What can we do to improve our site
-
Hi. I am hoping that some of you can help me with the in2town site www.in2town.co.uk
The site is a news/lifestyle magazine site. The site is a cross between, huffington post, digital spy, female first and the sun newspaper. Basically the site is a news site as well as covering showbiz news, travel news, health news and advice etc
What i would like is for people to look at the site and let me know what they feel i should do to improve the site to make it better for our readers and to gain more readership.
I would also like to hear from people on how they find moving around the site as well as the speed of the site.
At the moment the site is with an american hosting company and i am in the process of talking to UK hosting companies to move the site. The site is currently on a dedicated server.
It would mean a lot if people could give me their advice on how to improve the site and make it a beter experience for our readers while at the same time being able to generate income with the site.
Just a quick note, all content is original and we have a number of people who write for the site.
many thanks
-
To my mind you already have "sponsored" articles, they are just for one of your owner/contributors
Adding other sponsored links would only diversify the content, potentially get more quality content on the site and make it a better user experience.
To me you could manage the relationship with the readers and outside businesses your team are involve with in ways that visitors will gell with more. This covers the top banner (which looks like an external paid banner when someone is on the home page rather than something a regular contributor is involved with. There are loads of spammy looking gastric band promotions out there and you have real potential to both improve this site and generate more trust with potential gastric band purchasers by showing the relationship differently so they see the person behind the product and banner. Also I see it is a Liverpool number that is given, I do not know whether Gastric band some of the other services that those involved in the site provide are local and the extent that they are fine to be purchased by people across the UK and beyond - If services are localised around Liverpool then having the ads in such a dominant place may not be optimising your ad revenue (which could always be put on Adwords Display Network and optimised around Liverpool if that is the case. I tried to click on the banner too for more information and it did not lead to more information. I wanted to know enough in answering this question to click on in and not being able to annoyed me (only a tiny bit) but would add to user experience and improve conversions.
Also whether you think you do or not, you do sponsored posting and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that from a user experience perspective as long as you convey it in a way that meets both the needs of advertisers AND viewers.
I think you have been given the right advice in terms of optimising conversion from an individual visit but the wrong advice more generally. As well as a new visitors clicks you also want to engage with them so they dont hit the back button, facilitate social sharing and provide a quality user experience so that they are going to engage more with the site then you want to have less banners in different places than you do currently. You want to make it easy for people to share the articles with others and enable your readership to grow which can make all your advertising perform better.
Others have mentioned that there was some slightly dated content that was still high profile, this is obviously bad for the type of site you are doing. You also mentioned in a positive sounding way that it was all your own group of people that were writing content which is actually a bad thing and the two points are connected. Would I keep coming back to reading posts at SEOmoz (before I became pro and come to use the tools) if it was just Rand and other staff posting? Perhaps but no where near as often. I have welcomed the whiteboard fridays with different perspectives and different expertise, I like the fact that I get access to hundreds of experts here with different perspectives and this would not happen without guest contributions. Also it means you can have much more content without having to write it all. Ok you might give a link away but as long as you ensure that the articles are of high quality and only a minor proportion are clearly sponsored (and do not make this too deceptive) then all you are doing is making your site better with more varied content and sponsored posts are less damaging to user experiences than big banners.
I will stress that I am completely not the demographic for your site. If I had my way google would give out moderate penalties for articles less than 1500 words and bigger penalties for articles less than 1000 words and gossipy type topics would also get google penalties unless searched for explicitly so "news" would not give xfactor or celeb stories in the SERP results.
Also the most relevant people for you to get views from is your users and it does not look like you have all that many links to your site at present which will be harming your SEO. You may want to look at getting some sponsored articles and enhancing SEO as well as addressing some of the user experience issues.
But it is a pretty good site considering it is no-ones main concern.
-
I understand what you are saying but once you get a reputation for accepting paid articles then you never get away from it. We do not want to go down that road. We want our readers to know that what they read is news and not advertising.
would love to know what this 5star review section is
-
"We worked out last week after a meeting, if we accepted all the paid articles we are offered each week then we would make around £2500 per week"
I would take the 2500.00 for one weeks worth of articles as long as they had unique content. Then invest that money into a new logo, crisper images, have a programmer plug in a 5star review section, and do an all around clean up of the site.
