Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Endless Scrolling and prev/next
-
Hi,
We have a new website on https://www.neakriti.gr We have asked for endless scrolling between our articles, so when we get at the end of one article, the next loads.
Looking at the produced html code I saw the articles contain and to other articles.
When I asked the development team why this happens, I got a reply that its needed for the endless scroll of the articles. But to my understanding "prev" and "next" is only used on pagination cases, and endless scroll between articles has nothing to do pagination.
Here is an example article
https://www.neakriti.gr/article/ellada-nea/1524252/fthinoporinos-o-kairos-tin-tetarti-stin-kriti-deite-analutika-tin-prognosi/If you "view html code" on that article you will see this "next", "prev" declarations to other articles.
Can anyone please let me know if the declaration of "prev" and "next" articles should stay or if I should ask the development team to remove it?
Thanks
-
Thank you for your reply.
I however am unable to see the problem you describe. Even at the page code you pasted, I see that the canonical URL is the same:
Where the canonical URL of the page is the same as the page
https://www.neakriti.gr/article/kriti/irakleio/1524790/eftase-stin-kriti-o-nikos-kotzias/When you scroll down, the URL changes and if you "view code" of the updated page that was appended you see the new canonical URL.
Can you please explain me your findings as I am unable to replicate it?
-
Hi,
One extremely good reason why you may want to consider using pagination.
I just found a separate canonical pointing at a different page URL when I used your infinite scroll
**Your URL & your canonical Do not match it would be okay if: **you are trying to send traffic to a different URL that is off-site. Now if it is on-site canonical's most of the time are better handled by 301's or 302 Plus this happened on 25 URLs in a row so it i is an attempt to direct traffic somewhere else.
SEE:
-
** Title**
-
Έφτασε στην Κρήτη ο Νίκος Κοτζιάς [Length:33]
-
Page Url
https://www.neakriti.gr/article/kriti/irakleio/1524790/eftase-stin-kriti-o-nikos-kotzias/ -
Canonical
-
https://www.neakriti.gr/article/kriti/irakleio/1524813/mnimes-apo-ton-thanato-tou-kosta-katsouli/
page code:
You can't do this without changing URLs Please think about site structure and how if you check your Google analytics I guarantee you the deeper you get away from the homepage the less traffic you get. The golden rule is no more than three clicks from the homepage meaning if land on the homepage and I want to find an article about X, Y, and Z I am going to be able to find those articles through your navigation taking me (in an ideal world) no more than clicks from the homepage.
if you have a really powerful brand something that is a household name forget what I said you can do whatever you want. If you do not you, unfortunately, have one place where you have to find a huge amount of links and the only way you can do it is by scrolling so if I want to show my friend the article that you wrote and I did not share that article or bookmark it I cannot find it unless I scroll through a large amount of other and hopefully find it. Google is not going to endlessly crawl URLs that are not together internally and through a solid site structure. You need to remember that site structure is one of the most important things to building a website. If you create URL structure that hard for people and Google to crawl you will get extremely poor results.
If you really feel the need to do this make sure you add pagination to the bottom and you have a footer that people can actually access during the entire experience. If you look at this entire page you will notice there is pagination on the bottom just like the 1-2-3 style examples below. Yet you can do what appears to be very similar to infinite scrolling, however, there is an enormous difference in this you notice there are pages listed every X amount of items. And you can simply go to what you need to go. to using pagination on the bottom see pictures.
