What offline signals affect SERPS?
-
A journalist contact of mine was asking whether we were getting close to the point where 'developers' (for which I read Google) can take account of opinions/interests/actions of people who don't use the Internet (the example I was give was 'poor' people and 'rich' people).
This got me thinking about what (if any) offline signals that Google/Bing etc. use as signals for ranking. I understand that some household demographic data may be used for ad targeting (I think I read that Axciom do that) - but are there any others?
-
That's one of the things I was wondering about Nick - how much other (i.e. non-browsing behaviour type) personal information does Google et al gather?
Another type of information is things like the UK Companies House maintains information of registered companies (including registered office address etc.) - could that be useful for local ranking? (BTW I'm not sure Companies House info is relevant, but there may be other sources that are).
-
That said, isn't it down to travel companies to decide what is the best product for certain budgets? Although the concept is interesting, I can only think that Google places answers the post code question. If it were to go further it would need to obtain personal data about the user entering a search query so It can truly match relevant results and i'm just not sure people would be comfortable with that.
-
@Dejan SEO, not sure if using offline data would go against Google's 'philosphoy'. I guess there are (at least) two categories of 'offline' information that would be relevant: things that are truly offline (for which an entirely new 'parser' would be required) and things that can be imported and correlated with online data.
I think the postcode example is a good one - if I live on a particularly poor neighbourhood and do a search for 'where can I get a good family holiday to suit my budget' or something like that, a 'better' result for me might be different to someone living in an affluent area...and Google does say it wants to give the 'best' or most appropriate answer doesn't it?
How to turn that idea into something actionable for SEO? Well, I'll leave that to someone cleverer than me!
@digna99 no, please online ID cards!?!
-
If they are not doing it now, they will be soon I am sure. Why? Since it would be great for business.
I have little doubt that discount travel companies utilize the offline data to signal what type of deal they may offer your or accept.
Depending on what Zip code you are in, or if you use a regular bank card or Platinum American Express to pay.
This will no doubt translate to individual user results via search engines.
This question also got me thinking about the potential of an "Online ID Card" or license to surf the web. While I hate the idea, it would lessen the problems for anti-piracy groups and crime (tracing IP's and proving who did what etc), and would be a marketers dream know exactly who was doing what on the internet.
It would certainly ruin much of what makes the internet great, but it would bring some type order to it for government and corporations.
Sorry I mentioned it.
-
None to my knowledge. Wouldn't loading of offline data into algorithm go against Google's whole philosophy?
What an interesting topic!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Getting indexed in Google Scholar
Hi all! We have a client who publishes scholarly research as a highly regarded non-profit. Their Publications aren't being indexed in Google Scholar 50% of the time and when they are, Google is pulling random stuff from a PDF vs. from the html page. Any advice on best practices is enormously appreciated
SERP Trends | | SimpleSearch1 -
What do we know about the "Shops" SERP Feature?
I came across this SERP Feature in a search today on a mobile device. It does not show for the same search query on desktop. What do we know about this "Shops" SERP feature? shops-blur.jpg
SERP Trends | | seoelevated0 -
Has anyone used youramigo or know what Technics they use or alternative to YourAmigo
please share your experience. I don't know much about them and they approached me for our ecommerce site.
SERP Trends | | bizuhodge0 -
My website is being Cached with non-www and With WWW it is not indexed and cached
Hello Team, I had one question that my website is being indexed and cached with Non-www but with WWW it is not caching it is showing 404 error. Even each and every redirection is proper. Still it is showing an error. Can you please tell me what issue i had with my site?? Here is my links: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nCH1DvhuQT8J:https://www.canvaschamp.com/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=usa
SERP Trends | | CommercePundit0 -
Google Fetch and Render - Partial result (resources temporarily unavailable)
Over the past few weeks, my website pages have been showing as partial in the Google Search Console. There are many resources/ files (js, css, images) that are 'temporarily unreachable'. The website files haven't had any structural changes for about 2 years (it historically has always shows as 'completed' and rendered absolutely fine in the search console). I have checked and the robots.txt is fine as is the sitemap. My host hasn't been very helpful, but has confirmed there are no server issues. My website rankings have now dropped which I think is due to these resources issues and I need to clear this issue up asap - can any one here offer any assistance? It would be hugely appreciated. Thanks, Dan
SERP Trends | | dan_550 -
Sitelink (meta) descriptions in Google SERP
Hi, I am probably not the only one having this question regarding the quality of sitelinks in organic results. When your search returns sitelinks, I know the only thing you can do to avoid certain sitelinks to appear is to demote it for that search result. But what can you do about the description. For the main result you are pretty much able to create an appealing description, but when the sitelinks appear, all sitelinks display these crappy 'composed' descriptions. I've read Google did some tests a couple of years ago with multiple descriptions and multiple titles, but this doesn't cover the issue I just described. Is there a way to create 'sitelink descriptions'? Thanks in advance for your thoughts.
SERP Trends | | ConclusionDigital0 -
Redirection of domain maybe affected by google
I have the domain clinicadentalbarcelona.net that in the past suffered a big traffic drop due to algorithm actualizations, but did not recieved any google letter. Althought the domain still is getting good rakings but has some toxic links I want to change the content to new domain clinicadentalbarcelona.es that as no historic or any linkbuilding my cuestion is if i can redireccion 301 of clinicadentalbarcelona.net (that has some page rank and links) to clinicadentalbarcelona.es/blog to prevent it from afecting the main root domain and to bring the page ranking and some links to a a web that as none. thank you what would you do in my case
SERP Trends | | maestrosonrisas0 -
Different Data Center Affecting Listings
I have a client in Phoenix that is completely dominant for every targeted term. However, he is
SERP Trends | | mgordon
dominant for those terms everywhere but in Phoenix (where we want him to
be). (NOTE- this is organic, not affected by local/hybrid). I realize there are different data centers, but these results have been like this for three weeks now. Does anyone have any ideas on why this is occurring and if so, suggestions on how I can get the results in Phoenix to
match everywhere else in the country?0