-
i paid a consultant to look at my site on the advertising side as i wanted to make the site a nice experience and gain advertising revenue.
He told me to put the advert right at the top and to put on some pages a google adsense advert on the left. He also told me to put adverts under the menu such as the tesco advert.
what you see on the site is what an add guy has told me to do but it does not look right but he then shown me lots of sites like that. i think one sitre was the guardian.
I would love to hear from people who could recommend some news sites to look at ref advertising.
Also i got a graphic designer in who spent a few hours as a consultant and he told me to do that layout on the home page as it was easy to read. He said it was based on the huffington post layout.
I am very critical so what i want is people on here to try and give me feedback on how to turn the site around and make it look good and keep people coming back.
-
thanks keri. one thing we will not allow on the site is paid articles. Each week and i am sure this happens to many other people on here, but we get loads of companies asking if they can pay to have an article on the site.
We worked out last week after a meeting, if we accepted all the paid articles we are offered each week then we would make around £2500 per week, but we are not into that. We are trying to build something and trying to get things right.
The site started off as a hobby as i do other work besides this but now it has become a learning curve and trying to turn it into a business.
-
this is all good thank you. can you tell me more about the google reviews please. I use joomla for the site. The plan is, in two years time to have the site built by a professional web designer, at the moment we do not have the budget and this is one of our down falls
-
Hi Diane,
I'd make sure all of your articles are timely and not expired. I looked at the Featured Lifestyle Stories (are these paid somehow? They seem more spammy than some of the other articles, and are featuring insurance, bingo, weight loss, etc) have articles that talk about deals that expire in July, or of events that happened in July.
-
Hi here are my observations, please don't be offended just my opinion on things I noticed.
Your celebrity pictures seem distorted to me (32in monitor) this would be a big turn off. For example Richard Branson looks squished, Russell Brands photo looks stretched, Kristen Stewart squished, Celebrity Big Brother squished,
David Beckham pixelated, your photos are what the user sees first they need to be as crisp as possible, it could be my monitor however CNN, or any other news source does not have this problem on my monitor.
Speaking of first, the weight loss ad at the top should go. I would place the ads on the inside of the site in less obvious places. They should not be the first thing someone sees.
The footer section "N2TOWN ONLINE MAGAZINE BRINGING YOU THE LATEST LIFESTYLE NEWS"
I would reformat this into 2 columns and not use as much spacing.
Your copyright still shows 2011, and you could get a much better logo on fiverr for $5.00
When I click on a story the first thing I see is the top banner link, then the header and now another large affiliate link right under it. I have to scroll down to even find the story.
I think the stories should be your main focus not the ads. If you focus on the stories then you will get more readers, and ultimately those will convert into ad clicks.
http://www.in2town.co.uk/Claire-Hegarty-Alternative-Health The authors pic looks distorted on my pc very pixelated.
http://www.in2town.co.uk/Louise-Parker-Beauty-Blog this one looks great!
Benidorm Hotel Reviews by In2town. I am not sure why you placed the opening text in a photo the text that says " WE WANT YOUR **Benidorm Hotel Reviews" **
That needs to be on the site, not in an image, and then I would install a Google reviews plugin this will allow you and your readers to place a 5 star review that will show up in Googles search which will bring you more readers.
They will not have to email you the review they can post it right to your site, then Word Press will notify you someone has written a review and you can approve, or deny it.
Everything loaded very quickly I had no trouble with that or the navigation.
I like everything else I hope this helps.
-
A few suggestions - considering the size of the homepage, it loaded fine in my Chrome browser. If I was browsing the web, I would probably bounce from this site if I was looking at design alone. Perhaps spend a little bit of money and time coming up with a professionally designed logo? I don't understand the color scheme - bright colored line breaks with gray borders? If you're trying to generate income and interest readers, maybe create an oDesk job and see what you get? Good luck!
