Google Update?
-
We have a website that for the past several weeks has been very consistent at between 13,500 and 14,200 daily visits and this site received 15,600 last Thursday.
THIS week, Monday is at 22,200, Tuesday is at 26,200, and at mid-day today (at about our traffic halfway point in the day) we're already at 14,000 today.
This was a site that was bringing about 14,000 visits as of May 16th last year and dropped to 11,000 the following week. The traffic to this site this week is so far beyond statistical analysis that there must have been something that happened.
-
Is it possible that this direct traffic is coming from email? I've seen big direct traffic spikes when a link has "gone viral" over email. The other thing I would check for is multiple Google analytics tags on the home page (double counting your traffic), but you would probably see a crazy low bounce rate if that were the case.
-
Possible tracking issues are not checking out. 3rd party advertisers are showing higher impressions and clicks.
Traffic by specific service providers... Comcast, Roadrunner, Cox, etc.. are all consistently higher at the pace of traffic growth. Traffic from all of these sources have a graph that looks identical; Showing the same increase at the same time.
Further, the non-U.S. traffic is down by percentage so the spike is coming from domestic traffic originating in the United States.
Average time on site for the last 30 days is: 1:20... minute twenty seconds. Month of January was 1:24. The past two days is 1:02. With traffic being up 70% if they were all brief hits - then the past two days' visitor duration should be cut in half.
The home page traffic which is where the spike in visitors are landing on the site has a visitor duration of about 22 seconds lower than usual, which is 55 seconds.
The visitor duration difference looks more like the traffic isn't targeted, although not 100% uninterested either.
We have done a lot of work on this site since losing some traffic to Panda last summer. I just wouldn't expect such a dramatic increase without an update in Google but regardless the increase is in "direct" visits and not from search.
-
Has time spent on page changed at all? If the bounce rate is higher I would figure it would have dropped. Also is it just visits that are up? Did pageviews stay roughly the same?
When something like this happens I try to look for any indicator that analytics is having tracking issues.
For example if a user came to the site, then went to a page that is somehow killing my cookie information or ending my session somehow then that would cause the visits to spike while pageviews stayed the same. This would also drive my bounce rate up.
This happens often if you have a third party tool like a booking engine or chat tool that uses a different URL, and you aren't using the linker functionality where you need to.
Another suggestion would be to do a comparison to recent history of location and service provider dimensions to see if any specific location or service provider is spiking compared to recent slower times.
If all of that looks legit it may just be that other marketing efforts are paying off, and people are coming back to your site...
-
Yeah, revenue is up. We have several ad programs running and affiliate systems that are outside of our tracking software - so it seems that 3rd parties are seeing it too.
Now, revenue isn't up in a straight line with the traffic increase because we are not as aggressive on our home page with ads and affiliates. Bounce rate is higher on that page than before but time spent on page isn't? Bounce rate went from 48% to 79% which scares me. Seems the traffic coming in is less targeted now than our typical sources.
-
Interesting stuff - is revenue up as well then? Could there be an issue with analytics code counting people twice, or not counting people in the past?
-
Carson thanks for your response.
Here's how strange it is. There's an overall boost in traffic on most of the pages but they are trickling out from the home page. The home page traffic is up tremendously. Our direct visits: Not driven by Google, Yahoo or any other significant referrer - the spike seems to be from direct visits. No spike in keywords, nothing. Last Tuesday/Wednesday's home page PV= 1,435. This Tuesday/Wednesday's home page PV = 22,594.
I was wondering if there was an algorithm change with Google maybe temporarily from a URL where the SSL system they are using is giving referring the visitor as a no-follow. Google I ask, because I don't know of another traffic source that could produce these numbers. I wish that I knew so I could duplicate it!!
Affiliate impressions and revenue are up in reflection of the traffic change, the average time spent on the home page is almost identical to historic #s (55 seconds).
Not to toot my horn but we are good at this stuff and we can't figure it out. There's no referrer for this new traffic - it is all registering as direct - and still seems to be increasing.
No significant blog, forum or social media mentions either. The thought was that maybe the site was mentioned on TV or something but even that would have spiked inside a 2-3 hour window and then go back down. Not keep gaining.
The site is samplewords.com and typically gets about 365k visits per month and 825k PV. I would love to hear someone's theory on this.
Maybe it's something simple I'm missing while I look for something more technical?
-
We are not aware of any significant changes since last Thursday, but I'm glad to hear that your results are doing well! It might be interesting to go into analytics and see where the users are coming from. Are they coming through Google-organic, or did you perhaps pick up some coverage that is sending you referring traffic?
If it is organic traffic, you can then look at organic keywords, compare it to the past, and see which keywords have increased the most. It's always good to know what's going right and how you can duplicate it It's also worth looking at your content report to see which organic landing pages are doing well.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google's stand on LSI keywords?
