Too Many Non-Niche-Specific Links?
-
Something just occurred to me today.
I work in-house for an embroidered patch company, but I respond to a lot of HARO queries about Marketing, SEO, SEM, Web Design, ect. So, we have a lot of links from these types of sites. Additionally, I have done guest blogs on these topics because those are what I'm knowledgeable about.
We also have links from customers' personal blogs or websites stating they got their patches from us and are happy, blah, blah, blah.
On top of that, we hired someone who ended up getting tons of .edu links by spamming blogs. Oy.
I'd estimate only about 10% of our links come from embroidery, sewing, screen printing, promotional products, etc types of sites.
I guess it's not really known or documented how much weight Google places on niche-specific links--we just assume that it matters, and I'm sure it does.
Our rankings are fine now, but I'm looking for some opinions from other SEOs about how much they think this will matter in the future or how much it matters now. Could this hurt us in the future?
.
-
Agreed
-
Agreed. I didn't think our answers were contradictory, I agree with you totally. I just didn't feel she needed to spend time trying to get rid of the naturally built non-niche links and I don't think you thought so either.
Cheers!
-
Hi Marisa,
I think what me and Billy are both saying here is to put most of your focus toward building niche-specific links. The other links will come, and it is actually good to have non-niche related links so that it looks natural to Google.
What I was trying to say was this if, for example, 80% of your links all came from motor racing websites, and your website is about cats, this can be confusing. If only 20% come from there, 20% from dog websites, 10% from directories, etc, then this is good.
Make sure that you don't focus too much on building non-niche specific links though as the most powerful links are the related ones. Also, completely agree with Billy regarding getting rid of those spammy .edu links. They could come back to haunt you.
Hope this has cleared things up,
Matt.
-
Two very good answers, however they're rather contradictory to each other. I'm still not sure what to do about this.
-
I don't believe that non-specific YET naturally built links will ever hurt you. Obviously they will never help quite as much as industry specific links but the fact remains that they are not spam; they are real, honestly built relationships. I would not spend one second worrying about those links. I would also, however, not spend lots of energy or time building more if there are more relevant links that you could be spending your time trying to build.
I would probably do my best to dump those spammy .edu links though. But that's just me
Cheers!
-
If you think about the links to your website as a web of semantic data. If your website was about cats and you have lots of websites that also talk about cats linking to you then Google can identify that your website is, in fact, about cats. However, if your website is about cats and you have a lot of websites that link to you about motor racing, then this can confuse Google and actually maybe believe that your website is, in fact about motor racing.
Semantically similar information is becoming more and more important and is the basic fundamental of search. Having a lot of links pointing to your website can help with building authority to your website, but niche specific links are invaluable.
Hope this helps,
Matt.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Back link plan discussion
When you have a lot of keywords that you rank for say something like 15,000 or more. How do you develop a good back link plan? I was thinking to first look at the highest volume keywords we already rank for but aren't in the top 1-3 spots. To focus on those few words trying to obtain more high quality back links. But I'm not sure if this is the best plan . What would you do? What are some good consistent back link plans you can use to work on a keyword or lots of keywords? Thanks for the discussion, Chris
Algorithm Updates | | Cfarcher1 -
Sub domains take away the pagerank/link juice of main website?
Hi all, I would like to know how sub domains will be collaborated with domain or main website in terms of authority, backlinks, link juice, etc...Link juice will be passed to sub domains from domain or vice versa? If there are large number of pages in sub domain, will that going to impact the ranking of main domain? Backlinks of sub domain are going to be a deciding factor for website ranking too? Thanks
Algorithm Updates | | vtmoz0 -
Google AMP (accelerated mobile pages), can it be used for non-Google news and Ecommerce Websites?
Mozzers, I've been doing a lot of research on Google's new Accelerated Mobile Pages (AMP) https://moz.com/blog/accelerated-mobile-pages-whiteboard-friday. From what I'm seeing, these AMP version websites are only for Google News-worthy websites such as New York Times, Cosmopolitan, and the BuzzFeeds of the world. But what about Ecommerce websites like Ebay or Amazon? Will AMP versions of "scotch tape" via OfficeDepot work in the SERP's on non-Google News cards?
Algorithm Updates | | Shawn1240 -
Technical Argument to Prefer non-www to www?
I've been recommending using non-www vs. www as a preferable set up if a client is starting a site from scratch, and there aren't any pre-existing links to consider. I'm wondering if this recommendation still holds? I’ve been looking on the interwebs and I’m seeing far fewer articles arguing for the non-www version. In the two courts, I’m seeing highlighted: Pro www: (ex: www.domain.com) Works better with CDN networks, where a domain needs to be specified (though that argument is 3 years old) Ability to restrict cookies to one hostname (www) or subdomain (info. blog. promo.) if using multiple subdomains IT people generally prefer it Pro non-www (ex: domain.com) If you ever want to support or add https://, you don’t have to support 2 sets of urls/domains Mindset: fewer and fewer people think in terms of typing in www before a site url, the future is heading towards dropping that anyway. Though that is a bit of a cosmetic argument…. Is there a trend going back to www? Is there a technical argument to recommend non-www over www? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | Allie_Williams0 -
Where can I find a breakdown of google search volume by specific industry/vertical? For example, what % of people searching in google are looking for housing? Cars? Restaurants?
I"m looking for specific breakdowns of search volume in google by: #1 Vertical (Shopping/restaurants/Services etc). For example, how many people are searching in google for information pertaining to restaurants per month? Search volume for all of 2012, 2013, 2014? #2 More granular categories within verticals, people searching for: books,apartment rentals,cellphones) Is there a breakdown of google search somewhere online that gives this type of information? Thank you MOZ community, really appreciate it!
Algorithm Updates | | AppleSauceRules0 -
Why is Google.co.uk showing so many US retailers on search queries?
Over the last couple of years Google seems to be showing more and more irrelevant search results in the field I am based in (dietary supplements) with searches for products coming back with results which highlight US vendors. Given I am in google.co.uk and actually logged in as well, why is Google so far off with their results lately?
Algorithm Updates | | predatornutrition0 -
Why have my external followed links risen from 271 to 9961 in three weeks?
I've noticed a massive increase in the number of external followed links to my root domain (from 271 to 9961) - has anyone else experienced this?
Algorithm Updates | | HeatherBakerTopLine0 -
Today all of our internal pages all but completely disappeared from google search results. Many of them, which had been optimized for specific keywords, had high rankings. Did google change something?
We had optimized internal pages, targeting specific geographic markets. The pages used the keywords in the url title, the h1 tag, and within the content. They scored well using the SEOmoz tool and were increasing in rank every week. Then all of a sudden today, they disappeared. We had added a few links from textlink.com to test them out, but that's about the only change we made. The pages had a dynamic url, "?page=" that we were about to redirect to a static url but hadn't done it yet. The static url was redirecting to the dynamic url. Does anyone have any idea what happened? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | h3counsel0