Unnatural links warning and steps to fix it
-
Hi there,
Firstly our website is - imrubbish.co.uk
Basically we were unintentionally using a rogue seo company for about 5 months who charged a lot of money and built absolute rubbish quality links.
When i saw the type of links being built i immediately stopped them as i knew they were bad news but the damage had been done.
I have since moved to a completely ethical seo company who for the past 6 months have tried with me to remove this penalty without success.
Here are the steps we have taken.
Unnatural links warning.
- Submitted a file with all the links we know are bad and resubmitted.
Not good enough
- We then used disavow tool as there were so many links we had no control of. Along with a detailed write up of what has happened and who had done it.
Not good enough
Now the problem my seo guy thinks is because there are more and more links appearing almost daily that are still left over rubbish from the old seo company.
I think there might also be other problems - maybe my anchor test distribution is spammy etc, i dont know and i am hoping someone can maybe help with a couple more pointers.
I have asked a similar question before where there was a discussion about even just leaving it and concentrating on building more ethical links with brand anchor text but that was not working so we used the disavow tool.
We have been stuck in this rut for over a year now and could really do with some extra help/guidance from anyone who has experience or knowledge of what we should do.
I saw the post yesterday about this very subject and hope someone could help drill done specifically what could be the problem in our case.
We would also look at hiring someone if they could help.
Thank you
Jon
-
Hi Jon,
You mentioned that you submitted a file with your known bad backlinks and that you also disavowed those links, but did you actually make attempts to get those links manually removed? Google wants to see that you have tried to remove as many of your unnatural links as possible. You also need to document this well in a Google Doc so that they can see your efforts.
If you have indeed tried to remove backlinks then the next most common reason for sites to fail at reconsideration is because you haven't identified enough of your links as unnatural. Sometimes what looks natural to you actually may be a link that goes against the quality guidelines.
Don't give up on this domain! I've yet to see one that couldn't be saved.
-
Hi Jon
Sorry I didn't see this earlier - tried to private message you but I don't believe I can at the moment. If you'd like, feel free to drop an email at tom [at] sowhatmedia.co.uk
Obviously replace the [at] with @. Hopefully I can help you out a bit more there.
-
Hi im rubbish,
I would generally agree with Tom on the need to be completely honest with yourself when assessing links.
It is also a good idea to make sure that you have carefully read the finer detail of Google's quality guidelines. Make sure you know what qualifies as a link scheme in Google's eyes. This page provides some specific examples that might be eye opening if you have not read them recently.
If you think that the ongoing issue is caused by the appearance of more links, then there are a couple of things you should do:
- Make sure that you disavow entire domains as Tom suggested, so that any other links in existence at that domain will also be disavowed.
- Carefully monitor and identify new links as they appear. If it seems that unnatural links are still accumulating without explanation, highlight the issue in a reconsideration request and make sure that you provide scrupulous detail for the Webspam team to follow up. Be very clear - "these links have not been initiated by us".
Since you're in the UK it might be useful to know there are a couple of Search conferences coming up in the next couple of weeks that include sessions and workshops on link removal and penalty recovery.
BrightonSEO in the South - 11 & 12 April. I believe individual conference tickets are all gone, but there are still places in the Link Removal workshop with Tim Grice (which comes with a full day conference ticket included)
ionSearch in the North (Leeds) - 18 & 19 April. The conference includes both an Expert Panel on Link Removal and workshop sessions. Tim Grice will also be speaking here, as well as Christoph Cemper (owner of the company that develops Link Detox) and myself (rmoov.com).
A final note on starting again with a new domain: This absolutely has to be purely a business decision. With the obvious amount of time, money and effort put into your site's branding to date, even stripping back the entire link profile and "rebooting" your domain is likely to be a better business proposition than having to recreate an entire brand.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
Hi,
It was a manual penalty the site received. I dont want to give up hope on it yet, our domain is very brandable and has been established for 5 years with a good proportion of repeat business. We also have 5 or 6 very high quality almost impossible to get links.
I would like to get this manual penalty removed that has and is the number one objective. Because of the penalty we setup recyclingbins.co.uk and wheeliebins.co.uk the former is doing very well so in that sense it may be a blessing - a deep hard to fathom blessing as it meant we had to improve other areas of business.
Would you be available to talk about this? I am in a contract with seo company i have, but i would like to look at getting someone with specific expertise in this to help? I could get the existing seo company on creating good links with natural brand anchor text then.
Thank you
Jon
-
There was a great article by Pinpoint Designs on this exact topic.
I'm having the same issue as you with a bad domain trying to turn it into a good one. I have a client who seems to have gotten hit by Penguin and then a unnatural link penalty (manual) we did get the removal notice of the manual penalty but our rankings have not recovered yet. Jon's advice is great but I would also take a look at the article above posted on SEOmoz.
-
Yes Tom, I am also agreed with you to suggest taking new domain and it must be very beneficial to start market freshly.
-
Hi Jon
This is such a shame, as it looks a great website with a cool domain name. It always makes me angry when an SEO agency prays on the naivety of a webmaster, as your previous company did.