-
We have used a site called http://www.usertesting.com to help us identify usability and navigation problems in need of improvement. Their testers are excellent and the fee is extremely reasonable. You will be amazed at the information you get from just 3-4 tests. This might be more meaningful than any usability comments you receive here. I am thinking that your site and content are more targeted for the general public than the SEO community. Just a thought!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved URL dynamic structure issue for new global site where I will redirect multiple well-working sites.
Dear all, We are working on a new platform called [https://www.piktalent.com](link url), were basically we aim to redirect many smaller sites we have with quite a lot of SEO traffic related to internships. Our previous sites are some like www.spain-internship.com, www.europe-internship.com and other similars we have (around 9). Our idea is to smoothly redirect a bit by a bit many of the sites to this new platform which is a custom made site in python and node, much more scalable and willing to develop app, etc etc etc...to become a bigger platform. For the new site, we decided to create 3 areas for the main content: piktalent.com/opportunities (all the vacancies) , piktalent.com/internships and piktalent.com/jobs so we can categorize the different types of pages and things we have and under opportunities we have all the vacancies. The problem comes with the site when we generate the diferent static landings and dynamic searches. We have static landing pages generated like www.piktalent.com/internships/madrid but dynamically it also generates www.piktalent.com/opportunities?search=madrid. Also, most of the searches will generate that type of urls, not following the structure of Domain name / type of vacancy/ city / name of the vacancy following the dynamic search structure. I have been thinking 2 potential solutions for this, either applying canonicals, or adding the suffix in webmasters as non index.... but... What do you think is the right approach for this? I am worried about potential duplicate content and conflicts between static content dynamic one. My CTO insists that the dynamic has to be like that but.... I am not 100% sure. Someone can provide input on this? Is there a way to block the dynamic urls generated? Someone with a similar experience? Regards,
Technical SEO | | Jose_jimenez0 -
Why does a site that is worse than mine by every objective measure I can find, keep outranking me in search?
I’ve been working on educating myself about SEO all day, again. All-Star Telescope up in Canada. We have a competitor that consistently ranks #1 and I don't get it. Their site is full of duplicate content (straight copy and paste from the manufacturer site). They don't have any meaningful blog or video content to add relevance or value to their site. We have higher page authority, higher domain authority, and they keyword analyzer in moz says that our page is higher quality than the the competitors page. Our site is slow, but theirs is slower. I can’t find a single metric on any tool (ubbersuggest, Moz, ahrefs, semrush) that says Telescopes Canada is a better site, or has a better NexStar 8SE product page (a popular telescope). Here’s the link to Telescope Canada’s page for their Celestron 8SE: https://telescopescanada.ca/products/celestron-nexstar-8se-computerized-telescope-11069?_pos=1&_sid=f0aa91cc2&_ss=r Here’s a link to the Celestron 8SE page from the manufacturer website: https://www.celestron.com/products/nexstar-8se-computerized-telescope?_pos=1&_sid=56abdabd4&_ss=r#description Telescopes Canada has just copied and pasted. There is no original content aside from adding the shipping and return policy to the tab, and having some options for selecting accessories on the page. Here is our page: https://all-startelescope.com/products/celestron-nexstar-8se Our titles are good, our metadata is good (but I don’t think that’s been a serious ranking factor for about ten years). The text is original, it’s relevant, we have healthy internal links to the page. We have invensted in some excellent blog content, we’re adding new products to the website so that we rank for more keywords. All of those things are helping, but I fundamentally don’t understand why Telescopes Canada is #1 almost across the board on every key product in our market. There is something that I’m not seeing here, something that isn't being captured by the tools that I have. Is it simple the fact that they get more traffic? Is that why some people go and buy traffic? Can you see any metric, any tool in your toolbox that indicates why they rank at the top, or even higher than we do for in these search terms specific to that product: Celestron NexStar 8SE
Technical SEO | | nkennett
NexStar 8SE
Celestron NexStar 8SE Canada
NexStar 8SE Canada We've worked with two highly ranked SEO's to try and figure this out, one in Canada, and one in the USA. I haven't seen a confidence inspiring answer from either of them. Posting on a forum is a bit of an act of desperation, I'll continue to work the problem, but it's discouraging to see the leader in my industry look like he's just phoning it in with his website.1 -
Can I canonical the same page?
