Include placename in URL, or not?
-
Hi Mozzers,
I'm wondering whether to put placename in URL or not. This is for a hotel so it's very focused on the county.
I have loads of sub pages along the lines of www.hotelname.com/short-breaks-somerset www.hotelname.com/eat-out-somerset and so on but I was wondering whether that placename element would help or hinder.
For example, may want to rank for short breaks in other searches (not just those seeking short breaks in Somerset) and was wondering whether the somerset bit may actually hinder this in the future.
Also noticed Somerset is mentioned in nearly all of the page urls through the site. Perhaps this is a bit spammy and just not neccesary. I can include the address of the hotel on every page anyway.
What do you think? Thanks in advance for your help
Luke -
Thanks Tom - thanks for nudging me in the right direction and Somerset is just brilliant. Haven't actually been there before but... wow. Drinking a nice glass of organic Somerset Cider as I type (slurp!).
-
Hey Luke
I say promote Somerset more and more, it's lovely there!
I think from an SEO perspective having Somerset in your place name is unlikely to have a negative effect. It's not really stuffing a keyword in there, it's more being descriptive, so I wouldn't worry there.
Now for other non-Somerset terms, it could be having a slight SEO effect. There's a slight correlation between URLs with keywords in them and higher rankings, so one could argue that if Google is able to associate your hotel/breaks with Somerset, it might disassociate them with hotel breaks in say Blackpool. The URL may not serve the user intent (although I'd say your on-page content would dictate this far more).
What I do think would be a greater problem, however, is the click-through and conversion rate of users looking for breaks but not in the somerset area. If they see your site in the search engines and see Somerset in the URL, it might discourage them for clicking. Similarly, if they're on your site and see it, they might not think it's relevant and leave.
More so for the user experience rather than the SEO ramifications, I'd consider changing the URL, if this is relevant.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to improve PA of Shortened URLs
Why some of shortened urls like bitly/owly/googl has PA>40? I tried everything to improve PA of my shortened urls like facebook shares, retweets and backlinks to them but still i have PA-1. Checkout this URL: https://moz.com/blog/state-of-links in MOZ OSE and you will many 301 links from shortners
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | igains
I asked many seo experts about this but no one answered this question so today subscribed MOZ pro for the solution. Please give me the answer.0 -
E-Commerce - Include the product creation DATE?
Hi there! I would to ask you if it's advisable to include the creation date of new products (the product description ) in a e-commerce shop, I mean, if it makes a difference (in SEO terms, of course). Thanks for the info and my best regards! Z.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | zkouska0 -
Partial Manual penalty to a URL
Hi Mozers, I have a website which has got a partial manual penalty on a specific url. That url is of no use to the website now and is going to be taken off in 3 months time as the website is going to be completely redesigned. Till then I dont wont to live with the partial manual penalty for this url. I have few things in mind to tackle this: 1. take out the url from the website now (as the new redesign will take 3 months) 2. take out internal links pointing to this url in question 3. file for reconsideration with google stating we have taken off the url and have not generated any backlinks and the backlinks are organic. (no backlinking activity has been done on this website or the url) Please let me know if this works or i will have to get the backlinks removed then the disavow then the reconsideration. Looking forward for ur response 🙂
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | HiteshBharucha0 -
Magento Category URL
Hello I do SEO consulting and a client launch a new Magento Enterprise site. My question is they changed a URL from /category-list/ to /category/ and it is 301 redirecting correctly but the links off of that URL are not. Example: www.site.com/category/ if you click a link the next one shows up like this: www.site.com/categorty-list/vendor/ for example. Any help would be appreciated! Thanks
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | christaylorconsulting0 -
How to remove trailing slashes in URLs using .htaccess (Apache)?
I want my URLs to look like these: http://www.domain.com/buy http://www.domain.com/buy/shoes http://www.domain.com/buy/shoes/red Thanks in advance!
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | esiow20130 -
Is it still valuable to place content in subdirectories to represent hierarchy or is it better to have every URL off the root?
Is it still valuable to place content in subdirectories to represent hierarchy on the site or is it better to have every URL off the root? I have seen websites structured both ways. It seems having everything off the root would dilute the value associated with pages closest to the homepage. Also, from a user perspective, I see the value in a visual hierarchy in the URL.
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | belcaro19860 -
Google Sitemaps & punishment for bad URLS?
Hoping y'all have some input here. This is along story, but I'll boil it down: Site X bought the url of Site Y. 301 redirects were added to direct traffic (and help transfer linkjuice) from urls in Site X to relevant urls in Site Y, but 2 days before a "change of address" notice was submitted in Google Webmaster Tools, an auto-generating sitemap somehow applied urls from Site Y to the sitemap of Site X, so essentially the sitemap contained urls that were not the url of Site X. Is there any documentation out there that Google would punish Site X for having essentially unrelated urls in its sitemap by downgrading organic search rankings because it may view that mistake as black hat (or otherwise evil) tactics? I suspect this because the site continues to rank well organically in Yahoo & Bing, yet is nonexistent on Google suddenly. Thoughts?
White Hat / Black Hat SEO | | RUNNERagency0