How can I get unimportant pages out of Google?
-
Hi Guys,
I have a (newbie) question, untill recently I didn't had my robot.txt written properly so Google indexed around 1900 pages of my site, but only 380 pages are real pages, the rest are all /tag/ or /comment/ pages from my blog. I now have setup the sitemap and the robot.txt properly but how can I get the other pages out of Google? Is there a trick or will it just take a little time for Google to take out the pages?
Thanks!
Ramon
-
If you want to remove an entire directory, you can exclude that directory in robots.txt, then go to Google Webmaster Tools and request a URL removal. You'll have an option to remove an entire directory there.
-
No, sorry. What I said is, if you mark the folder as disalow in robots.txt, it will not remove the pages are already indexed.
But the meta tag, when the spiders go again on the page and see that the pages are with the noindex tag will remove it.
Since you can not already include the directory on the robots.txt. Before removing the SE pages.
First you put the noindex tag on all pages you want to remove. After they are removed, it takes a week for a month. After you add the folders in robots.txt to your site who do not want to index.
After that, you dont need to worry about the tags.
I say this because when you add in the robots.txt first, the SE does not read the page anymore, so they would not read the meta noindex tag. Therefore you must first remove the pages with noindex tag and then add in robot.txt
Hope this has helped.
João Vargas
-
No, sorry. What I said is, if you mark the folder as disalow in robots.txt, it will not remove the pages are already indexed.
But the meta tag, when the spiders go again on the page and see that the pages are with the noindex tag will remove it.
Since you can not already include the directory on the robots.txt. Before removing the SE pages.
First you put the noindex tag on all pages you want to remove. After they are removed, it takes a week for a month. After you add the folders in robots.txt to your site who do not want to index.
After that, you dont need to worry about the tags.
I say this because when you add in the robots.txt first, the SE does not read the page anymore, so they would not read the meta noindex tag. Therefore you must first remove the pages with noindex tag and then add in robot.txt
Hope this has helped.
João Vargas
-
Thanks Vargas, If I choose for noindex, I should remove it from the robot.txt right?
I understood that if you have a noindex tag on the page and as well a dissallow in the robot.txt the SE will index it, is that true?
-
For you remove the pages you want, need to put a tag:
<meta< span="">name="robots" content="noindex">If you want internal links and external relevance to pass on these pages, you put:
<meta< span="">name="robots" content="noindex, follow">If you do the lock on robot.txt: only need to include the tag in the current urls, new search engines will index no.
In my opinion, I do not like using the google url remover. Because if someday you want to index these folders, will not, at least it has happened to me.
The noindex tag works very well to remove objectionable content, within 1 month or so now will be removed.</meta<></meta<>
-
Yes. It's only a secondary level aid, and not guaranteed, yet it could help speed up the process of devaluing those pages in Google's internal system. If the system sees those, and cross-references to the robots.txt file it could help.
-
Thanks guys for your answers....
Alan, do you mean that I place the tag below at all the pages that I want out of Google? -
I agree with Alan's reply. Try canonical 1st. If you don't see any change, remove the URLs in GWT.
-
There's no bulk page request form so you'd need to submit every URL one at a time, and even then it's not a guaranteed way. You could consider gettting a canonical tag on those specific pages that provides a different URL from your blog, such as an appropriate category page, or the blog home page. That could help speed things up, but canonical tags themselves are only "hints" to Google.
Ultimately it's a time and patience thing.
-
It will take time, but you can help it along by using the url removal tool in Google Webmaster Tools. https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/removals
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How fast should a page load to get a Green light at Googles PageSpeed?
So, trying to get e big e-commerce site to work on their page loading issuses. Their question left me without an answer, so how fast should a site be, so that it will get a Green light at the Googles Page Speed test? Is there a number in seconds? Do we know that?
Technical SEO | | ziiiva1230 -
Single page website vs Google
Hi, I was wondering on this issue: There is a website for guesthouse. It has all information on one page (it is a valid page, with legitimate content). How google treats those pages? Would it treat it as Doorway Page? Or give some other penalties? What about a bounce rate? Because it will be pretty high, as there is no option to go somewhere else? What is your opinion on single page websites - SEO wise? Is it a shot in the foot? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | LeszekNowakowski0 -
Will a Robots.txt 'disallow' of a directory, keep Google from seeing 301 redirects for pages/files within the directory?
