Blog posts not getting indexed and being outranked by scrapper sites.
-
Our Google traffic has dropped significantly over the last year and now we're struggling to even get our blog posts indexed. It's been extremely discouraging and we're trying to do what ever we can to fix it.
I've included a screenshot of our Google traffic as well as Pages Indexed according to WebmasterTools.
The Problem
- Our blog posts are frequently not getting indexed.
- Many times they are outranked by low authority scraper sites, our Twitter/FB account, etc.
- Sometimes our homepage will rank instead of the blog post.
- Sometimes we'll break a news story, get tons of quality backlinks, and still be nowhere in Google.
- Pretty much the only Google traffic we see is from existing posts.
- Still 3,200 pages indexed when we have only 1,600 posts. I guess this isn't really a problem... just waiting for the meta noindex to take effect.
More details
- We've seen no duplicate content or other warnings from WebmasterTools.
- We've been constantly acquiring quality backlinks from credible sites.
- We deleted the useless content and fixed the canonical issues that were a result of switching servers.
History
Our site is a news/entertainment blog. The traffic usually has spikes depending on what's going on in the news.
- Nov 1, 2011 - Site kept maxing out at 30k+ visits so we switched servers.
- Jan 30, 2012 - Hired a writer so we could focus on other aspects of the site.
- Apr 19, 2012 - Noticed our posts weren't getting indexed like they used to. Suspected our writer was spinning articles but couldn't find any evidence. 90% of our blog posts were nowhere to be found in Google. Scrapper sites would outrank us for our own stories... even our Twitter account was ranking ahead of us. IF our story would show up in Google it would usually be the home page instead of the blog post.
- Sep 2012 - Finally got more serious about addressing the problem. Noticed a couple potentially big problems and started making changes.
Canonical Issues
- non-www site didn't redirect to www. It showed 2 different link profiles according to OpenSiteExplorer and 0 backlinks according to Webmaster Tools.
- Wordpress shortlinks weren't redirecting to the actual permalink. For instance http://www.domain.com/?p=123 and http://www.domain.com/post-example were both getting indexed.
For every post there were 4 different versions that Google had to choose from.
http://domain.com/?p=123, http://www.domain.com/?p=123, http://domain.com/post-example, and http://www.domain.com/post-example
I figured the canonical issues must have happened when we switched servers which was the reason for the drop in WebmasterTools indexed pages and increase in Not Selected pages.
FIXED (Sep 15): One we fixed the canonical issue the Indexed Pages went back up however the Not Selected is still the same.
Duplicate Content
When we first created our site we wanted to have tons of images for each musician/athlete/actor/etc. so we uploaded about 5-10 for each person. We created a blog post for each image with no writing and the exact same post titles. As a result there were TONS of low-quality, similar posts, with virtually identical permalinks. e.g. http://www.domain.com/james-smith1, http://www.domain.com/james-smith2, http://www.domain.com/james-smith3, etc.
A crawl on Sep 26 showed over 550 duplicate content warnings.
FIXED (Oct 1): We deleted/301 redirected the useless pages (they weren't getting traffic anyways) and by the next crawl the number was almost to 0... which it's at now.
We also had TONS of tags (since there're constantly new names in the media) that were getting indexed so we had meta robots noindex them.
Questions:
- Why aren't a majority of our posts getting indexed?
- Were we penalized or just stuck because of a filter?
- How long should it take for meta robots to noindex the tags pages? (I did it on Sep 25 but they are still there)
- If a site is scraping our content (same title, image, excert) but linking to us, should we contact them and tell them to remove it?
- Is there anything else we need to do start getting our blog posts indexed like they used to?
- Should we try contacting Google to re-evaluate our site?
Sorry, that was a LOT of writing. If anyone wants the URL please let me know so I can PM it to you. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
-
Thanks for the quick response Dana!
They are sourcing us but at the moment they're constantly showing up instead of our site. There's no reason they should outrank us, but we figured they couldn't really be hurting us since they are linking to us.
It's weird that the site is able to scrape content and still get good indexes... maybe Google just hasn't picked up on it yet.
We are hoping that we don't have to worry about scrapers once our blog posts start getting indexed like they used to.
I think we'll send them a friendly email like you suggested.
-
I sympathize with your frustration. I know what it's like to come into a situation after years and years of technical missteps made by folks who never took SEO into consideration and then have to start cleaning up the mess.
You have a lot of hard technical problems and I'm not a developer so I will let those more technically gifted than myself address some of those.
There is one question I felt I could answer and that is #4: "If a site is scraping our content (same title, image, excert) but linking to us, should we contact them and tell them to remove it?"
You could go that way. But in the event that it is a decent site (despite the fact they scraped your content), first make sure you have a canonical tag properly implemented on your page, then, contact them and say "I see you found my content interesting enough to share on your site. Instead of me asking you to remove it, would you mind adding in an attribution line, giving credit to my site as being the source of the content and including a link back to me please? I think we can both agree this would be better than having me file a DMCA request with Google."
Just a thought
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Viewing search results for 'When searching in google we find our site in the first position but when some others search it is seen on the second page 1 st position why is this happening?'
Viewing search results for 'When searching in google we find our site in the first position but when some others search it is seen on the second page 1 st position why is this happening?'
Search Behavior | | Alyaauditors0 -
With MFI, should we delete our mobile version of our site?
