Image Links Vs. Text Links, Questions About PR & Anchor Text Value
-
I am searching for testing results to find out the value of text links versus image links with alt text.
Do any of you have testing results that can answer or discuss these questions?
If 2 separate pages on the same domain were to have the same Page Authority, same amount of internal and external links and virtually carry the same strength and the location of the image or text link is in the same spot on both pages, in the middle of the body within paragraphs.
-
Would an image link with alt text pass the same amount of Page Authority and PR as a text link?
-
Would an image link with alt text pass the same amount of textual value as a text link? For example, if the alt text on the image on one page said "nike shoes" and the text link on the other page said "nike shoes" would both pass the same value to drive up the rankings of the page for "nike shoes"?
-
Would a link wrapped around an image and text phrase be better than creating 2 links, one around the image and one around the text pointing to the same page?
The following questions have to do with when you have an image and text link on a page right next to each other, like when you link a compelling graphic image to a category page and then list a text link underneath it to pass text link value to the linked-to page.
-
If the image link displays before the text link pointing to a page, would first link priority use the alt text and not even apply the anchor text phrase to the linked page?
-
Would it be best to link the image and text phrase together pointing to the product page to decrease the link count on the page, thus allowing for more page rank and page authority to pass to other pages that are being linked to on the page? And would this also pass anchor text value to the link-to page since the link would include an image and text?
I know that the questions sound a bit repetitive, so please let me know if you need any further clarification. I'd like to solve these to further look into ways to improve some user experience aspects while optimizing the link strength on each page at the same time.
Thanks!
Andrew -
-
Gotcha. This is a total guess, but I'd venture to say that PageRank is probably passed in the same quantities (mozRank definitely is).
Page Authority is harder to say because it doesn't actually "flow" - it's a metric we calculate AFTER the rest of the link graph and the metrics are done processing and represents a machine-learning based algo with inputs of every other kind of link metric. One of these could certainly be the ratio of images to text links or the existence or non-existence of both, but as with any machine learning system, it's hard to know what's actually (even for the folks who wrote it!)!
-
Hi Rand, thanks so much for the feedback. I agree and see it the same way.
For sites with great images and compelling media, it would make sense that a lot of their back links are image links pointing to their home or internal pages where the images are located. Anchor text links likely influence keyword rankings a bit more since they likely add more context to the link than an alt tag and the surrounding content around an image link. But a link from a great source is ideal indeed.
The question that I guess I haven't fully answered is whether or not Page Rank, Page Authority, Link Juice. etc gets passed as the same AMOUNT when flowing through an image link versus a text link. Using the page example I mentioned above, would an image link that flows from a Page Authority 50 page pass the same AMOUNT of Page Authority as a text link from a Page Authority 50 page? It's a geeky question, but so are so many elements of SEO
And the effectiveness of wrapping an image with text link are still kind of unknown by our crew or others I've talked to about it. At a glance, it's less code on the page, less links, and a good user experience, so on paper I think doing category grid links on ecommerce sites might serve the user and bots well if more sites would link the image AND text link together.
Thoughts?
- Andrew
-
Hi Andrew - it's been a while since I ran this particular test (almost 2 years!) but, back then, we saw that a straight HTML text link with anchor text appeared to pass slightly more ranking ability/value to a page than the same link with an image + alt text. Now, that said, I'm still a huge fan of image links - they're natural, they make sense in a backlink profile, etc. - and it certainly could have changed since then.
Honestly, from a practical standpoint, I usually wouldn't sweat image vs. text (get what you can if it's a great link source!), but from a technical level, my guess is that anchor text in HTML text is still slightly more influential than an image + alt attribute.
-
I am not aware of any search engine throttling the amount of PR or authority that is passed on by a link based on link type. If you or anyone else has any information on this topic, I would love to take a look at it.
-
Exactly, same idea that I'd like to test out too. Hopefully we'll hear feedback from others too on this.
In regards to PR and Page Authority going through and image link or text link, do you feel like the same strength would be passed through either form of link? (Not taking anchor text into consideration, just PR/Page Authority)
-
I thought about this same issue recently. On my next project where I encounter this topic, I plan to experiment with creating a div which contains the text and the image, then providing a single link for the div.
Basically, if you have a page with a linked image, and then a text link below the image, I would rather make that area a single clickable link rather then two separate links. I would need to do a bit of experimentation from a SEO perspective but it is something to think about.
-
Thanks for the solid reply Kent. I agree with your feedback and I'm looking a bit deeper to see if it would be smart to link an image and text phrase together.
Any thoughts on that? It could be easier for the user because they could click on both, and there would be less links on the page which could be good. But I wonder if search engines would attribute the anchor text to the link if it also includes an image?
-
Search engines are constantly changing their algorithms but to the best of my knowledge the below is accurate:
-
the first link to a given URL on a page is what's counted. The anchor text from the 2nd and further links would not offer value.
-
the order search engines go by is the order the links are seen as they read the page's code which may differ from how you see the links on the page
-
I believe link text offers more value then alt text. We know Google would prefer to weigh factors that a user can see such as text on a page, over a tag which can be stuffed with anything. With that said, since Google cannot see an image they are vulnerable and have to rely on us to tell them what is in the image. Lindsay offers a different opinion, see link below.
