Severe Health issue on my site through Webmaster tools
-
I use Go Daddy Website Tonight. I keep getting a severe health message in Google Webmaster tools stating that my robots.txt file is blocking some important page. When I try to get more details the blocked file will not open. When I asked the Go Daddy peeps they told me that it was just image and backup files that do not need to be crawled. But if Google spiders keep thinking an important page is blocked will this hurt my SERPS?
-
I would just like to add: If you're considering signing up for something (SEV), you may as well get a real hosting package.
-
Thanks for letting us know, and glad you found a work-around. A 0-second META REFRESH sometimes acts like a 301 - it's not ideal, as you said, but it's something.
-
For anyone else with Website Tonight, I have finally found a work around if not a fix. Being that Website Tonight will not allow you to do a 301 Redirect of an old page, I have figured out that if you re-create the deleted page (just the URL not the content) and use the Meta Tag to do a REFRESH to the new page, anytime the old page is clicked on it will bring them to the new page. Not ideal, of course, for SEO purposes but at least they are no longer going to a 404 and HOPEFULLY your old link juice will pass on.
-
While creating the copy of the home-page isn't ideal, if Google hasn't indexed it, it's very likely not creating duplicate content problems. Either they're filtering it out or haven't indexed it at all (since it probably has no links/paths).
I don't think that this alone is the cause of your ranking drop, but you've got a few things going on, so it's tough to say. Unfortunately, most of the ideal solutions seem to be impossible in the Godaddy system, and that's going to continue to cause you some problems.
-
No I have not made any changes yet. Google has never preferred the /shakeology.html page. I don't think it's ever been indexed. My only problem is that since I tried to CHANGE the root url not CREAT ANOTHER VERSION my serps have seemed to tank and I am trying to avoid the duplicate content issues that I believe the /shakeology.html is causing.
-
No I have not made any changes yet. Google has never preferred the /shakeology.html page. I don't think it's ever been indexed. My only problem is that since I tried to CHANGE the root url not CREAT ANOTHER VERSION my serps have seemed to tank and I am trying to avoid the duplicate content issues that I believe the /shakeology.html is causing.
-
It's a bit dangerous to simply block "shakeology.html", if Google has preferred it for a reason - you could end up getting your root page back in the rankings, or you could end up just falling out completely. I think you'd be better off leaving it and having the "wrong" page rank, if that's the only viable option.
I'm actually still showing your root home-page ranking, though, and now the "shakeology.html" page isn't even appearing in the index. Did you already make a change?
-
My original wanted homepage is www .hompage .com
My duplicate is www. hompage .com/shakeology.html
Would it be possible and/or advisable to use a Parameter in Web Master tools to ignore the /shakeology.html?
-
Unfortunately, there just comes a point where sometimes these very narrow CMS systems hit their limits, and it can start to harm you. I don't know Website Tonight well enough to help on that (hopefully someone else does), but there may come a point where you want to consider to a more advanced platform. These days, there are a lot of options that aren't budget-breakers, although switching is always a bit tough.
-
Unfortunately no. The edit page section of Website Tonight only shows the newer homepage.com/shakeology.html version and not the original homepage.com
I am afraid to delete the homepage.com/shakeology.html in fear that I will be left with neither one.
You probably aren't seeing the preview of the .com/shakeology.html because it is not the indexed homepage. It shows for the homepage.com version. The canonical tag was me trying to redirect search engines from the new (unwanted) homepage to the original because Website tonight won't allow me to 301 it.
-
Sounds like SEO Executive has got you covered on the Godaddy front - just wanted to point out a couple of things:
(1) I'm not seeing a preview for your home-page, and I had trouble connecting to it the first time. It seems to be cahced, so this could be a fluke.
(2) Not sure if this is part of the Godaddy code, but there's a really weird tag on the home-page:
name="canonical tag" content=""/>
That might just be a reference, but it doesn't do anything. If it's supposed to actually be a canonical, then something is broken.
-
Yes I saw that but unfortunately the organize your site page on website tonight only shows the new page. I'm afraid to delete it and lose both.
