What's your favourite SEO directory?
-
We're having a bit of a debate in the office today about SEO directories. We all seem to have our favourites here - Octopedia, AbiLogic and JoeAnt to name a few that have been mentioned.
Just wondering what everyone else's favourite directories for SEO are?
Which pass the best link juice? Which offer the best value for money? Would love to know everyone's thoughts...
-
The best directories in my opinion are directories focused in your niche. For example if your website is about web design services, I would look for web design directories. You might search for something like allintitle:web design services directory
-
Yep, this I agree with this. 98% of the directories I see on the web are a waste of space and actually offer no value to a person looking for something. At one time they at least gave value to a business as a backlink. There are a few exceptions in each demographic as some directories actually have real content and good information along with their listings. Efunda / EngTips / IndustrialLinks to name a few in my demographic.
If you're just looking for a jumping off point, then those directories are worth some time, but I would agree with Keith that the value of such directories are at the very least waning.
Personally, if you have the time I would invest it in your business appropriate forums and blogs. Find where your potential customers interact with each other, go to their forum and "engage" the community. Offer them free advice, answer questions and in general share your knowledge. By proving yourself helpful and when it is appropriate you can drop a link to a product page or an article on your site. The biggest caveat I can say is don't run around hitting up forums and spamming them, every forum that you want to be on has some sort of moderator that will remove your post. And personally if I'm on a community site and I see a blatant spam post, not only will I not click it, I will make a mental note to never go there.
-
Thanks Keith, totally agree with you - directories definitely aren't as valuable as they used to be and they only make up a tiny part of our link building strategy now. This is why we seem to have developed our favourite ones as we submit sites to so few directories, we want to make sure they're good ones!
-
Love the BBB answer Syed. Real legitimacy involved in that so MFA's would never do it. Good call!
-
I actually question the value of any of these directories anymore (even the ones listed on SEOmoz)... just seems like the things that worked a few years ago with the directories just doesn't do it anymore.
Maybe the big G is hip to these techniques.
After all, Google's job is to provide the best results to searchers, the most relevant information. Just because you have more directory submissions, does that make your site better than one that has more natural links?
Certainly not knocking using directories, I just usually start with the on site metrics like content, titles, descriptions, images, video, etc... Then move towards social interaction (I honestly think this is where more weight is, or will be given) including articles on authority sites if possible, maybe even press releases... all before ever even thinking about directories.
Once again, I don't want to say directories are a waste of time, I just go in a different direction maybe.
-
I would have said Google Directory just looking at all the importance Google gives to their own services (look +1, personal results, etc) but its been taken off couple of months ago - so Dmoz it is for Free. And definitely BBB for paid - great to give trust signals as BBB verifies business extensively and I am positive Google wouldn't ignore that in their algo. but its pretty expensive and time-consuming to get listed there though.
-
I don't to derail your post getting into Dmoz.org specifics since its covered so many other times here and well.. just about everywhere on the web. I will say of the 10+ sites I've been part of submitting to them, so far 75% of them are approved, the longest one taking about 1 year.
If you haven't check it out yet SeoMoz.org has a very good listing of directorys / sites to get on if at all possible and or appropriate for your demographics.
-
Yes - agreed, DMoz is a classic, and where we start a lot of our link building campaigns. But do you have much luck when submitting? It seems to us that sites are rarely approved
-
Never heard of any of them you mentioned. The most valuable would be Dmoz.org, though I think its "value" maybe waning, and its not a guarantee for any site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How important are 'anchor' text links now
We have started building some good links but I'm just wandering how important anchor based text ones are now.
Link Building | | nick-name123
I'm not talking about spamming/going too heavy but a few here and there. What's your recent experience?0 -
Angies List and Judy's Book and other sites
How much SEO weight do sites like Judy's Book or even Angie's List have. I do see the links in the linking reports but I am not sure if I should classify them as paid directories for inclusion. Also a second part of the question is do most of you still recommend the use of paid directories for link building? Yahoo Directory, BBB and so on?
Link Building | | runnerkik0 -
Should we imitate our competitor's blog network?
One of our competitors has built a little blog network, and I'm wondering if it's worth it for us to imitate it. Here's how they have it set up: They have domain.com, their e-commerce site, and blog.domain.com. They also have a half-dozen EMD blogs set up that all link to each other and to the e-commerce site, each one supplying content related to one niche of their busines (e.g. kitchenwidgets.com, widgetsforkids.com, etc.). It seems they've been doing this since December 2011. In my opinion, the content on these EMD blogs is pretty low value. Sure enough, they have basically no inbound links from outside the blog network, and it's not getting shared socially. I'm having a hard time imagining a lot of long-tail searches that would bring in qualified shoppers, since they basically just write up 300-word long descriptions of photos. Based on SEMrush data, it doesn't look like this approach is hurting them -- they didn't take a Penguin dive in April, for example. But how likely is it that this approach is helping them enough to justify the time they must spend writing (probably ~30-60m a day)? It would be trivial for the algo to determine that these are not natural links and completely devalue them. Would it not be better to consolidate that time into 2.5-5hrs a week spent researching and writing a valuable, link-worthy, long-tail-rich post for the main blog and then promoting it in hopes of attracting natural links?
Link Building | | CMC-SD0 -
Link Directories
Hi there, We're very shortly launching a new website so as part of our link strategy we will be linking to directories found with the Link Acquisition Assistant for various keyword searches. I was wondering at what point is it not worthwhile submitting to these directories with regards PA and DA? For example if a directory has a domain authority of 69 but the page authority for the keyword in question is only 1, would it be a waste of time? Cheers
Link Building | | TalarMade0 -
Paid directory submission
Hi Team,
Link Building | | PLEsearch
We are looking for link submission in paid directories, so could you please you please let us know what will be the procedure of paid link submission ASAP Regards0 -
Seo review
I wanna a opinion a seo review for this website, filmeonlinenoi.com, the content is in Romanian ... i cant get to the 1st page, idk why... i tryed evryting
Link Building | | Alexsmenaru0 -
Do you think it's a good idea to try to find synergy between clients for blog posts/citations/links, or should you keep clients away from each other?
Say you have for example three (in this case) clients, and: Client A sells red widgets Client B is a doctor Client C sellls blue widgets With some research, you find that: Red widgets (A) can make the process of blue widget creation (C) even more effective. Red widgets (A) can protect you from harmful things that doctors (B) are qualified to recommend that you stay away from. Furthermore, there are things that doctors (B) recommend that you do in order to maximize the benefits of red widgets (A) Blue widgets (C) carry with them certain potential health risks, which according to doctors (B) can be minimized using the following means Sometimes blue widgets (C) can be used to effectively repair red widget (A) factories ...and so forth. Sure you're really writing these articles to generate links and exchange authority, and frankly you started with "how can I find synergy between these clients?" rather than a with a great article subject that needed a citation which luckily happened to be another client, but the citations are legitimate and the clients are qualified to speak on the subjects where their expertise and interests overlap. Would you consider going ahead with this? Does anyone have any experience doing it? I could see potential pitfalls if clients were to interact with each other, but keeping yourself as the intermediary might well work and overall it seems like a decent way to grab low-hanging fruit as they say. What do you guys think?
Link Building | | PathMarketing0