Why Would My Page Have a Higher PA and DA, Links & On-Page Grade & Still Not Rank?
-
The Search Term is "Alcohol Ink" and our client has a better page authority, domain authority, links to the page, and on-page grade than those in the SERP for spaces 5-10 and we're not even ranked in the top 51+ according to Moz's tracker.
The only difference I can see is that our URL doesn't use the exact text like some of the 5-10 do. However, regardless of this, our on-page grade is significantly higher than the rest of them.
The one thing I found was that there were two links to the page (that we never asked for) that had a spam score in the low 20's and another in the low 30's.
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to maybe get around this?
Certainly, a content campaign and linking campaign around this could also help but I'm kind of scratching my head. The client is reputable, with a solid domain age and well recognized in the space so it's not like it's a noob trying to get in out of nowhere.
-
You are more than welcome.
I know I really enjoy answering questions on here and I suspect that EffectDigital does as well.
Please do let us know how you get on either directly or by replying to this post, that is one thing that is lacking when we respond to questions on any forum. People don't always let us know the results of our answers.
I wish you all the best working with what sounds to be a good client and hope to see more of you on the forums.
Steve
-
Thank you both for your additional information.
I was aware of most of the content that you've published here. However, you've taken my understanding and painted a very helpful "big picture" that takes a step back to understand all the factors at play.
It's been very helpful to me as it reminds me that there likely isn't a "magic fix" but that through continual work on the body of the business/website, and through continual differentiation and creation of great content, over the long-term we should be well positioned to compete even further.
Part of this question comes from a deep dive into trying to understand what's taken place for the client overall as there wasn't a lot of SEO work done at all over the history of the business and they've still managed to be very successful.
This company was a pioneer in their space, they're such wonderful people and such a wonderful company that they were able to grow significantly. Now, as competitors have crept in because of their success, and have deployed strong SEO strategies, they're starting to see their first shift from the major growth scale.
We have the closest thing to a "magic fix" that you can have which is moving their blog from the separate URL that it's presently on with its millions of links, to be attached to its main eCommerce site. There is some apprehension on their part with making this move too quickly (which is understandable). And so I'm really trying to paint an overall picture as you've just helped paint so that they can understand, what we can do from here (without moving the blog) and what that looks like.
Your answers have been so tremendously helpful to guiding the millions of thoughts in my head to something that's actionable and a great way to explain it and I just wanted to thank you both very much for your answers because I know you're also busy people, with a lot to do.
Thanks so much!
-
Not a problem! I always like these kinds of Qs and responses as they cover a bit of the history of SEO
-
Thanks EffectDigital,
Again your answer takes it to a new level though and provides great insights.
-
Steve's answer is really great. Basically in SEO we have to cater to Google's PageRank algorithm. We used to be able to see a very watered down, simplified version of PageRank using the Google toolbar for Firefox (before Chrome became big) and using various Chrome extensions thereafter
Google figured out that people were misusing this data and shut off the API which supplied the (very, very simplified version of) PageRank (a number for 0-10 for each URL on the web). PageRank still exists and Google still use it in their ranking algorithms, but no one except Googlers (and even then, only certain ones) can see it. Arguably no one could ever really see it, as TBPR (Toolbar PageRank) was really simplified and watered down, it was never a full view on a page's 'actual' PageRank
Suddenly, marketers had no way to evaluate the SEO authority of each web page they were looking at. Many stepped in to fill this hole (Ahrefs supply a URL and domain rating metric, Majestic SEO supply Citation Flow and Trust Flow metrics, Moz of course were first with PA and DA)
These metrics are our industry's attempt to fill a hole left by Google's removal of bad data from the public eye. Moz attempt to use various signals and metrics (link counts, search traffic estimates for URLs) to re-build TBPR as PA and DA
... but Google don't use PA and DA. Google use PR (PageRank). PA and DA are 'shadow metrics', they indicate and mimic but they are indicators only and cannot (read: absolutely must not) be taken at face value
For example, although link counts affected Google's old TBPR (Toolbar PageRank) metric, other things did too. If a site was blocked from Google, if a site had a penalty or algorithmic devaluations. Those things could lower or nullify the TBPR rating of a website. Since Google and Moz are not 'connected' in data terms, Moz's metrics miss many of the 'true' authority nullifying circumstances which could occur - thus you can end up with high PA / DA and still no traffic
Things that can affect you:
- Algorithmic devaluations, where the sites linking to your site are penalised and thus they no longer pass SEO authority to you - making your results go down as well. Not a penalty, just Darwinism in action I am afraid
- An actual penalty on your site
- Poor keyword targeting where your keywords aren't properly used in your content and / or Meta data, stuff like that. Sounds like this one is a real concern for you, as you may have SEO authority but NO relevance!