Additional reading:
http://www.seomoz.org/qa/view/26507/alt-text-vs-anchor-text
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/results-of-google-experimentation-only-the-first-anchor-text-counts
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to determine the value of these links?
Hi Guys, How can you determine the value of external links which are deep inside a website. Two examples: http://www.sheknows.com/community/home/ten-tips-buy-car-insurance Two sub-folders deep. http://www.dogfoodhowto.com/899/whats-the-best-puppy-food-for-cockapoo-puppy-at-home.html One sub-folder deep. These links are clearly far from the homepage, so was wondering if they are worthless or how can you determine the value of them? Cheers.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nattyhall0 -
Are We Doing Link Building Right? Do Certain Links Actually Matter?
I've been thinking about this as I go through my daily link building activities for clients. Do we really know as much as we hope/think we do about how Google values inbound links, which links actually matter, and how much these link signals play into rankings? For example, does Google REALLY value the fact that a business is paying to sponsor a local sports team, or to join a local chamber? For local businesses, link building is rather difficult because they don't necessarily have the resources or ability to implement ongoing Content Marketing initiatives to earn links naturally. How can we be sure that the things we recommend actually make a difference? I had my family real estate business featured in almost a dozen articles as expert sources, with links from authoritative sites like Realtor.com and others. Does Google distinguish between a profile link on a site like Realtor.com vs. being featured as an expert source on home page news? Just second guessing a lot of this today. Anyone can to share thoughts and insights?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RickyShockley0 -
Our site is on a secure server (https) will a link to http:// be of less value?
Our site is hosted on a secure network (I.E. Our web address is - https://www.workbooks.com). Will a backlink pointing to: http://www.workbooks.com provide less value than a link pointing to: https://www.workbooks.com ? Many thanks, Sam
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Sam.at.Moz0 -
'Nofollow' footer links from another site, are they 'bad' links?
Hi everyone,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | romanbond
one of my sites has about 1000 'nofollow' links from the footer of another of my sites. Are these in any way hurtful? Any help appreciated..0 -
How to manage images
We have been using Google+ to load our images straight on to our site, we did this to make sure our site loaded fast. google+ delivers them to website at the size we specify, so even if original is say 4000px x 3000px we can ask for them at 100x100 and they send as resized scale. we dont have to manage sizes just the original images and their tagging If we wanted to improve our SEO opportunities should we be doing this another way? Our images show if you look in the image serp but they dont appear on the main serp. How much of a difference would having the images on our own domain rather than having them on Google+ I am working through the recommended list below, would love to hear guys who are doing well with images and have to manage 1000's of them. There are a number of ways to optimise your images to increase your visibility within Google image search, and the chance of being featured within the main search results (as seen in the 'tablet PC' example): Use a short descriptive piece of text featuring desired keywords within the image alt text attribute.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PottyScotty
Save the image using a descriptive file name
Create an Image XML sitemap
Ensure your images directory isn't blocked by robots.txt
Ideally host images on the same domain
And surround the image with related text content to build a stronger page context/association0 -
Is this link being indexed?
link text Deadline: Monday, Sep 30, 2013 link text I appreciate the help guys!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jameswalkerson0 -
Sculpting anchor text percentage through disavow?
Hi there, should less-than-optimal links be preserved, if those links contribute to a more attractive anchor text percentage profile? I'm working on a client who spun a bunch of articles, using keyword word anchor text. No surprise, the strategy worked great up to the penguin update. About 90% of the client's links come from these spun articles. The other 10% of links are naturally occurring, quality links. Furthermore, these quality links are also keyword rich. Now, it occurs to me that if I remove / disavow the links coming from the spun articles, I'm left with the 10% of quality, anchor text rich links. I'm concerned that Google will see this percentage as too high, and lower the rank. Furthermore, I have a vague memory of watching some YouTube video, where an ex-Googler says that your brand name should be about 60% of your anchor text, and everything else lower. Finally, when I examine the anchor text in links coming into the ranking sites, they have 5-15% anchor text density on their keywords. So, I feel a bit of a contradiction: I should clean up all of the crappy links from the spun articles, but then that risks having only the keyword rich anchor text links active? Therefore, I'm considering leaving some of the crappy links active on non-relevant keyword text, such as the good 'ol "click here" link. Also, before answering this, I can already predict some of the answers on philosophical grounds: those crappy links from spun articles are not natural and garbage, so get rid of them. Fair enough, but I'm also interested in an answer on only the dimension of what will produce the highest rank for my client?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ExploreConsulting0 -
Increasing Internal Links But Avoiding a Link Farm
I'm looking to create a page about Widgets and all of the more specific names for Widgets we sell: ABC Brand Widgets, XYZ Brand Widgets, Big Widgets, Small Widgets, Green Widgets, Blue Widgets, etc. I'd like my Widget page to give a brief explanation about each kind of Widget with a link deeper into my site that gives more detail and allows you to purchase. The problem is I have a lot of Widgets and this could get messy: ABC Green Widgets, Small XYZ Widgets, many combinations. I can see my Widget page teetering on being a link farm if I start throwing in all of these combos. So where should I stop? How much do I do? I've read more than 100 links on a page being considered a link farm, is that a hardline number or a general guideline?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | rball10