404-like content in webmaster tools
-
Hello
this is so strange i have just noticed when looking in webmastertools
there are some pages of our website it is showing like 404-like content but in reality the page is getting 200 response and it is good.
but why does google read that as 404-like content! we have product information and image of the product and even buy button in the page..
not only product pages but also for some content pages it showing 404-like content!
thanks in advance for your valuable opinions on the topic..
-
really appreciated your time and advice. i respect your opinons. actually i just wanted to give a example (target) for why we are using all these subcategories at the top.
we are not satisfied with the google rank and this is actually a new design of our site. its been just a week days since we are using this new system and the template.
by considering your words now i am rethinking and surely will need to take actions.
-
You are comparing your site with Target which is not an equivalent site. Target has a DA of 95 which is amongst the highest on the internet. Your site does not have the authority to make such a system work, and likely never will. That's nothing wrong with your site. 99% of the sites on the internet don't have a DA that high.
Another question before comparing yourself with Target. How is their SEO? Don't assume because they are a large retailer in the physical world that their online SEO is good. Have you tried searching for "Buy TV" or "Buy Television" and checking where Target ranks? I see stores like Circuit City and Best Buy ranking on the first page, but not Target.
How about more specific searches for common products? When I search for a popular brand which Target sells, I don't see them on the first page of results, but I see their competitors. Try searching for "phillips 32" tv" or "buy phillips 32" tv".
Also, look at Target's own menu for "TVs". They offer a link to their "TVs and Video" category (under Electronics) and to "TVs". Target has a MUCH larger selection and they do not break down "TVs" the way you do into the various types.
There are two things to consider with respect to your links. The first is useability. Take a look at your Google Analytics. It will show exactly how frequently each of your links is being used. I am willing to bet most of your 266 links are almost never used. That should indicate a need for change.
The second consideration is flow of PR throughout your site. You offer a link to "MP3" and "iPods", but then you also offer a link to 260 other items. Are the other items you are linking to less important? Because you are flowing the same amount of link juice to everything, which means that your more important pages receive almost none. Why? Because you are sharing your link juice with other pages which are not as important.
You are welcome to disregard the suggestion I shared. It is my advice to you, but you are in control of the site. The question is, are you happy with your rankings in Google presently? If so, keep doing what you are doing. If not, something needs to change. You could leave your navigation in tact and work on other aspects of your site, but 266 links on a site with such a low DA stands out as a major concern.
-
this is the complete url http://www.digitalcompring.com/imagen-sonido/55318-ue55d7000-8806071261218.html..
few days back we tried one module to make the url a bit beautiful what that module done was removed the numbers at the end of the url. but it slowed the very much so we disabled it..
some what i cant agree with this statement
////////
If you offer 250+ links on a page it can be difficult for users to locate a useful link. If you only offer 50 links on the page, users will have a lot easier time finding what they need.
///////////
because the links which we gave in the menu are making it is very easy for the client to get what he want every easily.. for example if one client is looking for LED tv he can just go to that sub category in tv's with out much difficulty. same case with every subcategory.. if you take games section... if the client is looking for ps3 console or games he can navigate there very easily.. we designed that menu mainly to keep it easy for the client..
i can give you some big brands for example who are using the same thing for example
http://www.pixmania.com/es/es/home.html
but what i see in target product pages is there are many comments of clients for each product. i guess this will make difference ?
-
This other link you are sharing is much better with respect to content. You are up to 228 words of unique content. It is still very thin on content.
With respect to the 404 issue, the URL you shared with me (the one receiving the 404 notice in WMT) is:
www.digitalcompring.com/imagen-sonido/55318-ue55d7000.html
When I enter that URL I am taken to the following page:
http://www.digitalcompring.com/imagen-sonido/55318-ue55d7000-8806071261218.html
I still receive a 200 header response code. Your server is changing the URL and I can't see the actual URL you listed.
With respect to links, if you value SEO at all you need to remove most of the links on the page. One step is you can link to the categories instead of the sub-categories and individual pages. For example you presently link to the "Televisions" category then offer links for "Televisions 3D", "Televisions Internet", "Televisions HD" and so forth. Simply link to the "Televisions" category and remove all the sub-category links.
Check your Google WMT and see which links are not used. If you offer 250+ links on a page it can be difficult for users to locate a useful link. If you only offer 50 links on the page, users will have a lot easier time finding what they need.
-
thank you so much for the detailed explanation..
i have given one more page too which it is showing 404 alike
http://www.digitalcompring.com/imagen-sonido/55318-ue55d7000-8806071261218.html
this got many words. but the only reason i can see is we have way too many link in the page..
but how to reduce them ? the link on the top menu is important o us. because it gives good look to the website..
any suggestions would be welcome on how to reduce the links on our pages.
once again thank you so much Ryan and others who replied
much appreciated..
-
Ravi, the likely root-cause of your issue is poor page design.
The page you shared (http://www.digitalcompring.com/aire-y-clima/1022-bp-3100.html) has 28 words of unique text in the main content area, that's it.
Try counting every word on the page. Include all of the header, the footer, the side bar. When examining the header include every word in each of the drop down menus. Also include the "Commentarios" tab which has a bit of text and shows zero comments. When you are finished, that is the amount of duplicated content which appears on every page of your site.
Now look at the main content area. The "Mas" tab starts with "Caracteristicas" which is common to every page, then shows 27 unique words. Above that area is the main product image with perhaps 20 unique words.