make sure to check Google's index though I would be careful nonetheless. https://www.google.com/search?q=site:www.neakriti.gr/+inurl:page
https://www.google.gr/search?q=site:www.neakriti.gr/+inurl:page
and most importantly when I go to the CRM build and host your site I see that they the time to chapter different parts of each unique page showing me that they are not using infinite scrolling while yes the pages may be large they are using
- https://www.example.com/subfolder/subfolder/#name-of-chapter
- https://www.atcom.gr/technology/netvolution/#BENEFITS
- Your site
- https://www.neakriti.gr/article/kriti/1449099/sti-martyriki-bianno-parelasan-gia-to-oxi-video/
Use this to find some problems with AMP
-
It shows me this:
-
Link to AMP detected on submitted URL
-
You may have entered URL of a canonical page. This page links to the following AMP URL:
-
https://www.neakriti.gr/article/kriti/irakleio/1524790/eftase-stin-kriti-o-nikos-kotzias/AMP/
Stick to what works I like that you have the bar on top showing me how far I have scrolled however I'm used to it telling me how far down the page I've gone not how far down I have gone on an
Page Url
https://www.neakriti.gr/article/kriti/irakleio/1524790/eftase-stin-kriti-o-nikos-kotzias/
Title
Έφτασε στην Κρήτη ο Νίκος Κοτζιάς [Length:33]
Meta Description
Στο εδώλιο του δευτεροβάθμιου δικαστηρίου θα καθίσουν 4 άτομα [Length:61]
Meta Keywords
Ηράκλειο, Κώστας Κατσούλης
Canonical
https://www.neakriti.gr/article/kriti/irakleio/1524813/mnimes-apo-ton-thanato-tou-kosta-katsouli/ Meta Robotsindex, followImagesmages on Page: 86
Images Without Alt Text: 26Headings (you have 5)
| |
- H1
- 1
|
- Μνήμες από την υπόθεση θανάτου του Κώστα Κατσούλη
- 2
|
- Θέρισος: Στο χειρουργείο ο άνδρας που έπεσε από ταράτσα και διαπέρασε πέργκολα
- 3
|
- Ν. Κοτζιάς: «Το στόμα μου δεν κλείνει, εγώ δεν εκβιάζω, ούτε εκβιάζομαι»
- 4
|
- «Συναυλία αγάπης» για το Παιδικό Χωριό SOS Κρήτης
- 5
|
- Έφτασε στην Κρήτη ο Νίκος Κοτζιάς
|
Hopr this helps,Tom
-
-
I hate to say this to but endless scrolling is a terrible when it comes to search. It is honestly one of the worst things you can do for your site unless you’re very well recognized brand. For instance Instagram can get away with this type of stuff 99% of sites cannot pagination is great for what you want to do please remember Google has to crawl? With paginated pages You get a a different page
https://parallelpath.com/blog/the-downfalls-of-infinite-scroll-websites-on-seo
https://www.bruceclay.com/blog/infinite-scrolling-seo-risks/
https://yoast.com/pagination-infinite-scrolling/
https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2014/02/infinite-scroll-search-friendly.html?m=1
Any time you implement JavaScript-enabled features, you run the risk of making it harder for search engines, like Google, Yahoo and Bing, to crawl your site’s content.
If You are not showing the content until somebody scrolls to it I see that you are changing the URL which is excellent. I know that you’re using Ajax to do that from what I can see and unfortunately that is not going to be very good for seo .
I think it’s great that you have the bar at the top showing how far someone scroll I just think that you need to separate these into pages look at Google them selves you get Max 10 links at the bottom you get a next that’s Page
-
Prev/next should be used for telling Search Engines when there are similar looking/content pages. Considering the infinite scroll changes the page itself, prev/next are not necessary at all.
_"How can we implement this?" - _well, that's what your dev team is for, right Is it possible? - everything is possible. Again, the example I sent you was just the first example which came up in google for me, which seemed decent to me. I haven't looked too much into it, i didn't do any digging.
"Google is your friend, my friend"
-
Hi,
thank you for your response. I am looking at the example page you showed me.
-
So I should ask them to remove the "prev"/"next" then right? It only causes confusion to the search engines that all the articles are a series of a single article somehow, right?
-
There is something additional I noticed during the endless scroll there, the "back button"...
On our website every time a new article is appended at the end, the URL changes too, but going back in history (pressing the back button) takes you back to the previous article of the endless scroll... so if you scrolled lets say 5 times with endless scrolling, you have to press 6 times the back button to get back to the home page... But interestingly on what you sent me this doesn't happen with the navigation history.
I told the development team that I didn't want the "back button" to take me to the previous URLs of the endless scroll, but they replied to me that this was not possible...
How can we implement this?
-
-
Hi there.
You are correct, it's not necessary at all to have prev/next for endless scroll. There are plenty of other methods to trigger the load on scroll. simply google "endless scrolling examples" and make your pick. One of them at the top - https://infinite-scroll.com/demo/full-page/ no prev/next at all.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
AdultBlock scam? Is there a downside to doing this instead....?