I'll start by stating that a brand new responsive site is under development and will be launching early 2019. Until then, with Mobile First Indexing, we're curious if we should remove our mobile site altogether. Looking at Google guidelines, it looks like we have Dynamic serving content, so when a mobile device is used, a VERY TRIMMED down version of our site content is presented. I read that if a mobile version doesn't exist, google will use the MFI indexing on the desktop version still, since that is what is rendered on a mobile device. If Google starts using our mobile site for its indexing, we're not going to be looking good. At this point, are there negative affects to removing our mobile site and having the desktop version render on all devices?
Search Behavior | | Technical_Contact0 -
Getting Rid Of Bad Backlinks - should I pay?
I have had a sudden increase in "bad" incoming links to my site. And at the same time my ranking has taken a dive. I have not done any link building in the last few months, and I have used multiple tools to track incoming links, and they show a major increase in incoming links from "toxic" sites in the past couple of months. I have documented this entire process with reports and emails, and have contacted all the Sites concerned requesting that they kindly remove the links. Most have replied that we must pay them between $5 - $25 per link to be removed and some of the Sites have multiple links to us. I am not sure what we should do and am concerned that if we pay these companies to remove the link, they could create more links as it appears many are connected to multiple spam type directory Sites. On the other hand many Sites advise not to use the Disavow Tool unless you are sure you need to use it and that even if used the results may take a very long time. Our decline in our SEO ranking is really affecting our business and I would really appreciate advice as to what to do?
Search Behavior | | support20130 -
Micro Location Site with EMD , Property related
Hi I have a client, who focus is on Commercial property leasing in Johannesburg and surrounding area's. We find that people search for "area"& "property type" The client bought 50 exact match domains for keywords that we currently run in Google Adwords for example:We advertise on keywords: "Midrand offices to let" and bought Midrandofficestolet.com, now the group wants to make small micro sites with unique article about commercial property in that area "Midrand" with a link to the main site where the "midrand properties" are listed . The feeder or micro sites will also have contact details of main site. the domains will all be hosted on the same server, registered to the same owner est. Is this typical link farming? or should we rather build the articles on the main website and park the domains on the area categories? The clients main-set is that he will same money on adwords by owning the EMD and from that link to his main site Your guidance will be much appriciated
Search Behavior | | Zooka0 -
Two sites with different URLs
I help organize an ecommerce site for a company that is named after the state that the company was founded in (ex: Florida Pipes). Our programmer is thinking about creating a duplicate site that would have a name that was more location agnostic so people shopping on the site would not think that they may be ordering from far away hence incurring extra shipping charges. He said that the site would only have a different URLs, name and homepage but would link to all of the same stuff that is on the site that is up now. He said that there would be no way to tell (possibly for the layperson) that the two sites were related. Is this a good practice? Would we be penalized in search results for having two URLs linking to the same content? (We are a 30 year old company that ranks very high for our main keyword) Thank you for your input!
Search Behavior | | Winoman0 -
Internal Site Search Analysis
Hi Folks, I have about 6,000 internal site search phrases that I want to analyze. There are many variations and duplicates that have similar intent within the data, e.g. Employment, Employment Opportunities, Employment Application. Does anyone have any thoughts on how I can aggregate the data to get an idea of user intent. There's a lot of long-tail in there. The data does not come from Google's site search tool. I just have a spreadsheet of the terms and the number of times they were searched. Cheers!
Search Behavior | | BedeFahey0 -
1 Blog or Multiple Blogs?
We have a number of blogs that we categorize based on our vertical markets. In all cases the reader gets to the info through some type of search based on their needs/interests. I can't help thinking that being specific, in other words sticking to the particular vertical market: nuts or coffee or breakfast cereal is better than lumping them all together into 1 blog. On the other hand, if 1 blog is to be used, once a search was completed that search would drive that reader to that 1 blog that contained all the long-tail keywords anyway...so maybe that's an argument for 1 blog only. What do you think? Thanks in advance for your input.
Search Behavior | | karlseidel0 -
Drastic Fluctuation in Site Rankings
All, Hope you are having a good day! Recently I had a strange issue with one of my site and I am not sure what might have caused it. I am sure this would be a good place to discuss about it and get some feedback from the elite people in the industry. Here is the problem. Last weekend (On sunday noon) my site which was ranking on Page 1 suddenly dropped its ranking for its main keywords to nowhere, I was panicked to see what was happening and by the end of the day it was slowly coming back and by next morning everything was back. Again on Wednesday noon, the same thing happened. However, this time it din't come up by the next morning. Making it worse, all of my keyword rankings went down from good spots to no where and there was a point when I could no longer see my site. I was worried something might have happened this time and was not sure what could the reason be. On Friday afternoon all the ranking came up better than the previous (which is a very good news for me). At the moment, my site is doing very well and I am really happy about it. I did realize that Google was updating their Algorithm, but this behavior is the strangest I have seen over years. Can someone enlighten me on this peculiar behavior. Is there something wrong with my site or is it a common thing that I have never noticed? I have never done anything blackhat for the site. To be honest, all I have done is some low level link building on the site and the site had some advantage of a re-direct from one my previous site which was doing very well in search engines (I changed it to take advantage of the new domain I had). Your opinions/suggestions are a appreciated.
Search Behavior | | frostmill0