Should I be running my crawl on our www address or our non-www address?
-
I currently run our crawl on oursitename.com, but am wondering if it should be run on www.oursitename.com instead.
-
It does make sense. Based on what you wrote, ours is not set up correctly. But now I have the language to better work with our provider.
You are very helpful!! Thank you!
-
There's really no way to avoid the existence of the two different addresses, THMCC - they're a byproduct of the way of the way web servers and domain names work. They both exists as soon as a website is created. And visitors tend to use them interchangeably.
They aren't "actually" two different sites, they are just two different addresses that refer to the same pages, causing the search engines to see them as duplicate content. Kind of like how your house's location can be described by the lot number on the city plan, or by the postal address. Same house - different ways of showing where it's located.
If the 301 redirect is done correctly, the search engines will understand that everything should be considered to be at the one primary address and they'll pass along the other version's authority to the primary version automatically. And therefore no second version to compete with.
You can easily tell if the redirect is working properly. Let's assume you decide for example that the www.thmedicalcallcenter.com version is the primary and redirect the non-www version to it. When you type in the non-www address into the browser's address bar and hit enter, you should actually see the URL in the address bar change to the www version of the address.
And yea, you absolutely must have both addresses taken care of. You have no way of controlling whether someone types in the address with or without the www. and you want either one to get forwarded on to the primary address.
Does that all makes sense?
Paul
-
Thanks so much, Paul!!
The SEO Moz helpdesk is who told me that I needed to have oursitename.com in addition to www.oursitename.com. Is this true? Creating oursitename.com and the redirect seems to have caused a lot of errors, mostly duplicates from the redirect probably not being done correctly. But overall, was/is it in our best interest to have both www.oursitename.com and oursitename.com?
-
Thanks again!! One more question if you don't mind. If the 301 redirect is done correctly will this fix the competition issue in all the search engines? If not, should I get rid of oursitename.com?
-
As far as the search engines are concerned, thmedicalcallcenter.com and www.thmedicalcallcenter.com are two separate sites that will compete against each other and dilute each others' authority and ranking unless one is 301-redirected to the other.
As SEO5 indicates, it's best to assess which version already has the most incoming links and use that version as the primary, redirecting the other one to it.
This is best done using a 301 redirect written into your site's .htaccess file. In addition, there is spot in Google Webmaster Tools (GWT or WMT) where you can also hint to Google which version of the site you want to be the primary.
It's not enough to only use the hint in GWT as that only applies to Google, it will do nothing to correct the problem in the other search engines.
Paul
-
I thought they were the same...with a 301 redirect from oursitename to www.oursitename.com so I am confused as to why one would have more inbound links than the other. Also, what is WMT?
Thanks!!!
-
Pick the one that has more inbound links associated with it and already has high pages in the index. Make sure you set the preferences in WMT to either the www. or the non www version.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How to fix the Crawl Diagnostics error and warnings
hi im new to the seo world and i dont know a lot about it , so after my site get crawled i found 1 error and 151 warning and 96 notices , it that bad ?? and plz cam someone explain to me how to fix thos problem , a will be very thankful
Moz Pro | | medlife0 -
Crawl test from tools
Hi, I notice that the crawl test which is from the Research Tools doesn't really get a new crawl even though there is 2 crawl per day. It will only provide the data which was acquire from the crawl diagnostics in my pro account. There is no point for me to get the data which I get from my crawl diagnostic isn't it? Even seomoz provided with more than 2 crawl per day also useless in this case. This whole thing doesn't make sense as the crawl diagnostics will only perform a full crawl test once every week. but even the crawl test also not helping any thing out for me.
Moz Pro | | hanzoz0 -
Third crawl of my sites back to 250 pages
Hi all, I've been waiting some days for the third crawl of my sites, but SEOMOZ only crawled 277 pages. The next phrase appeared on my crawl report: Pages Crawled: 277 | Limit: 250 My last 2 crawls were of about 10K limit. Any idea? Kind regards, Simon.
Moz Pro | | Aureka0 -
Crawl Diagnostics Error Spike
With the last crawl update to one of my sites there was a huge spike in errors reported. The errors jumped by 16,659 -- majority of which are under the duplicate title and duplicate content category. When I look at the specific issues it seems that the crawler is crawling a ton of blank pages on the sites blog through pagination. The odd thing is that the site has not been updated in a while and prior to this crawl on Jun 4th there were no reports of these blank pages. Is this something that can be an error on the crawler side of things? Any suggestions on next steps would be greatly appreciated. I'm adding an image of the error spike Xovep.jpg?1 Xovep.jpg?1
Moz Pro | | VanadiumInteractive1 -
What are followed vs non-followed links in Domain Analyis report?
I'm new to SEOMoz and wondering if some nice person can put this into plain English for me? 🙂 On the Competitive Domain Analysis report there are green follow / no-follow links and blue followed / non-followed linking root domains? what is the context of the green & blue circles? is there a better or worse visual representation that I should aim for - more dark green, more light green or about half & half. thanks in advance
Moz Pro | | seanuk0 -
Crawl test tool from SEOmoz - which URLs does it actually crawl?
I am using for the first time the crawl test tool from SEOmoz and I do not really understand which URLs the tool is going to crawl. First, it says "enter any subdomain" --> why can´t I do the crawl for the root domain? Second it says "we'll crawl up to 3,000 linked-to pages" --> does that mean that the tool crawls all internal links that it can find on the given domain? Thanks for your help!
Moz Pro | | Elke.GetApp0 -
Is there any way to view crawl errors historically?
One of the website's we monitor have been getting high duplicate page titles, as we work through the pages, we see changes and the number of duplicate page titles are decreasing. However, lately, it went up again and the duplicate page titles have increased. I wanted to ask if there's any way to view the new errors and the old errors separately or sorted in a way that can help me identify why we are getting new page crawl errors. Any advice would be great. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | TheNorthernOffice790 -
Do crawl reports see canonical tags?
Greetings, I just redesigned my site, www.funderstanding.com, and have the old site pointing to the new site via canonical URLs. I had a new crawl test run and it showed a large amount of duplicate content. Does the SEO Moz crawl tool validate canonical urls and adjusts the duplicate content count or is this note considered? FYI, I sent from no duplicate content to having 865 errors since the redesign went up so that seems suspicious. I would think though that assuming the canonical tag were used properly, and I hope it is?, that this would not be a problem?? All help with this is most appreciated. Eric
Moz Pro | | Ericc220