Correct URL Structure Question
-
Dear Moz Community,
I have a quick question regarding my internal link structure.
Which route would be the best way to design my website?
Option A)
MYSITE.com/category/make/model/state/cityOption B)
MYSITE.com/category-make-model-state-city.aspxI've been reading a lot of articles regarding link structure by Matt Cutts (or at least referencing him), but I'm not sure what the best practice is for today. Any information or references would be great.
Thank you very much!
-
Hi Rand
Many thanks for taking the time to check by on this one. I appreciate you giving your valuable input.
Peter
-
I wouldn't say that two levels is the max - but in general you should avoid having unnecessary/non-useful folders of depth, and probably no more than 5+ levels of folder depth if possible. Crawlers have gotten much more sophisticated, but it still tends to be the case that more folders don't add a lot of value, so unless there's a good reason (and there may be a reason for some in CFS' case as I noted above), I'd avoid them.
-
Hi Peter - generally speaking, I'd still recommend minimizing unnecessary subfolders, but in this case, I'd lean a little more toward A than B for usability, readability, and crawling purposes. My guess is that CFSSEO's got a lot of URLs in various forms of those subfolders, not just the example shown.
CFSSEO - If possible, I'd choose to go with something like mysite.com/category/make-model/city-state/xyz.html (but it really depends on the specifics of what's in the folders and how they describe the pages).
The reason is that you want to have a logical URL structure that makes sense to crawlers (who will make guesses about locations) as well as highly readable to searchers/users (who often scan the URL in the search results). In those cases, slashes are far more common and readable than hyphens.
-
Thank very much, Mr. Lunn.
I read on an SEO "checklist" that it is best to avoid deep link structures. If possible, try not to go past two levels
i.e.
Option A)
MYSITE.com/level-one/level-two/level-three/level-four/level-fiveOption B)
MYSITE.com/level-one/level-two.aspxDoes that still hold true today? Anyone have any good reference material slightly more recent?
Thank you very much!
-
Hi,
I would go with option B as option A implies sub-folders. Rand Fishkin suggests the same in this blog post: 11 Best Practices for URLs which was written 7 years ago (that long?!), but I think this principle still holds true.
I hope that helps,
Peter
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO question about lots of outbound links
I'm considering adding a directory page to one of my websites that lists local groups from all around the world. I haven't kept up with SEO in a long time, but I recall (many) years ago that having a lot of outgoing links and very few (if any) inbound connections was a terrible thing. Is this still the case, or have search engine algorithms figured out that this can be beneficial to site visitors? What effect will adding a page like this have on my SEO?
Link Building | | jordanchris0 -
A few questions about unnatural links
i have just had another reconsideration request rejected by Google. In my rejection message they have given me 3 examples of unnatural links, but two of them I have had nothing to do with. My website is http://www.seoco.co.uk Here are the 3 links they mentioned: http://www.pyjamapeople.com/articles/authors/107/David-Eaves http://www.timeandattendance.co.uk/blog/?tag=access-control http://www.worx.at/blog/und-punkt/ the 1st one is just a website that republished one of my articles, I never submitted there or anything. Do I need to contact every single website that republished one of my articles and get those removed? Are they not classed as natural? Also, the page is not even cached by Google, why are they telling me to get rid of links that are not even in their index? The 2nd link is a client site and is definitely unnatural, I removed my link from the main part of the site a while ago but the blog footer was not updated, I will take care of that one. The 3rd link is a totally natural blogroll link that I had nothing to do with. What do you think I should do about it? Should I mention to Google on my next reconsideration request that it is in fact natural, or should I just bite the bullet and get it taken down? Also, there are a few pretty decent links out there that I am thinking about getting taken down on good sites, what do you think I should do with these two: 1. http://www.webcredible.co.uk/user-friendly-resources/search-engine-optimisation/directory-submission.shtml 2. http://www.webpronews.com/10-reasons-why-i-hate-shout-outs-on-digg-2007-10
Link Building | | Eavesy1 -
How do I distributing Articles to the correct sites
I'm relatively new to the SEO world, however, I've landed myself a SEO job for a mobility bath, shower and wetroom company.
Link Building | | desktop_nev
I've optimize the pages and added links to directories BUT I would like to start gaining quality links. I've wrote articles, including keyword links, but I would like to know the best strategy to get articles distributed to generic/industry specific sites.
Any help will be greatly appreciated! Thanks in advance1 -
Link Bait - How to use it question?
Hi, Lets say you have two pages, one is your money page which contains products etc and the other is a piece of content used for link bait. Say the link bait works well and you pick up lots of links from it, how do you then benefit your money page from this? I can only think of creating an anchor text link from the link bait back to the money page. Is that usually how this process works?
Link Building | | Bondara0 -
Open Site Explorer Question
Ok, so Open Site Explorer question: Say you enter a link and filter as follows - Followed + 301, only external, this page, ungroup. Now lets say 50 links appear from the same domain, when you visit the domain one of those Go Daddy type parked domain pages appear with lots of adsense as they usually do. Link back... No where to be seen. What's the score here? Is this domain showing up because OSE is yet to update for this domain?
Link Building | | Bondara0 -
Question on Directory submission
If I am submitting to directories for our site. Should I submit them as www.mycompany.com or http://www.mycompany.com or some other way. Any best practices? Or does it even matter? I am a novice.
Link Building | | Boodreaux0 -
Is there any reason why a link within an <area> tag would not be counted as correct backlink?
Is there any reason why a link within an <area> tag would not be counted as correct backlink? In this example there is no <a> tag, so will this still be considered a link?</a>
Link Building | | MiroAsh0 -
Question about 302 re-direct
Hi, I have noticed a competitor of mine is using 302 redirects to his website. It seems to me that he is buying a huge amout of domains and linking to his own website though this. I have never noticed anyone else do this before and wondered what people's views are on this?
Link Building | | Tinderbox0