How can I tell Google, that a page has not changed?
-
Hello,
we have a website with many thousands of pages. Some of them change frequently, some never. Our problem is, that googlebot is generating way too much traffic. Half of our page views are generated by googlebot.
We would like to tell googlebot, to stop crawling pages that never change. This one for instance:
http://www.prinz.de/party/partybilder/bilder-party-pics,412598,9545978-1,VnPartypics.html
As you can see, there is almost no content on the page and the picture will never change.So I am wondering, if it makes sense to tell google that there is no need to come back.
The following header fields might be relevant. Currently our webserver answers with the following headers:
Cache-Control:
no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0, public
Pragma:no-cache
Expires:Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Does Google honor these fields? Should we remove no-cache, must-revalidate, pragma: no-cache and set expires e.g. to 30 days in the future?
I also read, that a webpage that has not changed, should answer with 304 instead of 200. Does it make sense to implement that? Unfortunatly that would be quite hard for us.
Maybe Google would also spend more time then on pages that actually changed, instead of wasting it on unchanged pages.
Do you have any other suggestions, how we can reduce the traffic of google bot on unrelevant pages?
Thanks for your help
Cord
-
Unfortunately, I don't think there are many reliable options, in the sense that Google will always honor them. I don't think they gauge crawl frequency by the "expires" field - or, at least, it carries very little weight. As John and Rob mentioned, you can set the "changefreq" in the XML sitemap, but again, that's just a hint to Google. They seem to frequently ignore it.
If it's really critical, a 304 probably is a stronger signal, but I suspect even that's hit or miss. I've never seen a site implement it on a large scale (100s or 1000s of pages), so I can't speak to that.
Two broader questions/comments:
(1) If you currently list all of these pages in your XML sitemap, consider taking them out. The XML sitemap doesn't have to contain every page on your site, and in many cases, I think it shouldn't. If you list these pages, you're basically telling Google to re-crawl them (regardless of the changefreq setting).
(2) You may have overly complex crawl paths. In other words, it may not be the quantity of pages that's at issue, but how Google accesses those pages. They could be getting stuck in a loop, etc. It's going to take some research on a large site, but it'd be worth running a desktop crawler like Xenu or Screaming Frog. This could represent a site architecture problem (from an SEO standpoint).
(3) Should all of these pages even be indexed at all, especially as time passes? More and more (especially post-Panda), more indexed pages is often worse. If Googlebot is really hitting you that hard, it might be time to canonicalize some older content or 301-redirect it to newer, more relevant content. If it's not active at all, you could even NOINDEX or 404 it.
-
Thanks for the answers so far. The tips are not really solving my problems yet, though: I don't want to set down general crawling speed in the webmaster tools, because pages that frequently change should also be crawled frequently. We do have XML Sitemaps, although we did not include these picture pages, as in our example. There are ten- maybe houndreds- of thousands of these pages. If everyone agrees on this, we can include these pages in our XML Sitemaps of course. Using "meta refresh" to indicate, that the page never changed, seems a bit odd to me. But I'll look into it.
But what about the http headers, I asked about? Does anyone have any ideas on that?
-
Your best bet is to build an Excel report using a crawl tool (like Xenu, Frog, Moz, etc), and export that data. Then look to map out the pages you want to log and mark as 'not changing'.
Make sure to built (or have a functioning XML sitemap file) for the site, and as John said, state which URL's NEVER change. Over time, this will tell googlebot that it isn't neccessary yo crawl those page URL's as they never change.
You could also place a META REFRESH tag on those individual pages, and set that to never as well.
Hope some of this helps! Cheers
-
If you have Google Webmaster Tools set up, go to Site configuration > Settings, and you can set a custom crawl rate for you site. That will change it site-wide, so if you have other pages that change frequently, that might not be so great for you.
Another thing you could try is generate a sitemap, and set a change frequency of never (or yearly) for all of the pages you don't expect to change. That also might slow down Google's crawl rate of those pages.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I "no-index" two exact pages on Google results?
