Restructuring/Removing 301 Redirects Due To Newly Optimized Keywords
-
Just to be clear, this is for one unique page on a website. Also, please see my diagram attached.
Let's say that a page's URL was originally /original. So, you optimize the page for a new keyword (keyword 1), and therefore change the URL to /keyword-1. A 301 redirect would then be placed...
- /original > /keyword-1
However, let's say 6 months down the road you realize that the keyword you optimized the page for (keyword 1) just isn't working. You research for a new keyword, and come up with (keyword 2). So, you'd like to rename the page's URL to /keyword-2.
After placing a redirect from the current page (keyword 1) to the 'now' new page (keyword 2), it would look like this...
- /original > /keyword-1 > /keyword-2
We know that making a server go through more than one redirect slows the server load time, and even more 'link-juice' is lost in translation.
Because of this, would it make sense to remove the original redirect and instead place redirects like this?
- /original > /keyword-2
- /keyword-1 > /keyword-2
To me, this would make the most sense for preserving SEO. However, I've read that removing 301 redirects can cause user issues due to browsers caching the now 'removed' redirect. Even if this is ideal for SEO, could it be more work than it's worth?
Does anyone have any experience/input on this? If so, I greatly appreciate your time!
-
Hi Corey,
I appreciate the you taking the time to read through our questions and provide some insight. Thanks for all of your help!
P.S. we're also from Chicago. So if I see you out and about, remind me that I owe you a brew.
Thanks,
Drew and the rest of the Logical Media Group team
-
Sure, the chaining redirects thing is something that Matt Cutts has talked about, I think in a few videos. I'm blessed with the ability to actually test/observe this stuff on loads of major sites that are in production as well, which is always the ultimate bit of validation on an SEO theory. Every now and again even Google will give advice that is flat out wrong, and for the most part, the SEO community will repeat it again and again as it's lore.
As for extracting headers, I have some back-end automation that I've written. Here's a nice little free tool that lets you see a single page though:
http://www.northcutt.com/tools/free-seo-tools/http-header-viewer/
If you have a chain of redirects occurring on a page, it will show. Sometimes this is necessary, especially if you have them flying in from all over (ie. in the application, in your .htaccess, in the Apache config files). It always helps to test; I've surprised a few clients with this one.
-
Hi Corey,
Thanks for taking the time to read through this and provide a response!
I'm happy to hear that you think the latter is indeed a better method. You say that chaining redirects causes other issues as well. Do you mind elaborating on this? I just watched a Matt Cutts video and he does confirm that you should avoid chaining too many redirects because Googlebot could actually stop following them at some point (sounds like around 4 or 5).
It's also interesting to hear that you mine for this situation during your auditing process. Do you do this by looking through the .htaccess file or is there a tool you use?
Thanks again for taking the time to help us out with this! Any additional feedback is greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
The Logical Media Group Team
-
Well, first of all, you can't use a keyword as your TLD.
I think I see what you're getting at though. No, don't ever chain redirects; part of my auditing process in fact involves mining for that exact thing, because it causes other issues. Instead of:
/originalUrl.php -> /secondTry.php -> /thirdTry.php
Do:
/originalUrl.php -> /thirdTry.php
/secondTry.php -> /thirdTry.phpI'd also add, at least half of the SEO blogs that I've read over the years are provably wrong in one way or another. But I think I see what that person was getting at too. 301 redirects do sometimes get cached, because a 301 redirect is supposed to be a permanent redirect (unlike a 302 redirect). That doesn't mean that you can't change it though.
In the scenario that they described, they said that they would not just remove the redirect and expect everything to return to normal. It was a 'permanent' redirect. It needs to be 'permanently' directed back to definitely be undone where actually possible.
Good luck.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
301 Redirect in breadcrumb. How bad is it?
Hi all, How bad is it to have a link in the breadcrumb that 301 redirects? We had to create some hidden category pages in our ecommerce platform bigcommerce to create a display on our category pages in a certain format. Though whilst the category page was set to not visable in bigcommerce admin the URL still showed in the live site bread crumb. SO, we set a 301 redirect on it so it didnt produce a 404. However we have lost a lot of SEO ground the past few months. could this be why? is it bad to have a 301 redirect in the breadrcrumb.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | oceanstorm0 -
Default Wordpress 301 Redirects of JS and CSS files. Bad for SEO & How to Fix?
