SEOMoz Crawl Warnings, do they really hurt rankings?
-
SEOMoz reports 250 crawl warnings on my site. In most cases its too long title tags, with 4 of them its missing meta description.
SEOMoz says it will hurt my rankings? However, I'm sure a recent whiteboard Friday contradicted this.
So what is it?
-
This may be the video, Matt Cutts said, the #1 mistake people make in SEO is crawlability
He states that crawability biggest step, then great content after thet marketing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6xxcQdAHbIBing also suggests crawlability is important.
Listening to Duane Forrester from Bing he often mentions trust in relation to SEO violations. The wrong use of redirects and canonical tags, errors and wrong dates in sitemaps, and other violations all lead to a loss of trust.
This is becoming even more important with microdata. A simple html error can give completely different meaning to the snippets. Up until now the bots had to find the content and work out if it is visible to the user, but now with microdata content is arranged in objects and being able to find and crawl these objects mean that you need to be free of violations -
I humbly suggest the test you performed is flawed in some manner. Meta descriptions have no direct effect on Google rankings.
If you wish to stretch, you could say that a meta description might influence CTR and other metrics which do affect rankings. In that sense, almost anything can indirectly effect rankings.
-
Meta descriptions do affect ranking. I tested.
-
Matt Cutts himself mentioned in one of his videos that your website's accessibility to Google bot is one of the major things. You want 0 crawl errors and as many pages in Google index as possible.
-
Each warning is for a different metric. Depending on the metric it may affect rankings.
The long title tag warning is an issue which can affect rankings. The best understanding we have of title tags indicates the entire tag gets a fixed weight. If you use a single term such as "SEO" then all of the weight it applied to that single term. If you use a short phrase such as "Improve SEO Rankings" then the weight is divided amongst the three terms (although not evenly).
The title tag carries a lot of weight. If you provide long title tags you are likely losing some of the value and it definitely can affect rankings.
Additionally, the title tag affects Click Through Rate. If you offer a long title tag, it will get cut off by search engines and will likely reduce CTR.
Meta descriptions do not affect ranking (for Google) but they do impact CTR.
Bottom line, the warnings are designed to call your attention to items which should be investigated and/or fixed.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to fix the Crawl Diagnostics error and warnings
hi im new to the seo world and i dont know a lot about it , so after my site get crawled i found 1 error and 151 warning and 96 notices , it that bad ?? and plz cam someone explain to me how to fix thos problem , a will be very thankful
Moz Pro | | medlife0 -
Crawl Diagnostics: Next crawl date is in the past
Hi - I have quite a few crawl diagnostic errors and warnings. I have attempted to fix many of them but noticed this note at the bottom of the crawl diagnostics chart: "Last Crawl Completed: Mar. 22nd, 2013 Next Crawl Starts: Mar. 29th, 2013" It looks like SEOMoz thinks the next crawl date is Mar 29th, 2013, which is two weeks ago. Is there any way to "force" the crawl and get it back on regular schedule? This may have happened when my account was disabled because my credit card expired...Thoughts?
Moz Pro | | 6thirty0 -
Duplicate page titles in SEOMoz
My on page reports are showing a good number of duplicate title tags, but they are all because of a url tracking parameter that tells us which link the visitor clicked on. For example, http://www.example.com/example-product.htm?ref=navside and http://www.example.com/example-product.htm are the same page, but are treated as to different urls in SEOMoz. This is creating "fake" number of duplicate page titles in my reports. This has not been a problem with Google, but SEOMoz is treating it like this and it's confusing my data. Is there a way to specify this as a url parameter in the Moz software? Or does anybody have another suggestion? Should I specify this in GWT and BWT?
Moz Pro | | InetAll0 -
Are seomoz ranking in jeopardy?
A few weeks ago Raventools announced that they would no longer be able to provide tools based on the adwords API, then withdrew that. Rand commented on a thread here discussing that and made similar noises. Today Raventools made an announcement as SERP tracking with wording that sounded a lot like it had more than a little influence from Google. Would I be really paranoid to be wondering whether the Rankings tools in seomoz could be at risk?
Moz Pro | | matbennett1 -
Rankings Feature Changes
Hi guys, Is there a way that the Rankings tool within the campaigns could show a monthly comparison rather than weekly? Possibly a drop down just to choose weekly or monthly. At the moment, when someone outside of the team involved looks at the results, it looks as though the website is in a downward sprial, where as we could be lower than ever, just with one bad week. Thanks for your help! 🙂
Moz Pro | | RPIDigital0 -
Wordpress-related warnings
As proposed by a number of people here, I have moved from WordPress.com to a self-hosted WordPress blog. I have also installed the SEO All in One plugin. This has been up and running for a month or so. My problem is that it is generated many (thousands) of warnings through my PRO Dashboard for Crawl Diagnostics. Specifically, I have a huge number of "Overly-dynamic URL" warnings. A typical URL is as folows: http://www.wednet.com/blog/2011/10/07/do-us-a-favor-dont/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=do-us-a-favor-dont This has three querystring parameters, all generated by WordPress automatically. Here's another significant issue. With the SEO All In One plug in I can control the SEO-related parameters for each post (title, meta description, etc). However, WordPress generates a ton of virtual URLs which I can't (as far as I know) directly control. For example, the following page is a category page with all the posts for a single category. This is generating warnings because the meta description is missing. However, I do not know how to control such parameters since the page is automatically generated. http://www.wednet.com/blog/category/ceremony/ These type of warnings dominate the stats I have through my dashboard. How can I resolve these? Thanks. Mark
Moz Pro | | MarkWill0 -
How long does the seomoz crawl take?
It's been doing it's thing for over 48 hours now and Ive got less than 350 pages... is this norma? It's NOT the first crawl.
Moz Pro | | borderbound0 -
Possible to force the SEOmoz Ranking Report to update?
Hi guys, I have added about 100 keywords to my Rankings Report in SEOmoz and I'm just wondering if there is a way to force the application to get my rankings ASAP rather than waiting a while for the rankings to come through? I'm in a bit of a hurry! 🙂 Thanks. C.
Moz Pro | | CormacMoylan230