Meta descriptions
-
When writing a meta description is it ok to use keywords that are not on the page or site itself?
-
You should write your description in a way that will make people want to click on your link when they see your description in the search results.
But be aware that Google won't necessarily pick your description to show—it shows what it thinks best matches what the searcher is looking for. If your description is heavy on keywords that are not on the page and does not contain words that reflect the content of the page, it probably won't get shown.
-
Not using the specific keywords which are embedded on a web-page is fine, writing a description which fails to accurately convey the individual (and unique) value of a web page is not fine.
Meta Descriptions no longer have a 'special place' within Google's various ranking algorithms and modules. A lot of people argue that at most, Meta Descriptions were only ever weighted as heavily as descriptive body content - and that in fact they never held any special ranking significance at all.
So why bother writing them at all? If they don't influence rankings, they won't influence your SEO right? WRONG
Meta Descriptions, if well written (if they seem to be thematically related to the specified page's content, if they're not overly promotional and they aren't full of grammatical errors) - are the most likely on-page element to be chosen to act as a SERP (Search Engine Ranking Position) snippet within Google / Bing's search results. Basically, the descriptive text you see under each hyperlink in Google's results.
A Meta Description won't change your page's ranking position for a given keyword (well, maybe under some very niche circumstances - but it's not common). That being said; a Meta Description which is nicely written, may entice Google's users (or the users of another search engine) to click on your search result instead of another one on the same page.
As such, Meta Descriptions can help your existing rankings to work harder for you (without actually shifting rankings around!)
Meta Descriptions should be written with the sole purpose of enticing users to click through from Google's results to your site. Whether that involves using your on-page keywords, or using alternative keywords - or using no keywords at all, only you can know. Write Meta descriptions from a CRO (Conversion Rate Optimisation) perspective and not from an SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) perspective.
You're trying to 'convert' Google's users, into your own SEO traffic. That off-site conversion is the key, not trying to use Meta Descriptions to increase your rankings (they won't alter your ranking positions)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are Meta-descriptions important for blogs?
I am tasked with optimizing an existing sites SEO. I have added meta's to all the menu pages, however they have blog section with over 700 posts. How important are meta descriptions when it comes to a websites blog? Do I need to take the time to go through 700+ blog posts and create unique meta descriptions for each one?
Algorithm Updates | | rburnett0 -
Meta robots at every page rather than using robots.txt for blocking crawlers? How they'll get indexed if we block crawlers?
Hi all, The suggestion to use meta robots tag rather than robots.txt file is to make sure the pages do not get indexed if their hyperlinks are available anywhere on the internet. I don't understand how the pages will be indexed if the entire site is blocked? Even though there are page links are available, will Google really index those pages? One of our site got blocked from robots file but internal links are available on internet for years which are not been indexed. So technically robots.txt file is quite enough right? Please clarify and guide me if I'm wrong. Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
The importance of meta keywords?
Hello, Is adding meta keywords still worth doing nowadays? I have been reading and hearing some different opinions about it. For a ' beginner ' in this field it is hard to find a definite answer to this questions.. Thank you for reading(and answering) my question!
Algorithm Updates | | EPPD0 -
Meta Descriptions - Google ignores what we have
Hi I still write meta descriptions to help with CTR. I am currently looking at a page where the CTR needs improving. I check the meta on Google SERPs & it isn't pulling through the meta description we have - but other info on the page. This isn't ideal - why does this happen? Will Google just make the decision and are descriptions not worth writing?
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey0 -
Meta Titles and Descriptions
Is there no use of writing Meta Titles and Descriptions? I have them added to 100's of my articles but Google picks the actual title from the URL and title in the article only... any reason for this? How can i check if my Meta title and Description are being seen by Search engines but it will just take time to index the new metas may be few more months to change in Search results.
Algorithm Updates | | skandlikp90 -
Meta Keywords ... Client request
I have a client who would like to include Meta Keywords in their site as they have seen competitors with it, we haven't used Meta Keywords tag before as doesn't impact ranking as we all know - however if I am to put them in - is there a limit - would 200 + negatively impact the site? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | lauratagdigital0 -
Meta Title Not Showing up in Google
Hello Friends, I have a website, www.bollywoodshaadis.com. On 1st may we changed our servers and revamped our website as per SEO updated guidelines. For some strange reason Google is not showing site Meta Title when you search the website on Google. All it shows is the domain name in the meta title. However, when you search info:www.bollywoodshaadis.com it shows the right Meta tags. Any reason for this happening? I have never seen this before. Thank you in advance.
Algorithm Updates | | SEOcandy0 -
HTML Not Validating META Title??!!
This seems pretty odd to me. HTML 5 is not validating lots of the typical META content - including, amongst others, the META title. This is typically seen as a standard 'must-have' for many SEOs, including the check-list on SEOmoz. Has anybody else had this issue? And of course, did you find a solution? Thanks, Mark
Algorithm Updates | | RiceMedia0