Open Site Explorer - SEO - Company Back Links not visible?
-
Hi Guys,
I am relatively new to the SEO community and have what is hopefully a pretty quick and simple question?
I have recently outsourced some of my SEO campaigns to an Australian SEO group which were referred to me buy a friend, and i do not have the time to manage all sites SEO.
On pitch the SEO company said they had in excess of 7000 domains, and they would implement a massive back linking strategy for me anywhere upwards of 200 links a month and all legit.
Initially there were some basic header and title tag changes needed on the site, and I am now in month 4 of my campaign.
Looking forward to using SEOMOZ service and specifically Open Site Explorer, I entered my URL but to my disappointment I could only see 4 links and two I was responsible for.
I spoke to the SEO company who responded Open Site Explorer wasn't a good indication of back links and that a lot of their sites were not on the network because of the structure of their linking being only one way.
I would appreciate a second opinion (external of this company) on this because of my short time learning and dabbling with SEO.
On a side note thoroughly enjoying learning SEO and my journey as part of the SEOMOZ community.
Appreciate any feedback or responses I get.
Kind regards
Bodie
-
Hi Mike
Thanks for all your feedback and yeh i agree with your sales comment.
i have set a timeframe of 6 months before i start dissecting the analytics and working out my ROI as I was told its a minimum of three months before you start seeing real traction with SEO.
Thanks for all your help! and you too Seattle!
b
-
Frankly, we've tried to keep rates as low as possible, but over time, we also have found there's a ton of work that needs to be done for some clients who come on board. It really depends on what they do.
I do 2 things for clients: 1) provide them rankings, but 2) and most importantly, what the rankings translates into traffic. I dive into the google analytics. Do those rankings equate to improvements in traffic? Do they help you evaluate your google analytics to show you that they do?
Rankings are not the whole picture.
Also, for some clients who do want to know more details, I provide details of the sources I pointed out above (OSE, Majestic & Google Webmasters). I will tell them how their links have increased or rather prove it via those sources. So, I'll give whatever a client basically wants within reason. These have given us very positive ratings everywhere clients have rated us and happy clients as far as I can tell. And for now, I think these are the main reports that show that we "did something" frankly.
Sorry, but when I reread this, this sort of sounds like we're selling our services, but frankly, all the above is what we do because we feel like it's fair communication. An SEO or an SEO firm has an obligation to report their work as much as the client wants to know...and I'm sorry, but it sounds like you haven't had other standards to compare it to in the past. Thus, the feeling of not getting what you pay for.
By the way, have you asked the provider these questions? If not, definitely do.
-
When they report your keyword rankings every month, do they cover a variety of search engines or are they just giving you Google.com.au results?
It's entirely possible that your site could be gradually increasing in rankings with the few links you have depending on your targeted keyword phrases. This is especially true in Google.com.au. The less competitive your keyword phrases, the less you have to work on link building (most of the time) to show up in the SERPs.
I just used the keyword phrase "luxury resorts" (just as an example) in the SEOmoz Keyword Analysis tool and found that the same keyword has a keyword difficulty of 77% on Google.com and 64% on Google.com.au. So it's important to check which search engines are being reported every month.
In the end, it comes down to traffic and sales. Are you seeing a satisfactory increase in traffic for what you're paying the company? Is that traffic converting as well as you'd expect?
It's really tough to call out an SEO company for not doing any work if you're seeing some results. It's the ones that do a ton of work poorly that are easy to spot. You could be seeing ranking increases with or without the company. It's tough to say without a lot more data and monitoring.
As for how much SEO companies should charge, I'll defer to the experts on this one: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/seo-pricing-costs-of-services
Mike
-
Hi SeattleorganicSEO, (sorry i didn't catch your name)
i don't think they would be responsible for many of those links, 4 of the domains we own and at least 5 other links i am responsible for.
In a nutshell, every month I get a 'Summary Of Your Rankings email', this email compares Initial Rankings to Current Rankings.
They show where I placed for the five initial keywords when we started and now where we are for those keywords and a whole bunch of other keywords that stem from those targeted ones. (which I know are really useless because I have checked the keyword volume tool to collate their worth. They have no search volume.
i am not doubting they are getting results as for these five keywords we are moving up through the ranks of google and approaching a first page spot.
I guess my main questions or concern is how can they be getting results if they are doing little or no link building?
The only onsite changes they have implemented are header and title tag updates.
I just don't want to be taken advantage of, as i stated earlier i am pretty new to the SEO game.
Also what do you think is fair for a monthly fee per site for SEO?
Appreciate any feedback moving forward.
Kind regards
Bodie
-
Hi Bodie,
I use Majestic SEO and Google Webmasters to verify my links a bit quicker. The links typically show up on those much faster than they do on OSE.