-
I found some great info here that I believe explains it: http://support.godaddy.com/help/2986/organizing-your-website-using-the-organize-site-page
-
I really do appreciate all of your help. Here's the issue I'm having with this though... After I renamed the homepage file to add /shakeology.html to it (because I thought it would be beneficial to have a main keyword in the url) Website Tonight only shows me the homepage.com/shakeology.html and not the homepage.com. I'm afraid that if I delete /shakeology.html I will show neither one and in essence, according to Website Tonight just be deleting my homepage. I'm not sure how to properly accomplish what I'm looking to do without screwing myself any further??
-
Personally, that's what I would do is delete it. Unless, there is a reason you need that page.
-
Since I can't 301 it, would it be bad to delete the dupe page?
-
Yes thanks. I foolishly renamed my home page and caused a duplicate page. Website tonight will not allow me to do a 301 redirect. I put a canonical tag on the /shakeology. Should this do the trick?
-
Your welcome! I'm also sending the other side of the story not to confuse you but to allow you to make a decision based on both sides: http://groups.google.com/a/googleproductforums.com/forum/#!category-topic/webmasters/crawling-indexing--ranking/8nyxCtv9RHM
-
Oh OK great. Thanks so much for your help. I just got nervous because Google puts up the Severe Health Issue warning everytime I get crawled.
-
This is a javascript file and I don't see it being an issue unless Google thinks your hiding it to be spammy . Also, there are some that say it's a benefit to block js files from the search for SEO purposes. Here is an example of that situation: http://www.seomofo.com/advanced/do-not-let-google-crawl-javascript.html I think since this is out of your control and goes by the standard of how Godaddy sets up there sites, then it shouldn't be an issue.
-
It was just crawled. And it was after robots.txt was uploaded. This is the page it lists: siteUtil.js
-
Also, the following are duplicates: http://www.shakes4life.com/shakeology.html & http://www.shakes4life.com
-
When did Google last index your site? You can check this through webmaster tools. When did you instal the robots.txt file. The reason I ask: If Google's last crawl was before you uploaded your robots file then that could be the issue. Please look at these statistics and verify this before we move further.
-
Is Google webmaster tools giving you the specific name of the files that are being blocked?
-
Is there something on it that would be detrimental to my SERPS?
-
Yes. When I type www.shakes4life.com/robots.txt the same list shows.
-
Can you place the following in your browser and replace website with your domain name and www or non www in front. website.com/robots.txt
Let me know if you see the same stuff you sent me in your last response
-
Below is the robots.txt Website Tonight Creates when I tell it to allow all pages:
User-agent: *
Allow: /
User-agent: *
Disallow: /cache/
Disallow: /_backup/
Disallow: /_mygallery/
Disallow: /_temp/
Disallow: /_tempalbums/
Disallow: /_tmpfileop/
Disallow: /dbboon/
Disallow: /Flash/
Disallow: /images/
Disallow: /plugins/
Disallow: /scripts/
Disallow: /stats/
Disallow: /statshistory/
Disallow: /WstxSearchResults.html
Disallow: /WstxSearchResults.php
Disallow: /QSC/ -
Yes you are correct. I forgot to mention (sorry) that I do use S.E.V. It allows you to create a robots.txt and lets you choose pages to block. However, even when you choose allow all, by default it blocks certain files. Go Daddy tells me they are only system files but Google tells me an important page is blocked.
-
From what I know, Godaddy Website Tonight does not offer you the opportunity to create a custom robots.txt. I believe you have to sign up for there Search Engine Visibility services. Here is some more information: http://support.godaddy.com/help/article/5321
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How long does it take for Webmaster Tools to index a site?
I submitted my client's site about a week ago. It had 138 links, it's still at 43 links. Should it be taking that long to index? Thanks! Luciana
Technical SEO | | Luciana_BAH1 -
Site hacked in Jan. Redeveloped new site. Still not ranking. Should we change domain?