- Technical issues like an architecture which Google can't (or doesn't want to spend the time to) index, e.g: over-reliance on generated content through JavaScript (which Google can crawl, but it takes them much longer - so if you're a nobody don't expect them to care much or take that time)
- Technical indexation issues like blocking your own site with Meta no-index directives or robots.txt crawl blocks
- Legal challenges to your business or content in the form of DMCA requests, people filing reports directly with Google to have content removed from your site - there are many other types of legal challenge that can affect SEO
- Content duplication, internal or external
- Spam reports and disavow logs against your website
... there are many other factors, a big one is that your site may lack a value-proposition for end users. If other sites doing what you do, existed before you - and they're cheaper, have better reviews or tout unique features like free shipping (click fit and collect services for clothing, etc etc) then your offering itself may just not be competitive (and no matter how good your SEO is the site was doomed from the business end). Google expects sites to 'add value' to the web
The best thing to do is concentrate on your value proposition and making your site genuinely popular online. It's not easy. Building a successful site is as hard as building a successful business, it's just the digital reflection of what you are and what you do
-
Hi,
The first thing to remember, Google rankings do not use MOZ DA or PA to decide where a website should be ranked in the results.
The best way to use DA and PA are as an arbitrary measurement that allows you to compare against other sites, so you can see how you are doing against your competitors.
Now without knowing the URLs involved, I cannot check the websites to give any real insights. However, there is any number of reasons why the other sites may be ranking higher than your clients.
They may have better content for the keyword. They may have more backlinks pointing to the domain, they may be answering questions regarding that keyword in more detail.
Without actually being able to compare the sites it is hard to say.
I would analyse the sites that are higher than yours, check the backlink profiles, compare the number of pages and compare the quality of the content then you should have a plan to move forward and improve your rankings.
I hope this helps,
Steve
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Links on page
Hi I have a web page which lists about 50-60 products which links out to either a pdf on the product or the main manufacturers website page containing product detail. The site in non e-commerce is this the site/page likely to get hit by Penguin? Would it be best to create a separate page for the product/manufacturer group i.e 5 or 6 pages but linking out to the PDFs etc...?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Cocoonfxmedia0 -
Ranking for homepage & category page?
We lost our Google organic ranking (position 1 - 3) for our highest converting key phrase (cotton tees) in February. The ranking was for our homepage (brandname.com) which is very image heavy and doesn't have much readable content. We noticed that all of our competitors are ranking above us for their category page, not their homepage. The difference between us and our competitors is that we specialize in this key phrase and they just offer one category of the key phrase. For example, we only sell cotton tee's and they sell cotton tees, handbags and shoes. When we dropped we noticed that Google began showing our homepage AND category page in the results, so we pointed our brandname.com to brandname.com/cotton-tees canonically. The idea was that this would assure that the homepage and category page were not competing with each other. The homepage was not really optimized for cotton tees so we thought this might help. 1. Is there any harm in removing the canonical and allowing both pages to rank? (We're also working on redesigning the homepage to add more readable text & optimize for cotton tees.) 2. Our homepage URL used to be "brandname.com/cotton-tees" and we consistenly ranked between 1 and 3 for cotton tees during that time. We modified the homepage URL because it seemed spammy and are now just "brandname.com". Does it make sense to go back to the URL with the key phrase in it if that is our main product and we want to rank for it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EileenCleary0 -
Parameter Strings & Duplicate Page Content
I'm managing a site that has thousands of pages due to all of the dynamic parameter strings that are being generated. It's a real estate listing site that allows people to create a listing, and is generating lots of new listings everyday. The Moz crawl report is continually flagging A LOT (25k+) of the site pages for duplicate content due to all of these parameter string URLs. Example: sitename.com/listings & sitename.com/listings/?addr=street name Do I really need to do anything about those pages? I have researched the topic quite a bit, but can't seem to find anything too concrete as to what the best course of action is. My original thinking was to add the rel=canonical tag to each of the main URLs that have parameters attached. I have also read that you can bypass that by telling Google what parameters to ignore in Webmaster tools. We want these listings to show up in search results, though, so I don't know if either of these options is ideal, since each would cause the listing pages (pages with parameter strings) to stop being indexed, right? Which is why I'm wondering if doing nothing at all will hurt the site? I should also mention that I originally recommend the rel=canonical option to the web developer, who has pushed back in saying that "search engines ignore parameter strings." Naturally, he doesn't want the extra work load of setting up the canonical tags, which I can understand, but I want to make sure I'm both giving him the most feasible option for implementation as well as the best option to fix the issues.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | garrettkite0 -
Can a home page penalty cause a drop in rankings for all pages?
