Google keyword tool no data for a KW- what to assume in this case?
-
There are cases when google keyword tool shows just a dash - means no data available and google suggest just use global volume instead.
But what if we want to know only local search volume? what should we assume in this case? Does that mean local volume is 0 or it can still be respectable volume & its just Google couldn't find data ?
-
"So I guess if there is - (no data available) means not much people or noone is looking for it"
As stated in my previous answer, no data available most most likely means that few or no people are searching for the term, but this isn't 100% certain. There are other possible reasons for seeing no search volume for a keyword. Google's publicly viewable search volume numbers are not always accurate, sometimes they have to block/hide keywords due to copyright or trademark issues, etc. I have also noticed that Google's localized search volume estimates may be more prone to errors than their global search volume numbers. I even once saw a keyword where the local search volume was higher than the global search volume, so the data isn't always 100% accurate.
If you want to be more confident about the local search volume for a specific keyword, run an Adwords campaign for a short time.
-
yes, my target term is right one and I am using exact match.
Finding similar terms is not an issue, I know few ways to do it. Just curious about -
So I guess if there is - (no data available) means not much people or noone is looking for it
Point is the term I am searching - its not possible no one is searching it !!!
-
Hi Vikas,
When local volume is 0, this means there is not enough/or no people searching for that term.
Assuming you believe your targeted term is the right one and that you are using exact match try the following:
-
Use phrase or broad match to find any similar terms with search volume
-
You can use google trends to see any correlating search patterns
-
Maybe try broadening the type of keywords you are using? Keyword suggestion tools such as Ubersuggest helps.
Hope this helps,
Vahe
-
-
I would say it is likely that there isn't much local search volume, but there are other options. It's difficult to say with 100% certainty. You could run a quick Adwords campaign to see how many impressions you get, which can be a very good way to measure search volume (just make sure your QS and bid are high enough that your ads shows all the time).
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Keyword Planning and Site Architecture
Hi all, I'd like to know your thoughts on keyword planning and site architecture. I thought it was best practice to structure your website so specific pages target certain keywords. The titles, meta desc. and content on these pages should be unique to that page. I've had good success ranking pages this way. But! How come so often you'll see a website that has no keyword planning ranking so well? Let's take the example: "Bamboo Sheets". A top ranking website in my country sells all kinds of bamboo bedding, including sheets, towels, pillow cases, etc. They have "Bamboo Sheets" in the title & meta description for the main category page (www.store.com/bamboo-sheets) - which is where it should be. But then I see it again on the homepage title & meta (www.store.com) and other pages of the website. So why aren't they cannibalizing their own pages? And why do they blog about Bamboo Sheets and not cannibalize the keyword from there? Is landing page optimization just a myth? It seems entire websites built around a keyword rank just as well, and in most cases, much better than sites with keyword specific landing pages. If you only sell one product this isn't a problem, but for websites that offer multiple products or services, it's incredibly frustrating when trying to compete. It's like Google still gives a lot of authority to keyword rich domain names and business names. Thoughts?
Keyword Research | | Onlineorders0 -
Potential Keyword Cannibalisation
Hi, I am concerned that our website's rankings are currently being affected by KW cannibalisation. We don't rank too badly for our target keywords but they could, of course, be better, especially as the niche is very competitive! One thing that is bothering me is that our internal pages do not rank well for these KWs and instead it is the homepage appearing in the rankings. This is despite the fact that the internal pages are optimised for the different keywords. Basically the HP is also targeting these same keywords and I was wondering if this is affecting our rankings overall? I am not keen to risk changing the homepage in case our rankings suffer massively and we drop out of Google completely. If anyone could offer some advice then that would be great. Is it simply a case of trying to get external links pointing to these internal pages? Would internal linking to them prove effective as well? Cheers Tom
Keyword Research | | National-Homebuyers1 -
Newbie Keyword optmization question
I'm optimizing this page: http://gainesvilleholistichealthcare.com/treatment-options/acupuncture/ This is for a local, Gainesville, Fl acupuncturist. The words that show the most search volume on GKT for the city of gainesville are "acupuncture" followed by "acupuncture gainesville fl". Will optimizing for "Acupuncture in gainesville" or "Your Gainesville Florida Acupuncture solution" optimize it for both of these important terms? I guess my question really is, how specific does the match between the searcher's phrase and the KW's I use need to be.
Keyword Research | | Graphbyte0 -
Keyword tool suggestions??
Hello, What does everyone use as a good keyword tool for keyword research? I previously used Google's, but would like something better than what its become. Thanks!
Keyword Research | | CHECOM0 -
Checking history of keyword rankings
When working on a new client how can we look in to the history of keyword rankings? I would like the last 2 years but they have been tracked by me for only 1 month?
Keyword Research | | dynamic080 -
To Meta Keyword or Not To Meta Keyword, That Is The Question
I can't seem to get a reliable answer on this one. It seems to be split down the middle as far as who agrees and who doesn't, of course some of that content is outdated. So, for today, should I be using the meta keywords tag or not? Thanks, Steven
Keyword Research | | sfmatthews0 -
Google Trends not Consistent with Google Keyword Tool
Hi Everyone, I was doing a little Google Trends research on Real Estate and narrowed it down to my state. I have found that on Trends it is showing a two or three towns above the one I am living in showing that it gets a lot of search volume. They will put the top one as a 1 and then the others below it as like .87 or .675 etc. I am taking that as 87% of the top one or 67.5% of the top city in search volume. I checked these numbers against the Google Keyword Tool and found that my town still gets more exact visits (4 times the amount of the one Google Trends ranks #1) I can't see the actual search volume on Google Trends but was wondering....Which one do you trust? I have done some testing on it and realized that for the most part, the numbers in the keyword tool RARELY change. Do they maybe update it once per year? FYI: As you know I trended real estate so what I did on the Keyword tool is "Town State Real Estate" and looked at both Broad and Exact searches. I would appreciate any guidance you guys can give on how I should be paying attention to this data. Thanks!
Keyword Research | | blake-766240 -
Most Accurate Keyword Count
Okay, there are so many keyword tools out there, and I would like to know the one that is most accurate for search volume.
Keyword Research | | azguy0