So our IT guy just sent me an email from our domain registrar, encouraging us to sign up for an annual 'adultblock' service. For those that aren't sure what this is... Adultblock represents a straightforward mechanism that enables qualifying organizations to block the registration of any domain that falls under their trademark. This includes unlimited variants based on the holder's labels. Instead of worrying about registering and managing many different adult related TLDs, it is possible to block trademarked domains under all four TLDs for up to ten years through just one action. Unfortunately, this service is not cheap, and I'm starting to wonder about the 'downside' of NOT doing it. Does anyone know if just purchasing the adult related TLDs for our domain, and then just sitting on them, would have any sort of negative effect on our SEO? Alternatively, could we just set an alert for when / if those domains ever get purchased and then just disavow those sites in search console? Thanks!!
Branding | | av-seo0 -
Why not just use an alias if the only change is a different domain Name?
We are rebranding our store with a new name. We have purchased a NewDomainName. Can I just make the "Old Domain Name" an alias for the "NewDomainName"? The site will not change in any other way than having a new logo. This is an e-commerce site with over 100 categories of artisan made products. So once we move the site, the old domain will be empty. Thank you Stephen
Branding | | stephenfishman1 -
Should our rebranded company update our existing Instagram profile or delete it and start from scratch?
Our company just did a complete rebrand with a new name and logo. Instagram allows us to change our name, username, logo, and information, unlike Facebook, but there isn't a lot of online content about whether or not that's the best route. Any thoughts?
Branding | | RyanHeffernon0 -
How does the background on my product photos impact SEO - step and repeat vs. plain background
I have a new e-commerce site and I'm focused on optimizing it for SEO. If I am taking product photos, will having a step-and-repeat (background with our logo repeated) in the background of the product impact how the images are scanned by Google? In other words, would I benefit from having a plain background behind my item shots vs. a backdrop with our logos all across it? I don't want Google to think I'm spamming my logo across all our items, but also want our photos to be recognized as ours. I want to gain SEO from my effort and definitely not hurt it! Thanks!
Branding | | A_Wo0 -
Rate My Logo!
Hey guys, Can't for the life of me decide which color pallet to use for this logo, so please let me know your thoughts! The logo is for a website that specialises in Instagram social media marketing - So without further ado... Green, Blue or Blue with Red Heart? Thoughts, feedback and anything else you want to add! DBFnY
Branding | | camille10 -
Organic Brand Clicks/Traffic Drop - Why?
Hi Moz Community, I've been reviewing Search Console and have been noticing that there has been a consistent drop in brand clicks. The overall number of keywords (especially for the top 2 pages) have been increasing, according to SEMRUSH, however, traffic and sales are still in decline. There are no algorithmic and manual penalties, in addition, paid search activity has been increasing in the leadup to Christmas. Has anyone experienced this and potentially advise how to diagnose and resolve this issue?
Branding | | rec1230 -
In the Google search results, the company name (with the drop down arrow) next to the result URL is incorrect. The company being displayed here is a company we acquired many years back. How do I adjust/fix this?
When I search any term for my organization, we are getting good results BUT the company name, next to the results URL is of an orgnization we acquired many years back and not the name of our company. The URL is correct page JUST the company name next to this URL is incorrect on the Google search results page. How do I go about changing so the company name next to the URL ?
Branding | | DigitalNTT0 -
Rebranding/Url Structure Change
Hi Everyone, First off thanks for taking the time to looking at my question. I was wondering about rebranding and URL structure changes. Right now my company is planning on changing their domain and doing a massive change to their site which includes a url structure change. The idea is in September they will be changing the site to be a combination of wordpress and ruby on rails (currently the site is ruby on rails). The homepage and design on the site will be completely different and parts of the site will be in php and other parts will be in ruby. The URL structure will also be changing completely at the same time. Each page will be completely different in structure, including the homepage (currently now it redirects you to a subfolder page that is your local page [i.e. nyc if you are in new york]). Then, the following month, they will be changing their domain name to a different domain. I have asked them to do this in stages. First the domain, second the rebrand, and third the URL restructuring or we could lose SEO traffic but they asked a freelancer his opinion and the freelancer said that you could do the rebrand change with the URL restructure and then domain later and while you're SEO may disappear, it'll definitely return in 3 to 4 months. Could you tell me who is right and what the correct method is to make this change?
Branding | | MattJD0