I have a site where I have 500+ Page listing pages and I would like to rel=canonical them to the master page. Example: http://www.example.com//articles?p=18 OR http://www.example.com/articles?p=65 I plan on adding this to the section from of the page template so it goes to all pages - When I do this, I will also add the canonical to the page I am directing the canonical. Is this a bad thing? Or allowed?
Technical SEO | | JoshKimber0 -
Canonical URLs in an eCommerce site
We have a website with 4 product categories (1. ice cream parlors, 2. frozen yogurt shops etc.). A few sub-categories (e.g. toppings, smoothies etc.) and the products contained in those are available in more than one product category (e.g. the smoothies are available in the "ice cream parlors" category, but also in the "frozen yogurt shops" category). My question: Unfortunately the website has been designed in a way that if a subcategory (e.g. smoothies) is available in more than 1 category, then itself (the subcategory page) + all its product pages will be automatically visible under various different urls. So now I have several urls for one and the same product: www.example.com/strawberry-smoothie|SMOOTHIES|FROZEN-YOGURT-SHOPS-391-2-5 and http://www.example.com/strawberry-smoothie|SMOOTHIES|ICE-CREAM-PARLORS-391-1-5 And also several ones for one and the same sub-category (they all include exactly the same set of products): http://www.example.com/SMOOTHIES-1-12-0-4 (the smoothies contained in the ice cream parlors category) http://www.example.com/SMOOTHIES-2-12-0-4 (the same smoothies, contained in the frozen yogurt shops category) This is happening with around 100 pages. I would add canonical tags to the duplicates, but I'm afraid that by doing so, the category (frozen yogurt shops) that contains several non-canonical sub-categories (smoothies, toppings etc.) , might not show up anymore in search results or become irrelevant for Google when searching for example for "products for frozen yoghurt shops". Do you know if this would be actually the case? I hope I explained it well..
Technical SEO | | Gabriele_Layoutweb0 -
Help optimising this site
Hi I have been optimising this site http://seakayakdevon.co.uk/ which is a wordpress site since making changes to it recently the site is now indexed and appearing among its competitors. trouble is they still are placed higher rn the SE rankings. i wish to optimise for local search i.e on Google places etc. but the trouble is there is'nt a physical address for the business it is run from various coastal locations. any ideas how i can still market for local search- maps etc. I have done the following optimisation: sitemaps title tag, description tag improved content removed duplicate content an blocker pages replace image text and replaced with header tag improved page names - making them static any advice of guidance would be greatly appreciated- will the fatc its built in wordpress limit its ability to gain better ranking in the SE? Thanks
Technical SEO | | Bristolweb0 -
What to include on a sitemap for a huge site?
I have a very large site and I'm not sure what all to include on the sitemap page. We have categories such as items1, items2 and in the items1 category are 100 vendors with their individual vendor pages. Should I link all 100 vendor pages on the sitemap or just the main items1 category?
Technical SEO | | CFSSEO0 -
How to improve my ranking for spain
Hi i have been redoing my site www.in2town.co.uk because i needed to start from scratch and as a result i lost a lot of rankings and traffic but things will get better when i have finished the site and got it the way i want it, but my question is. i am in spain at the moment and i looked at my site and foiund that it is not on the first page but in england it is on the first page and would like to know how i would need to improve this to make my site go on the front page for spain. Any advice would be great as i want to try and gain global traffic for the site
Technical SEO | | ClaireH-1848860 -
Xenu Alternative for Large Sites
We're launching a new site and we're trying to crawl it to check for any problems. It's millions of pages and Xenu seems to start encountering errors as the numbers mount past 500,000. Does anyone know of an alternative, free or paid, that could handle the size better?
Technical SEO | | eLocalusa0