Additional links + Sinking DA
-
Hello from a tired SEO
I slept badly last night when I discovered last evening our Domain Authority had slumped. I've found that my client is now receiving followed backlinks from links placed in the footers of two good quality/related sites.
My question is should I ignore the reduction and keep link building around these - or - should I ask for these links to be removed?
Another factor in the mix is we have gone from about 300 links to 600 in a month. I have been working hard on our blog and site content with feeds to technorati.
Any advice for a tired novice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
-
Thanks Rand, I needed that. I've just been informed by my son's school that the council want to withdraw his funding - the UK is pretty dire at the moment. He has SEN. Still puts things in prospective.
-
That is fantastic to hear! So glad we could be helpful. Congrats on getting off the ground; the first steps are the hardest ones. Thrilled to have you here at Moz
-
Hi Rand
I nearly fell off my chair when I saw your face on this answer!
You've probably grasped that I am a struggling novice working on her own. The only thing that got me through Wednesday night was the thought that I could ask for help in the morning. I'm pretty sure that the additional links are not detrimental and that (having read the PA/DA link) the score we now have is a fairer reflection on our true DA.
I've set up our social profiles, established a blog and content strategy, followed all the 'make it readable advice' and am now doing the reaching out to other bloggers method you suggested. (I've even got one genuine backlink
to our piece on Finnish Digger Sitters) that was a proud day http://socialmedianordic.com/author/ingeborgv/page/2/.
My initial job with an old school SEO was a far cry from what I'm learning now. Your site is awesome, I really can't thank you enough.
Catherine
-
Hi Catherine - Wayne's responses were great, but I just wanted to jump in with another voice.
I'd say that if you think the links are actively hurting you in Google/Bing or could be perceived by someone on the search quality/webspam team as manipulative, go ahead and get rid of them. But, if they're editorial links that send you traffic or are just good in quality, don't sweat it!
Remember also that we just updated the PA/DA models - discussed here - http://www.seomoz.org/blog/introducing-seomoz-updated-page-authority-and-domain-authority - which might be responsible for the scoring changes.
-
Ok I'll chill - don't like the idea about the paper cup!
You're a star!
Thanks
Catherine
-
Sounds like you might be sweating a bit too much.
Also sounds like you're thinking with the right intentions: keep close tabs on your competitors; eek out the links that they have garnered from "good neighborhoods" and make sure you're using best practices with regard to anchor text.
I can tell you from experience, if you continue to stress over the "unexpected" in the SEO world, you may find yourself drooling into a paper cup at your local mental health facility!
It's actually what most of us (the good ones, anyway!) thrive on with regard to SEO: THE RAPID CHANGE!
The entire premise of SEO, at least for me, has been about rolling with the tide and realizing you'll never be ahead of the curve, or even caught up. It sounds as if you aren't a coder, etc., so just do your best to recognize the standards and best practices set forth in Webmaster Guidelines, and you're going to be ok.
Now, quit losing sleep
-
Thanks Wayne Stats on organic keywords keep going up. And I'm thinking of links from other sites (following the trail or my competitors).
Thank your for the reassurance - it's very hard learning this job on ones own sometimes, particularly when the unexpected happens. That's happened to me twice this week and it's unnerving
Yours sincerely
Catherine
-
Hi there, Catherine!
What about your traffic? Have you seen any reduction in organic since the "slump"? This might tell you a bit more than your Domain Authority (DA). (Not dismissing DA by any means, but sometimes it's not a clear-cut indicator of how well/poor you're doing in the SERPs.)
I wouldn't remove the footer links if the sites are reputable and its done in an honest/non-spammy fashion. I'm sure you can look at it and determine if it's "creepy" or not
Keep in mind though, footer links are certainly not given the weight they perhaps once carried! Also, if you're asking whether or not to keep building links from the same two sites, my suggestion would be to set your sights on different domains.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I disavow these links?