I see links from:
|
http://www.kimberleyaccommodation.com.au
| http://www.hotelkununurra.com.au |
| http://www.morgenpost.de/reise/article1873557/Palaeste-Strandhuetten-und-andere-neue-Hotels.html |
| http://www.australien-news.com |
| http://www.bha.broomeaccommodation.com.au |
| http://www.gourmet-report.de/artikel/340712/Westaustralien-Luxusurlaub-ohne-Strassenanbindung.html |
| http://www.lookcook.net/index2.php?artikel=7416&typ=news& |
| http://australien-info.de/serendipity/authors/1-Newsletter-AUSTRALIEN-INFO/P1.html |
| http://pindanpost.com/2011/12/19/the-berkeley-river-experience-coming-soon |
| http://www.kimberleyhotel.com.au/?id=37x71378420738950769 |
| http://www.tourismtopend.com.au/accom_result1/berkeley-river |
| http://australiabig.com.au/?p=291 |
|
http://www.reisegezwitscher.de/reisetipps?format=feed&type=rss
| http://www.eastkimberleydirectory.com.au/search/?link=Accommodation&category=ekdbusiness |
| http://content.yudu.com/A1usv7/SLHDEC11/resources/47.htm |
As your unique domains linking back.
However, 4 months and not seeing movement or a growth in the backlinks is a pretty big red flag.
Let me know if you ever need a quick check on Majestic. You can get a free glance of the total domains and backlinks for free
though via SEObook's SEO tool bar.
Can't validate Michael's concerns 100%, but it does seem a little fishy given that you've been with them for 4 months. No reports?
How do they communicate that their work's been complete?
|
|
-
Hey again Bodie,
I checked your site using a bunch of SEO tools and, I'm sorry to say, but I don't see any evidence that any link building has been going on with your site. OSE is not a perfect tool by any means, but it's just so remote that only a couple of links would show up after 4 months. Alexa shows the same amount of links and my personal script shows only 1 more.
I'm not going to say that the company you're using isn't building any links, but I really don't see it.
This is a shame too because link building to your site would be very easy. You have a great design and well written content. I could see pitching "Top 10 Hidden Australian Luxury Resorts" articles getting picked up no problem for guest posts. Even doing viral content like infographics and high-powered articles on travel sites wouldn't be too difficult.
I would recommend switching companies if only based on the fact that, when you questioned them, they could have easily given you a spreadsheet of every live link they had for you. That's just basic SEO reporting. The fact that they didn't do that makes me even more suspicious.
Mike
-
Hi Michael,
Updated and looking forward to your feedback.
Kind Regards
b
-
Hello Bodie,
I suspect I know what's going on but I don't want to jump to conclusions. If you'd kindly include your URL, I can check what's going on with your backlinks.
Mike
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
A competitor's SEO firm is building spammy links to my website.
A competitor's SEO firm is building spammy links to my website. I know the disavow link process, but even this can be time consuming. Is there a better way to protect my website? Any and all ideas appreciated.... Are there any cool Moz tools that can help me manage this assault? Sorry, just a follow up from me... It appears that many of the spammy links (referrals) I see in Google Analytics are not present in Google WebMaster Tools. Does this mean that the spammy ones that I'm concerned about have already been discounted by Google, or are the spammy links no-follow? Any input on this would also be appreciated.
Moz Pro | | BVREID0 -
Web Site Migration Testing and SEO-QA Automation?
