Major Ranking Drop
-
My site bestdslrreview dot net was ranking number one for Canon T3i. I was amazed considering my competition. Canon T3i was at number 3 to 5 usually for US traffic.. Canon 7d review was ranking number 2 and Canon 7D was on page one.
Canon 7D keywords dropped about 10 places but Canon T3i Review dropped about 50. and same for Canon T3i.
I worry about a number of things, including thin affiliate site but I don't know, my articles are original. I also worry about to many links with my keywords in anchor text.
My on page results from SEOMOZ look great to me. This drop was my main reasons for going ahead and signing up. Hoping I could find out what happened.
The site is only about six months old. I waited probably three months before doing any significant link building.
The good thing is, I was ranking high from Black Thursday until a few days before Christmas. It can't be someone else just started doing SEO as I fell far too fall. Some kind of penalty. I had Google do this to another of my sites once though and after a couple of months it bounced back for most of my keywords. A site very much like this one.
Is this just the Google Dance?
Thanks
-
Oh I laughed about blaming it on the kids but personally, I think it is more likely the dog. haha
-
I don't THINK I have a think content issue. But I'll re-write those features just to be on the safe side.
I think I built too many links too fast, thousands of them and then stopped. I wont do that again. I think it is a sudden decrease in link velocity. I've have struggled with link velocity a lot and finally, I think I understand why it is important to continue with it.
You touched on it. To me it could look unnatural but like I said a small site could be popular and get lots of links. Another SEO expert told me that is true but if the backlink velocity drops to fast it could be that Google takes that as a signal the page is no longer popular as well as the possible natural linking problems.
I will continue with my blog network, slower but better quality than the others I built. However, I will also work on the duplicate content issue. I have lots of content with no links just to help with the thin but now I realize that a page could still be thin too. Will make things a bit better if I do that too.
As always, I'm all ears.
-
I dont mean that duplicate content on same site is ok, only that you want be penelized for it. But only one version of the duplicate content will rank. meaning you wont get any credit for it. they will pick a version to rank, using a canonical you can hint to the search engines what version that should be.
what the penalty you want to avoid is thin content. meaning what is left on the page after you take away advertizing and duplicate content found elsewhere on the web, then if what is left is not substantual and usefull, then it is thin content. Duplicate content wont hurt you in itself, it wont help you, but thin content will hurt you.
-
Yes, I made them no-index follow. I've now removed the no-follow on category and tags but that's the way it was before. the drop.
As for the duplicate content, only the bullet text is duplicate. That's 105 words out of 890. That's 13% and it is too high for me. I'll re-write that and resolve that just to be on the safe side. Its really two of the bullets that are causing it. But I'll change them all, looks like I got lazy there. I'll check the other articles on the site as well to make sure I didn't do that on those.
The duplicate content issue is as clear as mud. Now I know that Goggle says they don't penalize a site for duplicate content on other sites. Of course, that doesn't hold true for autoblogs. But that doesn't seem to be true when one considers backlinks. I'm uncertain. You seem very knowledgeable and I'm sure you are. What you basing the statement that onsite duplicate content will not hurt you. I'm pretty sure I've read on Google site itself that they HATE that. The reason they do is because of having the same page show up in the SERPs more than once. And I clearly had that going on before.
Yeah, It was Matt Cutts, I just couldn't remember his last name.
I'm really having trouble with this issue and based on what I've seen around the web, I'm not alone. I've got one fairly large site with over 1500 indexed pages. Google Web Tools showed a LOT of pages with duplicate titles and it took me forever to get those to disappear. Finally they did after I removed the index for categories and tags.
I'm having a lot of trouble with canonical URLs. I know I'm not alone. i've read much and understand little. I learned the most for an SEOmoz help link.
If I understand it, the intent is to tell SE where the main article is. I turned the canonical option back on in SEO platinum but then turned it off again. I'll show you why. It gave me two different links in the header. One for my category and one for my article. That seems counter productive to me and exactly what I don't want to happen.
Thanks for all of your help.
I probably shouldn't have marked your message Good answer as that made the thread answered. LOL oh well, I'll know next time. I don't want to take up all of your time.
Thanks very much for the help.