What I'd ask first is what sources have you used to identify your bad backlinks? In an ideal world, you should be using multiple. In the past, I've had success with removing penalties but only when using a combination of Google webmasters report, Open site explorer, MajesticSEO (historical index) and LinkDetox. I'd highly recommend majestic's historical index as it is the most complete crawl out there as far as I know, while LinkDetox can help you diagnose a number of links and see if they're toxic or suspicious.
The next question I'd have is how is your current SEO guy classifying the bad links? I've found that it is important to be as vigilant as possible with your classification - probably more so than you think you need to be. This means if you see any link with targeted anchor text, either partial or exact, get rid of it. Blogrolls/site-wide links: Gone. If at any point you can look at a link and think: "That looks like I asked for it to be there/it was placed there" consider it for removal.
Have you been explicit in your reconsideration request? Of course, this is only relevant if you get a message back confirming manual action has been taken. If you don't and no manual action has been taken, the penalty is not present and doesn't require a reconsideration.
You need to give a detailed account to Google of what steps you have taken to have the links removed. How you found the link (by source), where you found the contact details (on site, contact form, who.is data), when you contacted them, when you followed up etc. Anything you can't get removed after multiple requests should only then be disavowed, in Google's eyes. The Disavow tool is great but Google really wants you to be as thorough as you can and make every effort to have the links removed before you disavow.
In addition, don't be afraid to use the domain:example.com function liberally. You'll disavow any link on the entire domain with this, which can be a big help.
In some circumstances, I actually recommend starting with a fresh domain - it can actually be less work starting with a fresh, clean link profile and earning some high quality links this way. I'd consider this if I were you, but I can completely understand the attachment to your domain.
Hope this helps in some way and feel free to ask me anything else you may be wondering.
All the best!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should we optimise our internal links?
Hi again, We recently had a technical search audit done by a specialist agency and they discovered a number of internal links that caused redirects to happen. The agency has recommended we update all of these links to link directly to the destination so we don't lose out on link equity. We'd just like to know if you think this would be a worthwhile use of our time. Our web team seem to think that returning a 301 to a crawler means that the crawler will stop indexing the original URL and instead index the redirected destination? Thanks all. Clair
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | iescape2 -
Internal Linking
Hi I've been looking over my pages and it says for this page for example http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/1-6kw-halogen-heater I have too many links, I think it was about 178. These links are from the menu and bottom of the page - how much of an issue is this for internal linking structure? I wouldn't want to remove the menus or change them too much. Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
Internal Linking - Can You Over Do It?
Hi, One of the sites I'm working on has a forum with thousands of pages, amongst thousands of other pages. These pages produce lots of organic search traffic... 200,000 per month. We're using a bit of custom code to link relevant words and phrases from various discussion threads to hopefully related discussion pages. This generates thousands of links and up to 8 in-context links per page. A page could have anywhere from 200 to 3000 words in one to 50+ comments. Generally, a page with 200 words would have fewer of these automatically generated links, just because there are fewer terms naturally on the page. Is there any possible problem with this, including but not limited to some kind of internal anchor text spam or anything else? We do it to knit together pages for link juice and hopefully user experience... giving them another page to go to. The pages we link to are all our pages that produce or we hope to produce organic search traffic from. Thanks! ....Darcy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
Does Disavowing Links Negate Anchor Text, or Just Negates Link Juice
I'm not so sure that disavowing links also discounts the anchor texts from those links. Because nofollow links absolutely still pass anchor text values. And disavowing links is supposed to be akin to nofollowing the links. I wonder because there's a potential client I'm working on an RFP for and they have tons of spammy directory links all using keyword rich anchor texts and they lost 98% of their traffic in Pengiun 1.0 and haven't recovered. I want to know what I'm getting into. And if I just disavow those links, I'm thinking that it won't help the anchor text ratio issues. Can anyone confirm?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MiguelSalcido0 -
I get warnings for overly dynamic urls, but have canonical links in place.
Hi, Seomoz gives me warnings for overly dynamic urls. This is mostly caused by a crumbtrail system. I have a canonical link in the header for all the urls I receive warnings on, should I still worry about this? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mooij0 -
How do I find the links on my site that link to another one of my pages?
I ran IIS Seo toolkit and it found about 40 pages that I have no idea how they exist. What tool can I use to find out what internal link is linking to them so I can fix them or get rid of them?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EcommerceSite0 -
Link from archived article.
A strong news site has an "archived.domainname" folder, where they have older articles listed. I can get a link on a page where there is a 4 year old article, which will be in this archived sub-domain. My questions: Will Google view a link from a 4 year old article as less valuable. Will Google notice the article is 4 years old and find it odd why the page all of a sudden has a link to my site, and thus devalue such link the sub-domain "archived" does that tell Google it is old and a link will be less valuable thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | knielsen0 -
Outgoing affiliate links and link juice
I have some affiliate websites which have loads of outgoing affiliate links. I've discussed this with a SEO friend and talked about the effect of the link juice going out to the affiliate sites. To minimize this I've put "no follows" on the affiliate links but my friend says that even if you have no follow Google still then diminishes the amount of juice that goes to internal pages, for example if the page has 10 links, 9 are affiliate with no follow - Google will only give 10% of the juice to the 1 internal page. Does anyone know if this is the case? and whether there are any good techniques to keep as much link juice on the site as possible without transferring to affiliate links? Appreciate any thoughts on this! Cheers
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ventura0