Open Site explorer (last 1-3 updates) shows new and wierd results
-
Hi Moz'ers! I have a questions for you guys. Can you explain why the website "Netspiren" has a lower "domain Authority" than "Duft og Natur"? See screenshot. I know it's a tough question without a detailed analysis, but looking at OSE's data, does the mozrank,moztrust, C-block don't reflect the power of the Domain Authority. What's you take? BTW: "Netspiren" has always had more and better links, and also had a higher Domain Authority. Something about the Domain Authority changed since the past 1-3 OXE updates. Looking forward for your take on this! Have a good weekend!
-
Hi Frederik,
Domain Authority is highly correlated with both mozRank and mozTrust, and includes factors from both of these metrics into the final Domain Authority score. Most of the time, a site with both superior Domain MozRank and superior MozTrust will also have a higher Domain Authority, but not all the time.
In this instance, I think we are seeing an edge case where Linkscape was reporting funny numbers. In the time since you posted your original question, not only Linkscape has been updated but the way Domain Authority metrics has also been updated for the first time in a couple years. The old Linkscape calculations were accidently including certain types of binary and junk files. If Duft og Natur had a large number of these types of files included in the Index, it could have certainly thrown the numbers off.
The end result is more accuracy today.
In fact, looks like Netspiren now scores a DA of 45, whereas Duft og Natur scores a 40. Nice!
-
Hi Yannick,
Thanks for your response.
I agree that such links build Domain Authority.
But great links from CNN etc. should also increase the moz-trust/rank... And Netspiren has a higher moz rank/trust. What I am wondering about, is the logic/correlation between: Mozrank/trust vs. Domain Authority. The screenshot shows that Netspiren.dk has more of any other metric, than the overall metric "domain Authority (And Total amount of links, which I don't take much into account). -
It's not only about sheer numbers. If you get a link from bbc.co.uk, theguardian, etc. etc. Those links are only from 2 root domains/C blocks, but will be very trustworthy/authoritive. So you have to look a bit further than just the numbers.
Followed links are of course giving more link juice than no-followed links (which give almost none or no link juice at all)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
New URL, new physical address, New Name. 30 point drop in Domain Authority. Yikes.
I have a client who is asking for SEO help after renaming their business, getting a new URL, and somehow having an address change (without moving to a new location...weird...I know). This has set them back big time in terms of their domain authority (they went from a 46 to a 15 in DA). The web developers they work with put a 302 redirect in place from their old URL (home page), which had 10,477 links from 52 root domains, to their new URL's home page. Open site explorer shows that they now have 5 links! We can improve some of the local search set backs from the name and address change with a citation audit and clean up, but the domain name change is a killer. So here's my question or questions, really: Do we need to manually rebuild links with partner websites? I know there is debate around the actual link juice passed along from a 302 vs a 301 redirect (despite what has been publicly stated by Google). Or is this just a waiting game while old links get recrawled?
Moz Pro | | TheKatzMeow1 -
New pages on my web site
I have created web sites that appear somewhere on Google in hardly any time at all, but I appear to have forgotten something or things are different for pages added recently to an existing website. I have added a page on a particular subject, optimized it using on page grader, so that I get an A, and a check mark for everything except H1 tags and rel=canonical which my web hosting provider does not support. I do have a check mark for accessible to search engines The page has the format http://www.domain.com/specific-keyword It is in the menu, so should have internal links to it, as I understand it. I have created a new site map, and submitted it in webmaster tools. Interestingly it says that of the 96 pages only 76 were indexed is this a clue? and why would they not index a page I have then shared the page on google plus, facebook, tumblr, pinterest and twitter and some others In OSE it comes up as domain authority 28 page authority 1, the social media shares do show up in metrics on the right but no links internal or external are shown, they do on other pages I created in the same way. Is it just a case of waiting or is their something I do to help thank you
Moz Pro | | singingtelegramsuk0 -
Website data updates
Hello All, I have downloaded some reports for "following" links from SEO Moz and no doubt the report is very comprehensive. However, I know some links listed in the reports does have rel="nofollow" tag attached to it but it is list still shown that they are following links. Can some please guide be to understand why this has happened. Is it possible that SEO Moz has old data of our site because these changes were recently done (2-3 weeks before)..? OR Have I misunderstood following as dofollow..? Any help would be highly appreciated. Thanks, moosa.
Moz Pro | | moosa0 -
Open Site Explorer vs Webmaster Tools
Hi there. OSE is showing 53 linking domains and WMT is showing 161.
Moz Pro | | JeromeSavon
Why are so many missing from OSE. They are all links of a decent age. Thanks0 -
Local search results reporting
Is there a way I can report on local search results for our keywords by city?
Moz Pro | | RPM5
For example could I specify Phoenix or Chicago and then see how we rank as if we did the search in that city?0 -
My website was hacked last Thursday
My business website was hacked (for the 2nd time in 12 months) last Thursday and all data lost. I've been rebuilding the site and database since then but I'm still getting Hacking Warnings each day. The latest warning says: Dear Colin/Administrator,
Moz Pro | | NileCruises
Someone has attempted to inject SQL into your domain:
HACK DETECTED!
PHP TYPE
IP: 94.100.17.134
Scriptname: /index.cfm
PathInfo: /index.cfm
QueryString: src=http%3A%2F%2Fpicasa.com.oprst.in%2Fshow.php%3Fid%3D16907217 My Technical advisro tells me the IP address is that of Inferno Solutions of The Netherlands. I wonder if anyone has suffered hacking like this what steps they too and what I could do about the potential hackers? Colin0 -
Keyword Update More Frequent?
I think it's extremely important to be aware of any change in ranking ASAP is there any way to have SEOMOZ Pro update more often than once a week?
Moz Pro | | montage0 -
Any tools for scraping blogroll URLs from sites?
This question is entirely in the whitehat realm... Let's say you've encountered a great blog - with a strong blogroll of 40 sites. The 40-site blogroll is interesting to you for any number of reasons, from link building targets to simply subscribing in your feedreader. Right now, it's tedious to extract the URLs from the site. There are some "save all links" tools, but they are also messy. Are there any good tools that will a) allow you to grab the blogroll (only) of any site into a list of URLs (yeah, ok, it might not be perfect since some sites call it "sites I like" etc.) b) same, but export as OPML so you can subscribe. Thanks! Scott
Moz Pro | | scottclark0