Hi there: We are developers with some digital marketing expertise, but a current issue has us perplexed. An outside SEO firm has asked us to clean up a large number of 301 redirects. Most of these are 'default' Wordpress behavior that relate to calling the latest version of a JS or CSS file. For instance, a JS file is called with this: https://websitexyz.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js?ver=4.9.1 but ultimately redirects to this: https://websitexyz.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js. We are being asked to prevent the redirect from happening by, presumably, calling the ultimate file to begin with. The issue is that, as far as we know, there's no easy way to alter WP behavior to call the ultimate file to begin with. Does anyone have any thoughts on this? Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Daaveey0 -
301 Redirect and Loss of PA and DA
Mozzers, http:itsgr82bme.com Old domain homepage had a DA of 24 and a PA of 36 Currently redirected to http://thekidstime.com Homepage shows a DA of 6 and a PA of 1. That is a significant loss of authority. I thought a 301 is supposed to be better than that. What gives? What are the next steps, asking the old backlinks to update their links? Thanks for your help, Matt
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | matt.nails0 -
How to handle potentially thousands (50k+) of 301 redirects following a major site replacement
We are looking for the very best way of handling potentially thousands (50k+) of 301 redirects following
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | GeezerG
a major site replacement and I mean total replacement. Things you should know
Existing domain has 17 years history with Google but rankings have suffered over the past year and yes we know why. (and the bitch is we paid a good sized SEO company for that ineffective and destructive work)
The URL structure of the new site is completely different and SEO friendly URL's rule. This means that there will be many thousands of historical URL's (mainly dynamic ones) that will attract 404 errors as they will not exist anymore. Most are product profile pages and the God Google has indexed them all. There are also many links to them out there.
The new site is fully SEO optimised and is passing all tests so far - however there is a way to go yet. So here are my thoughts on the possible ways of meeting our need,
1: Create 301 redirects for each an every page in the .htaccess file that would be one huge .htaccess file 50,000 lines plus - I am worried about effect on site speed.
2: Create 301 redirects for each and every unused folder, and wildcard the file names, this would be a single redirect for each file in each folder to a single redirect page
so the 404 issue is overcome but the user doesn't open the precise page they are after.
3: Write some code to create a hard copy 301 index.php file for each and every folder that is to be replaced.
4: Write code to create a hard copy 301 .php file for each and every page that is to be replaced.
5: We could just let the pages all die and list them with Google to advise of their death.
6: We could have the redirect managed by a database rather than .htaccess or single redirect files. Probably the most challenging thing will be to load the data in the first place, but I assume this could be done programatically - especially if the new URL can be inferred from the old. Many be I am missing another, simpler approach - please discuss0 -
Adding a secondary keyword or other keyword variation to the title tag affect ranking for primary keyword?
Hi Moz Community, According to Google Search Console, the main keyword for our website is undergoing a low click through rate, even though we have good ranking for that keyword (top 3). Currently, our homepage's title tag is "Brand Name: Primary Keyword". I am thinking about adding a secondary keyword or other keyword variation to differentiate our company from others in order to possibly increase the click through rate. Will this affect the current ranking for the primary keyword? Also, is the clickthrough data in Google Search Console accurate? Thank you! Best, Raymond
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | raymondlii0 -
Removing 301 redirect from 2.5 yr old domain
Hello, Need Advise. We are in Automobiles We have an Automotive site - build 3 yrs back - which is our main site (Site A) We built a separate niche site on Used cars 2.5 yrs back (Site B - url http://www.usedcarindelhi.com) - did seo - promote it for a year and later on in feb 2013 - did 301 domain redirection to Site A Now - we thinking to rebuild Site Site B again and remove redirection Will there be any harm on Site A, as we have now removed the redirection or shall we pass on link from home page of Site B to Site A i.e say Powered by Site A (on Top) or at all no direct linking is actually needed. PS :- Also - can anyone let know the backlink quality of www.usedcarindelhi.com. Its PR 3, DA - 18, Majestic Citation Flow - 18, Trust Flow - 11 . Pl advise
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Modi0 -
How important is having a 301 redirect?
Is having a 301 redirect a must for rankings when it comes to the www and non-www version of a site? I am on the bottom of page 1 for my main key phrases but I can't do a 301 redirect with my web host that I've been with for over a year. I've been considering changing web host (currently with Yahoo) but I also have concerns about transferring the site and the impact it might have because of the changing ip address. So my options are Stay Put Change Web host Which would you recommend?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bronxpad0 -
Is it ok to use both 301 redirect and rel="canonical' at the same time?
Hi everyone, I'm sorry if this has been asked before. I just wasn't able to find a response in previous questions. To fix the problems in our website regarding duplication I have the possibility to set up 301's and, at the same time, modify our CMS so that it automatically sets a rel="canonical" tag for every page that is generated. Would it be a problem to have both methods set up? Is it a problem to have a on a page that is redirecting to another one? Is it advisable to have a rel="canonical" tag on every single page? Thanks for reading!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SDLOnlineChannel0