Website Redesign / Switching CMS / .aspx and .html extensions question
-
Hello everyone,
We're currently preparing a website redesign for one of our important websites. It is our most important website, having good rankings and a lot of visitors from Search Engines, so we want to be really careful with the redesign.
Our strategy is to keep as much in place as possible. At first, we are only changing the styling of the website, we will keep the content, the structure, and as much as URLs the same as possible.
However, we are switching from a custom build CMS system which created URLs like www.homepage.com/default-en.aspx
No we would like to keep this URL the same , but our new CMS system does not support this kind of URLs.The same with for instance the URL: www.homepage.com/products.html
We're not able to recreate this URL in our new CMS.What would be the best strategy for SEO? Keep the URLs like this:
www.homepage.com/default-en
www.homepage.com/productsOr doesn't it really matter, since Google we view these as completely different URLs?
And, what would the impact of this changes in URLs be?
Thanks a lot in advance!
Best Regards,
Jorg
-
Hello Jeff,
Thanks for your response as well!
Like you said, I think we have to customize some things in our CMS system (Composite C1).
I found some very helpfull documents which will help us with this.With a few tweaks I hope we can leave everything the same during the migration and change things later in small steps.
Thanks a lot Jeff,
Regards,
Jorg
-
Hello Peter,
Thanks for your response!
We can indeed set up 301 redirects, that should be fine. But like most SEO's would recommend, we would like to keep everything as much the same as possible.We are currently looking for the options to adapt the new CMS systems that it lets us customize every URL on page level.
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Jorg
-
Jorg -
I do agree with Peter; you should absolutely use 301 redirects to redirect your old page names to the new ones.
I would try to keep some consistency for your URLs, if you could.
So if the page now is www.domain.com/about.html --> go with www.domain.com/about/
This will (a) make the 301 rewrites a lot easier to do, and (b) keep things a bit more simple for you.
That said, there are ways to keep the old page name extensions intact, but it depends on your server settings and how much access you have to modify things.
For example, you could have a page that appears to be: about.html ... and ends with the .html extension, but was really a php page.
Depending on the server, this is usually a quick thing to fix, although you'll need to update your content management system to work with this.
I'm a big fan of not changing the URLs if you don't need to. You'll still do okay if you do a single 301 redirect, but more than a few hops and you'll start to loose value.
Hope this helps!
-- Jeff -
Hi Jorg
As the old site has URLs with .aspx I assume that was using a Windows server. Is the new site also on a Windows server.
I don't work on Windows server sites myself but I believe you can set up 301 redirects on your server using IIS.
For each old URL you would need to set up a 301 redirect to point it to the new URL. By doing that, bookmarked pages and links on the Internet to your site will resolve to the right page on the new site, plus search engines will also be redirected to the correct page and at the same time you will retain some but not all of any SEO value links to those pages are passing to your site.
I hope that helps,
Peter
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How bad is it to have duplicate content across http:// and https:// versions of the site?
A lot of pages on our website are currently indexed on both their http:// and https:// URLs. I realise that this is a duplicate content problem, but how major an issue is this in practice? Also, am I right in saying that the best solution would be to use rel canonical tags to highlight the https pages as the canonical versions?
Technical SEO | | RG_SEO0 -
Is the content on my website is garbage?
I received a mail from google webmasters, that my website is having low quality content. Website - nowwhatmoments.com
Technical SEO | | Green.landon0 -
Subdomain/subfolder question
Hi community, Let's say I have a men's/women's clothing website. Would it be better to do clothing.com/mens and clothing.com/womens OR mens.clothing.com and womens.clothing.com? I understand Moz's stance on blogs that it should be clothing.com/blog, but wanted to ask for this different circumstance. Thanks for your help!
Technical SEO | | IceIcebaby0 -
Rel no follow question
Hello, I probably already know the answer to this question. But, When you use a rel no follow tag on an internal link or external link. Will the google bot still navigate to the link, in question? Thanks for your help.
Technical SEO | | PeterRota0 -
Blog.furnacefilterscanada.com/ or furnacefilterscanada.com/blog/
My shopping cart does not allow to instal a WordPress blog on a sub-domain like: furnacefilterscanada.com/blog/ But I can host my blog on another server with a sub-domain like: blog.furnacefilterscanada.com In a SEO point of view is there a difference between the 2? Link juice? Page authority? Thank you, BigBlaze
Technical SEO | | BigBlaze2050 -
Questionable Referral Traffic
Hey SEOMozers, I'm working with a client that has a suspicious traffic pattern going on. In October, a referral domain called profitclicking.com started passing visits to the site. Almost, in parallel the overall visits decreased anywhere from 35 to 50%. After checking out profitclicking.com more, it promises more traffic "with no SEO knowledge". The client doesn't think that this service was signed up for internally. Regardless, it obviously smells pretty fishy, and I'm searching for a way I can disallow traffic from this site. Could I simply just write a simple disallow statement in the robots.txt and be done with it? Just wanted to see if anyone else had any other ideas before recommending a solution. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | kylehungate0 -
Two companies merge: website A redirect 301 to website B. Problems?
Hi, last december the company I work for and another company merged. The website of company A was taken offline and the home page was 302 redirected to a page on website B. This page had information about the merger and the consequences for customers. The deeper pages of website A were 301 redirected to similar pages on website B. After a while, the traffic from the redirected home page decreased and we thought it was time to change the redirect from a 302 into a 301 redirect to the home page. Because there are still a lot of links to the home page of website A and we wanted to preserve the link juice. Two weeks ago we changed the 302 redirect from website A into a 301 redirect to the home page of website B. Last week the Google webmaster tools account of website B showed the links from the 301 redirected website A. The total amount of links doubled and the top anchor text is the name of company A instead of company B. This, off course, could trigger an alarm at Google. Because we got a lot of new links with a different anchor text. A tactic used by spammers/black-hats. I am a bit worried that our change will be penalized by Google. But our change is legit. It is to the advantage of our customers to find us if they search for the name of company A or click on a link to website A. We didn´t change the change of address of domain A in Google webmaster tools yet. Is it a good idea to change the change of address of domain A into domain B? Are there other precautions we can take?
Technical SEO | | NN-online0 -
Googleoff/on tags
Hi all, I'd like to restrict Google indexing a part of content on the page. Does tag really work for it as it described on https://developers.google.com/search-appliance/documentation/46/admin_crawl/Preparing#pagepart? Thanks, Jane
Technical SEO | | Jane_Barry0