Adding parameters in URLs and linking to a page
-
Hi,
Here's a fairly technical question:
We would like to implement badge feature where linking websites using a badge would use urls such as:
domain.com/page?state=texas&city=houston
domain.com/page?state=neveda&city=lasvegas
Important note: the parameter will change the information and layout of the page: domain.com/page
Would those 2 urls above along with their extra parameters be considered the same page as domain.com/page by google's crawler?
We're considering adding the parameter "state" and "city" to Google WMT url parameter tool to tel them who to handle those parameters.
Any feedback or comments is appreciated!
Thanks in advance.
Martin
-
Thanks Paul. You confirmed our understanding.
Another head is always better!
Thanks again.
Martin
-
Sorry for the misunderstanding, Martin. I was misled by this statement:
... the parameter will change the information and layout of the page
If the content of the page will truly be different depending on the parameter, the search engines are probably going to consider them separate URLs no matter what you do.. That's their whole definition of separate pages.
If the parameter simply rearranges a page's content (e.g. creates a different sort order for the same products) then combining the pages can usually work.
If you want to try to combine these pages for ranking purposes anyway, the tool to use is the rel=canonical tag. You insert it into the header of the custom parameter pages pointing back to the primary page.
Google is clear though that canonical tags are taken as suggestions only, and if it thinks your pages should actually be indexed separately, it will ignore the canonical.
You could then back this process up by using Bing & Google WMT to specify that the ?state= and city= parameters are to be ignored. But the above caveat still applies.
Paul
-
Thank you for your feedback Paul.
Well, I guess I didn't explained myself correctly because we do want to have all the parameters considered 1 page!
Our goal is 2 fold:
1- Have the parameters in the URL considered 1 page in order to have 1 page with many links pointing to it in order to have higher page authority (instead of 20+ pages with lower authority).
2- Keep the user experience relevant by display and organizing the page content based on the referring url (in our case the links from badges).
So in other words how do we (if possible) make sure google and bing consider all parameters as combined page?
Thanks again!
Martin
-
You're actually in the reverse position of most people dealing with URL parameters, Martin. By default, the Search Engines consider different parameters to be different pages and most users are struggling with how to make the SEs understand they're all one page to avoid duplicate content issues.
In your case, you want the SEs to treat those pages according to the way the SEs normally do, which means you "shouldn't" need to do anything extra to get them indexed separately. That's what's naturally going to happen.
I'm with you on the hinting in Google Webmaster Tools though. May as well use that capability to confirm for Google that you do want those parameters indexed. You should do the same thing in Bing Webmaster Tools as well. Kind of a "belt & suspenders" approach.
Paul
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What to do with existing URL when replatforming and new URL is the same?
We are changing CMS from WordPress to Uberflip. If there is a URL that remains the same I believe we should not create a redirect. However, what happens to the old page? Should it be deleted?
Technical SEO | | maland0 -
Will adding a mini directory to our blog with lots of outgoing no follow links harm our authority and context
We are an adventure travel tour company, who run hiking, kayaking, biking adventures in several countries. We have a travel tour operator website with a blog in a sub folder of the site. We want to add a section/category in the blog itself with a hiking club mini directory, that lists all hiking clubs in 1 or 2 specific countries. The reason we want to do this is because the people searching online for these clubs are our target market and potential clients. We hope to rank for some of these searches, and encourage interest in our blog/website in the process. We also want the potential to build relationships with these clubs. The question I want to ask is: if we add say 100 to 200 listings, and make all outgoing links no follow, will this harm our page authority, reputation with SE's or pose any other risk for our site. The other question is, do you think that this will dilute the context of our content - as its slightly different in context to the rest of our site content. Are we better to set up a separate site for this purpose.
Technical SEO | | activenz1 -
404 error - but I can't find any broken links on the referrer pages
Hi, My crawl has diagnosed a client's site with eight 404 errors. In my CSV download of the crawl, I have checked the source code of the 'referrer' pages, but can't find where the link to the 404 error page is. Could there be another reason for getting 404 errors? Thanks for your help. Katharine.
Technical SEO | | PooleyK0 -
Parameter handling (where to find all parameters to handle)?
Google recently said they updated their parameter handling, but I was wondering what is the best way to know all of the parameters that need "handling"? Will Google Webmaster find them? Should the company know based on what is on their site? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | nicole.healthline0 -
If two links from one page link to another, how can I get the second link's anchor text to count?
I am working on an e-commerce site and on the category pages each of the product listings link to the product page twice. The first is an image link and then the second is the product name. I want to get the anchor text of the second link to count. If I no-follow the image link will that help at all? If not is there a way to do this?
Technical SEO | | JordanJudson0 -
Which version of pages should I build links to?
I'm working on the site www.qualityauditor.co.uk which is built in Moonfruit. Moonfruit renders pages in Flash. Not ideal, I know, but it also automatically produces an HTML version of every page for those without Flash, Javascript and search engines. This HTML version is fairly well optimised for search engines, but sits on different URLs. For example, the page you're likely to see if browsing the site is at http://www.qualityauditor.co.uk/#/iso-9001-lead-auditor-course/4528742734 However, if you turn Javascript off you can see the HTML version of the page here <cite>http://www.qualityauditor.co.uk/page/4528742734</cite> Mostly, it's the last version of the URL which appears in the Google search results for a relevant query. But not always. Plus, in Google Webmaster Tools fetching as Googlebot only shows page content for the first version of the URL. For the second version it returns HTTP status code and a 302 redirect to the first version. I have two questions, really: Will these two versions of the page cause my duplicate content issues? I suspect not as the first version renders only in Flash. But will Google think the 302 redirect for people is cloaking? Which version of the URL should I be pointing new links to (bearing in mind the 302 redirect which doesn't pass link juice). The URL's which I see in my browser and which Google likes the look at when I 'fetch as Googlebot'. Or those Google shows in the search results? Thanks folks, much appreciated! Eamon
Technical SEO | | driftnetmedia0 -
Directory URL structure last / in the url
Ok, So my site's urls works like this www.site.com/widgets/ If you go to www.site.com/widgets (without the last / ) you get a 404. My site did no used to require the last / to load the page but it has over the last year and my rankings have dropped on those pages... But Yahoo and BING still indexes all my pages without the last / and it some how still loads the page if you go to it from yahoo or bing, but it looks like this in the address bar once you arrive from bing or yahoo. http://www.site.com/404.asp?404;http://site.com:80/widgets/ How do I fix this? Should'nt all the engines see those pages the same way with the last / included? What is the best structure for SEO?
Technical SEO | | DavidS-2820610