Hi- I have a client that had thousands of dynamic php pages indexed by Google that shouldn't have been. He has since blocked these php pages via robots.txt disallow. Unfortunately, many of those php pages were linked to by high quality sites mulitiple times (instead of the static urls) before he put up the php 'disallow'. If we create 301 redirects for some of these php URLs that area still showing high value backlinks and send them to the correct static URLs, will Google even see these 301 redirects and pass link value to the proper static URLs? Or will the robots.txt keep Google away and we lose all these high quality backlinks? I guess the same question applies if we use the canonical tag instead of the 301. Will the robots.txt keep Google from seeing the canonical tags on the php pages? Thanks very much, V
Technical SEO | | Voodak0 -
Site splitting value of our pages with multiple variations. How can I fix this with the least impact?
Just started at a company recently, and there is a preexisting problem that I could use some help with. Somebody please tell me there is a low impact fix for this: My company's website is structured so all of the main links used on the nav are listed as .asp pages. All the canonical stuff. However, for "SEO Purposes," we have a number of similar (not exact) pages in .html on the same topic on our site. So, for example, let's say we're a bakery. The main URL, as linked in the nav, for our Chocolate Cakes, would be http://www.oursite.com/chocolate-cakes.asp. This differentiates the page from our other cake varieties, such as http://www.oursite.com/pound-cakes.asp and http://www.oursite.com/carrot-cakes.asp. Alas, fully indexed in Google with links existing only in our sitemap, we also have: http://www.oursite.com/chocolate-cakes.html http://www.oursite.com/chocolatecakes.html http://www.oursite.com/cakes-chocolate.html This seems CRAZY to me, because wouldn't this split our search results 4 ways? Am I right in assuming this is destroying the rankings of our canonical pages? I want to change this, but problem is, none of the content is the same on any of the variants, and some of these pages rank really well - albeit mostly for long tail keywords instead of the good, solid keywords we're after. So, what I'm asking you guys is: How do I burn these .html pages to the ground without completely destroying our rankings for the other keywords? I want to 301 those pages to our canonical nav URLs but, because of the wildly different content, I'm afraid that we could see a heavy drop in search traffic. Am I just being overly cautious? Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | jdsnyc20 -
Google webmaster showing 0 indexed, yet I can see them all them Google search?
I can see them all the pages showing up in Google when i search for my site. But in webmaster tools under the sitemaps section in the indexed pages - the red bar is showing 0 indexed pages, even though they seem to be indexed. Any idea why is this showing like this? I don’t really think it’s that important as the pages are still indexed, but it just seems odd. Please see in the image.
Technical SEO | | Perfect0070 -
Home page indexed but not ranking...interior pages with thin content outrank home page??
I have a Joomla site with a home page that I can't get to rank for anything beyond the company name @ Google - the site works fine @ Bing and Yahoo. The interior pages will rank all day long but the home page never shows up in the results. I have checked the page code out in every tool that I know about and have had no luck....by all account it should be good to go...any thoughts/comments/help would be greatly appreciated. The site is http://www.selectivedesigns.com Thanks! Greg
Technical SEO | | DougHosmer0 -
Can anyone help me understand why google is "Not Selecting" a large number of my webpages to include when crawling my site.
When looking through my google webmaster tools, I clicked into the advanced settings under index status and was surprised to see that google has marked around 90% of my pages on my site as "Not Selected" when crawling. Please take a look and offer any suggestions. www.luxuryhomehunt.com
Technical SEO | | Jdubin0 -
How narrowly geo targeted should your Google Places page be?
Hi Mozers I'm still struggling with my London based client with two locations and one business. Basically she has a location in W1W 'Westminster' and a location in 'WD!' Borehamwood. Has anyone any good resources of input concerning geotargeting. I've done some searching but can't get quite the help I'm seeking. I'd like to make the Pages cover a 5mile radius and be highly specific to their locations. Is this the right way to proceed? Thanks
Technical SEO | | catherine-2793880