Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Which is Best Practice for creating URLs for subdomain?
-
My website is related to education. We have created sub domains for all major colleges, universities & Entrance exams like Gre, Toefl ETC.
for eg: amityuniversity.abc.com (Amity is Name of University )
Now if have to mention city name in URL as well (college is located in multiple locations)
amityuniversity-delhi.abc.com
amityuniversitydelhi.abc.comNow my Q is can we use hyphens in sub domains if we have to add city name or shall we create without using any hyphens.
In Directory structure we can always separate words with hyphens, can we follow same practice in subdomain as well
Which is a best URL for subdomain
amity-university-delhi.abc.com
amityuniversity-delhi.abc.com
or amityuniversitydelhi.abc.com -
As to:
Here is to the day that we don't have to make a domain registrar rich!
As an old Marine, we have a saying in that proud group that really applies:
COPY THAT! (A Big I agree) especially with regard to a certain daddy that sucks rocks in Arizona, USA and has girls as his spokes persons...
-
I completely agree with the fact that those of us that do this everyday aren't the best to ask in regards to this, though our office is a mixed bunch, not all marketeers.
In general I have noticed that more and more users that I have come across are becoming more aware of what they are clicking on in the SERPs. They are filtering results based on their own judgments, not just trusting the search engines as they may have done in the past. Though as you say with the growth of the last five years there is probably one hell of a lot of people that trust in the SERPs whatever they serve for a query. In relation to this suspicion; I think page titles and descriptions influence this more than EMDs.
It would be an interesting study to see the impact of hyphens(the amount) in EMDs and their click through rates from the SERPs.
As we have both attested, though, we have had success with EMD with hyphens, though this is obviously down to many factors in relation to SEO strategy we have employed, not just a good domain.
Thanks for your input it is very valuable.
Here is to the day that we don't have to make a domain registrar rich!
-
As to the how many is most (typically one or two, cant think of where we used three).
As to those of us who do this daily, I don't think we are a good group to ask because we get used to certain conventions. My experience is that we are ahead of a lot of non hyphen domains in some tough verticals. But, we really bust it with all SEO and try to be cutting edge. (May not have as much to do with hyphens, if anything).
Suspicious users. Maybe in the past. But with the growth of the last five years, I would think it is much less a factor.
With Google, I just do not believe it is a factor, but am willing to be wrong. Again, they are out there everyday and short of going to .whatever, it is easier to use exact match with hyphens at times. Now, if EMD becomes a non-issue, so will hyphens.
We are going into a new area with a client over the weekend and I went in and bought every .com, .net, .info, .org with hyphen and non hyphen today. There were two .coms and a .net missing around roughly 40 root domain permutations. I look forward to the day I can just brand the domain/sub-domain and not make a registrar rich.
Best,
All the best,
-
Very interesting response Robert, with some very good and valid points - though I think you would want a expert in order to carry out that change, although that might not be the right place to find them - a very nice example of why hyphens, in the right situation, are very valid.
When you have worked with hyphens and domains what is the largest number of hyphens on an EMD you have worked on?
This has set off an interesting discussion in the office with the feeling that a domain with multiple hyphens is less trusted by the majority here when they appear in the serps, therefore receiving less click-throughs.
In general do you think users have been educated to be suspicious of domains that appear long and and exact match with hyphens and that is why it is believed to be spammy by some?
The most I have worked on in regards to EMDs with hyphens is one and this dominated the SERPs for the targeted terms.
Do you think EMDs with multiple hyphens possibly set off alarm bells with Google in regard to over-optimization rather than efficient labelling of a resource online, in particular since Penguin?
-
Thanks Robert for your reply
Till date we have used hyphens in sub domain & we have not seen any -ve impact.
We were creating a list of 1000 new colleges so i just wanted to be rest assured, that's y i raised Q.
Also Students are aware of famous universities & colleges so thr is lot of search related to University specific keywords.
