How to handle Not found Crawl errors?
-
I'm using Google webmaster tools and able to see Not found Crawl errors. I have set up custom 404 page for all broken links. You can see my custom 404 page as follow.
http://www.vistastores.com/404
But, I have question about it.
Will it require to set 301 redirect for broken links which found in Google webmaster tools?
-
I agree with Ben on this one. There are plenty of 404s caused by scraper sites that don't and won't affect my time, especially on big sites.
Also, redirects aren't the only tool available. There are plenty of other ways to fix GWT 404 errors, particularly if there is a fundmental problem aside from the link in question.
-
Hi Commerce, I was certainly came across a blog post on this topic on Google's Webmaster Central blog, it covers most of the questions around 404 errors.
Generally speaking:
- If these are pages that you removed, then the 404 HTTP result code is fine.
- If these are pages that changed addresses, then you should 301 redirect to the new addresses. How you do this depends on your setup, for Apache-servers you may be able to use the .htaccess file for this.
- Unless these are pages that used to receive a lot of traffic from search, these 404s won't be the reason for your site's traffic dropping like that. Google understands that the web changes and that URLs disappear - that is not a reason for Google to stop showing your site.
So my recommendation would be to check the URLs that are listed as 404 crawl errors. If any are important, then set up redirects to the appropriate new URLs as soon as you can. If none of them are important, then keep this in mind as something worth cleaning up when you have time, but focus on the rest of your site first. Often drastic drops in traffic are due more to the general quality of the website, so that's what I'd recommend working on first.
For more deatails refer to How to Fix Crawl Errors.
I hope that your query had been solved.
-
Makes sense - in which case the homepage might not be the best place for you.
Another option for the custom 404 which works well in certain circumstances is to add a dynamic element to it.
For example, we know the referring URL has reference to product XYZ which may now be unavailable, but perhaps we can dynamically pull in other relevant products into the 404 page.
Thats something I am looking to do with hotels that become unavailable - pull in a dynamic element to the 404 which basically recommends some other hotels close by.
-
Well I would have to disagree with that principal. Sometimes you have to think a little broader than just SEO and ask yourself if it really makes commercial sense to redirect everything.
That's why I put a financial cost against each unique redirect. At the end of the day it requires someone to action it and that person has a cost associated with their time that may be better allocated working on something that will actually drive business uplift or improve customer experience.
Each to their own of course, but I see a lot of SEO's who don't think big picture and they up using up developer resource doing stuff that then has no impact. It just p!sses people off in my experience.
-
Hi Ben,
I agree with you that some links are not worth redirecting. However, in my experience a dead link never comes alone. Often there is some kind of reason that the link was created, and there might be others you don't know about.
For this reason I usually recommend redirecting all broken links, even if the individual link is not worth the trouble. Obviously there are exceptions to this rule, but most of the time it's worth your trouble.
Sven
-
Good to know! But, I have very bad experience to redirect such a strong page to home page. I have removed too many product pages for market umbrellas from my website and redirect it to home page. Because, I don't have specific landing page or inner level page for it. So, I'm able to see change over ranking for specific keywords. My home page is ranking well in Market Umbrellas keyword because too many external page link my product page with that keyword. It also create negative ranking impression for my actual targeted keyword which I'm using for my home page.
-
Yeah, which is basically what Kane is saying as well. If you don't have an appropriate internal page then you could send the 301 redirect to your homepage or if it was a specific product you might want to redirect it to the parent/child category.
If its a particularly strong URL that has been linked to from many good external sources then you might consider adding a replacement content page and redirecting to that.
Ben
-
Hi Ben,
I got your point. If my page is available on external page which have good value (Good page rank or heavy amount of traffic) so, I need to redirect it on specific internal page to save my page rank flow. Right?
-
Hopefully I am understanding your question correctly here....
The main benefit of the custom 404 page aside from the obvious improvement to user experience is that you provide additional links into content that otherwise wouldn't necessarily be available to the search bots.
In essence if you just had a standard 404 error page you'd send the search bots to a dead page where their only decision would be to leave the domain and go elsewhere.
Regards setting up 301 redirects I like to associate a cost to each 301 redirect. Imagine the time it will take you or someone else to set each redirect up (say $5 per redirect). Then consider the following:
Is the URL that is 404 worth redirecting?
(1) Does it hold some residual SEO value (i.e., is it present on external sites that is driving link equity? if so can you redirect that equity to somewhere more valuable?
(2) Is the URL present on an external site driving referral traffic? if so do you have a new content page that will still match the users intent?
if the URL(s) that are 404'ing have no real link equity associated to them and/or you don't have a genuinely useful page to redirect the user to then I would just let them hit the 404 page.
If in doubt put yourself in a users boots and ask yourself if the set-up you have done would offer a valuable experience? no point redirecting a user to something totally irrelevant to the original intent - it'll just p!ss them off most the time and increase your bounce rate.
-
If there is a link pointed at that 404 page, then I will almost always 301 it to regain that link value. If I control the source of the link, I'll change that instead. If the link is from a spammy or junky website, I don't worry about it.
Here is a worthwhile article on how to go about fixing GWT crawl errors:
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/how-to-fix-crawl-errors-in-google-webmaster-tools
I would suggest adding more content to your 404 page. Try to help people find what they're looking for by suggesting common pages, product segments, etc.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How can I best handle parameters?
