How can I tell Google, that a page has not changed?
-
Hello,
we have a website with many thousands of pages. Some of them change frequently, some never. Our problem is, that googlebot is generating way too much traffic. Half of our page views are generated by googlebot.
We would like to tell googlebot, to stop crawling pages that never change. This one for instance:
http://www.prinz.de/party/partybilder/bilder-party-pics,412598,9545978-1,VnPartypics.html
As you can see, there is almost no content on the page and the picture will never change.So I am wondering, if it makes sense to tell google that there is no need to come back.
The following header fields might be relevant. Currently our webserver answers with the following headers:
Cache-Control:
no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0, public
Pragma:no-cache
Expires:Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Does Google honor these fields? Should we remove no-cache, must-revalidate, pragma: no-cache and set expires e.g. to 30 days in the future?
I also read, that a webpage that has not changed, should answer with 304 instead of 200. Does it make sense to implement that? Unfortunatly that would be quite hard for us.
Maybe Google would also spend more time then on pages that actually changed, instead of wasting it on unchanged pages.
Do you have any other suggestions, how we can reduce the traffic of google bot on unrelevant pages?
Thanks for your help
Cord
-
Unfortunately, I don't think there are many reliable options, in the sense that Google will always honor them. I don't think they gauge crawl frequency by the "expires" field - or, at least, it carries very little weight. As John and Rob mentioned, you can set the "changefreq" in the XML sitemap, but again, that's just a hint to Google. They seem to frequently ignore it.
If it's really critical, a 304 probably is a stronger signal, but I suspect even that's hit or miss. I've never seen a site implement it on a large scale (100s or 1000s of pages), so I can't speak to that.
Two broader questions/comments:
(1) If you currently list all of these pages in your XML sitemap, consider taking them out. The XML sitemap doesn't have to contain every page on your site, and in many cases, I think it shouldn't. If you list these pages, you're basically telling Google to re-crawl them (regardless of the changefreq setting).
(2) You may have overly complex crawl paths. In other words, it may not be the quantity of pages that's at issue, but how Google accesses those pages. They could be getting stuck in a loop, etc. It's going to take some research on a large site, but it'd be worth running a desktop crawler like Xenu or Screaming Frog. This could represent a site architecture problem (from an SEO standpoint).
(3) Should all of these pages even be indexed at all, especially as time passes? More and more (especially post-Panda), more indexed pages is often worse. If Googlebot is really hitting you that hard, it might be time to canonicalize some older content or 301-redirect it to newer, more relevant content. If it's not active at all, you could even NOINDEX or 404 it.
-
Thanks for the answers so far. The tips are not really solving my problems yet, though: I don't want to set down general crawling speed in the webmaster tools, because pages that frequently change should also be crawled frequently. We do have XML Sitemaps, although we did not include these picture pages, as in our example. There are ten- maybe houndreds- of thousands of these pages. If everyone agrees on this, we can include these pages in our XML Sitemaps of course. Using "meta refresh" to indicate, that the page never changed, seems a bit odd to me. But I'll look into it.
But what about the http headers, I asked about? Does anyone have any ideas on that?
-
Your best bet is to build an Excel report using a crawl tool (like Xenu, Frog, Moz, etc), and export that data. Then look to map out the pages you want to log and mark as 'not changing'.
Make sure to built (or have a functioning XML sitemap file) for the site, and as John said, state which URL's NEVER change. Over time, this will tell googlebot that it isn't neccessary yo crawl those page URL's as they never change.
You could also place a META REFRESH tag on those individual pages, and set that to never as well.
Hope some of this helps! Cheers
-
If you have Google Webmaster Tools set up, go to Site configuration > Settings, and you can set a custom crawl rate for you site. That will change it site-wide, so if you have other pages that change frequently, that might not be so great for you.
Another thing you could try is generate a sitemap, and set a change frequency of never (or yearly) for all of the pages you don't expect to change. That also might slow down Google's crawl rate of those pages.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google indexes page elements
Hello We face this problem that Google indexes page elements from WordPress as single pages. How can we prevent these elements from being indexed separately and being displayed in the search results? For example this project: www.rovana.be When scrolling down the search results, there are a lot of elements that are indexed separately. When clicking on the link, this is wat we see (see attachements) Does anyone have experience with this way of indexing and how can we solve this problem? Thanks! LlAWG4w.png C7XDDYS.png gVroomx.png
Technical SEO | | conversal0 -
Can Google index the text content in a PDF?
I really really thought the answer was always no. There's plenty of other things you can do to improve search visibility for a PDF, but I thought the nature of the file type made the content itself not-parsable by search engine crawlers... But now, my client's competitor is ranking for my client's brand name with a PDF that contains comparison content. Thing is, my client's brand isn't in the title, the alt-text, the url... it's only in the actual text of the PDF. Did I miss a major update? Did I always have this wrong?
Technical SEO | | LindsayDayton0 -
Google Seeing Way More Pages Than My Site Actually Has
For one of my sites, A-1 Scuba Diving And Snorkeling Adventures, Google is seeing way more pages than I actually have. It sees almost 550 pages but I only have about 50 pages in my XML. I am sure this is an error on my part. Here is the search results that show all my pages. Can anyone give me some guidance on what I did wrong. Is it a canonical url problem, a redirect problem or something else. Built on Wordpress. Thanks in advance for any help you can give. I just want to make sure I am delivering everything I can for the client.
