Too Many Links Explode Upon Upgrade
-
We upgraded our CMS system in September and then had an explosion of new errors appearing in SEOMOZ.
Most concerning was the too many links area. Our main site is www.thenorrisgroup.com. Many of the links on the page are set up as no follows and nothing else changed so I don't understand why it's tracking differently all of a sudden. Any ideas?
-
Hi Aaron,
Have you been able to sort this out, or are you still looking for some help?
-
You should definitely remove the NoFollow tag. That is a separate issue from the "too many links" warning. I noticed it because you specifically mentioned you had added the NF tag to links.
With respect to the change, it is possible some of your links were previously not crawlable due to the site design. It is also possible your CMS is adding extra links as well. The only way to know for sure is to perform a thorough analysis of all links on the page. SEOmoz shows your home page has 125 links. In my experience the tool is quite accurate.
When I performed a quick scan of the page, I noticed 75 links visually. I would suggest checking the HTML of your home page and account for every link. Either I am missing something or you have a lot of links which are not visible. For example links contained in
<noscript>tags can cause this problem.</p></noscript>
-
I am so discouraged. Why would it change all of a sudden? It was fine and then it just exploded. Did SEOMOZ change the way they were tracking certain issues?
So bottom line I should take the NF off.
-
Ryan is correct; you cannot control the flow of PageRank or link juice around your site using the NF attribute, and, in general, it is not a "best SEO practice" to use the nofollow attribute on your own site links. If you would prefer the search engine to not index a page, it is far better to prohibit the crawl of that page via your robots.txt file.
Unless you are selling links (or trying to prohibit spam in blog comments, perhaps) I would not use the nofollow on a site. Why would I put a link on my site that I don't trust? I don't think I want to send that message to Google.
-
Hi Aaron,
A few things to know about your links:
1. The SEOmoz flag for "too many links" on a page is triggered when you offer 101+ links. In reality, there is no magical number whereby 100 links is ok and 101 is bad. It is a judgment call involving numerous factors and can vary per site.
2. Overall I find the number of links offered on your home page to be fine. Your site's DA of 43 can support 125 links if they are all necessary. Your sidebar and content links look good. I would suggest evaluating your navigation menu and footer menu in Google Analytics. There is a tool which allows you to see which links are used and how often. If you find links which are not used (footer links have very low usage normally) then you may wish to consider removing them.
In the end, if you research the matter and determine your links are necessary and valued by visitors then you can leave them and disregard the warning.
3. In your case, the flag is a good thing because it allowed this conversation which will be helpful. Specifically, it is a VERY bad idea to nofollow your internal links in the manner that has happened on your site. Many people think if they "nofollow" a link, the link is ignored by search engines. That is not the case.
Adding the nofollow tag to a link means you do not trust the link. You still lose link juice. It can be confusing so I will share a couple examples:
Case 1 - you offer 100 links on a page. All links are followed. Each link receives roughly 1% of link juice (1/100). In reality there are a couple other factors such as link decay and link location, but they are not relevant to this conversation.
Case 2 - you offer 100 links on a page. 50 links are nofollowed. Each of the remaining links still only receive 1% of link juice (1/100). The 50 nofollow links still have link juice flow to them, but rather then that juice being passed on to the target page, it evaporates.
As a general rule, do not ever no follow any internal links. There can be some minor exceptions but you are far better off never using nofollow on an internal link then ever misusing nofollow on any internal links. For external links, only use nofollow if you do not trust the target site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I nofollow certain outbound links?