Thank you for your help in advance! I've read a ton of posts on this forum on this subject and while they've been super helpful I still don't feel entirely confident in what the right approach I should take it. Forgive my very obvious noob questions - I'm still learning! The problem: I am launching a site (coursereport.com) which will feature a directory of schools. The directory can be filtered by a handful of fields listed below. The URL for the schools directory will be coursereport.com/schools. The directory can be filtered by a number of fields listed here: Focus (ex: “Data Science”) Cost (ex: “$<5000”) City (ex: “Chicago”) State/Province (ex: “Illinois”) Country (ex: “Canada”) When a filter is applied to the directories page the CMS produces a new page with URLs like these: coursereport.com/schools?focus=datascience&cost=$<5000&city=chicago coursereport.com/schools?cost=$>5000&city=buffalo&state=newyork My questions: 1) Is the above parameter-based approach appropriate? I’ve seen other directory sites that take a different approach (below) that would transform my examples into more “normal” urls. coursereport.com/schools?focus=datascience&cost=$<5000&city=chicago VERSUS coursereport.com/schools/focus/datascience/cost/$<5000/city/chicago (no params at all) 2) Assuming I use either approach above isn't it likely that I will have duplicative content issues? Each filter does change on page content but there could be instance where 2 different URLs with different filters applied could produce identical content (ex: focus=datascience&city=chicago OR focus=datascience&state=illinois). Do I need to specify a canonical URL to solve for that case? I understand at a high level how rel=canonical works, but I am having a hard time wrapping my head around what versions of the filtered results ought to be specified as the preferred versions. For example, would I just take all of the /schools?focus=X combinations and call that the canonical version within any filtered page that contained other additional parameters like cost or city? Should I be changing page titles for the unique filtered URLs? I read through a few google resources to try to better understand the how to best configure url params via webmaster tools. Is my best bet just to follow the advice on the article below and define the rules for each parameter there and not worry about using rel=canonical ? https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/1235687 An assortment of the other stuff I’ve read for reference: http://www.wordtracker.com/academy/seo-clean-urls http://www.practicalecommerce.com/articles/3857-SEO-When-Product-Facets-and-Filters-Fail http://www.searchenginejournal.com/five-steps-to-seo-friendly-site-url-structure/59813/ http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2011/07/improved-handling-of-urls-with.html
Technical SEO | | alovallo0 -
Rel Canonical Crawl Notices
Hello, Within the Moz report from the crawl of my site, it shows that I had 89 Rel Canonical notices. I noticed that all the pages on my site have a rel canonical tag back to the same page the tag is on. Specific example from my site is as follows: http://www.automation-intl.com/resistance-welding-equipment has a Rel Canonical tag <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="http://www.automation-intl.com/resistance-welding-equipment" />. Is this self reference harmless and if so why does it create a notice in the crawl? Thanks in advance.
Technical SEO | | TopFloor0 -
Has Google Stopped Listing URLs with Crawl Errors in Webmaster Tools?
I went to Google Webmaster Tools this morning and found that one of my clients had 11 crawl errors. However, Webmaster Tools is not showing which URLs are having experiencing the errors, which it used to do. (I checked several other clients that I manage and they list crawl errors without showing the specific URLs. Does anyone know how I can find out which URLs are experiencing problems? (I checked with Bing Webmaster Tools and the number of errors are different).
Technical SEO | | TopFloor0 -
During my last crawl suddenly no errors or warnings were found, only one, a 403 error on my homepage.
There were no changes made and all my old errors dissapeard, i think something went wrong. Is it possible to start another crawl earlyer then scheduled?
Technical SEO | | KnowHowww0 -
Sitemap error
Hi, When i search for my blog post in google i get sitemap results, and when i click on it i get an error, here is the screen shot http://screencast.com/t/lXOIiTnVZR1 http://screencast.com/t/MPWkuc4Ocixy How can i fix that, it loos like if i just add www. it work just fine. Thanks
Technical SEO | | tonyklu0 -
Has anyone had to deal with malware found on their website?
I am helping my friend website and whole site has been hacked. Does anyone have had this problems? What's the best way to fix this problem? www.marksobhani.com/ Thank you
Technical SEO | | BistosAmerica0 -
Why isnt my Site getting Re Crawled !!!
The last crawl for my website was done long back ! What is the use if you dont re-crawl ? My website is www.caraccessoriesdelhi.in I have corrected all the errors. When will you recrawl it ? This is absolutely not done ! The last crawl was done on 3rd May !
Technical SEO | | VarunBansal0 -
I have found a website on my dedicated server which is not mine
Hi i have found a website on my dedicated server that is not mine by using a number of tools including http://www.yougetsignal.com/tools/web-sites-on-web-server/ the site that i found that was not mine is buycostumes.com i contacted my hosting company and told them and this is the reply i got back We have checked the issue and it appears there have a bug/glitch in this site, because after we checked the mentioned domain we found that this website respond on IP which is not our and is not assisgned in your Dedicated server as you may preview below: Found 3 domains hosted on the same web server as buycostumes.com (66.45.3.44). buycostumes.com (linkback) target.com (linkback) www.certifigroup.com (linkback) Thus if you find any issues on your web server, please mention them in this ticket and we will be glad to provide you with further assistance on this matter. Please feel free to contact us if you have any further technical difficulties. Best regards, Now they have not said if they are going to do anything about this and to be honest i am getting fed up with the hosting company because i am being told that the slow speed i was receiving for my website www.in2town.co.uk was down to it taking a long time to reach my server before reaching my site. Now not sure if this is correct or not but with all the help i have received off semoz i have managed to increase the speed to my site but now i have found this problem. Can anyone tell me if i am being played and also can anyone recommend a professional UK hosting company. Also is this site affecting my spped and my site performance.
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860