Technical SEO | | InfinityTechnologySolutions0 -
How GOOGLE can re-index my site as possible as?
I have facing the question about re-indexing in the google search engine, the case is: i have changed my site meta description but google indexed display part description why?? my site is http://www.green-lotus-trekking.com/everest-base-camp-trek/ whats the problem in meta tag description? Please let me know about this?
Technical SEO | | agsln0 -
Google webmaster showing 0 indexed, yet I can see them all them Google search?
I can see them all the pages showing up in Google when i search for my site. But in webmaster tools under the sitemaps section in the indexed pages - the red bar is showing 0 indexed pages, even though they seem to be indexed. Any idea why is this showing like this? I don’t really think it’s that important as the pages are still indexed, but it just seems odd. Please see in the image.
Technical SEO | | Perfect0070 -
Can Page Content & Description Have Same Content?
I'm studying my crawl report and there are several warnings regarding missing meta descriptions. My website is built in WordPress and part of the site is a blog. Several of these missing description warnings are regarding blog posts and I was wondering if I am able to copy the first few lines of content of each of the posts to put in the meta description, or would that be considered duplicate content? Also, there are a few warnings that relate to blog index pages, e.g. http://www.iainmoran.com/2013/02/ - I don't know if I can even add a description of these as I think they are dynamically created? While on the subject of duplicate content, if I had a sidebar with information on several of the pages (same info) while the content would be coming from a WP Widget, would this still be considered duplicate content and would Google penalise me for it? Would really appreciate some thoughts on this,please. Thanks, Iain.
Technical SEO | | iainmoran0 -
Duplicate pages in Google index despite canonical tag and URL Parameter in GWMT
Good morning Moz... This is a weird one. It seems to be a "bug" with Google, honest... We migrated our site www.three-clearance.co.uk to a Drupal platform over the new year. The old site used URL-based tracking for heat map purposes, so for instance www.three-clearance.co.uk/apple-phones.html ..could be reached via www.three-clearance.co.uk/apple-phones.html?ref=menu or www.three-clearance.co.uk/apple-phones.html?ref=sidebar and so on. GWMT was told of the ref parameter and the canonical meta tag used to indicate our preference. As expected we encountered no duplicate content issues and everything was good. This is the chain of events: Site migrated to new platform following best practice, as far as I can attest to. Only known issue was that the verification for both google analytics (meta tag) and GWMT (HTML file) didn't transfer as expected so between relaunch on the 22nd Dec and the fix on 2nd Jan we have no GA data, and presumably there was a period where GWMT became unverified. URL structure and URIs were maintained 100% (which may be a problem, now) Yesterday I discovered 200-ish 'duplicate meta titles' and 'duplicate meta descriptions' in GWMT. Uh oh, thought I. Expand the report out and the duplicates are in fact ?ref= versions of the same root URL. Double uh oh, thought I. Run, not walk, to google and do some Fu: http://is.gd/yJ3U24 (9 versions of the same page, in the index, the only variation being the ?ref= URI) Checked BING and it has indexed each root URL once, as it should. Situation now: Site no longer uses ?ref= parameter, although of course there still exists some external backlinks that use it. This was intentional and happened when we migrated. I 'reset' the URL parameter in GWMT yesterday, given that there's no "delete" option. The "URLs monitored" count went from 900 to 0, but today is at over 1,000 (another wtf moment) I also resubmitted the XML sitemap and fetched 5 'hub' pages as Google, including the homepage and HTML site-map page. The ?ref= URls in the index have the disadvantage of actually working, given that we transferred the URL structure and of course the webserver just ignores the nonsense arguments and serves the page. So I assume Google assumes the pages still exist, and won't drop them from the index but will instead apply a dupe content penalty. Or maybe call us a spam farm. Who knows. Options that occurred to me (other than maybe making our canonical tags bold or locating a Google bug submission form 😄 ) include A) robots.txt-ing .?ref=. but to me this says "you can't see these pages", not "these pages don't exist", so isn't correct B) Hand-removing the URLs from the index through a page removal request per indexed URL C) Apply 301 to each indexed URL (hello BING dirty sitemap penalty) D) Post on SEOMoz because I genuinely can't understand this. Even if the gap in verification caused GWMT to forget that we had set ?ref= as a URL parameter, the parameter was no longer in use because the verification only went missing when we relaunched the site without this tracking. Google is seemingly 100% ignoring our canonical tags as well as the GWMT URL setting - I have no idea why and can't think of the best way to correct the situation. Do you? 🙂 Edited To Add: As of this morning the "edit/reset" buttons have disappeared from GWMT URL Parameters page, along with the option to add a new one. There's no messages explaining why and of course the Google help page doesn't mention disappearing buttons (it doesn't even explain what 'reset' does, or why there's no 'remove' option).
Technical SEO | | Tinhat0 -
Page rank 2 for home page, 3 for service pages
Hey guys, I have noticed with one of our new sites, the home page is showing page rank two, whereas 2 of the internal service pages are showing as 3. I have checked with both open site explorer and yahoo back links and there are by far more links to the home page. All quality and relevant directory submissions and blog comments. The site is only 4 months old, I wonder if anyone can shed any light on the fact 2 of the lesser linked pages are showing higher PR? Thanks 🙂
Technical SEO | | Nextman0