Our top ranking site in the UK was hacked at the end of 2014. http://www.ultimatefloorsanding.co.uk/ The site was the subject of a manual spam action from Google. After several unsuccessful attempts to clean it up, using Securi.net and reinstating old versions of the site, changing passwords etc. we took the decision to redevelop the site. We also changed hosting provider as we had received absolutely no support from them whatsoever in resolving the issue. So far we have: Removed the old website files off the server Developed a new website having implemented 301's for all the old URL's (except the spam ones) Submitted a reconsideration request for the manual spam action, which was accepted. Disavowed all the spammy inbound links through Webmaster Tools Implemented custom URL parameters through Google to not index the SPAM URLs ( which were using parameters) Our organic traffic is down by 63% compared to last year, and we are not ranking for most of our target keywords any longer. Is there anything that I am missing in the actions I have taken so far? We were advised that at this stage changing domain and starting again might be the way to go. However the current domain has been used by us since 2007, so it would be a big call. Any advice is appreciated, thanks. Sue - http://www.ultimatefloorsanding.co.uk/
Technical SEO | | galwaygirl0 -
What do I need to do for HTTPS switch in Webmaster Tools?
My site is currently verified using a meta tag for both Google and Bing. Will I need to recreate the meta tag or will I be able to use the same one?
Technical SEO | | EcommerceSite1 -
Persistent Unnatural Links in Webmaster tools
We recently were notified about unnatural links from two websites (totalling a few thousands links each). We went to the websites and asked them to remove the links, which they apparently did. After this we applied for reconsideration to Google, explaining the situation, however they came back and said we still have links. We noticed there were still links, however there were less than before, and so we once again asked the sites to remove all the links. Now we are sure all the links are gone as when we click a random link and view the page source there is no reference to our site, however WebMaster tools is not updating the link list, claiming we still have thousands of links. Do we have to apply for another reconsideration request to get them to re-crawl the sites to get rid of the links, or should it happen automatically?
Technical SEO | | eXia0 -
Google Webmaster tools vs SeoMOZ Crawl Diagnostics
Hi Guys I was just looking over my weekly report and crawl diagnostics. What I've noticed is that the data gathered on SeoMoz is different from Google Webmaster diagnostics. The number of errors, in particular duplicate page titles, content and pages not found is much higher that what google webmaster tools is represents. I'm a bit confused and don't know which data is more accurate. Please Help
Technical SEO | | Tolod0 -
Webmaster tools lists a large number (hundreds)of different domains linking to my website, but only a few are reported on SEOMoz. Please explain what's going on?
Google's webmaster tools lists hundreds of links to my site, but SEOMoz only reports a few of them. I don't understand why that would be. Can anybody explain it to me? Is there someplace to I can go to alert SEOMoz to this issue?
Technical SEO | | dnfealkoff0 -
Does Google pass link juice a page receives if the URL parameter specifies content and has the Crawl setting in Webmaster Tools set to NO?
The page in question receives a lot of quality traffic but is only relevant to a small percent of my users. I want to keep the link juice received from this page but I do not want it to appear in the SERPs.
Technical SEO | | surveygizmo0 -
Partial Site Move -- Tell Google Entire Site Moved?
OK this one's a little confusing, please try to follow along. We recently went through a rebranding where we brought a new domain online for one of our brands (we'll call this domain 'B' -- it's also not the site linked to in my profile, not to confuse things). This brand accounted for 90% of the pages and 90% of the e-comm on the existing domain (we'll call the existing domain 'A') . 'A' was also redesigned and it's URL structure has changed. We have 301s in place on A that redirect to B for those 90% of pages and we also have internal 301s on A for the remaining 10% of pages whose URL has changed as a result of the A redesign What I'm wondering is if I should tell Google through webmaster tools that 'A' is now 'B' through the 'Change of Address' form. If I do this, will the existing products that remain on A suffer? I suppose I could just 301 the 10% of URLs on B back to A but I'm wondering if Google would see that as a loop since I just got done telling it that A is now B. I realize there probably isn't a perfect answer here but I'm looking for the "least worst" solution. I also realize that it's not optimal that we moved 90% of the pages from A to B, but it's the situation we're in.
Technical SEO | | badgerdigital0