Why Would My Page Have a Higher PA and DA, Links & On-Page Grade & Still Not Rank?
-
The Search Term is "Alcohol Ink" and our client has a better page authority, domain authority, links to the page, and on-page grade than those in the SERP for spaces 5-10 and we're not even ranked in the top 51+ according to Moz's tracker.
The only difference I can see is that our URL doesn't use the exact text like some of the 5-10 do. However, regardless of this, our on-page grade is significantly higher than the rest of them.
The one thing I found was that there were two links to the page (that we never asked for) that had a spam score in the low 20's and another in the low 30's.
Does anyone have any recommendations on how to maybe get around this?
Certainly, a content campaign and linking campaign around this could also help but I'm kind of scratching my head. The client is reputable, with a solid domain age and well recognized in the space so it's not like it's a noob trying to get in out of nowhere.
-
You are more than welcome.
I know I really enjoy answering questions on here and I suspect that EffectDigital does as well.
Please do let us know how you get on either directly or by replying to this post, that is one thing that is lacking when we respond to questions on any forum. People don't always let us know the results of our answers.
I wish you all the best working with what sounds to be a good client and hope to see more of you on the forums.
Steve
-
Thank you both for your additional information.
I was aware of most of the content that you've published here. However, you've taken my understanding and painted a very helpful "big picture" that takes a step back to understand all the factors at play.
It's been very helpful to me as it reminds me that there likely isn't a "magic fix" but that through continual work on the body of the business/website, and through continual differentiation and creation of great content, over the long-term we should be well positioned to compete even further.
Part of this question comes from a deep dive into trying to understand what's taken place for the client overall as there wasn't a lot of SEO work done at all over the history of the business and they've still managed to be very successful.
This company was a pioneer in their space, they're such wonderful people and such a wonderful company that they were able to grow significantly. Now, as competitors have crept in because of their success, and have deployed strong SEO strategies, they're starting to see their first shift from the major growth scale.
We have the closest thing to a "magic fix" that you can have which is moving their blog from the separate URL that it's presently on with its millions of links, to be attached to its main eCommerce site. There is some apprehension on their part with making this move too quickly (which is understandable). And so I'm really trying to paint an overall picture as you've just helped paint so that they can understand, what we can do from here (without moving the blog) and what that looks like.
Your answers have been so tremendously helpful to guiding the millions of thoughts in my head to something that's actionable and a great way to explain it and I just wanted to thank you both very much for your answers because I know you're also busy people, with a lot to do.
Thanks so much!
-
Not a problem! I always like these kinds of Qs and responses as they cover a bit of the history of SEO
-
Thanks EffectDigital,
Again your answer takes it to a new level though and provides great insights.
-
Steve's answer is really great. Basically in SEO we have to cater to Google's PageRank algorithm. We used to be able to see a very watered down, simplified version of PageRank using the Google toolbar for Firefox (before Chrome became big) and using various Chrome extensions thereafter
Google figured out that people were misusing this data and shut off the API which supplied the (very, very simplified version of) PageRank (a number for 0-10 for each URL on the web). PageRank still exists and Google still use it in their ranking algorithms, but no one except Googlers (and even then, only certain ones) can see it. Arguably no one could ever really see it, as TBPR (Toolbar PageRank) was really simplified and watered down, it was never a full view on a page's 'actual' PageRank
Suddenly, marketers had no way to evaluate the SEO authority of each web page they were looking at. Many stepped in to fill this hole (Ahrefs supply a URL and domain rating metric, Majestic SEO supply Citation Flow and Trust Flow metrics, Moz of course were first with PA and DA)
These metrics are our industry's attempt to fill a hole left by Google's removal of bad data from the public eye. Moz attempt to use various signals and metrics (link counts, search traffic estimates for URLs) to re-build TBPR as PA and DA
... but Google don't use PA and DA. Google use PR (PageRank). PA and DA are 'shadow metrics', they indicate and mimic but they are indicators only and cannot (read: absolutely must not) be taken at face value
For example, although link counts affected Google's old TBPR (Toolbar PageRank) metric, other things did too. If a site was blocked from Google, if a site had a penalty or algorithmic devaluations. Those things could lower or nullify the TBPR rating of a website. Since Google and Moz are not 'connected' in data terms, Moz's metrics miss many of the 'true' authority nullifying circumstances which could occur - thus you can end up with high PA / DA and still no traffic
Things that can affect you:
- Algorithmic devaluations, where the sites linking to your site are penalised and thus they no longer pass SEO authority to you - making your results go down as well. Not a penalty, just Darwinism in action I am afraid
- An actual penalty on your site
- Poor keyword targeting where your keywords aren't properly used in your content and / or Meta data, stuff like that. Sounds like this one is a real concern for you, as you may have SEO authority but NO relevance!