Hello everyone, I recently started a new wordpress website and created a static homepage. I noticed that on Google search results, there are two different URLs landing on same content page. I've attached an image to explain what I saw. Should I "no-index" the page url? Google url.JPG In this picture, the first result is the homepage and I try to rank for that page. The last result is landing on same content with different URL. So, should I no-index last result as shown in image?
Technical SEO | | amanda59640 -
Just validating a theory I have about why Google is Soft 404ing some of my doctor pages.
As of June 1 doctor pages on our website that say "No ratings are available yet" are being Soft 404ed in our Google Console. We suspect the issue is that wording, due to this post. https://www.contentkingapp.com/academy/index-coverage/faq/submitted-soft-404/ Just wondering if anyone with more expertise than me on 404s or local seo can validate that it is likely this issue. Some examples:
Technical SEO | | Patrick_at_Nebraska_Medicine
https://www.nebraskamed.com/doctors/neil-s-kalsi
https://www.nebraskamed.com/doctors/leslie-a-eiland
https://www.nebraskamed.com/doctors/david-d-ingvoldstad 63647547-aa09-42a8-afe5-4431f277f611-image.png0 -
Google Appending Blog URL inbetween my homepage and product page is it issue with base url?
Hi All, Google Appending Blog URL inbetween my homepage and product page. Is it issue or base url or relative url? Can you pls guide me? Looking to both tiny url you will get my point what i am saying. Please help Thanks!
Technical SEO | | amu1230 -
My Home Page meta title on Google isn't what it should be
Hey guys My website is http://www.oxfordmeetsfifth.com According to SEOcentro, my website should appear to Google as Fashion Tips for Women | Oxford Meets Fifth. I have used the Yoast plugin and force rewrote titles to ensure that is the home page meta title. It also appears correctly in browser. Could anyone advise why this is the case? Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | OxfordMeetsFifth0 -
Can someone tell me how in the heck this site is ranking?
Just saw a huge update on the Serps for "SEO Company" and "Seo Firm " and this site has tons of big Google no's no's going to it. www.seospecialists.co it has links coming from Porn and Gambling sites. It is heavily over optimized for both keywords. I won't cry the sky is falling[SEO is broke] but I am curious to know why Google thinks they are worthy to rank that high.
Technical SEO | | MattieMac0 -
Do Google Always Tell You About Penalties?
Hi One of my clients has recently suffered a big decline in rankings on some of their keywords, going from positions in the top 10 to sub 50 for some of their keywords, but not all. Their website is still indexed and there is no link warning from Google. Some of their links from a previous link builder are dodgy and we have already tried to contact the other company for removal but to no avail. Any ideas where I start? So far I planning to increase the branded anchor link and add some content as the site is fairly light on content. Is it worth doing a reconsideration request and mention the bad links incase this is the problem. Has anyone seen any particular good resources on what to do when it appears you have a penalty. None of my other clients have been effected by Panda or Penguin and although I have done some general reading I need to know what action to take and get up to speed FAST! Thanks in advance. Kind regards Karen
Technical SEO | | Karen_Dauncey0 -
Google indexing directory folder listing page
Google somehow managed to find several of our images index folders and decided to include them into their index. Example: websitesite.com/category/images/ is what you'll see when doing a site:website.com search. So, I have two-part question: 1) Does this hurt our site's ability to rank in any way?
Technical SEO | | invision
Because all Google sees is just a directory listing page with a bunch of links to images in the folder. 2) If there could be any negative effect, what is the best way to get these folders out of Google's index?
I could block via robots.txt, but I'm afraid it will also block all the images in that folder from being indexed in Google image search. I could also turn off directory listing in cpanel / htaccess, but then that gives is a 403 forbidden. Will this hurt the site in anyway and would it prevent Google from indexing the images in the directory? Thanks,
Tony0