Custom Error and page not found responses
-
When there is a 500 Internal Server Error, is it better to return an HTTP 500 response and custom error page from the requested URL, or is it better to return a 302 redirect? The redirect would send the browser to the custom error page, which would return the HTTP 500 result.
We tell Google not to index or follow our error pages, so if Google sees an error at a URL, we don't necessarily want Google to think that the URL should be ignored. That's why the alternative would be to redirect to a custom error page with it's own URL.
Similarly, what's the best approach if the response is a 404? Return HTTP 404 and custom 404 page from the requested URL, or redirect?
Thanks.
-
Just to add to Ryan's comments - if you had massive 500 issues, then you might theoretically argue that 301'ing would keep Google from crawling so many errors. At best, though, it's a band-aid, and maybe even a poor-fitting one. The better question is - why are those 500s occurring. Ultimately, they should be fixed, not patched.
Usually, Google isn't going to penalize a one-time 500 error or a short-term server problem. The only time I could see 301'ing is if you knew you had a major problem and couldn't fix it for a few days. The 301 (or possibly 302, in this case) could buffer you from crawl problems while you made the fixes. Obviously, that wouldn't be an ideal situation.
-
I have often though about this but have never really come to a answer.
If you 301 or 302 a page to a 404 error page and then return a 404, what are you telling the search engine. are you telling them that the erorr page does not exist, not the origianl page.I have always done just that, it was only recently that when wondering why goolge has not dropped pages from the index, that I had a good think about it. If you dont do anythiong and use the default ugly error page, it give a 404, rather than a 302 then a 404.
is this what gogole was talking about when they came up with soft 404 errors in WMT?
I did set up a test where i did both in 2 sites but i did not follow up on the test. -
The header response code chosen is important. I cannot think of any reason why you would choose to provide a 500 response code other then when your server naturally offers that response.
A 301 code should only be returned if you actually 301 the URL to the proper target. This code sends a message to search engines saying "hey, update the URL in your index to this new URL".
A 404 code should be returned if the content is no longer offered on your site and will not be offered. Actually, a 410 response "Gone" means the content is permanently gone and wont return. This tells search engines they should definitively remove the link. A 404 code tells search engines the content is not presently available. It may be a temporary issue which can later be resolved. When a search engine repeatedly finds a 404 error, they will then take action and remove the link.
-
Thanks for the replies.
I'm not sure I stated my question clearly. What I was wondering, was whether it is better to return status code 500 from the requested url, or status code 301 from the requested url. So in one case, the actual url content would be the error page, and in the other case it would redirect to the error page.
I'm not even sure if there is a difference, but if there is I'd like to learn more.
Thanks.
-
The best approach for a 404 error varies. If you know what the user was looking for and you have that content or similar content available, you should 301 redirect the user to the appropriate page on your site. For example, if you have a page on "Top 10 Christmas Gifts for 2010", if you delete that page you likely should perform a 301 redirect to your "Top 10 Christmas Gifts for 2011" page if it is available.
If you don't have a similar page available on your site, let the URL 404. Ensure your 404 page is helpful. It should have a basic "oh no, we lost your page" message along with your site's normal navigation and a search box. 404 errors are a natural part of the internet. In small numbers they are perfectly fine. Also, ensure your site's links are all valid. You can't control whether an external link leads to a 404 error but none of your internal links should cause a 404 error.
With respect to a 500 error, those are not common (at least compared to 404s). Something on your server is not configured correctly. You should have an error log and investigate the root cause of any 5xx errors. Find the source of the error and take action to fix it.
-
A 404 error means "not found". This is usually the page you get when you make a mistake spelling page name in a site, or if the page is deleted or moved. The problem is that the standard 404 page is ugly and unhelpful.
Many people have figured out that if you use a custom 404 page you can present a much more helpful page to you visitors. Others have taken it a step further and made that custom page a redirect to the home page, so that any links (and PR) pointing to pages that have been deleted (or misspelled) will be passed on to the website.
Hope this helps
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Very Old Pages Creeping Up - Advice
We are currently having very old pages dating back 5+ years ago appearing on moz all of a sudden, we don't necessarily get traffic from these links anymore and i doubt they still hold any weight. Currently they take you to a 404 page, would there be any worth in redirecting these links?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JH_OffLimits0 -
Pages blocked by robots
**yazılım sürecinde yapılan bir yanlışlıktı.** Sorunu hızlı bir şekilde nasıl çözebilirim? bana yardım et. ```[XTRjH](https://imgur.com/a/XTRjH)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | mihoreis0 -
Why are "noindex" pages access denied errors in GWT and should I worry about it?
GWT calls pages that have "noindex, follow" tags "access denied errors." How is it an "error" to say, "hey, don't include these in your index, but go ahead and crawl them." These pages are thin content/duplicate content/overly templated pages I inherited and the noindex, follow tags are an effort to not crap up Google's view of this site. The reason I ask is that GWT's detection of a rash of these access restricted errors coincides with a drop in organic traffic. Of course, coincidence is not necessarily cause. Should I worry about it and do something or not? Thanks... Darcy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
How long takes to a page show up in Google results after removing noindex from a page?
Hi folks, A client of mine created a new page and used meta robots noindex to not show the page while they are not ready to launch it. The problem is that somehow Google "crawled" the page and now, after removing the meta robots noindex, the page does not show up in the results. We've tried to crawl it using Fetch as Googlebot, and then submit it using the button that appears. We've included the page in sitemap.xml and also used the old Google submit new page URL https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/submit-url Does anyone know how long will it take for Google to show the page AFTER removing meta robots noindex from the page? Any reliable references of the statement? I did not find any Google video/post about this. I know that in some days it will appear but I'd like to have a good reference for the future. Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fabioricotta-840380 -
Is it OK to Delete a Page and Move Content to a Another Page without 301 re-direct
I have a page "A" that I want to completely delete and move the written content from A" to page "B". Since I am deleting "A" (not keeping page) is it OK to upload the content from "A" to page "B" and search engines will give "B" credit for the unique content? Or, since the content has already once been indexed on "A", "B" may struggle to get full credit for this new unique content, even though page "A" is deleted?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | khi50 -
YouTube Page
Hi All, I am new here but already I can see that SEOmoz is a great place for SEO 🙂 I need advice... We have one client that have 100.000 views per day on their YouTube channel! Now they have about 15.000 per day and ask us what we can do with SEO for their YouTube channel. Thanks for help! All The Best, Sanel
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | FighterSpirit0 -
Google is displaying my pages path instead of URLS (Pages name)
Does anyone knows why Google is displaying my pages path instead of the URL in the search results, i discoverd that while am searching using a keyword of mine then i copied the link http://www.smarttouch.me/services-saudi/web-services/web-design and found all related results are the same, could anyone one tell me why is that and is it really differs? or the URL display is more important than the Path display for SEO!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ali8810 -
Removing pages from index
Hello, I run an e-commerce website. I just realized that Google has "pagination" pages in the index which should not be there. In fact, I have no idea how they got there. For example, www.mydomain.com/category-name.asp?page=3434532
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AlexGop
There are hundreds of these pages in the index. There are no links to these pages on the website, so I am assuming someone is trying to ruin my rankings by linking to the pages that do not exist. The page content displays category information with no products. I realize that its a flaw in design, and I am working on fixing it (301 none existent pages). Meanwhile, I am not sure if I should request removal of these pages. If so, what is the best way to request bulk removal. Also, should I 301, 404 or 410 these pages? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Alex0