In some cases we have seen General level keywords like "Animation colleges Delhi" have less search compare to Particular university which is famous in Animation. In education we have seen thr is lot of search related to university & college level ky.
In hotel Industry its a vice versa
-
Rohan
This is one of my favorite topics and Matt makes great points. But, IMO there is not a right or wrong. Yes, SEOmoz has a great best practices page (see Matt's link) on this and when I look at it I always wonder as to its age or last update. (One of the reasons is that as the web expands, there are less and less .com/.net sites and it clearly says here that:
Top level domains (like .com) are the extensions associated with domain names. For best ranking results, avoid uncommon top-level domains (TLDs). Like hyphens, TLDs such as .info, .cc, .ws, and .name are spam indicators.
Here is why I question this: I do not believe that "spammy" can be quantified and I have yet to find a spammy test that was reliable. Also, I question what a spam indicator is and in the absence of any other relevant 'spam indicator' what affect it might have on ranking. Is it that Google has a spam indicator in the algorithm that absent any other evidence, devalues at some level a hyphen or a .info? I would love to see the proof.
Note: My incredulity is driven by results we achieve using hyphens as needed or .info as needed.
Today there are too many instances where hyphens are needed just to be able to figure out what it says. (Or to insure correct interpretation: expertsexchange.com is the classic in this group) Yes, if this is an EMD and if it is in a branded or common context someone who already knows of it might not use the hyphens.
But, if we are looking to capture those who are searching for something they don't yet know of, they are not typing in amityuniversity delhi with or without. They are searching for something like universities in Delhi, graphic design schools delhi, etc. They are not going to the SERPs and on finding what they want, going to the address bar and typing it in; they are clicking the link in the SERP and going to the page.
So, my rule is this: Use Hyphens to clarify a long or confusing domain/sub domain name. Use hyphens competitively if you desire an EMD where one is not available for a high impact page.
We are an agency and do a lot of sites that clients come to us with no domain name for. We use hyphens and non hyphens. I have yet to see where a hyphenated domain is negatively impacted to a level that gave me pause. I am sure based on experience that a hyphenated EMD does have more impact than a non hyphenated domain that is not exact match.
I look forward to a vigorous discussion on this oft discussed issue!
-
Hi Rohan,
You can use hyphens in sub-domains, however when using hyphens in relation to any domain or sub-domain I tend to stay away from them, if possible, as they tend to be related to spam practices, especially with multiple hyphens. I think you will find this SeoMoz best practice in relation to domains a good guide as to what is the best tactic to take - http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/domain
Hope this helps
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Does Google penalize you for reindexing multiple URLS?
Hello, Just a quick, question! I was wanting to know if multiple page indexing (site overhaul) could cause a drop in organic traffic ranking or be penalized by Google for submitting multiple pages at one time. Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | InternetRep0 -
Will changing a URL negatively affect ranking?
Hello Mozzers, We would like to change the URL for a page on our website which ranks well for some our keyphrases/words. We are hoping the change of URL, through the addition of an additional keyword would help boost the rank of that URL further. At the moment out page gets 2 x A and 2 x B 1xF on the MOZ page rank tool using 5 keyphrase/word variations . One phrase ranks 4, one ranks 3 and the other 3 are 'not in the top 50' Our plan was to change the URL, using SHF404, and use 'Fetch' in the Google search console to re-submit the page to Google. Appreciate you can't give any guarantees how Google will behave, just wondered what your thoughts were on the wisdom of changing the URL in the first place? Thanks Ian
On-Page Optimization | | Substance-create0 -
Google is indexing urls with parameters despite canonical
Hello Moz, Google is indexing lots of urls despite the canonical in my site. Those urls are linked all over the site with parameters like ?, and looks like Google is indexing them despite de canonical. Is Google deciding to index those urls because they are linked all over the site? The canonical tag is well implemented.
On-Page Optimization | | Red_educativa0 -
Correct .htaccess settings for canonical url?
