Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Company acquired but keeping website for now. How to rebrand without losing traffic?
-
A client has been acquired by a larger company who will eventually absorb client's website but this could take some time (a year or more). We have posted notice of the acquisition on their current site now, but it's time to make the rebrand of current site a priority. Since this site could be functional for some time and still operates as a lead generator for the company, we don't want to negatively affect their web traffic.
Curious if anyone has experienced similar or if there are best practices we should be following for this transition? Domain will stay the same for now.
-
Alagu, thank you for your reply. Currently we'll be staying on the same domain, however we expect to need to migrate relevant content to the acquirer's site in future, at which point we'll need to consider the 301s.
Thanks!
-
Thank you for your reply. I do think the "pure" rebrand stage is where we are at for now, with the full migration taking place sometime in the future. That will be the true challenge from a lead generation perspective, to ensure our client's services aren't lost in the larger ecosystem.
For now, we'll proceed with #1 (with caution!) and start planning for #3.
Appreciate the assistance!
-
Hi Kathleen,
I would think about this in a few phases (you may not do all of them):
- "Pure" rebrand - affecting the design of pages on the site, but not which pages exist or their basic HTML structure - this is the safest from an SEO perspective, though you run the risk of damaging conversion rate etc and so it is worth testing as much as you can and rolling out cautiously if it is a large site (see my whiteboard Friday on this for example)
- Website redesign / rebuild - affecting potentially anything on the site, but staying on the same domain - if as you indicate, you are going to roll the website into the acquirer's site, then I would do my best to avoid this stage - it's the riskiest without significant upside. If you can get away with #1 and #3 then I would do that. If you have to go through this stage, treat it as the serious SEO project that it is
- Migration into acquirer's site - you described it as "absorb" the client's site - I would expect in most acquisitions that you would end up with some combination of existing pages on the acquirer's site that should be the target of redirects of your client's pages and the need for some new pages (based presumably on existing pages on the client's site). Scoping out this mapping is the most significant part of this step - everything else is a migration project to be handled with the normal care and attention to detail
One thing to mention: we have seen people make assumptions that if you combine websites A and B, that the combined website will have the traffic of A+B. This is rarely the case for reasons of overlap / cannibalisation even if the migration and redirects function perfectly. So you are right to be cautious. The more overlap there is between the acquirer's site and your client's, the lower I would forecast the combined traffic. The more distinct they are (and hence the more your client's site could eventually migrate into a subfolder of the acquirer's site for example) the closer you might get to A+B.
I hope that all helps.
-
If the domain is same you can do 301 redirect of top pages (old website) that ranks higher to the newer version of the web page.
Secondly, without affecting your ranking you can move your old website pages to a newer domain also. This works if you want to change domain without modifying the sitemap and individual URLs of your website.
Make sure you have the search console access (verified) to both the website domains, Back-up your website and database(s) to restore in case of any error. Launch the website in the new domain.
Do 301 redirect via your site’s .htaccess file (At the old website host). Use the code below
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^www.newerdomain.com
RewriteRule (.*) http://www.newerdomain.com/$1 [R=301,L]Once this is done, then login to Google Search Console and go to the old domain settings icon. There will be an option called "Change of address" click it and select the new domain. Now go to the new domain property and add XML sitemaps to Google.
That's it!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
No index for http version of website
Hi, I've had a message from Google search console to say the sitemap for the http version of my site is tagged as no index. As the https version is indexed, do I need to change the http version to be indexed as well? Do I need to keep the http version of the site in search console alongside the https version, or should I remove it? Advice appreciated!
On-Page Optimization | | Robingoodlad0 -
Best structure for a news website including main menu nav
Just looking for thoughts and opinions on the best way to set up the main nav on a news website that covers a specific professional services sector. There are news items, archived news, blog, events, but also main menu links to the numerous news categories that go to a page listing the news articles under that category (as created in Wordpress when publishing the article). I'm thinking that having these off the main nav is diluting the juice to the more important pages including the events and the news page? Just thinking about how to rearrange and consolidate. Any thoughts on how people would structure something like this?
On-Page Optimization | | sam_legmark0 -
How long should my website content be (max and min number of words)?
I saw a web site which has been number 1 on Google for a long time, and the home page has 5700 words, but the results show it is not spam, so what would be the recommended word number for a home page?
On-Page Optimization | | Majapopa0 -
Is there any tool available to check which website using Lazy Load?
Hello Experts, Is there any tool available to check which website using Lazy Load? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | wright3350 -
Review my website and guide me what can do for top ranking.
Hi Guys, I really need your advice for my website (bmgapt dot com). I'm loosing ranking on (Buffalo Apartments) keyword. Two months ago my ranking number is 3 but now loosing to 15 number. What can I do for get again top ranking. Thanks in advance. John Smith
On-Page Optimization | | KLLC0 -
If I enbed the same video from my YouTube account on two different websites, will I get a duplicate content penalty?
I have a YouTube video I want to show my B2B and B2C customers. But I have a different websites for each. If I embed the video will I get duplicate content strike against me?
On-Page Optimization | | RoxBrock0 -
Two Word Company Name (Combined to One) & SEO
Hi All, I'm dealing with a company that has a two word name like "GreatCompany". They rank #1 for that but not for "Great Company". The phrase is not super competitive, but obviously they are not writing the company name with two words anywhere on their site. Has anyone had to deal with something like this? Thinking about creative solutions but I'm fairly sure we're going to need to use the name both ways to have an effect here (or use PPC to augment) but I don't really love the idea of doing that... will feel very odd and inconsistent for visitors. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | ketanmv0 -
Website accessible on http and https. Is it bad?
We noticed that our website is accessible on: http://www.example.com and https://www.example.com Both the versions have page rank of 4. Though on https version we have added canonical tag indicating http:// version as preferred. Is this fine or we need to use 301 redirect and let the site be accessible only on http:// version??
On-Page Optimization | | CyrilWilson1