Hi all, I have a ski website that I am currently performing a toxic backlink audit on. I have noted that a lot of the links being flagged as toxic/spammy by the tool I am using seem to be the same/similar sites with different URLs. The sites are vaguely related to skiing (relating to helicopter travel options for travelling to ski resorts) but it is concerning me that there are so many of them and they are being flagged as so toxic.
Link Building | | SolveWebMedia
Do you think it is worth disavowing these? Or contacting the owner to ask them to remove the link? I have included an example of some of the links below. https://www.cannes-helicopters.co.uk/index.php?menuopen=21&showcontent=5
https://nice-helicopter.co.uk/index.php?menuopen=21&showcontent=5
https://monaco-helicopter.co.uk/index.php?menuopen=21&showcontent=5 Slightly different site but same favicon icon:
https://monaco-helicopter.co.uk/index.php?menuopen=21&showcontent=5
https://www.whitetracks-holidays.com/Helicopter_Transfers_Villars_Switzerland.htm Thanks in advance for any advice / help!0 -
Back link from site with DA of 72 to a website domain. Clicking on the link redirects to our website not the attended one.
Hi,
Link Building | | JIMBO16
I've ran a back link check and discovered a good back link to a site which then gets redirected back to my company's website. I have a feeling that an old SEO agency has purchased a small website which has a decent link back from a relevant organisation with a high Domain authority and then redirects the domain to our website to get the link juice. What are your thought on this? Is this really bad practise and possibly damaging? Thanks, Jim0 -
Any benefits to having Wikipedia links now they are 'no-followed' (apart from traffic and natural link prof.)
I see that Wikipedia outbound links are all no-followed, is there any benefit (aside from the traffic) for having links here now ? For example is their co-citation and co-occurance benefits. I know there is without the links since from seeing previous Moz content about this saying Google getting good at connecting brand/s and topic mentions on a page (without any links) so appreciate Wikipedia is still good for that sort of thing. And a no-followed link is obviously good for the potential traffic. But is there any additional SEO benefit to having a no followed link on a wikipedia entry/stub too ? (aside from its contribution to your no-followed links which in turn contribute to a natural looking link profile) Cheers Dan
Link Building | | Dan-Lawrence0 -
What count as irrelevant links?
I recently had a link audit done for a client selling mechanical parts. This client supplies to the mining and construction industries. The link audit showed all links on mining or construction sites as irrelevant. When I questioned about it, they explained that my client is in the mechanical parts industry and therefor Google would penalize me as those count as irrelevant links. I don't agree, but need an expert opinion. Can anyone help?
Link Building | | seocoza0 -
Back Links Page
Hi Everyone, I have been trying to increase my companies presence on the web by creating back links of our site to other sites. I realize that our site sent actually allow for back links and was thinking about devoting a page to this. I few sites i have approached have asked for reciprocal links so i thought it mite be useful to have a space that allows for this. Doe anyone have any advice about allowing for back links on your website. Is there an optimum number that i should be mindful of if I'm going to add links to my site? Any advice would be much appreciated Thanks Pete
Link Building | | Hardley10 -
JavaScript is crawled by search engines, isn’t it? Does it mean that links embedded in JavaScript pass link juice?
I wonder If links embedded in JavaScript from an external Website pass link juice to the linked page and thus have a positive effect on google rankings. I read that JavaScipt is craweld. Does it mean that also the link juice is passed? I'm looking forward to your answers.
Link Building | | Tabea0 -
Link Churn - where have all my links gone?
I am sure most of you have asked yourself the question I'm asking right now.. Where have all my links gone? I am starting to get twitchy now. I would estimate we have lost around 60% of our links in the past 3 weeks. Does anyone have any comeback stories? Feel like I am back to the start again. I have made a number of changes on the site not least removing a reciprical link page.. that had over 200 links on it but from reading one of Rand's tweets is it true that linking out could be good again?
Link Building | | robertrRSwalters0