Hi, All of our outbound links are currently follow.I've read that the only case where nofollow should be used, according to Google, is for paid links, crawl prioritization & untrustworthy sites.The kinds of websites we are linking to from our blog include:- Websites with great content & high authority that is relevant to the topic we've written about that would enhance the user experience- Partners/companies we have a strong relationship with who also have decent authority- Social media profiles of industry people not within our organisation - Websites with definitions/wikipedia/soundcloud/published statistics/news sites and other large well known sites. I am wondering if we should put the nofollow attribute on the last 2 points (social media profiles of people we've referenced, websites with definitions/wikipedia/soundcloud/published statistics/news sites and other large well known sites.)Or do you think it's totally fine that all our links are follow provided the websites are legitimate, trustworthy and have some authority?Thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | PGAUE0 -
Keywords in site maps. Can there be too many? Can they be considered to be stuffed?
Hi everyone,
On-Page Optimization | | TheJewelleryEd
I'd appreciate some insight on a keyword stuffed site map I've seen on a site similar to ours (we don't have this kind of menu ourselves).
https://www.1stdibs.com/sitemap/jewelry/stone/pink-diamond/
This is accessed from a site map. Do you think it's too blatant / keyword stuffed? I haven't done this with our site, but am interested to see a big reputable site doing something so clearly just for SEO.
Would it work? Or would search engines dislike it? I'd really appreciate your thoughts.
Thank you.0 -
Are Back Links King
We have worked as closely as possible to the guidelines and advice on this forum, if we compare our on page Analsis with other companies in the same field as ours we have a far better site as far as SEO is concerned, our DA authority is higher and most of our page authority is higher but we just cannot seem to get up to their level in the search engines, one site that is in competiton with us do not use Facebook and also they do not use Twitter very much, I looked at some of their backlinks and their top one which was a blog had not been updated since 2011, over the years we have amassed far more what I would call worthless links as this was the done thing then, how can I get on the right track, are there any companies who could assess our site for a reasonable cost to point us in the right direction, we are doing our own blog, Facebook, Twitter, Onlywire?
On-Page Optimization | | Palmbourne0 -
Are My footer links bad?
I started working here recently, they said the footer links were to help with navigation of their most popular products. I am curious after reading http://www.seomoz.org/blog/internal-linking-strategies-for-2012-and-beyond if having these footer links could hurt the ranking of those key words after the penguin update. I am looking more into the analytics, and have not seen a negative impact yet.
On-Page Optimization | | DoRM0 -
Are there to many internal links here?
This is our main Motorcycle Parts page. In my opinion there are to many links on this page. They have put links to all the top brands after products. Do you think having all these links could be hurting our rankings/ ability for google to crawl the site efficiently? The links are good for navigation, I just think there are way to many there like over 200. Here is the page you can see what i am talking about http://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/s/49/61/Motorcycle-Parts
On-Page Optimization | | DoRM0 -
Page Shaping - No Follow Links
It's my understanding that adding a nofollow tag to pages that aren't of significance to users can help with page shaping and directing google to the most important links on my home page. I have 4 links on my home page that I'm considering adding a nofollow tag to: Privacy Policy, Legal Policy, Anti-Trust Policy, and Help-Desk Because these links are in the footer on every page I think they're probably sucking up some useful link juice. It's doubtful that anyone would actually search for our privacy policy or legal policy to find our site. I'd rather the juice to spread to other pages of use. What do you guys recommend?
On-Page Optimization | | inhouseninja0 -
Canonical links
My website is relatively new, January. We climbed steadily to 6th for our search term then overnight rocketed to 1st. This only lasted a week and have been stuck at 9th ever since. When I use the SEO Moz tools our site should theoretically be top...I only joined today btw. Anyway in Google webmaster tools I noticed it said I had duplicate title tags, when I checked to see what the pages were- it was my home page! Google also seems to have cached two versions of our homepage, the root domain and the Default.aspx page. Now I have fixed this canonical linking issue today (using canonical link tag and 301s) so time will tell but has anyone got any first hand experience of this issue? Was it a big factor? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | SplashBacksNI0 -
How many urls per page is to many
I know it used to be 100 urls per page, but recently Matt cutts has said that they can count a lot more now. I was wonder what you guys thought was how many was to many per page?
On-Page Optimization | | Gordian0