is not being indexed or crawled and since the crawl status code is 200 and there are no robots the meta-refresh url must be the problem. the meta refresh url is different than the on page report card url as it's the nojavascript url which my developer says should be ok. see his comments below. The is redirecting to http://mastermindtoys.com/store/nojavascript.html only in case if the JavaScript is disabled in the client browser. This is the right way to do it, I don’t understand why this might be a problem, otherwise MM has to implement Noscript pages that have a real content. I didn’t get what’s wrong about accessibility. The code 200 means it is accessible, and yes there is nothing to access if JavaScript is disabled on browser. I think there are no modern retail sites that would do any sensible business with the scripting disabled in browsers.The H1 is really present 2 times and second occurrence can be removed, though I highly doubt about importance of this change.Regarding duplicates – what URLs are considered duplicates? Can you please send me examples?I am not aware of canonical URL problem for MM site unless we consider old .asp links as duplicate links of the canonical product pages. I would appreciate if SEOMoz gave us an example what they mean.I suspect that the page is not getting indexed as a result of this or I'm just not getting a good score. Which is it?
On-Page Optimization | | mastermindtoys0 -
Url question for seo
Would it be beneficial to use url that is a match for my keyword to help with seo, then have my currently url forward to that one so I don't have to change any marketing materials? I was one of the feedback that I got when doing the on page keyword optimization tool on seo moz. Thanks J
On-Page Optimization | | fertilityhealth0