- Technical issues like an architecture which Google can't (or doesn't want to spend the time to) index, e.g: over-reliance on generated content through JavaScript (which Google can crawl, but it takes them much longer - so if you're a nobody don't expect them to care much or take that time)
- Technical indexation issues like blocking your own site with Meta no-index directives or robots.txt crawl blocks
- Legal challenges to your business or content in the form of DMCA requests, people filing reports directly with Google to have content removed from your site - there are many other types of legal challenge that can affect SEO
- Content duplication, internal or external
- Spam reports and disavow logs against your website
... there are many other factors, a big one is that your site may lack a value-proposition for end users. If other sites doing what you do, existed before you - and they're cheaper, have better reviews or tout unique features like free shipping (click fit and collect services for clothing, etc etc) then your offering itself may just not be competitive (and no matter how good your SEO is the site was doomed from the business end). Google expects sites to 'add value' to the web
The best thing to do is concentrate on your value proposition and making your site genuinely popular online. It's not easy. Building a successful site is as hard as building a successful business, it's just the digital reflection of what you are and what you do
-
Hi,
The first thing to remember, Google rankings do not use MOZ DA or PA to decide where a website should be ranked in the results.
The best way to use DA and PA are as an arbitrary measurement that allows you to compare against other sites, so you can see how you are doing against your competitors.
Now without knowing the URLs involved, I cannot check the websites to give any real insights. However, there is any number of reasons why the other sites may be ranking higher than your clients.
They may have better content for the keyword. They may have more backlinks pointing to the domain, they may be answering questions regarding that keyword in more detail.
Without actually being able to compare the sites it is hard to say.
I would analyse the sites that are higher than yours, check the backlink profiles, compare the number of pages and compare the quality of the content then you should have a plan to move forward and improve your rankings.
I hope this helps,
Steve
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Can a duplicate page referencing the original page on another domain in another country using the 'canonical link' still get indexed locally?
Hi I wonder if anyone could help me on a canonical link query/indexing issue. I have given an overview, intended solution and question below. Any advice on this query will be much appreciated. Overview: I have a client who has a .com domain that includes blog content intended for the US market using the correct lang tags. The client also has a .co.uk site without a blog but looking at creating one. As the target keywords and content are relevant across both UK and US markets and not to duplicate work the client has asked would it be worthwhile centralising the blog or provide any other efficient blog site structure recommendations. Suggested solution: As the domain authority (DA) on the .com/.co.uk sites are in the 60+ it would risky moving domains/subdomain at this stage and would be a waste not to utilise the DAs that have built up on both sites. I have suggested they keep both sites and share the same content between them using a content curated WP plugin and using the 'canonical link' to reference the original source (US or UK) - so not to get duplicate content issues. My question: Let's say I'm a potential customer in the UK and i'm searching using a keyword phrase that the content that answers my query is on both the UK and US site although the US content is the original source.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JonRayner
Will the US or UK version blog appear in UK SERPs? My gut is the UK blog will as Google will try and serve me the most appropriate version of the content and as I'm in the UK it will be this version, even though I have identified the US source using the canonical link?2 -
Links: Links come from bizzare pages
Hi all, My question is related to links that I saw in Google Search Console. While looking at who is linking to my site, I saw that GSC has some links that are coming from third party websites but these third party webpages are not indexed and not even put up by their owners. It looks like the owner never created these pages, these pages are not indexed (when you do a site: search in Google) but the URL of these pages loads content in the browser. Example - www.samplesite1.com/fakefolder/fakeurl what exactly is this thing? To mention more details, the third party website in question is a Wordpress website and I guess is probably hijacked. But how does one even get these types pages/URLs up and running on someone else's website and then link out to other websites. I am concerned as the content that I am getting link from is adult content and I will have to do some link cleansing soon.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Malika10 -