All my main keywords have dropped out of the SERPS. Could it be that the home page (the strongest) page has been devalued and therefore 'link juice' that used to spread throughout the site is no longer doing so. Would this cause all other pages to drop? I just can't understand how all my pages have lost rankings. The site is still indexed so there's no problem there.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SamCUK0 -
Best possible linking on site with 100K indexed pages
Hello All, First of all I would like to thank everybody here for sharing such great knowledge with such amazing and heartfelt passion.It really is good to see. Thank you. My story / question: I recently sold a site with more than 100k pages indexed in Google. I was allowed to keep links on the site.These links being actual anchor text links on both the home page as well on the 100k news articles. On top of that, my site syndicates its rss feed (Just links and titles, no content) to this page. However, the new owner made a mess, and now the site could possibly be seen as bad linking to my site. Google tells me within webmasters that this particular site gives me more than 400K backlinks. I have NEVER received one single notice from Google that I have bad links. That first. But, I was worried that this page could have been the reason why MY site tanked as bad as it did. It's the only source linking so massive to me. Just a few days ago, I got in contact with the new site owner. And he has taken my offer to help him 'better' his site. Although getting the site up to date for him is my main purpose, since I am there, I will also put effort in to optimizing the links back to my site. My question: What would be the best to do for my 'most SEO gain' out of this? The site is a news paper type of site, catering for news within the exact niche my site is trying to rank. Difference being, his is a news site, mine is not. It is commercial. Once I fix his site, there will be regular news updates all within the niche we both are in. Regularly as in several times per day. It's news. In the niche. Should I leave my rss feed in the side bars of all the content? Should I leave an achor text link on the sidebar (on all news etc.) If so: there can be just one keyword... 407K pages linking with just 1 kw?? Should I keep it to just one link on the home page? I would love to hear what you guys think. (My domain is from 2001. Like a quality wine. However, still tanked like a submarine.) ALL SEO reports I got here are now Grade A. The site is finally fully optimized. Truly nice to have that confirmation. Now I hope someone will be able to tell me what is best to do, in order to get the most SEO gain out of this for my site. Thank you.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | richardo24hr0 -
Page Rank
Hi guys I have an ecommerce in prestashop (unfortunatelly I can not change it at this moment). I made all main activities both off and on the page. And actually it is working pretty well since I am up on the SERP for all the target keywords. BUT, the page rank still be 0. The site is about 2 years old. My main competitor has the same domain authority than mine, but he has a page rank > 0 Moreover I have more quality links then it has, but it is older Any suggestions? Many thanks Ciao Diego
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sbrelax0 -
My site rank is not consistent. Once it at first page , then for the next week it is not found in top 100 position. Again two/ three weeks later it ranked automatically without any work. Why this is happening?
Here's the following are available in my site: robot.txt file is included sitemap available Natural link building going on. in a week total 100 links we are creating. 30 social bookmarks, 30 directory submission, 20 blog comments, 20 forum links All the blog and forum links are from relevant sources. Please help me ..
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | coldfireinc0 -
Can a domain rank for a competitive term with no links?
Hi, I know that this topic has received a lot of attention recently (Not all of it good) and I am not normally one to re-open a can of worms but the whole 'Camper Mens Shoes' fiasco has got me thinking. If you're not familiar with the story then you can get the highlights of it here - http://martinmacdonald.net/the-curios-case-of-camper-shoes/ My question is this - Say that you had a domain (Domain A) that was ranking well for a competitve keyword and that it had a good backlink profile. If you used rel="canonical" on every page of Domain A to point to a duplicate site on a different domain (Domain B) , would Domain B then rank well in place of Domain A? I know that this probably doesn't have much practical use but I am trying to get a better understanding of the effect of using rel="canonical" Would the result of doing the above mean that Domain B would rank well without having any links pointing directly to it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AdeLewis0