How can I tell Google, that a page has not changed?
-
Hello,
we have a website with many thousands of pages. Some of them change frequently, some never. Our problem is, that googlebot is generating way too much traffic. Half of our page views are generated by googlebot.
We would like to tell googlebot, to stop crawling pages that never change. This one for instance:
http://www.prinz.de/party/partybilder/bilder-party-pics,412598,9545978-1,VnPartypics.html
As you can see, there is almost no content on the page and the picture will never change.So I am wondering, if it makes sense to tell google that there is no need to come back.
The following header fields might be relevant. Currently our webserver answers with the following headers:
Cache-Control:
no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0, public
Pragma:no-cache
Expires:Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Does Google honor these fields? Should we remove no-cache, must-revalidate, pragma: no-cache and set expires e.g. to 30 days in the future?
I also read, that a webpage that has not changed, should answer with 304 instead of 200. Does it make sense to implement that? Unfortunatly that would be quite hard for us.
Maybe Google would also spend more time then on pages that actually changed, instead of wasting it on unchanged pages.
Do you have any other suggestions, how we can reduce the traffic of google bot on unrelevant pages?
Thanks for your help
Cord
-
Unfortunately, I don't think there are many reliable options, in the sense that Google will always honor them. I don't think they gauge crawl frequency by the "expires" field - or, at least, it carries very little weight. As John and Rob mentioned, you can set the "changefreq" in the XML sitemap, but again, that's just a hint to Google. They seem to frequently ignore it.
If it's really critical, a 304 probably is a stronger signal, but I suspect even that's hit or miss. I've never seen a site implement it on a large scale (100s or 1000s of pages), so I can't speak to that.
Two broader questions/comments:
(1) If you currently list all of these pages in your XML sitemap, consider taking them out. The XML sitemap doesn't have to contain every page on your site, and in many cases, I think it shouldn't. If you list these pages, you're basically telling Google to re-crawl them (regardless of the changefreq setting).
(2) You may have overly complex crawl paths. In other words, it may not be the quantity of pages that's at issue, but how Google accesses those pages. They could be getting stuck in a loop, etc. It's going to take some research on a large site, but it'd be worth running a desktop crawler like Xenu or Screaming Frog. This could represent a site architecture problem (from an SEO standpoint).
(3) Should all of these pages even be indexed at all, especially as time passes? More and more (especially post-Panda), more indexed pages is often worse. If Googlebot is really hitting you that hard, it might be time to canonicalize some older content or 301-redirect it to newer, more relevant content. If it's not active at all, you could even NOINDEX or 404 it.
-
Thanks for the answers so far. The tips are not really solving my problems yet, though: I don't want to set down general crawling speed in the webmaster tools, because pages that frequently change should also be crawled frequently. We do have XML Sitemaps, although we did not include these picture pages, as in our example. There are ten- maybe houndreds- of thousands of these pages. If everyone agrees on this, we can include these pages in our XML Sitemaps of course. Using "meta refresh" to indicate, that the page never changed, seems a bit odd to me. But I'll look into it.
But what about the http headers, I asked about? Does anyone have any ideas on that?
-
Your best bet is to build an Excel report using a crawl tool (like Xenu, Frog, Moz, etc), and export that data. Then look to map out the pages you want to log and mark as 'not changing'.
Make sure to built (or have a functioning XML sitemap file) for the site, and as John said, state which URL's NEVER change. Over time, this will tell googlebot that it isn't neccessary yo crawl those page URL's as they never change.
You could also place a META REFRESH tag on those individual pages, and set that to never as well.
Hope some of this helps! Cheers
-
If you have Google Webmaster Tools set up, go to Site configuration > Settings, and you can set a custom crawl rate for you site. That will change it site-wide, so if you have other pages that change frequently, that might not be so great for you.
Another thing you could try is generate a sitemap, and set a change frequency of never (or yearly) for all of the pages you don't expect to change. That also might slow down Google's crawl rate of those pages.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Page Load Timings: How accurate is Google Analytics Data?
Hello Guys, what are your experiences? How accurate is google analytics data regarding page load times? I know that one of my sites has trouble with pageload times, especially in India and USA. We are based in middle Europe and regarding to the GA data we have here in middle europe of about 2 seconds page load time. Moreover we have of about 4 seconds in USA and 10 seconds in India. Therefore I decided to test for a few sides a CDN (on these pages all static files are served over the CDN). However, first GA data indicates, that the page load times are even getting worse!!! But when I test it for example with pingdom (http://tools.pingdom.com/fpt/) and compare it with an old landing page without CDN implementation, the tool says it's faster. The CDN provider (maxcdn) send me also some reports, which indicate, that the page load time should be faster...That's the reason why I ask about your experience with the GA page load time data, because personally I get the impression you cannot trust the data... Thanks for your help! Cheers
Technical SEO | | _Heiko_2 -
When i type site:jamalon.com to discover number of pages indexed it gives me different result from google web master tools
when i type site:jamalon.com to discover number of pages indexed it gives me different result from google web master tools
Technical SEO | | Jamalon0 -
Google Displaying wrong URL but correct page title and description in SERPS
Hi. Our second highest performing page on Google is messed up in the SERPS. This is our login page. It always ranks high. It still does, but the URL is incorrect. Google is referencing an old redirect that was for a one off campaign from January 2014. This page has long been redirected. But now the vanity url for this page is what is displayed in Google. The link goes to our login page but once you log in it redirects you to a page saying the offer has expired instead of your account details. This is a huge issue for us. Can anyone shed some light? I'm having a rel canonical added since this page is used for a lot of vanity deeplinks.
Technical SEO | | PollyKane0 -
Cached pages still showing on Google
We noticed our QA site showing up on Google so we blocked them in our robot.txt file. We still had an issue with them crawling it so we blocked the site from the public. Now Google is still showing a cached version from the first week in March. Do we just have to wait until they try to re-crawl the site to clear this out or is there a better way to try and get these pages removed from results?
Technical SEO | | aspenchicago0 -
Can Page Content & Description Have Same Content?
I'm studying my crawl report and there are several warnings regarding missing meta descriptions. My website is built in WordPress and part of the site is a blog. Several of these missing description warnings are regarding blog posts and I was wondering if I am able to copy the first few lines of content of each of the posts to put in the meta description, or would that be considered duplicate content? Also, there are a few warnings that relate to blog index pages, e.g. http://www.iainmoran.com/2013/02/ - I don't know if I can even add a description of these as I think they are dynamically created? While on the subject of duplicate content, if I had a sidebar with information on several of the pages (same info) while the content would be coming from a WP Widget, would this still be considered duplicate content and would Google penalise me for it? Would really appreciate some thoughts on this,please. Thanks, Iain.
Technical SEO | | iainmoran0 -
Pages not indexed by Google
We recently deleted all the nofollow values on our website. (2 weeks ago) The number of pages indexed by google is the same as before? Do you have explanations for this? website : www.probikeshop.fr
Technical SEO | | Probikeshop0 -
How do i can change my instant preview image?
Since we've put an index.htm file indicating that our webiste is under reconstruction and have removed it few hours after, the instant preview picture still showing the informative message. It has been 40 day since and we've submit our sitemap few times. Is there a way to change it manually?
Technical SEO | | webit400 -
How can I get Google to crawl my site daily?
I was wndering if there was a trick to getting google to crawl my website daily?
Technical SEO | | labradoodlelocator0