Links on page
Hi I have a web page which lists about 50-60 products which links out to either a pdf on the product or the main manufacturers website page containing product detail. The site in non e-commerce is this the site/page likely to get hit by Penguin? Would it be best to create a separate page for the product/manufacturer group i.e 5 or 6 pages but linking out to the PDFs etc...?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Cocoonfxmedia0 -
Disavow Links & Paid Link Removal (discussion)
Hey everyone, We've been talking about this issue a bit over the last week in our office, I wanted to extend the idea out to the Moz community and see if anyone has some additional perspective on the issue. Let me break-down the scenario: We're in the process of cleaning-up the link profile for a new client, which contains many low quality SEO-directory links placed by a previous vendor. Recently, we made a connection to a webmaster who controls a huge directory network. This person found 100+ links to our client's site on their network and wants $5/link to have them removed. Client was not hit with a manual penalty, this clean-up could be considered proactive, but an algorithmic 'penalty' is suspected based on historical keyword rankings. **The Issue: **We can pay this ninja $800+ to have him/her remove the links from his directory network, and hope it does the trick. When talking about scaling this tactic, we run into some ridiculously high numbers when you talk about providing this service to multiple clients. **The Silver Lining: **Disavow Links file. I'm curious what the effectiveness of creating this around the 100+ directory links could be, especially since the client hasn't been slapped with a manual penalty. The Debate: Is putting a disavow file together a better alternative to paying for crappy links to be removed? Are we actually solving the bad link problem by disavowing or just patching it? Would choosing not to pay ridiculous fees and submitting a disavow file for these links be considered a "good faith effort" in Google's eyes (especially considering there has been no manual penalty assessed)?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Etna0 -
How do I find the links on my site that link to another one of my pages?
I ran IIS Seo toolkit and it found about 40 pages that I have no idea how they exist. What tool can I use to find out what internal link is linking to them so I can fix them or get rid of them?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EcommerceSite0 -
Google is ranking the wrong page for the targeted keyword
I have two examples below where we want it to rank for the targeted page but google picked another page to rank instead. This is happening a lot on this site I just recently started to work on. Example 1 Googles Choice for key word Motorcycle Tires: http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/cl/50/Tires-and-Wheels What we want Google to choice for Motorcycle Tires: http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/c/49/-/181/Motorcycle-Tires Other pages about Motorcycle tires: http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/d/12/Motorcycle-Tires We even used the rel="canonical" for this url to point to our target page. http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/c/50/-/181/Motorcycle-Tires Example 2 ATV Tires We want this page to rank http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/c/43/81/165/ATV-Tires however google has decided to rank http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/t/43/81/165/723/ATV-Tires-All that is acutally one folder under where we want it.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DoRM0 -
How long for new pages to rank
Hi Guys, Our website has some really good serps for our established keyword phrases some of which are quite competitive. We recently acquired and have begun selling some new brands through our online shop and launched new pages for these brands around 2 months ago. They are quite competitive ("merrell shoes" and "timberland boots" for example in google.co.uk) terms. Do you think we should get some keyword rich links built into these new pages from external sites such as blogs - or is there chances of ranking well driven more off our overall site authority/link profile? In other peoples experience, what is a typical realistic timeframe to start getting meaningful serps on new pages/keyword phrases (I know that is hard to answer - but ball parks figures appreciated). Thank you everyone in advance. Kind Regards (and happy thanksgiving to our US friends)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ConradC
Conrad Cranfield0 -
Does a page on a site with high domain authority build page authority easier? i.e. less inbound links?
Is this also why people build backlinks to their BBB profiles, Yellowpages Profiles, etc. i.e. why do people build backlinks to other pages that link to them? Wouldn't it be more beneficial to just build that backlink directly to your target?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | adriandg0