Google Disavow Tool - Waste of Time
-
My humble opinion is that Google's disavow tool.... is a utter waste of your time!
My site, http://goo.gl/pdsHs was penalized over a year ago after the SEO we hired used black hat techniques to increase ranking.
Ironically, while having visibility, Google itself had become a customer. (I guess the site was pretty high quality, trust worthy and user friendly enough for Google employees to purchase from.)
Soon enough the message about detecting unnatural links had shown up on the webmaster tools and as expected, our rankings sank and out of view.
For a year we had contacted webmasters, asking them remove links pointing back to us.
90% didn't respond, the other 10% complied).
Work on our site continued, adding high quality, highly relevant unique content.
Rankings never recovered and neither did our traffic or business…..Earlier this month, we learned about Google’s "link disavow tool" and were excited!
We had hoped that following the cleanup instruction, using the “link disavow tool”, we would get a chance at recovery!
We watched Matt Cutts’ video, read the various forums/blogs/topics online that were written about it, and then we felt comfortable enough to use it...We went through our backlink profile, determining which links were either spammy or seemed a result of black hat practices or the links added by a 3rd party possibly interested in our demise and added them to a .txt file. We submitted the file via the disavow tool and followed with another reconsideration request.
The result came a couple of weeks later… the same cookie cutter email in the WMT suggesting that there are “unnatural links” to the site.
Hope turned to disappointment and frustration. Looks like the big box companies will continue to populate the top 100 results of ANY search, the rest will help Google’s shareholders…
If your site has gotten in the algorithm crosshairs, you have a better chance of recovering by changing your URL than messing around with this useless tool.
-
I have to apologize to Google for my earlier response. After submitting a disavow request I did see my largest site recover. I do have to say I did submit another low quality website and got a quick response that it still was penalized. I only disavowed links and did not have any removed by third party sites. So it looks like you can get penalty removed with disavow and hard work. But don't think disavow alone will be good enough for manual action.
-
Where is this tool located in WMT? I can't find it anywhere
-
If all you said is true - that is *$#@# UP! I have also had all I can take from Googles WMT editors. Im all for better search results but this has gone to far. You make one mistake and Google throws you out and give you a pile of useless videos to watch. I really wish they would get their act together on this. Everyone cheats Google get over it and give us a way back in the game!
-
One suggestion, if you have not already done so is to have a closer look at directories.I have found that most webmasters I have worked with fight hard to keep directory links. If you look at it from the perspective that almost all self made links are unnatural then it would make sense that directory links could be in this pile.
-
We sure disavowed a lot of links... got the same response to our reconsideration request.... truly frustrating as google continues to rank sites that lack relevance, quality and good user experience over my site which provides all of that...
-
It sounds like you have been through a very frustrating time! Is it possible that you did not disavow enough links? I have found that many webmasters do not objectively look at their links and try to keep a lot that are actually unnatural.
-
we did submit a reconsideration request (many over the past year +) after using the disavow tool that stated that we did use the new tool along with contacting all the webmasters (gave a list in previous reconsideration requests).
My market is competitive but i was on page 1 and i have a truly better and easier site than the multi billion dollar companies (walmart, target, amazon) that don't focus on my products...
-
Even though you disavowed the links you still need to send a reconsideration request telling Google what you've been thriugh and how you've contacted all these sites and only 10% responded.
Also it seems to me like you've invested a ton of time fixing the negative, instead of focusing on future wins. Invest your time in creating good content on your site people will link to.
Also, how competitive is your market?
-
This tool would have seen huge amounts of usage since it was first announced (there are many sites in your position). I think it may be a little too early to give up on it as there has only been a few weeks since you submitted it.
