What is the best way to get found for different areas within my County.
-
my business is based in the UK in the county of East Sussex. It is not a large County and its neighbour is West Sussex. In terms of local search optimisation I would like to be found when people search for East Susses, West Sussex and Sussex. What is the best way to attack this?
e.g.
I could use the keywords, "my business is based in East Sussex, but we work across West Sussex too.
But would this cover me if someone searched "business in Sussex" .
I need some guidance as to the best way to handle this kind of local search conundrum.
Thank you
-
My pleasure! And you might like to know, I have an article coming out on the Moz Blog on this topic later this month. Stay tuned
-
Great response Miriam,
I appreciate you giving such a thorough answer !!
-
Hello There!
Here are a few tips I hope may help you.
-
Local SEO, at its core, is city-based rather than county based. So, the very core of your identity as a local business is based on the city/town/village where you are physically located. This is the locale you will be using in your Google Business Profile and in all of the citations you build, and it's the place in which you'll proclaim yourself to exist on your website.
-
Your Google local rankings will then be based on this physical location as it relates to the locations of searchers when they search for what you offer. How large of a search radius Google will show when someone makes this kind of a search will be based on how much competition there is for the particular keyword phrase. For example, if your business is the only Italian restaurant in a 10 mile/km radius, then you could well show up for searchers quite far away from your business, because Google has few options to return as results. But, if your business is one of 20 bakeries in the center of your town, Google might set a radius that is only a couple of streets wide, and keep changing the local rankings up as the searcher moves around town. In sum, your ability to rank in the local packs for an entire county is entirely predicated on how dense competition is for what you do. If competition is low, you might possibly do this, but it would be the exception rather than the rule, unless your business category is truly unusual. Ranking across two counties would be even less likely.
-
Because local rankings are so highly influenced by user location, the effort to become visible for searches beyond the true local search radius has to be shifted to other campaigns. Instead of local pack rankings for other cities and counties, you can work to achieve:
-
Organic results visibility via a combination of content development and link acquisition
-
Social media visibility via participation
-
PPC visibility via investments in ads
-
Offline visibility via community involvement and paid offline media
In general, this is the lay of the land for any business hoping to ranking somewhere beyond its city of location. Hope this helps!
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What are SEO best practices for Java Language Redirections?
We would like to get some insight on what is the best practice of setting up canonical URLs in the below scenario. CMS used: Liferay – we believe they are using java. The URL structure at this stage can not be changed to best practices (/en/ and /ar/). Currently the language redirections works like this: English: https://www.website.com/page1?AF_language=en Arabic: https://www.website.com/page1?AF_language=ar Depending how you entered the website last time the root URL will show English or Arabic content without the ‘sufix’: https://www.website.com/page1 All 3 different URL’s are being indexed on Google - which is causing duplication and confusion. We have a few ideas: Have 2 main URLS: https://www.website.com/page1?AF_language=en and have the canonical set to https://www.website.com/page1?AF_language=en https://www.website.com/page1?AF_language=ar and have canonical set to https://www.website.com/page1?AF_language=ar However, how would you handle the root page which does not have a specific language attached. If we need to make a choice we would go with Arabic, as mainly Arabic pages are indexed on Google with the root domain. This way we would (hopefully) retain the rankings for this. Question: did anybody had to deal with a similar situation? What would you do in a similar situation and why? Thanks for all your input.
Local Website Optimization | | skrauss0 -
Service Area Location Pages vs. User Experience
I'm familiar with the SAB best practices outlined here. Here's my issue: Doing local landing pages as described here might not be ideal from a user experience point of view. Having a "Cities We Serve" or "Service Areas" link in the main navigation isn't necessarily valuable to the user when the city-specific landing pages are all places within a 15-mile radius of the SAB's headquarters. It would just look like the company did it for SEO. It wouldn't look natural. Seriously, it feels like best practices are totally at odds with user experience here. If I absolutely must create location pages for 10 or so municipalities within my client's service area, I'd rather NOT put the service areas as a primary navigation item. It is not useful to the user. Anyone who sees that the company provides services in the [name of city] metropolitan area will already understand that the company can service their town that is 5 miles away. It is self-evident. For example**, who would wonder whether a plumbing company with a Los Angeles address also services Beverly Hills?** It's just... silly. But the Moz guide says I've got to do those location pages! And that I've got to put them high up in the navigation! This is a problem because we've got to do local SEO, but we also have to provide an ideal experience. Thoughts?
Local Website Optimization | | Greenery1 -
The best option for expanding a website to another country
Hi everyone, I have a couple questions about expanding my website from US to another country. Which option would be better to use: Country-Coded Top Level Domains, Sub-Directories or Sub-Domains? If I use a new domain, but I want to keep all the content, would canonicalization affect SEO of my new website? I want the new website (or another option) look just like the one I have, except for changing contact information, pictures and adding another language. Thank you!
Local Website Optimization | | KseniaLL0 -
Ways to expand your marketing area
I have a local business and put additional city names (7 of them) into the main title page along with the biz description in order to expand into these areas. I included these same cities on 3 other pages in the site as well, along with the custom descriptions for these pages. Is this overuse of city names in title pages? Will it negatively affect my rankings? What are the best ways to expand your marketing territory for a local biz? Thanks for any and all responses.
Local Website Optimization | | music1000 -
Should digital marketing agencies treat SEO differently when it comes to homepage content?
When I review competitor digital agency sites, they seem to have very little homepage content. But how would this be beneficial in gaining a higher SERP rank?
Local Website Optimization | | randomagency1 -
Which SSL should I get or does it even matter?
We do not have an eCommerce on our site but we do have a worldwide website and a local website, which SSL certs should I get? I found a lot here over at namecheap but not sure if the 10.95 would do just fine or what here: https://www.namecheap.com/security/ssl-certificates/geotrust.aspx ?
Local Website Optimization | | surfsup0 -
Single sites per location as well as group site. Should we get rid of single sites & only keep group site.
Currently we have several single sites for each of our dealership locations as well as an automotive group site linking to each location(dealership) website. Currently there is no landing page for each location on the group site. To save money we were looking into beefing up our group site and getting rid of our individual location sites. 301 redirecting them to location landing pages on the group site website. Each site has about the same authority including the group site. Each dealership location resides in the same province(state) but some locations are a 7hour drive apart so not all within the same vicinity. I want to ensure we continue to rank well in each location. I won't be able to include all geographic locations in the title tag on the homepage of the group site due to the character restrictions. What would you recommend? Keeping the individual websites per dealership location OR focusing solely on a group website. I need to ensure we continue to rank well in each city where each dealership resides. Thanks for any recommendations! It's greatly appreciated. Thanks for everyone's thoughts & opinions.
Local Website Optimization | | DCochrane1 -
NAP question about wider service area
My business is based in Suffolk, UK, but I serve an area that includes Essex, Cambs, Herts and Norfolk. I've been making an effort to include a constant NAP across all my local citations for Suffolk in an effort to rank better in local search.
Local Website Optimization | | schitz011
However, what effect does this have on pages when trying to rank for searches for areas where I have no physical location? If my entire site has NAP across it referencing Suffolk, does this impact the ability to rank organically for areas outside Suffolk? If so, what would be the best practice for increasing organic rank in these areas?0