I want to forward all urls to http:www.mysite.com but am a little confuse because I am getting duplicate content error: Pages with Duplicate Page Content as of Jan 15http://titanappliancerepair.com/ 1 duplicatehttp://titanappliancerepair.com 1 duplicatehttp://titanappliancerepair.com/index.html 1 duplicate*****************************************************************What should I put ion htaccess file so I can forwardhttp://titanappliancerepair.com/index.htmlhttp://titanappliancerepair.comhttp://titanappliancerepair.com/to http://www.titanappliancerepair.comor what is the correct way to do it?I'm confused because when I enter http://titanappliancerepair.com/ in browser it showshttp://titanappliancerepair.com so how can it be considered duplicate content?.Can someone help?I have godaddy and they have gave me this code to put RewriteEngine on
On-Page Optimization | | webbutler13
rewritecond %{http_host} ^coolexample.com [nc]
rewriterule ^(.)$ http://www.coolexample.com/$1 [r=301,nc]What is correct?0 -
How to Structure URL's for Multiple Locations
We are currently undergoing a site redesign and are trying to figure out the best way to structure the URL's and breadcrumbs for our many locations. We currently have 60 locations nationwide and our URL structure is as follows: www.mydomain.com/locations/{location} Where {location} is the specific street the location is on or the neighborhood the location is in. (i.e. www.mydomain.com/locations/waterford-lakes) The issue is, {location} is usually too specific and is not a broad enough keyword. The location "Waterford-Lakes" is in Orlando and "Orlando" is the important keyword, not " Waterford Lakes". To address this, we want to introduce state and city pages. Each state and city page would link to each location within that state or city (i.e. an Orlando page with links to "Waterford Lakes", "Lake Nona", "South Orlando", etc.). The question is how to structure this. Option 1 Use the our existing URL and breadcrumb structure (www.mydomain.com/locations/{location}) and add state and city pages outside the URL path: www.mydomain.com/{area} www.mydomain.com/{state} Option 2 Build the city and state pages into the URL and breadcrumb path: www.mydomain.com/locations/{state}/{area}/{location} (i.e www.mydomain.com/locations/fl/orlando/waterford-lakes) Any insight is much appreciated. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | uBreakiFix0 -
Blocking Subdomain from Google Crawl and Index
Hey everybody, how is it going? I have a simple question, that i need answered. I have a main domain, lets call it domain.com. Recently our company will launch a series of promotions for which we will use cname subdomains, i.e try.domain.com, or buy.domain.com. They will serve a commercial objective, nothing more. What is the best way to block such domains from being indexed in Google, also from counting as a subdomain from the domain.com. Robots.txt, No-follow, etc? Hope to hear from you, Best Regards,
On-Page Optimization | | JesusD3 -
URLs and folder structure for an E-commerce
Hi there !-) I´m helping a friend who has a e-commerce about nail polish in Brazil. I´m a little in doubt about the urls and folder structure. Two questions: 1. There are 10 products per category and 50 categories. Should I put them all in the root folder or creat 2 major categories ( 25 sub-categories each one)? 2. Whats the better product page url ( the store has around 500) nailpolish.com/IMPORT/BRAND/NAME-OF-THE-PRODUCT OR nailpolish.com/COMPLETE-NAME-OF-THE-PRODUCT Whats the best recomandation?
On-Page Optimization | | SeoMartin10 -
Best practice for Meta-Robots tag in categories and author pages?
For some of our site we use Wordpress, which we really like working with. The question I have is for the categories and authors pages (and similiar pages), i.e. the one looking: http://www.domain.com/authors/. Should you or should you not use follow, noindex for meta-robots? We have a lot of categories/tags/authors which generates a lot of pages. I'm a bit worried that google won't like this and leaning towards adding the follow, noindex. But the more I read about it, the more I see people disagree. What does the community of Seomoz think?
On-Page Optimization | | Lobtec0