You page offers 266 links! That is a lot. A normal 404 page has a few words at the top "Sorry we can't find the page you are looking for" along with links to other pages on the site. Basically your current page does not appear as a unique web page which should be indexed. I would advise greatly reducing your links on the page (try to keep under 100) and greatly increasing your content. The product seems to be a space heater. More pictures of the product, more description of it's usage, etc. I hate to offer anything word-count related but try to at least get 500 unique words on the page.
-
i am sorry but i didn't understand what we should do to rectify these errors. in google webmaster tools..
as it is reading our good 200 ok pages as 404-like content...
-
What I am getting at is, some sites trap a 404, and then decide to return a page depending on the url, this was popular in the old days. where really you ned to do this much earlier in the event cycle.
This often a cause of soft 404s
-
actually we use prestashop and i guess it is automatically creating..
-
Why does this page give a 301 then a 404
http://www.digitalcompring.com/fasfasdfasAre you creating these 404 like pages dynamicly, or is there actualy a static page tha the address
-
actually we kept the site for few hours in maintainence mode..
these are some pages
| http://www.digitalcompring.com/aire-y-clima/1022-bp-3100.html | 404-like content | Nov 8, 2011 |
| http://www.digitalcompring.com/internet-tv/55318-ue55d7000.html | 404-like content | Nov 8, 2011 |
and more...
i would like take this opportunity to ask one more question also... can you guys please check the page and give me some feedback to improve the SEO also ?
thanks
-
If you share the URL we can offer more specific feedback.
In general, look at the top of the page. Is there any text along the lines of "Oops...we can't find the page you are looking for"?
If a page returns a 200 response code but the crawl of the page indicates the page seems like a 404 page, Google will identify it as "404-like" content in WMT.
-
I have also had this problem when the site goes down for maintenance - it says there are 404s etc. Have you taken the site or any pages down recently and then put them back up?
A
-
I assume you are atlking about the soft 404 errors in GWMT
A soft 404 is a page that returns a 200 when it should return a 404.
Can we get a url?
there is a quict test you can do, see if this returns a 200 or a 404
some websites use the 404 page to do url-rewriting or some other reason, this causes a soft 404.
From what I have read, Google can test if you are doing this buy requesting anonsecne url, and see if it returns a 404 or a 200. if it returns a 200 then they look at your pages more closly.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Collapsible sections - content
**Hi,****I am looking to improve the aesthetics of some pages on my website by adding written content into collapsible tabs. I was wondering whether the content that is ‘hidden’ by tabs is given less weight by Google from the perspective of SEO? **Some articles I have read suggest that tabbed content is weighted equally with the content which is already immediately visible to the user, but others suggest that this may not be the case. **Please, can I request opinions on the matter? Any advice would be greatly appreciated, many thanks.**Katarina
Technical SEO | | Katarina-Borovska0 -
Site Audit Tools Not Picking Up Content Nor Does Google Cache
Hi Guys, Got a site I am working with on the Wix platform. However site audit tools such as Screaming Frog, Ryte and even Moz's onpage crawler show the pages having no content, despite them having 200 words+. Fetching the site as Google clearly shows the rendered page with content, however when I look at the Google cached pages, they also show just blank pages. I have had issues with nofollow, noindex on here, but it shows the meta tags correct, just 0 content. What would you look to diagnose? I am guessing some rogue JS but why wasn't this picked up on the "fetch as Google".
Technical SEO | | nezona0 -
Does 404 hurts my website.?
Does 404 hurts my website.? My website reporting 404 crawl errors on pages that have never been part of the website. Site showing lot of 404 errors and all errors from Blog.We didn't create any pages .Automatically pages are created and showing 404 (Not Found) error response..Please any one help me to identify those issues.?
Technical SEO | | nlogix0 -
Mobile site content and main site content
Help, pls! I have one main site and a mobile version of that site (m.domain.com). The main site has more pages, more content, different named urls. The main site has consistently done well in Google. The mobile site has not: the mobile site is buried. I am working on adding more content to the mobile site, but am concerned about duplicate content. Could someone pls tell me the best way to deal with these two versions of our site? I can't use rel=canonical because the urls do not correspond to the same names on the main site, or can I? Does this mean I need to change the url names, offer different content (abridged), etc? I really am at a loss as to how to interpret Google's rules for this. Could someone please tell me what I am doing wrong? Any help or tips would GREATLY appreciated!!!!! Thanks!
Technical SEO | | lfrazer0 -
Duplicate Content
Hi, I'm working on a site and I'm having some issues with its structure causing duplicate content. The first issue is that the search pages will show up as duplicates.
Technical SEO | | OOMDODigital
A search for new inventory may be new.aspx
The duplicate may be something like new.aspx=page1, or something like that and so on. The second issue is with inventory. When new inventory gets put into the stock of the store, a new page for that item will be populated with duplicate content. There appears to be no canonical source for that page. How can I fix both of these? Thanks!0 -
Google Webmaster Tools Reporting False Links
I was looking at Google Webmaster Tools and the amount of links that are reported in there are inaccurate. They reported over 50,000 links that created a huge spike in their link graph and I checked some of the links and they don't even have the link on their site. Can anyone help with this?
Technical SEO | | TopFloor0 -
Google inconsistent in display of meta content vs page content?
Our e-comm site includes more than 250 brand pages - lrg image, some fluffy text, maybe a video, links to categories for that brand, etc. In many cases, Google publishes our page title and description in their search results. However, in some cases, Google instead publishes our H1 and the aforementioned fluffy page content. We want our page content to read well, be descriptive of the brand and appropriate for the audience. We want our meta titles and descriptions brief and likely to attract CTR from qualified shoppers. I'm finding this difficult to manage when Google pulls from two different areas inconsistently. So my question... Is there a way to ensure Google only utilizes our title/desc for our listings?
Technical SEO | | websurfer0