Hey Mozzers, Are there any good Migration-SEO-QA Tools out there? Given a prioritized list of URLs and prioritized list of Keywords, is there a tool that can compare basic SEO factors, old URL vs. new URL, and identify all the specific gaps that need to be fixed? Here is a basic SEO-QA acceptance checklist, for porting any website. . . . Until the porting work is completed we cannot accept the new website. Givens: 1. A list of the Top 100 URLs from the old site, prioritized by conversion rates, landing page traffic, and inbound links. 2. A list of the planned 404 - mapped URLs, old to new site, from the porting team. 3. A list of the current Top 200 Keywords, prioritized. 4. A good amount of SEO work has already been done, by several professionals, for the current (old) site. **How to evaluate if the new site will be acceptable to Google? Check ON-PAGE SEO Factors... ** **. . . that is, the NEW site must be AS GOOD AS (or better than) the current (old) site,
Moz Pro | | George.Fanucci
in the eyes of Google, to preserve the On-Page SEO work already done. ** Criteria: URLs ok? :: Is the URL mapping ok, old to new, best web page? LINKS ok :: Are all internal LINKS and keyword Anchor Text ported? TEXT ok :: On-page content, TEXT and keywords ok? TITLE ok :: HTML Title and title keywords ok? DESCRIPTION ok :: HTML Meta Description ok? H1, H2 ok :: HTML H1, H2 and keywords ok? IMG kwds :: HTML IMG and ALT keywords ok? URL kwds :: URL - keywords in new URLs ok? Potential porting defects: Keywords in URL missing: Keywords in HTML Title missing: Keywords in Meta Description missing: Any internal LINKS or Link anchor text missing: Keywords in Page TEXT missing: H1, H2 missing keywords: HTML IMG alt-text, IMG file URLs, any missing keywords: Notes: Until the porting work is completed we cannot accept the new site, or set a target date for potential cutover. There are eight (8) data items per URL, and about one hundred (100) URLs to be considered for SEO-QA before going live. We were expecting to cutover before the end of February, at the latest. There is no point in doing full QA acceptance-tests until the porting work is completed. QA spot-checks have found far too many defects. About 60% of the landing-page traffic comes via the top 40 URLs. With over 100 URLs to look at, it can take more than a week or two just to do SEO-QA in detail, manually, item-by-item, page-by-page, side-by-side, old vs. new. Spot-checks indicate a business disaster would occur unless the porting defects are fixed before going live. _Any Migration-QA Tools?_Given a prioritized list of URLs and prioritized list of Keywords, is there a tool that can compare basic On-Page SEO factors, old URL vs. new URL, and identify most of the specific gaps that need to be fixed before going live with the new site? _ *** Edit: Any comments on the SEO criteria, tools, or methods will be appreciated!_0 -
SEO Crawl Report Images?
Does SEOMOZ crawl images in the report? Raven tools is showing me about 200 missing alt tags and title tags. I can not seem to find any of this information on the SEOMOZ report. Am I missing something?
Moz Pro | | jasonsixtwo0 -
Missing Juicy link finder
Hello, In the past, I was using two tools mainly: Keyword difficulty and the Juicy link finder. Buit Juicy Link Finder does not exist anymore and I miss it 😞 Any of you are missing it also? Do any of you who were using that tool have found a new tool to do the same good job than what Juicy Link Finder was doing? Thanks Nancy
Moz Pro | | EnigmaSolution0 -
On page links tool here at Seomoz
Hi Seomoz - first of all, thanks for the best SEO tools I have ever worked with (this is my first question in this forum, and also I just subscribed as a paying customer after the 30 days trial you guys offer). My question: After having worked for several weeks on getting the numbers of links in our forum on www.texaspoker.dk down, we are somewhat surprised to see that we didn't succeed in getting lower numbers. For instance, this page: http://www.texaspoker.dk/forum/aktuelle-konkurrencer/coaching-projekt-bliver-du-den-udvalgte has (that's what Seomoz seo tool tells us): 239 on page links. Can this really be true? We can't find these links, and we actuually did a lot to lower the numbers of links, for instance the forum members picture was a link before, and also there was a "go to top" link in each post in the forum. Thanks a lot.
Moz Pro | | MPO0 -
How long do old links stay in Open SIte Explorer stats?
Hi, In Open Site Explorer has around 2000 External followed links which would be great if it was true. I think the issue is that before my site wasn't appending slashes to the url so I think it was counting links from http://mydomain/page1 to http://mydomain/page2/ as an external link (could be wrong here). I corrected this a couple of months ago but I still seem to have over 2000 External links. When I look at the linking pages many of them are "sans slash" and have old anchor text in the link. How long does it take of OSE to update these stale links it there any way I can prompt it to take aciton?
Moz Pro | | moesian0 -
CSV export of Open Site Explorer is incomplete.
I exported my back links report from the Open Site Explorer toolbar as a CSV but the file it showed was only about 400 urls. The tool bar is listing over 1,200 links, so at first I thought maybe it was only exporting one link for each unique domain, but it only lists 200 or so unique domains linking to my site. I know it will only export 10,000 urls, but obviously I'm significantly below this level. Here is a link to a competitors site which is having the same issue.
Moz Pro | | bbelgard
http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=www.zoobooks.comListing about 900 links and only generating about 500 in the CSV report. Any help would be much appreciated.0 -
Open Site Explorer Data
Good afternoon SEOmoz, I first want to congratulate with you for the amazing new look and new features of Open Site Explorer, it's an amazing and valuable tool that I use every day and that has helped me build tons of links for my clients. I have been keeping track of the OPE data on a monthly base and I just noticed something strange. In May 2011, OSE was showing that my client's website had 12,624 links, in July 2011 the website had 14,157 links and today I just ran a new report that showed just 6,401 links. I don't want to believe that in 2 months we lost half of the links, so I was wondering if you guys can give me more insights about this data.
Moz Pro | | Aviatech
Did SEOMoz change the way they measure the number of links? Or is this just a bug or issue they are having with the new version of OSE? Thanks!0