I suspect Google will be implementing the results of the tool for high authority site first and then roll it out to lower authority sites. As your site is of low authority I think it may be a casing of playing the waiting game to see if the results come through. Don't give up just yet! Focus on gaining high quality links through valuable content and Google will eventually pay attention.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Reclaiming Ranking positions in Google
We have a website we are working on that was ranking well in Google but since having a hosting upgrade has completely dropped in rankings. When a hosting upgrade was made, the developer added an incorrect robots.txt file that restricted the site from being found, hence resulting in lost rankings. We have since sorted out that issue so the robots.txt is OK. However, ranking results have yet to be reclaimed. We are unsure why these rankings haven't rebounded back, as it has been a while now. The site is https://www.brightonpanelworks.com.au. We have since also attempted to add a sitemap however to help the site be better crawled and to regain rankings, however, it appears that sitemap generators are having problems creating a sitemap for this site and we are not sure why. And we are not sure whether this may relate to why Google has not picked up on pages and ranking results have not be restored. If you have any ideas as to how we can reclaim rankings to the strong positions they were in previously, that would be much appreciated. We believe we may be missing something here that is not allowing webpages to be picked up and ranked by Google.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gavo0 -
Google Webmaster tools -Fixing over 20,000+ crawl errors
Hi, I'm trying to gather all the 404 crawl errors on my website after a recent hacking that I've been trying to rectify and clean up. Webmaster tools states that I have over 20 000+ crawl errors. I can only download a sample of 1000 errors. Is there any way to get the full list instead of correcting 1000 errors, marking them as fixed and waiting for the next batch of 1000 errors to be listed in Webmaster tools? The current method is quite timely and I want to take care of all errors in one shot instead of over a course of a month.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | FPK0 -
Html language deprecated by Google?
Hi Mates, Currently we are using on our site two tags for language (we are targeting english ) .... and these are defined on the head section, my question is it is required by Google in order to rank well or it is deprecated. Thank you Claudio
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ClayRey0 -
Hide Aggregation from Google?
Google isn't a fan of aggregation, but sometimes it is a good way to fill out content when you cannot cover every news story there is. What I'm wondering is if anyone has continued to do any form of aggregation based on a category and hide that url from Google. Example: example.com/industry-news/ -- is where you'd post aggregation stories but you block robots from crawling that. We wouldn't be doing this for search value just value to our readers. Thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | meistermedia0 -
Website Structured data in Google
Can anyone help me to show website structure data in Google when someone search my website in Google. I already added my website in Google and Google webmaster tool. Thanks in adv.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | talkinnetventure0 -
Is this the "Google Dance"?
We just did a site redesign, and removed the noindex, etc. about 10 days ago. Over the last 24 hours, I've gotten some of my top keywords on the first page, but now they are gone, a few hours later. I assume this is typical?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CsmBill0 -
Experience with Google Disawow Tool and discovering bad back-links
Hi Community, is there any experience to tell here about the disawow tool from Google? Any review? It have helped revocer sites beaten by Penguin or penalized after WMT Unnatural Link building message? Which tools and methods you use to find bad back-links to submit for the disawow tool? Thanks for your feedback,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Braumueller0 -
Why is Google Webmaster Tools reporting a massive increase in 404s?
Several weeks back, we launched a new website, replacing a legacy system moving it to a new server. With the site transition, webroke some of the old URLs, but it didn't seem to be too much concern. We blocked ones I knew should be blocked in robots.txt, 301 redirected as much duplicate data and used canonical tags as far as I could (which is still an ongoing process), and simply returned 404 for any others that should have never really been there. For the last months, I've been monitoring the 404s Google reports in Web Master Tootls (WMT) and while we had a few hundred due to the gradual removal duplicate data, I wasn't too concerned. I've been generating updated sitemaps for Google multiple times a week with any updated URLs. Then WMT started to report a massive increase in 404s, somewhere around 25,000 404s per day (making it impossible for me to keep up). The sitemap.xml has new URL only but it seems that Google still uses the old sitemap from before the launch. The reported sources of 404s (in WMT) don't exist anylonger. They all are coming from the old site. I attached a screenshot showing the drastic increase in 404s. What could possibly cause this problem? wmt-massive-404s.png
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sonetseo0