-
i noticed to made them follow that is good becqause linkjuice can still flow back out.
but you that fact that a page is not indexed does not change the flow of LJ to it.I fyou have 2 duplicates then use a canonical tag, or get rid of one of them things
like tag pages with shippets of other pages, are ok, at worst they wont rank, they
will not hurt you. its duplicate content from other sites that is the problem.As a rule blocking from robots is a last resort. i would concentrate on the duplicate
content from other pages, you need to add enouth original conent to make the page usefull.As Matt Cutts said, take away advertisments, content that is avaiable elsewhere, and what is left,
is it usefull and original?I wouldent bother with the tags in the sitemaps, category pages yes, bing for one say that
they only want the main pages in the site map, not every page, but having said that I asked
Duane Forrester from Bing and he said for a small site listing all pages is not a problem.We have alll been in panic mode when we lose rankings, I am a computer programmer
and when things are not working I start to believe anything and everything is responcible,
I will uninstall things, delete thing, blame my kids, assume i have a virus, but when i settle
down i usually find its somthing simple. -
As users build links to a website or URL, we see that pattern emerge and can
track the time over which links are built. Fast growth can indicate
popularity. Normally links build in a similar fashion across all websites, with
spikes potentially indicating popularity. When we compare that data against the
other signals we track, we get a truer picture of if that popularity is real or
not. Machines can build links quickly, but if we know the source of the links
is a common location or service that is “less than organic”, we’ll discount the
value of the links. -
I'm really glad you brought up the no no-index issue.
Most of that was probably created after the drop and I'll tell you why I did it to hopefully learn why I shouldn't do it.
I no-index privacy policy and disclaimer earnings type pages. I do that because I don't want those pages to dilute my money pages. Is that a mistake?
I also went in and usually do it from the beginning and set tag and categories to no index. I'm not sure when I did that on this site but I think it was after the drop. I'm not sure. The reason I do it is that seems to create duplicate listings in the SERPs. Or I thought it was afraid of duplicate content. Is my thinking wrong on that? I see the same pages/articles listed when I do site:domain.com and sometimes I get two listings for the same page on page one of Google. One for the article and one for the tag or category. I use SEO Platinum to accomplish this I also removed categories and tags from my sitemap using the xml sitemap generator plugin.
On the scripts, now that is something totally new to me. I'm pretty sure I did that after the drop. When I did site:domain.com I saw a lot of them listed. My robots.txt file looks like this:
User-agent: * Disallow: /wp-admin/ Disallow: /wp-includes/ Sitemap: http://bestdslrreview.net/sitemap.xml
This is likely what is causing the no index on the scrips/plugins. So I should remove those to lines? I'm going to go ahead and do that since I was never sure that they should have been there in the first place.
Also I do not include categories and tags in my sitemap, should I start including those in the sitemap?
Thanks very much for the help. Sometimes I over think when I don't know exactly what the answers are.
-
Thank you. I think it will come back too but the too many links issue.....
I have always wondered about that and I seem to get different advise.
I forgot his name, the Goggle guy, Matt ??? most of you will know... He wrote a post indicating you can't link too many times. That is what most of the people that say you can't build to many links to fast base their advice on. But to me, I've always wondered if it makes since to have 2000 links to a site with five articles. Then I reason people could love a site with only a few pages, I'm sure that happens naturally at times?
If you're right, then I've made it worse because I've been building more links but aiming at higher PR sites when I do it. I've got a lot of links from PR 0 sites but in open site explorer it appears I have a pretty good natural looking distribution of links across different PR sites so I'm not at all sure.
I'm all ears if you and others have more to say to help me with this issue.
-
There is a fewe pages with no index, They see to have content i cant see why you would no index them, like this one
/tag/canon-7d/
You have also no indexed a few scripts, I beleive this is a mistake, because a search engine knows that the scripts are being used, but does not know what you are doing with them, and may lead to a lack of trust.Thhere are a few other technical issues, but not what would lead to a huge drop in ranking.
You do have a fair bit of duplicate content, the reviews are on other pages, if you wrote the reviews i would not worry, search engines usealy know why is copying and who is the creater.
If you are getting this content from elsewhere, you need to add enouth content to each page so that it apears original.
-
So you are saying you have been only building links for 3 months, but looking at OSE the Canon TSi page has 425 linking domains and canon 7D 751 linking domains?? This is way too many for that time frame IMHO. I would say you have tripped a filter. Wait 60 days and see if it comes back up... it should do.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
My DA keeps going up, by my rankings keep falling.
Hi, I manage a few clients, but the one that is in reference to this question is a local law firm. They blog on a regular basis and we continue to monitor for and delete any negative backlinks. Their domain authority keeps rising, but they continue to lose rankings for tracked keywords. Has anyone else faced a similar situation? Does anyone one know what is causing this or what I can do to combat it? Thanks,
On-Page Optimization | | GavinAdv0 -
Will pushing a visitor to a conversion page hosted on a 3rd-party domain hurt the landing page ranking
Had an interesting question from a client. The client has a page that is optimized for a specific term. The goal of the page is to push users to sign-up for a trial. The trial registration (conversion) page is hosted by a third-party. Will pushing users to the conversion page cannibalize the SEO authority of the landing page. My reflexive answer is to say no, but now am not so sure.
