Indexing techniques
-
Hi,
I just want a confirmation about my indexing technique, if is good or can be improved. The technique is totally whitehat and can be done by one person. Any suggestions or improvements are welcome.
- I create the backlinks ofcource first
- I make a list on public doc from Google.
- On the doc are only ten links.
- After I digg it , and add some more bookmarks 5-6.
- I tweet the digg and each doc. (my 2 twitter accounts have page authority 98)
- I like them in Fb.
- I ping them thru ping serviecs.
- Thats it. Works ok for moment.
Is anything what I can do to improve my technique?
Thanks lot
- I create the backlinks ofcource first
-
No is not gaming, is adult but I am thinking also to develop a gaming site , to turn Mine in a gaming site because in Cy no jobs about SEO. They are more gamblers there , And Online I dont think so that I will go good... Also I make more money from affiliate like to work for somebody... Maybe I wasnt so much lucky I guess...But is ok..Im still happy:)
-
Based on your profile, I'm guessing this is a gaming-related site?
-
My goal is about the old pages to get crawled fast. Which contains my links on them. Is not about my pages.
-
Many of them are authority 10-20-30-40, some other are zero. All are indexed pages because I am taking the links from a competitor. Yes some are low quality links but he is ranking number 1 after 2 500 000 exact matches.I just do this effort to speed up the indexing because many of them are not getting indexed fast. I mean I saw some of them that after 1 month start to show up in Webmaster Tools. After this process all are etting indexed in one day maximum. As for the quality links what you are suggesting to get is almost impossible due to the nature of the niche. Nobody want to give them, as this specific keyword is extremely profitable and have millions of searches. I mean the hardest part is to get the already good ones, and build authority for the other what I create new...OHHHH.. Also we are just 2 persons working here...From 1000 links what I visit until now only 60 was possible to get . Stay another 9000 links for checking.....If I get until 600 from his links will be good I guess , my site is already ranking with his keyword, but in position 50 about(just on page optimization)...and is old, pr 2 with 150 likes and some tweets, all real.The new links are builded in the last 2 days so I dont know where it will goes the site . Other bad on this is that they are around 45 exact matches domains under him with the same keyword...Mine is even not in url..
-
I believe you are referring to getting backlinks indexed. The only reason you would need to go to all that effort is if you were building low quality links on deep pages or pages with thin content that Google would not value in their index (e.g. Forum profile links, blog comments) I'm sure you are doing more than enough to get your links indexed but they will become quickly deindexed if Google no longer values the page content. If you are going to all this effort to index a batch low quality links then why not put that same effort into building links on pages with more trust & better quality content that Google will want in their index?
-
IF your goal is to get your webpages indexed, then why not create a sitemap and submit it in GWT? I don't understand why you would go through all that trouble to get your webpages indexed.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Substantial difference between Number of Indexed Pages and Sitemap Pages
Hey there, I am doing a website audit at the moment. I've notices substantial differences in the number of pages indexed (search console), the number of pages in the sitemap and the number I am getting when I crawl the page with screamingfrog (see below). Would those discrepancies concern you? The website and its rankings seems fine otherwise. Total indexed: 2,360 (Search Consule)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Online-Marketing-Guy
About 2,920 results (Google search "site:example.com")
Sitemap: 1,229 URLs
Screemingfrog Spider: 1,352 URLs Cheers,
Jochen0 -
Google Indexing of Images
Our site is experiencing an issue with indexation of images. The site is real estate oriented. It has 238 listings with about 1190 images. The site submits two version (different sizes) of each image to Google, so there are about 2,400 images. Only several hundred are indexed. Can adding Microdata improve the indexation of the images? Our site map is submitting images that are on no-index listing pages to Google. As a result more than 2000 images have been submitted but only a few hundred have been indexed. How should the site map deal with images that reside on no-index pages? Do images that are part of pages that are set up as "no-index" need a special "no-index" label or special treatment? My concern is that so many images that not indexed could be a red flag showing poor quality content to Google. Is it worth investing in correcting this issue, or will correcting it result in little to no improvement in SEO? Thanks, Alan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan10 -
Index or noindex mobile version?
We have a website called imones.lt
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | FCRMediaLietuva
and we have a mobile version for it m.imones.lt We originally put noindex for m.imones.lt. Is it a good decision or no? We believe that if google indexes both it creates double content. We definitely don't want that? But when someone through google goes to any of imones.lt webpage using smartphone they are redirected to m.imones.lt/whatever Thank you for your opinion.0 -
Indexing falling/search queries the same - concerned
Hello, I posted abou this a few days ago but didn't really get anywhere and now have new information after looking into it more. This is my site - http://www.whosjack.org My page indexing has been falling steadily daily currently from thousands of pages indexed to just a couple of hundred. My search queries don't seem to be currently affected, I have done crawl tests to see if the site can be crawled and put the site:whosjack.org into Google and had 12,000 results come back when goole has said it has indexed 133 and falling. However all pages indexed on the site:whosjack.org search seem to be stories with just two words in the title? I am sure I am missing out on traffic here but can't work out what the issue is and how to fix it. I have no alerts on my dashboard and when I submit sitemaps to webmaster tools I get 15,115 URLs submitted 12,088 URLs indexedwhich cant be bad?Any help/suggestions really appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | luwhosjack0 -
Google didn't indexed my domain.
I bought *out.com more than 1 year, google bot even don't come, then I put the domain to the domain parking. what can I do? I want google index me.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Yue0 -
Index.php canonical/dup issues
Hello my fellow SEOs! I would LOVE some additional insight/opinions on the following... I have a client who is an industry leader, big site, ranks for many competitive phrases, blah blah..you get the picture. However, they have a big dup content/canonical issue. Most pages resolve with and without the /index.php at the end of the URL. Obviously this is a dup content issue but more importantly they SEs sometimes serve an "index.php" version of the page, sometimes they don't, and it is constantly changing which version it serves and the rank goes up and down. Now, I've instructed them that we are going to need to write a sitewide redirect to attempt a uniform structure. Most people would say, redirect to the non index.php version buttttt 1. The index.php pages consistently outperforms the non index.php versions, except the homepage. 2. The client really would prefer to have the "index.php" at the end of the URL The homepage performs extremely well for a lot of competitive phrases. I'd like to redirect all pages to the "index.php" version except the homepage and I'm thinking that if I redirect all pages EXCEPT the homepage to the index.php version, it could cause some unforeseen issues. I can not use rel=canonical because they have many different versions of the their pages with different country codes in the URL..example, if I make the US version canonical, it will hurt the pages trying to rank with a fr URL, de URL, (where fr/de are country codes in the URL depending where the user is, it serves the correct version). Any advice would be GREATLY appreciated. Thanks in advance! Mike
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MikeCoughlin0 -
How do I index these parameter generated pages?
Hey guys, I've got an issue with a site I'm working on. A big chunk of the content (roughly 500 pages) is delivered using parameters on a dynamically generated page. For example: www.domain.com/specs/product?=example - where "example' is the product name Currently there is no way to get to these pages unless you enter the product name into the search box and access it from there. Correct me if I'm wrong, but unless we find some other way to link to these pages they're basically invisible to search engines, right? What I'm struggling with is a method to get them indexed without doing something like creating a directory map type page of all of the links on it, which I guess wouldn't be a terrible idea as long as it was done well. I've not encountered a situation like this before. Does anyone have any recommendations?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CodyWheeler0 -
Should I Allow Blog Tag Pages to be Indexed?
I have a wordpress blog with settings currently set so that Google does not index tag pages. Is this a best practice that avoids duplicate content or am I hurting the site by taking eligible pages out of the index?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JSOC0