Hi all, So the keywords which appear while typing some keywords and suggested keywords at the bottom of the search results page are refereed as LSI keywords. I been noticing some of the LSI keywords for years related to our industry and Google now suddenly changed them. I wonder why it would be. I can see competitors are started using those LSI keywords widely, is that the reason Google changed them? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Celebrity Profile On The Side of Google For High Profile Person
Hello! When I google "Justin Timberlake" I see web search results and a sidebar. See image below: http://screencast.com/t/qwYeiFZQRzT How does one get their results to display like this? Is this something that Google creates automatically or is it something the celebrity initiates/creates on their behalf. Does the celebrity have any options to choose from as to what displays on this sidebar? What is this called? I look forward to your response. qwYeiFZQRzT
Algorithm Updates | | InternetRep0 -
Have you seen what happens when you Google Academy Awards 2014?
Hi All... Just wondering if it is a new feature on Google's side (knowledge Graph)? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | BeytzNet0 -
Fetch as Google in GWT - Functionality
Hi, For example, some of the HTML improvements notices from GWT, says dupe meta descriptions or titles, for pages that have since been 301 redirected or had a canonical tag added. So, my idea is to force google to read it using "Fetch as Google" - hoping that it will now see 301 redirection or the fix we have implemented. Does this work? How long does it take? Lastly, should I just click the "fetch as google" or should I also click on the "Submit to index" button? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | bjs20100 -
How could Google define "low quality experience merchants"?
Matt Cutts mentioned at SXSW that Google wants to take into consideration the quality of the experience ecommerce merchants provide and work this into how they rank in SERPs. Here's what he said if you missed it: "We have a potential launch later this year, maybe a little bit sooner, looking at the quality of merchants and whether we can do a better job on that, because we don’t want low quality experience merchants to be ranking in the search results.” My question; how exactly could Google decide if a merchant provides a low and high quality experience? I would image it would be very easy for Google to decide this with merchants in their Trusted Store program. I wonder what other data sets Google could realistically rely upon to make such a judgment. Any ideas or thoughts are appreciated.
Algorithm Updates | | BrianSaxon0 -
Which Google Snippet to use? Products or Review
A "product" page that includes "user reviews/ratings" and "comparison prices", which Google snippet do/should you use? Thanks in advance
Algorithm Updates | | righty0 -
Do you think Google is destroying search?
I've seen garbage in google results for some time now, but it seems to be getting worse. I was just searching for a line of text that was in one of our stories from 2009. I just wanted to check that story and I didn't have a direct link. So I did the search and I found one copy of the story, but it wasn't on our site. I knew that it was on the other site as well as ours, because the writer writes for both publications. What I expected to see was the two results, one above the other, depending on which one had more links or better on-page for the query. What I got didn't really surprise me, but I was annoyed. In #1 position was the other site, That was OK by me, but ours wasn't there at all. I'm almost used to that now (not happy about it and trying to change it, but not doing well at all, even after 18 months of trying) What really made me angry was the garbage results that followed. One site, a wordpress blog, has tag pages and category pages being indexed. I didn't count them all but my guess is about 200 results from this blog, one after the other, most of them tag pages, with the same content on every one of them. Then the tag pages stopped and it started with dated archive pages, dozens of them. There were other sites, some with just one entry, some with dozens of tag pages. After that, porn sites, hundreds of them. I got right to the very end - 100 pages of 10 results per page. That blog seems to have done everything wrong, yet it has interesting stats. It is a PR6, yet Alexa ranks it 25,680,321. It has the same text in every headline. Most of the headlines are very short. It has all of the category and tag and archive pages indexed. There is a link to the designer's website on every page. There is a blogroll on every page, with links out to 50 sites. None of the pages appear to have a description. there are dozens of empty H2 tags and the H1 tag is 80% through the document. Yet google lists all of this stuff in the results. I don't remember the last time I saw 100 pages of results, it hasn't happened in a very long time. Is this something new that google is doing? What about the multiple tag and category pages in results - Is this just a special thing google is doing to upset me or are you seeing it too? I did eventually find my page, but not in that list. I found it by using site:mysite.com in the search box.
Algorithm Updates | | loopyal0 -
Are multiple domains for my website hurting my Google ranking?
Hello, I currently have two domains showing up in google search: shwoodshop.com shop.shwoodshop.com These domains are currently ranked in the #2 and #3 spot, however my page is much more trafficked than the current #1 ranking. I am wondering if the fact that I have two domains competing for the #1 spot is hurting my search ranking. If so, what is the best way to remedy this issue and get back my #1 spot? I'm rather new to SEO and teaching myself as I go, so I appreciate the feedback!
Algorithm Updates | | shwoodshop0