On-Page Optimization | | infoblue0 -
301 Redirect and SEO Rankings
I recently restructured my webpage URL's (about 300 ~ 75% of my total website) to make the URL paths more SEO friendly. Within a few hours of restructuring the pages, I did a 301 redirect to my old URL's and pointed them to the new pages. I have seen ~ 50% drop in organic traffic. I started the restructuring exercise 14 days ago and finished it a few hours back. I have 3 questions: How long will it take for me to recover my old traffic. Will I recover most of it or some of it? Due to a glitch in the specified path, some old URL's were wrongly redirected (this happened with 9 pages to be exact). I will explain exactly what happened: www.redirct.com/superseonow1 ---- redirected to ---- www.redirectnow.com/seonow1 **/superseonow was 301 redirected to /seonow. After 3 days I realize that /superseonow1 was actually /supernow1. The same thing happened to 9 pages - /superseonow2, /superseonow3 ..... ** I have removed all the wrong redirects. When I tried to enter the correct (old) paths now and 301 redirect them to the new paths, the page was not found using the old paths. Should I redirect the old paths to the New ones even now? 3. Finally, in how much time after you change the page structure should you use the 301 redirect. Since I had two different teams working on this job, there could have been up to a 24 hour gap between the redirection.
On-Page Optimization | | rajatsharma0 -
Can a page lose ranking because it has too many bold tags?
I run a product search website for the Engineering Sector. Each of the companies listed on the website has a profile page. This page used to rank very well in google. Over the last couple of weeks these pages disappeared for google i.e they fell about 20 to 30 spots in the search results for relevant keywords like the Manufacturer Name. I was trying to analyze the page and found that Each of the Categories that the manufacturer supports was listed in "bold" and linked to the page for that category. A manufacturer can support up to 20 or 30 categories so this results in about 20 or 30 Bold keywords. Is this a bad practice? Could this be a reason for a drop in ranking or do bold keywords on a page not matter? What are your views?
On-Page Optimization | | raghavkapur0 -
Does keyword usage in the footer have an effect on how high a page ranks?
My client has a lot of text about their company in their footer. Is the text in the footer associated with the on page keyword usage and density for all pages or none of the pages?
On-Page Optimization | | Santaur0 -
Keywords & ranking
I am working for a social networking site called Yookos. Much our content is user-generated. How can i add keywords onto the site to make sure our site appears in the SERPS? Also what techniques can i use to make our social site rank highly? Do the other SEO techniques apply here?
On-Page Optimization | | seoworx1230 -
Possible Reasons for 40% Drop in Google since January?
Hello: I know this is long - but I kept it as succinct as I could to explain the situation - but everyone of the brilliant people on here insight is so greatly appreciated in advance. There has been more than a 30% decline in traffic mostly from Google on a site with an 11 year presence on the web, 5 page rank (historically 6), fairly good quality backlinks (but they are old). I cannot pinpoint a smoking gun (such as a specific penalty) - if it's just not attrition in demand for the product itself which there is plenty of evidence for. But I practice only white hat, so I don't know what it is. I do not engage right now in link building because my time to work on SEO is very limited. We have a few common keywords that cannot be avoided (because there are no good synonyms) so there is a high density for one word especially all over the site. From some websites (like tidbits) we have in Google Webmaster account tens of thousands of backlinks. How serious is this (FYI - they're not new though) Because of some unflattering reviews from sites with strong authority, the number of click throughs vs. impression in Google Search has dropped dramatically - I think a big part of it is that because the reviews drove down CT ratio. Interestingly, the number of CTs from Adwords has also dropped off significantly, and I was told by Adwords specialist that declining organic traffic does affect the Adwords traffic to - in fact, they're not even using our daily budget for Adwords as they used to. The site also doesn't pick up quality organic backlinks as it used to, and the anchor link text is almost always the same - a product name. Plus, the site was banned in 2008 by Google (from a black hat keyword stuffing that I discovered happened in another dept.) and only after really working hard was it reinstated by reconsideration request. Site traffic from Google has never fully reached it's potential since then. Also, text prices were removed from Buy Now buttons even though the prices were textually part of the buttons for years (could this be some penalty?) **Is it possible that Google is taking the ban history, the poor reviews, the decline in CTs to impressions on the site, the huge decline (75% over four years) in "search volume" or "search interest" (according to Google Trends) for the site's main product name and just using all of this to keep downgrading the site? If true, wouldn't the page rank be diving down to anywhere from 0 to 2 (or is that not relevant at all?) ** There are no messages of a penalty or anything else in the official Webmaster account for this site. Any insight anyone is able to provide is much appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | holdtheonion1 -
Dropping the www
We are planning on changing our domain next week. Everything has been covered including google change of domain procedure and redirects etc. I plan on dropping the www during this move as it is redundant and dilutes the keyword density of the domain. What do you guys think of this? Is it worth doing? Thanks, Gareth
On-Page Optimization | | SimpsonGareth0